Lots of Domains Going Nowhere - Point to a Real Domain?
-
I have hundreds of domains that I have purchased over the years that arent going anywhere except GoDaddy's Cash Parking system, which returns very little revenue, if at all.
I wonder if it would make more sense to just point these domains to actually e-commerce sites that I own. If so, how best to take these domains and point them so that SEO credit is given properly. Most of these available domains dont have anything to do with the e-commerce stores. So not sure it would help.
Furthermore, if I were to purchase new domains that were more relevant to the keywords to our e-commerce sites, how best to set them up so we can generate traffic on them and point them over to the actual domains?
Many thanks.
-
Just simply redirecting them to your site will not carry seo benefit. You should vrite great content for them, market themindividually: eran links, do social etc and place conversion points that point to your site. The point is exact match domains is that it is easier to rank them in google for the exact term, but that means writing content, doing marketing: just like with any other site.
If you can see from the attached article there are pros and contras. I would always think twice to create another domain. In first place I would always want to make new content for my primary site. I don't know your budget but I think dealing with microsites are for those with big budgets.
-
That is very helpful. So lets stay with the question of purchasing new domains with my exact search terms. What should I do with those new domains? Redirect them to our current site?
-
I have hundreds of domains that I have purchased over the years that arent going anywhere
Is there anything on these domains to attract visitors? If nothing is on them then don't expect them to go anywhere.
I wonder if it would make more sense to just point these domains to actually e-commerce sites that I own.
If there is nothing on these domains to attract visitors, links, likes, tweets, etc. then pointing them to an ecommerce site will be a waste of time.
If so, how best to take these domains and point them so that SEO credit is given properly.
If these domains are not earning SEO credit such as links, likes, tweets, traffic, bookmarks, etc. then they will not transfer any credit. SEO credit is like money... you must earn it before you can give it away.
If I were to purchase new domains that were more relevant to the keywords to our e-commerce sites, how best to set them up so we can generate traffic on them and point them over to the actual domains?
Here's my best advice.... Stop focusing on domains and start focusing on the work of building a great website. Let these domains expire and buy a digital camera with the savings. Then start creating great content on a subject that you are passionate about and use the digital camera to illustrate it generously. Maybe start shooting videos that will inform your visitors about the topics of your website. If you are not up to creating content then just spend the money on beer.. you can probably buy a couple cases a week with the savings.
If you are determined to make a website then think about the websites where you go shopping, read content, or find amusement. I bet that they are not naked domains. Build something that will rival them. It will be a lot of work but without that investment from you why would anybody visit your site?
-
Hello Justin,
Getting some (and definately not a significant amount) pagerank from parked domains and generating traffic on them are two different things.
If you build a html scheme let's say for the domains and try to write diferenet content for them, host them under different ip, you still have to make those pages visible to google so to add at least one-two links pointing to them. Having done all this stuff you have the chance that they may pass a little amount of link juice to your e-commerce stuff. These are still one page microsites with only few incoming links so they do not carry a significant value in google's eyes -> not able to pass significant value.
Consiering the time you spend writing those articles to publish on the domains I would rather turn that on blogging as blogs alrady have some traffic that can come through the links. Those links will carry more ranking value as well as google sees those as totally different authentic votes to your site.
i would only purchase additional domains if they are exatly matcing my search terms and those terms have a significant amount of traffic. That way maybe you can have youse of them. Otherwise I would publish every article under my main domain, so that users can find it easier and google sees that my site is regularly updated.
Here's a good article: http://www.siliconbeachtraining.co.uk/blog/do-microsites-work-for-seo/
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Wrong sitelinks (from the old homepage on the domain)
Hi there, I am quite a novice when it comes to SEO. So you'll have to forgive me if the questions has already been asked by someone before me. The question is about site links in google. Google does generate som sitelinks, but some of the are seemingly generated on the basis of the old homepage. All the sitelinks corresponds to menu items, but two of those items exist only in the homepage on the domain. The fact that the SERP entry is not exactly as we wanted it to be is not strange at alle. We have yet to write in a propper metadescription, and optimize for the right keywords. Because that, I gather from my research, has a great role to play for googles decisions about which lins to use as sitelinks. But I do not understand why google decides to use link names on a page that is no longer there as sitelinks on a new page without those link names. I would like to understand this before experimenting with keywords and metadescriptions. I will appreciate an explanation as well as any advice on the relation been keywords and metadescritions. Happy day, Plovsky First, some context: 1. We just changed the homepage on our domain, pointen the domain name to the IP the new webhost and the new website.
Technical SEO | | plovsky0 -
Old domain vs. New keyword domain - Thoughts?
Okay. I'd like to get opinions as to what everyone thinks about domains lately. Here is any example: The current domain is general in nature, in fact, it's a persons name because they are a real estate agent. So the domain is something like JohnDoe.com. Current stats: Has approx. 130 linking domains pointing to it. Has over 300 incoming links from these linking domains. The link profile is clean and not spammy (not to say there are not a few that might be here and there) Was bough in 1994 The new domain would have very little value except it would be keyword rich such as PortlandHomesForSale.com (just an example). What are your thoughts. Thank you.
Technical SEO | | JordanRussell0 -
Should a 301 from a penalised domain to a new domain be removed?
A business traded on a domain let's say example.COM which was heavily penalised due to non-removable spammy back links. Their previous SEO advised them to set up on example.CO.UK but redirected example.COM to example.CO.UK. Example.CO.UK ranks very poorly, presumably due to being 'tarred with the same brush' i.e. attributed with the ills of example.COM. Will it do any good to remove the redirect or is example.CO.UK now doomed as well?
Technical SEO | | Ewan.Kennedy1 -
Are they going to deindex everyone?
Looking at the over-optimisation list it pretty much seems to me something that everyone is doing so are we suddenly going to find the best results actually de-indexed. Maybe Google will slowly shut off indexing stage by stage so everyone changes. What are your thoughts?
Technical SEO | | photogaz0 -
Migrating to a subdirectory in the same domain
Hi! I have a new version of my website, running with a different CMS (joomla). In order to install the new CMS while not loosing my all content and links I was forced to install the new site in a subdirectory. So the old website was http://www.mydomain.com And the new one is http://www.mydomain.com/subdirectory I had redirected http://www.mydomain.com to http://www.mydomain.com/subdirectory but I am not sure if that is correct, or if it will generate SEO problems. I named the subdirectory with a keyword, at least to have any advantage of something that to my short knowledge looks bad... What do you think? Another question... I understand that it is a good SEO rule to optimize each page for a different keyword. Is it a problem if http://www.mydomain.com is not optimized for anything? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | ociosu0 -
Duplicate content across multiple domains
I have come across a situation where we have discovered duplicate content between multiple domains. We have access to each domain and have recently within the past 2 weeks added a 301 redirect to redirect each page dynamically to the proper page on the desired domain. My question relates to the removal of these pages. There are thousands of these duplicate pages. I have gone back and looked at a number of these cached pages in google and have found that the cached pages that are roughly 30 days old or older. Will these pages ever get removed from google's index? Will the 301 redirect even be read by google to be redirected to the proper domain and page? If so when will that happen? Are we better off submitting a full site removal request of the sites that carries the duplicate content at this point? These smaller sites do bring traffic on their own but I'd rather not wait 3 months for the content to be removed since my assumption is that this content is competing with the main site. I suppose another option would be to include no cache meta tag for these pages. Any thoughts or comments would be appreciated.
Technical SEO | | jmsobe0 -
How Do You Balance Factors In Domain Selection?
Recently, there has been considerable discussion and debate about the value of choosing keyword-rich and exact-match domains. In a recent webmaster Q&A, Matt Cutts seems to suggest that google is planning on "turning down the dial" on keyword domain signals: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAWFv43qubI How will these changes (if at all) impact your advice to clients on domain selection?
Technical SEO | | Gyi0