Site rankings steadily decreasing - do I need to remove links?
-
Since mid-April, our ranking have been steadily declining. Our two main keywords are 'nuts and bolts' and 'bolts and nuts'. 'nuts and bolts' dropped from 7th to 46th in May and has recovered slightly to 28th, and 'bolts and nuts' moved from 7th to 16th, and is today 24th.
Ranking on keywords we specialise in have fared better, but they're fairly niche. 'bsw bolts' has moved from 2nd to 4th, and 'imperial bolts' has moved from 1st to 4th.
I think my link profile is the issue. I don't think we've been penalised by Penguin directly (I may be wrong, I don't think we'd be page 2 on such a competitive term as 'bolts and nuts' after Penguin if we had been penalised.), but I think what's happened is that sites that link to us have been penalised, resulting in a knock on effect. Does that sound right?
Here's my link profile:
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/links?site=www.thomassmithfasteners.com</a>
I've been slowly building relevant links with prospective customers and kept up a very basic social media profile - just the odd blog post and sharing on Facebook and Twitter.
Do I need to delete all the directory links? We do have links from directories that don't look fantastic, more are shown in Webmaster Tools than are listed here. Some of the directories no longer seem to exist, I take it I don't need to do anything and Google will catch up in those cases. Should I attempt to remove (or disavow) all links with names like best-directory etc? Or should I just concentrate on building better links? I'm not sure where to start!
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Best Regards,
Stephen
-
OK, it's now a few months later, with nothing linkbuilding-wise except posting blog posts on Facebook, G+ and Twitter.
I've tried to make the site more accessible - we now have a simple, responsive design and I've tried to make the content clear and concise. In short, written for humans rather than search engines.
As of the end of November, 'nuts and bolts' has now disappeared completely, and 'bolts and nuts' is page 8. There are many pages much higher which are not as relevant and have no links. We still rank highly for more specialised terms - ie 'bsw bolts' and 'imperial bolts' are still page 1, but not as high as before.
We get an 'A' grade on the on-page grader for 'nuts and bolts, and most above us get F. I was cautious about removing links as our profile doesn't seem too bad but it does seem as if it's that. There are a fair few questionable directories in there, no doubt about that, but our overall practice in recent years has been natural building and link earning.
So - I've created a spreadsheet and identified the bad links - ie directories with any SEO connotations. I am about to submit removal requests, I thought two polite requests a couple of weeks apart prior to disavowing with Google.
I am also gradually beefing up the content on the shop pages in case of any 'thin content' issues.
I noticed 100s of broken links in webmaster tools due to 2 broken links on our blog and have fixed those. I have also been fixing errors W3C compliance-wise.
Am I right to do all this? Can anyone offer any suggestions? I'm still not 100% sure if this is Panda, Penguin or something else. My guess is Penguin, but the decline started in March 2013, which correlates with Panda.
Best Regards and thanks for any help,
Stephen
-
Can any of you knowledgeable chaps please help with this?
As my last post says, I'm getting an 'A' grade on the Moz on-page grader, but 31 repeats of 'bsf bolts' meaning it's picking up the list from the shop database.
Is there a way around this? In the description of the item, I've changed BSW to 'Whitworth' where possible (means the same), but I'm stuck on 31 repeats, which is obviously too many. I thought Google ignored shop database lists of items, but seemingly not.
Best Regards,
Stephen
-
Hi Cyrus,
Thank you very much for your response.
I have added content related to the bolt threadforms on my page to give more information. However, the ranking on the BSF Bolts page has decreased from 4th to 9th.
http://www.thomassmithfasteners.com/hexagon_bolts_bsf.html
I ran it through the MOZ on-page grader and the thing that jumps out is it says I have 22 repetitions! I think the PHP list of the shop items is being seen as keyword stuffing. Of course, I have to describe the items on each line. Is there a way to combat this?
Many thanks for your assistance.
Best Regards,
Stephen
-
Hi Stephen,
Without doing a full backlink audit, there's a few things I would do first.
Try your site with Panguin Tool to see if you've been hit by a known update: http://www.barracuda-digital.co.uk/panguin-tool/
Also try this over-optimization tool to check your anchor text: http://www.removeem.com/ratios.php
Your theory about the decrease in value of your link profile may be spot on. It never hurts to build more quality links.
On another note, I couldn't help but notice quite a lot of your site is "thin" content. Pages such as this: http://www.thomassmithfasteners.com/full_nuts_bsf.html . While this is common with your competitors as well, beefing these sections up with more descriptive content could never hurt.
Also, you might want to check your title tags. The seem to mostly start with "Thomas Smith Fasterners". Normally, you want to place the keywords you want to rank for towards the begining of the tag, and avoid repeating the same phrases across multiple title tags.
http://moz.com/learn/seo/title-tag
Thomas Smith Fasteners - UNC Full Nuts BS 1768 Online Shop
or
Shop UNC Full Nuts, BS 1768 from Thomas Smith Fasteners -
I would disagree with only one aspect of Kurt's comment, Stephen, and only because I tend to try to err on the safe side. I would remove/disavow any links from questionable directories. There are still a few good ones out there, but I believe the majority carry a nasty connotation.
Kurt is absolutely correct when he says that "recovery" of previous rankings by no more that link removal is a pipe dream... ain't gonna happen! The equity that you lost by any links that were devalued before removal is gone forever and will have to be replaced with new activity.
Since it seems that a major portion of your losses are focused around "nuts and bolts" and "bolts and nuts", you might also try changing your anchor text on a significant portion of the links using that anchor text, at least on any source sites that seem worth hanging onto.
-
Stephen,
Dropping in ranking because you loose links either from them being devalued by Google or the sites shutting down is quite possible. It could also be a combination of lost links and a spammy profile. But you've gleaned onto something a lot of people don't get about Penguin and spammy link. People like to talk about "recovering" from Penguin, but what they often don't understand is that the link authority that was getting them their earlier rankings is gone. There's nothing to recover to. What's really going on is that their site's new authority level is lower and they are going to just have to build their site's authority level up as though they never had a higher authority site before. So, it's not something where they can disavow a few links, get a few links removed and "Alakazam!" rankings have returned...but they seem to expect that.
If you had a lot of links pointing to your site which are now either gone or devalued, then it would make sense that your site lost rankings. You just have to build the site back up with some natural link building.
As to your question about spammy directories, I wouldn't worry about the initially. Focus on putting out great content and sharing it and see how that goes. If, after several months, you find that you aren't getting any movement, then perhaps you go in and have links removed and start disavowing links.
And, yes, Google will eventually remove the old links from your profile. It just takes Google forever and a day to do so. The link list in Google Webmaster Tools is never up to date. It's always months behind.
-Kurt Steinbrueck
OurChurch.Com -
Hi Kurt,
Many thanks for your response.
The report on links in Google Webmaster Tools shows a lot more links - but the sites no longer exist for a fair amount of them. I'm guessing that they were removed from Google's index and then the webmaster, seeing no benefit, deleted the site. I did see on here that Google delisted 1000s of blogs and directories in March - which ties in with when we started losing rankings. So maybe we haven't been penalised directly but lost ranking due to say, 100 links (just a guess) no longer being active, so we aren't gaining anything from them - which is a lot when we only have 400-500 anyway. Does that sound right?
As an example, one is something like freeseo24x7. something, which is a dead link now.
I presume directories like that are obvious bad news now, I'm going through the Google list to see if there's any more like that. Would you delete / disavow those?
If the sites are no longer accessible for a lot of the 'bad' directories that link to us, will Google update its list for my site over time?
-
Hi Stephen,
A quick review of your link profile didn't actually look too bad, at least I didn't notice anything glaring. You have some keywords that have lots of links, but those appear to all be internal links that are part of the navigation of your site which is normal.
I'd recommend focusing on building links rather than removing links. Your site doesn't have a ton of links pointing to it. According the the Open Site Explorer report you referenced, you have 434 links. Even if there is some issue with an unbalanced link profile, it should take many good, natural links to balance it out.
-Kurt Steinbrueck
OurChurch.Com
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
I need help on how best to do a complicated site migration. Replacing certain pages with all new content and tools, and keeping the same URL's. The rest just need to disappear safely. Somehow.
I'm completely rebranding a website but keeping the same domain. All content will be replaced and it will use a different theme and mostly new plugins. I've been building the new site as a different site in Dev mode on WPEngine. This means it currently has a made-up domain that needs to replace the current site. I know I need to somehow redirect the content from the old version of the site. But I'm never going to use that content again. (I could transfer it to be a Dev site for the current domain and automatically replace it with the click of a button - just as another option.) What's the best way to replace blahblah.com with a completely new blahblah.com if I'm not using any of the old content? There are only about 4 URL'st, such as blahblah.com/contact hat will remain the same - with all content replaced. There are about 100 URL's that will no longer be in use or have any part of them ever used again. Can this be done safely?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | brickbatmove1 -
Google is alternating what link it likes to rank on wordpress site and
Hi there, I'm experiencing a problem where google is pick and choosing different links structures to rank my Wordpress site for my main keywords. The site had pretty good #1 rankings for a long time but recently I noticed Google is choosing to rank the page in one of two ways. Let me just say that the original way where it held good rankings looked like this for example: flowers.com/the-most-beautiful-wedding-bouquets/ this is just an example it' is not my site. And when google decides to switch it up it uses this link structure:flowers.com > weddings (this still points to this link flowers.com/the-most-beautiful-wedding-bouquets when I hover my mouse over it) however this link structure that never appeared before and now does, usually has much lower rankings. Please note it's not both link structures being ranked at the same time for the keywords. It's one or the other that google is currently alternating in ranking and I believe it's hurting the sites position.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | z8YX9F80
I'm not sure if this is a wordpress settings thats gone wrong or what the problem is but I do know when shows the expanded and descriptive link structure flowers.com/the-most-beautiful-wedding-bouquets the rankings are higher and in 2nd place. I'm hoping by rectifying this I can regain back my position. I'm very grateful for any insight you could offer on why this is happening and how I could fix it. Thank you. PS Wordpress site has several SEO plugins0 -
Widespread Ranking Drops for Strong, White Hat sites
Hi Moz, A few of our sites experienced widespread ranking drops across all keywords this morning. Both of these are very strong sites with a high DA (56), moz rank and moz trust above 5. We haven't been doing any black hat SEO, creating spammy links, or paying for links. Is anyone else seeing anything similar or have any ideas as to what type of Algorithm update this might be? We currently rank 67th for our name.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | OneClickVentures0 -
Should I remove all rel=nofollow links?
I have a 60 page site that had some nofollow links sprinkled throughout, 50% of which are probably on its mailto: email links. Should I remove all nofollows all in one go, or just the mailto links first, and later the others? Or has anyone had any negative effects in 2012 from this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | emerald0 -
2 Year Old Keyword Focused Site Will Not Rank for Keyword
Hi All, I need your help. This site is confounding me. The site is turnstilefactory.com It's a few years old. Strong domain name and seo focused on the term 'turnstile'. In bound links are not abundant, but certainly not absent either. Considering the subject matter, content and competition in the space, I would expect this site by now to at least be in the top 10 pages for the search 'turnstile', but it's not. I've tried everything I can think of with this, but it just won't rank for anything other than it's domain name. Can anyone please take a look and let me know if they see something I'm missing? It would be appreciated. Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seomozpaul0 -
Could targeting 2 geographic locations decrease rankings?
Hello, I think that us targeting 2 different geographic locations (San Francisco, CA and Salt Lake City, UT) is negatively effecting the rank of some of our main keywords. My evidence for this: Since December our main keyword (NLP) dropped in ranking for nlpca(dot)com from about 19th to about 40th. This is about when we started to really target 2 different locations. Other main keywords dropped a lot as well, like the important term "NLP Training" Also, our name, nlpca(dot)com indicates NLP California (CA stands for California in Google) The other day we bolded a sentence with the words "Salt Lake City, Utah" at the top of our content and in one of Google's Databases (the one I was looking at) we dropped in rankings for "NLP California" where we used to be completely sitelinked (where we took up a lot of space at the top of the search). Also, we shot up to 1st on my datacenter for both "NLP Utah" and "NLP Salt Lake City". At the same time, our rankings for the term "NLP" dropped off the map. It has come back up, but we've also targeted California again. A lot of our anchor text has the word "California" in it. We're thinking about building a separate site for Utah and just linking to it from the California website when we need to. Does it sound to you, in your experience, that targeting both locations in our case is what's causing a decrease in rankings? Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BobGW0 -
Competitor purchased thousands of hidden links to our website... will it hurt rankings?
A competitor has allegedly purchased a site wide HIDDEN link on a property that links to our website. Would this link hurt our rankings? Requests to the site to remove those links didn't go well -- they state they can legally link to any site they like and are not going to remove those links. Technically speaking, this is what the link looks like in their html: Our Primary Keyword The thousands of hidden links from this website will now vastly outnumber our existing backlinks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Nick_Seo_Moz0