Why has my bounce rate gone in to orbit since moving the same content to a new site?!
-
I moved our site to a wordpress theme over the christmas break. All content is pretty much the same word for word, and I think the new site looks much, much better than the old one.
Why then, has our overall bounce rate gone from 7-8%, up to 74%? Bounce rates for some KW focused internal pages have gone from 2-3% to similar 70+% in some cases.
Just to confuse things further, I have also changed the name and branding for the site to differentiate us from a competitor and stop the confusion we've experienced at times. But, I can't see how the new logo would cause and extra 65% of visitors to leave straight off! I really don't want to go back to the old name and don't think that's the answer anyhow, but I may have to test it out of sheer desperation.
There's only a static holding page for the old site now as a reference point for people searching the old name (not many). So I've attached a screenshot of how it looked below. Also at http://imgur.com/aM5o9.
The new site is at flatroofs.co.uk.
I have just noticed that by placing the previous 'more information' links a secondary menu in the left widget area rather than on the page, they are less noticeable especially if you scroll down to the bottom of a page, where the only links are in the footer? Again though, if 75% of people are put off this easily something else must be at play!
Any advice/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance, Danny.
-
Hey, just noticed your note about you perhaps becoming a fellow Albertan!
Let me know if there's anything I can do to help with info etc in your planning. I work in tourism so have access to lots of resources.
Look forward to welcoming you to Canada!
Paul
-
Some great advice, thanks a lot Paul.
I hadn't even noticed myself that there are links in the slider text !
All the best
ps: I hope to join you as a resident of Alberta (or BC) in the not too distant future! : )
-
Looks to me like the Analytics was being called both within the Moonfruit system for Flash (around line 14) and pagetracker and _trackpageview were being called in straight javascript calls around line 222. That'd definitely mess things up.
Little usability note - the links that are shown in your home page's slider are 404ing. Your 404 page would benefit from having a search box on it as well (as might the other pages on your site.) Unfortunately, WordPress's default search is HORRIBLE so you'll likely want to implement an alternative. There are a number of good search plugins available.
Paul
-
Thanks Paul
I think you may have hit the nail on the head to some extent!
I did the old site in a week back 2008 after being made redundant and seeing my financial life flash before me. I had no clue what I was doing or where to begin, so landed on a WYSIWYG editor called moonfruit sitemaker.
Nowadays I can tell you that this means the whole site is flash, and the analytics set up is only via the tracking ID / UA code, which is entered via the dashboard. This has meant I have no way to enter the code for conversion tracking or a number of other things. Apparently there is a html version of the site available to SEs, which I assume is why it has still ranked quite well.
The landing page for the old site is on the fist domain i bought: flatroogrp.co.uk. Would the code be visible from this?
As some evidence of what you describe, the attached screenshot shows the unexplained EXPLOSION in bounce rate which occurred some time ago. I even tried to speak to moonfruit about this as it was such cause for concern; they could offer no answer, but as you can see, it disappeared again some 9 months later...
A few visitors that became customers have asked me why our (old) site is laid out so strangely. This is where they have seen the pure flash version that bears no resemblance to the real thing. If that hasn't put them off then nothing should!
Thanks again
-
Hi Egol and thanks very much for your advice.
On the top banner image suitability I totally agree, but am having upload issues with wordpress at the moment.
I also agree with your other points, but, most of them don't really seem to apply to sub pages (which are returning an equally high bounce rate); these have a sidebar menu with all services showing in there and no moving parts really.
I have even considered whether the confusion with a (very big) competitor has anything to do with the old site's success?
My other big question mark is the yellow branding, although I like it and it's definitely distinctive.
I am going to look at getting a sidebar menu back on the homepage right now!
Thanks
-
Turning this question around, Danny, I'm willing to bet that your "old" site had its Analytics code incorrectly implemented and that it had been falsely reporting it's bounce rate all along.
In over 12 years of web marketing, I've never come across a regular site that had an accurate bounce rate below 10%.
The most common cause of such an unnaturally low bounce rate is having the Analytics tracking called more than once once on the page. This makes it nearly impossible for a visit to be tracked as bounce. This can also be caused by a number of other things (setting virtual pageviews to default pages actions etc) but dupe Analytics code is by FAR the most common.
Unfortunately I can't find a usable version of your site in the Wayback machine to try to check the old site. If you have an archived version of the old site, it would be well worth checking a significant number of its pages to look for dupe Analytics code.
I'd love for you to be the exception to my ultra-low-bounce-rate experience, but I'd seriously look at confirming that the old site's rate was accurate before assuming the new site has a new problem.
A 74% bounce rate isn't all that unusual for such a commercial site, though definitely a target for some of the improvements EGOL suggests.
-
I would bet big money that your bounce rate is higher on the current site....
-
most of the clickable links on the new site deliver hidden content instead of sending to a new page (the old site seems to have had lots of links that took visitors to a different page) (are you certain that these are working in the browsers that are used by your visitors?)
-
the huge image at top of page may discourage visitors to explore, also the first image is not a very impressive roof - even after you put a new one on. Have any better examples? (my family does roofing and I have worked on a few flat roofs myself)
-
the new site has lots of changing content. top image changes automatically - faster than I can get a good look at it.... testimonial box changes automatically - a lot faster than I can read it
-
all of your great services are hidden under a drop-down menu... I bet most people who visit your site never see them. I didn't until I started writing this
I'd dump the cool features (changing content, drop down menu, hidden text blocks) and go back to simple, click to a new page and read with a persistent navigation that shouts the services you offer instead of hiding them.
I am willing to bet one-month of roofer's pay that most of the people who visit your website looking to get a roof fixed are not the most web-savvy people. So cool design features are a hinderance to communication.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Brand Name: Conversion Rate Optimizing: Eponymous VS Generic
Good day all, We are entertaining the idea of changing the Domain Name & Brand Name for straplessfashion.com. While still in development, the website sells women undergarments. We did some survey research and it seems that women (age 18-40) really liked either "Demi's Dream" or "Almost Skin" as a good name. More specifically, Almost Skin seems to be the more popular choice over "Demi's Dream". I think "Almost Skin" catches attention quicker and may work best in PPC. However, when personalizing a brand name is considered, "Demi's Dream" might be the best choice. Would you please offer your advise on which of these two names might be the best for a new Domain and Brand name for the website mentioned above? Which would convert better? Thank you for your help. Carlos
Conversion Rate Optimization | | 90miLLA0 -
Is there anything obvious about my site to why it's not converting?
Hi I am reaching out to the community to see if anyone can see why our site is not converting or point out anything that might be hindering conversion. Our site is www.tidy-books.com Any help would really be appreciated. I can provide more details on request Thanks
Conversion Rate Optimization | | tidybooks0 -
Site Redesign - 2 Target Audiences?
Hey everyone, we are planning a redesign on our website (we have been planning it since Fall last year, but got very busy in the Winter), and some new content / design questions have arisen. Right now, we are a "digital media" agency, and we offer video, design, and marketing services. So we do web videos, motion graphics, websites, seo, really a little bit of everything except for 3d modeling. What we are really trying to sell is the combination of these services (we may create a web video and redesign a groups website, then manage their adwords and marketing campaigns) and become our audiences "Go To" digital media agency. We were toying with the idea of giving visitors the option of picking from one target audience or another when they arrived at the home page, and their experience would be customized to best fit the needs of that particular audience from there on out. For example, on our homepage we were thinking of display our overview and value proposition (which would be the same, no matter which target audience group you were a member of), then asking if the visitor was a "Small Business Owner looking for guidance" or a "Marketing Director looking for outsourcing partners", then based on what option they chose, they'd be directed to a corresponding landing page optimized for converting this audience. We were worrying this may drop our domain or page authority for our home page, since these aren't really keywords that we'd normally be trying to rank for. We understand that it is ideal to have 1 "niche" target audience, but we found that we heavily service both audiences. Any help or suggestions are appreciated, thanks!
Conversion Rate Optimization | | RenderPerfect0 -
What's the Best Method of Content Distribution
This question is both specific and open ended. I have a new web project I've been working on content for. I paid to have a really sweet research article written and I am in the process of turning it into an info-graphic as well. Being that the the website is so new it doesn't have many customers and few to no blog readership. Now that I will soon have great content for the site should I : A. Post on the Blog ? ( Its a Blogger on a blog. domain.com ) B. Post as a static page on the website ? (domain.com/content) C. Something Else ? Whats the easiest to promote and push traffic to?
Conversion Rate Optimization | | CDUBP
Which will rank best?
Which will rank longer?
Which will rank faster? Any other suggestions to get the content in front of the niche market?0 -
Have Google Shopping show site listings instead of Amazon and eBay listings
An e-commerce site I'm currently working with also has storefronts on eBay and Amazon. When searching Google Shopping, their Amazon and eBay product listings come up but NOT their primary site's listings. Can anyone shed some light on how to a) feed the main site's products to Google Shopping and subsequently b) have Google remove the eBay and Amazon listings? Obviously, this would be a boon to business and hey wouldn't have to pay the Amazon and eBay fees associated with each sale. Thanks for any help!
Conversion Rate Optimization | | Nobody15330770827561 -
Is it better to get a new site instead of maintaining a category? I'm stuck.
If you had a website "Food for Dogs" and: Food for German shepherds was improving in search traffic & conversions Snack Food for German shepherds had no change and never resulted in conversions but resulted in many leads for #1 Food for Poodles was unchanged but improving conversions Here's the kicker... Food Container for Dogs was super high traffic but with no conversions or any activity to other categories Would you redirect "food container for dogs" to a different site and delete that tab from the original site completely? It's still related but does not offer any $ value or leads to any of the other categories. Just note that we have a different interest in this category that will support the other categories at one time, but not any time soon. We also have a major group on LinkedIN that's grown to thousands of members for the "food container for dogs" category. On top of it all, the "food container for dogs" has been increasing in rank on Google for several keyphrases to positions 2-5 (nationally) Other important question: Would keeping "food container for dogs" influence the ranking of the other keywords? (by dilution of the site's PR or any other reason?)
Conversion Rate Optimization | | HMCOE0 -
How to you determine what a good CPA is on an ecommerce site?
Do you calculate shipping, warehouse cost, cost of goods into your CPA? Lets say my current CPA is $20 and average order is $100. Its 20% of each order cost goes to lets say ppc, seo, email or affiliate. Do I include cost of shipping lets say its $7.00 and cost of goods are $40.00 I end up with a profit of $33 and that doesn't include taxes, salary, warehouse cost ect. *this is all hypothetical, Im trying to see if my real CPA is inline or I should work on decreasing it. Any thoughts? Thanks
Conversion Rate Optimization | | perytestusr0 -
Duplicating Product Titles in the Page-Content
I have been debating this with a few others within my office and we would like an outside opinion on this issue. This screenshot is of a new product grid I have been designing. I have decided to try something new for SEO that I have seen elsewhere. (see attached image) The page-content below the last products on the page, now have a small paragraph that contains all the products "titles" that are visible on the page. The intention is to capitalize on multiple search terms by using modifiers to replace special character sets within the title. For example: 46" 3 Seat Perforated Square Picnic Table = 46 Inch 3 Seat Perforated Square Picnic Table Not only does this give a secondary search term that could convert but increases the number if instances of "Table" within the page. Suggestions or Thoughts? Thanks! GviGn.jpg
Conversion Rate Optimization | | Highland0