Are These Types of Links Tracked
-
I have a client that is looking to be listed on a group of directory sites for the service that they offer. After reviewing the site I found that they have a unique way of listing their links, check out one example at http://www.lakidsguide.com/Summer_Camps.php#educational where each title is a link that goes to the client website. IF you look at the first listing for Adventure Treks the link actually goes to http://www.lakidsguide.com/linktrack.php?type=listingionid=33&bid=9391&listingid=10176 and then is redirected to their true website at http://adventuretreks.com/. Would this link be picked up by Google and the other engines as a link from lakidsguide.com to adventuretreks.com with the way they are directing the link to their own tracking page first? To me it seems that the engines would not see any outgoing link and therefor the listing would not give the client any benefit as far as SEO is concerned.
Any input?
-
I dont think the like has its value dissolved.
it is a follow link, google concern is not passing link juice, they dont want you to be able to link to someone without costing link juice,.
If it is follow and it can be folowed, meaning it does not have a redirecet page blocked by robots, then it will pass link juice. see what Matt Cutts says
-
Though the link itself has it's SEO value dissolved, consider the link may still hold value as a "citation" if trying to rank in Google Places for say "summer camp [city]" in a city or region that does trigger places results if there are lots of summer camps.
-
These links are followed by Google noe days as they now follow javascript links.
It was my belief that they did this so they did not pass link juice and so wee of no value, but I believe that if they are followed by google as they are now, then they will pass link juice.
-
Ryan is correct in that redirects are not the ideal kind of link - and the reason they're redirecting in this case is most likely for tracking purposes.
However, you need to check the server response code in these cases.
A 301 redirect is a "permanently moved" response, and these will pass link juice (not 100% of it, but better than nothing).
In this case, the server is responding with a 302 "temporarily moved" status. **This will pass no ranking value. **
In this case, the link has no SEO value - and I would evaluate it purely on the traffic it generates.
There are an array of tools out there for checking server response codes - I use this one: http://www.seoconsultants.com/tools/check-server-headers-tool/
Here's the server response I got for the link you've referenced above:
<dt>SERVER RESPONSE:</dt>
<dd>
HTTP/1.1 302 Found Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:23:23 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.28 (Unix) mod_gzip/1.3.26.1a PHP/4.4.8 mod_ssl/2.8.15 OpenSSL/0.9.7a X-Powered-By: PHP/4.4.8 Location: http://adventuretreks.com/ Content-Type: text/html
</dd>
-
These redirect type of links are for tracking purposes on the side of the referring website- which are usually systematically generated by the CMS platforms they have.
In short, no, these are not the high value direct SEO links that you are looking for. However, search engines are able to follow these links and also follow the redirect to the website (adventuretreks.com in this case), but at that point is of little SEO value and gets tracked as a referral type of link.
If you are paying for these listings (which i assume you would be to a degree) you would need to evaluate the value of that link based on the traffic it would send, and not the SEO value it gives you.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Disvowing Links?
I ran a report through SEM rush and it came back with 174 toxic links ( score 100-60). I have been reading mixed reviews about what to do. Most of the websites are not relevant and appear to be linking to the images. Should I disavow these links? Would it help SEO? Or should I leave it be?
Link Building | | higherimages0 -
External links cannot be found
HI, we have a relatively new website, and we know that there are a couple of external links to this site. But in Moz and in KWfinder, it says that there are no backlinks. We do not use robot.txt or noindex, and we have no clue how to make crawlers find the external links so that our DA will be enhanced. Anyone a solution? Marielle
Link Building | | symagic0 -
Is there an extra SEO benefit for linking to pages that link to you?
Currently working on a link-building strategy and have gotten a few mentions. Just curious if there is any SEO benefits of linking back to the pages my site was mentioned and linked on? Would love to hear your thoughts, thanks!
Link Building | | Derrald0 -
Linking structure question
I generally go with UX over SEO when it comes to pretty much anything on my site. But, my question today is about linking (both internal and external). For internal links, I generally link in the same tab and for external links I generally open in a new tab. Recently I've gotten a few questions about external links opening in new tabs because some mobile devices can't open more than one tab at a time. So, here is my questions. What do you do and why? Is there any SEO value to having your links open in a new tab? Thanks.
Link Building | | DarinPirkey0 -
Old links
I am looking to remove some old directory links that now look spammy. Some years ago the site was redesigned. The links are all to the old pages url, which is 301 redirected to the new. If we remove the 301 and let the page 404, will that suffice in Googles eyes?
Link Building | | cottamg0 -
Linking to a pdf
Hi All I have a pdf that people can download from my site, what I want to know is that when people link to the pdf does the pdf share link power to pages linked to from within the pdf (like a html page would) or is the link power being waisted going to the pdf and should I somehow get the links to a normal page? The pdf is a free downloadable resource to people in the party planning industry and so gets linked to quite a bit by sites telling their readers to get the information we provide. Thanks for your thoughts Sean
Link Building | | SKE0 -
SEOs and web developers frequently leave links to their site in the footer of their clients' sites. Does this negatively impact the site with the links?
Does this provide any SEO value to the receiving site? Has anyone experienced problems doing this?
Link Building | | KatMouse2