Do you think this site has been hit by penguin?
-
Hi Guys,
I need some opinion on a website i am working on www.colourbnners.co.uk
They updated their website in August but the company they used did not take into account the URL structure and hence there's a massive loss in links in August time.
They also dropped off Google for all their key terms except their brand name 'colour banners'
Since then, they have implemented a 301 redirect.Some key points
- They have not received any manual warnings in WMT
- I have disavowed some poor quality links that they have built over the years
- I am building high quality links quite selectively/slowly
- There were a lot of duplicate content issues - these have been resolved now.
So my question to you SEO pros is do you think its penguin? or something that i am missing?
If it is penguin, what is the best form of attack to get it removed?
regards
gezzagrez
-
First, I have to second Marie - the easiest way right now to detect a Penguin drop is to look at the publicly released update dates and compare them to your search traffic. Penguin often hits hard and fast - it's not usually subtle.
One thing I think you have to be careful about is your definition of "quality" vs. Google's. For example, diversity matters to Google. If you guest blog on generally decent sites (non-spammy, for lack of a better word), but that's your only link-building tactic, you could still be in trouble. It's just not natural, in Google's eyes, and they're going to think you're only guest blogging to get links (which may be the truth). It's not that your posts are bad, but you're relying too much on one tactic to the point that it could look manipulative. I'm not saying this is what you're doing - just making a general observation (and one that affects a lot of people right now, IMO).
At first glance (and, please note, link profile analysis can be tricky), I'm seeing a lot of keyword-loaded anchor text. It's a bit tricky, since you have an EMD (so your "brand" is keyword-based), but you may be pushing the variants of "banner(s)" too hard. Again, that can be a sign of artificial link building patterns.
Frankly, you've also got some links that look outright spammy. Take this one, for example:
http://www.constructionindustryscheme.org/
Your link is at the bottom (not even really in a footer) with no context or relevance to the page. This looks incredibly artificial.
-
To determine if it's Penguin, look at your Google analytics. In the left column, click on "Acquisition" and then "all traffic". Then, move a little to the right and click on "google/organic". Change the dates so that you're seeing everything from Jan 1 2012 to present. Do you see a dramatic drop that starts on a particular day? If Penguin has affected you then the drop happened on April 12, 2012, May 25, 2012, October 5, 2012, May 23, 2013 or October 4, 2013. If there's a drop on another day then something else is going on.
A quick look at your backlink profile though, has me concerned. Google is getting really good at only taking in to account links that are truly earned. I'm seeing lots of low quality directory links.
If you do have a drop on a Penguin day, then you've got a long road ahead of you. You have to remove or disavow close to 100% of your self made links AND be able to attract new links. Then you'll need to wait till the algorithm refreshes and see if things improve. If the drop is just gradual with no specific day then it may just be that Google is no longer giving value through the links that are self made. In either case, you need to find ways to attract links naturally. Don't say it can't be done. If you start another thread asking people for ways to attract links to a site selling colour banners you'll get a whack of ideas.
-
thats brilliant how you have got links on them high profile websites! time is an issue that i have. Writing a truly creative piece can take days which is the thing i struggle with most.
In terms on the URL...the URL has always been www.colourbanners.co.uk its just the structure of the deeper pages i.e. www.colourbanners.co.uk/products/mesh-banners all changed.
I don't know whether this triggered something, but there was a huge drop in August (ahrefs shows this pretty well)
I know there are some shoddy links - some of which i disavowed but with no manual penalty im treading carefully. I'm leaning towards it being a problem with the anchor text distribution.
-
Don't say that around these parts! There's always content that can be created that will gain attention. For instance, our main business is phone unlocking yet I've just got links from The Guardian, Forbes, Gizmodo, MSN, Yahoo Finance, Cult of Mac, the list goes on. This is now the third time in 6 months that a piece of work has spread like this. You just have to find the research or idea that will get published on target sites and publish/promote it.
This particular site looks very similar to a problem I'm actually going through. I'd be asking more questions about the switch over in August. What do you mean the URL structure wasn't taken into account? It sounds like it wasn't just a simple redesign.
If the previous URL didn't have a penalty, it seems too coincidental to me that it all of a sudden it would after switching to a new domain.
-
yes its banners.
Yes i guest blog and so i am extremely selective on where my posts go.
I know 'content is king' and all that, but realistically, but how much content can you write about colour banners that gets people interested? its tough and so paying for guest blogs on relevant sites is (in my opinion) still plausible and extremely important.
What are your thoughts on this drop and what would you do?
cheers
gezzagregz
-
URL doesn't exist. Is it "banners" instead?
Quick question. You've mentioned building high quality links, slowly and selectively. This sounds manipulative and when considering a link based penalty, is this the best thing to do?
I suppose I'm actually question how you can be decidedly selective or slow about building links. The route I use is to create content and then beyond my powers of promoting it, hope that others find it interesting and link to it. What method do you use that allows you to select which links you're getting and ensure that you're work won't snowball, with links coming in quicker than you'd expected?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Site Link Issues
For several search terms I get site links for the page http://www.waikoloavacationrentals.com/kolea-rentals/kolea-condos/ It makes sense that that page be a site link as it is one of my most used pages, but the problem is google gave it the site link "Kolea 10A". I am having 0 luck making any sense of why that was chosen. It should be something like "Kolea Condos" or something of that nature. Does anyone have any thoughts on where google is coming up with this?
Technical SEO | | RobDalton0 -
Local site under generic domain
Howdy Mozers, We have main website on .com domain and local websites for each language like .es, .fr, .in etc. We decided to move all local sites under main domain .com using subdirectories with gTLDs. One of the local sites has a manual penalty. Right now we are redirecting local site which have penalty using 302 redirect. So my question is. Will 302 redirect hurt our main site? Is there any other way to redirect visitors from local site without passing penalty? We have few thousands monthly users who are still using local domain links to get to our site, so we can't remove redirect at all. Best Regards,
Technical SEO | | juris_l
Juris0 -
Site Migration Questions
Hello everyone, We are in the process of going from a .net to a .com and we have also done a complete site redesign as well as refreshed all of our content. I know it is generally ideal to not do all of this at once but I have no control over that part. I have a few questions and would like any input on avoiding losing rankings and traffic. One of my first concerns is that we have done away with some of our higher ranking pages and combined them into one parallax scrolling page. Basically, instead of having a product page for each product they are now all on one page. This of course has made some difficulty because search terms we were using for the individual pages no longer apply. My next concern is that we are adding keywords to the ends of our urls in attempt to raise rankings. So an example: website.com/product/product-name/keywords-for-product if a customer deletes keywords-for-product they end up being re-directed back to the page again. Since the keywords cannot be removed is a redirect the best way to handle this? Would a canonical tag be better? I'm trying to avoid duplicate content since my request to remove the keywords in urls was denied. Also when a customer deletes everything but website.com/product/ it goes to the home page and the url turns to website.com/product/#. Will those pages with # at the end be indexed separately or does google ignore that? Lastly, how can I determine what kind of loss in traffic we are looking at upon launch? I know some is to be expected but I want to avoid it as much as I can so any advice for this migration would be greatly appreciated.
Technical SEO | | Sika220 -
Canonical URLs in an eCommerce site
We have a website with 4 product categories (1. ice cream parlors, 2. frozen yogurt shops etc.). A few sub-categories (e.g. toppings, smoothies etc.) and the products contained in those are available in more than one product category (e.g. the smoothies are available in the "ice cream parlors" category, but also in the "frozen yogurt shops" category). My question: Unfortunately the website has been designed in a way that if a subcategory (e.g. smoothies) is available in more than 1 category, then itself (the subcategory page) + all its product pages will be automatically visible under various different urls. So now I have several urls for one and the same product: www.example.com/strawberry-smoothie|SMOOTHIES|FROZEN-YOGURT-SHOPS-391-2-5 and http://www.example.com/strawberry-smoothie|SMOOTHIES|ICE-CREAM-PARLORS-391-1-5 And also several ones for one and the same sub-category (they all include exactly the same set of products): http://www.example.com/SMOOTHIES-1-12-0-4 (the smoothies contained in the ice cream parlors category) http://www.example.com/SMOOTHIES-2-12-0-4 (the same smoothies, contained in the frozen yogurt shops category) This is happening with around 100 pages. I would add canonical tags to the duplicates, but I'm afraid that by doing so, the category (frozen yogurt shops) that contains several non-canonical sub-categories (smoothies, toppings etc.) , might not show up anymore in search results or become irrelevant for Google when searching for example for "products for frozen yoghurt shops". Do you know if this would be actually the case? I hope I explained it well..
Technical SEO | | Gabriele_Layoutweb0 -
Why would this site outrank a Pr2 site with higher domain authority?
I am trying to get a pr2 site to be on top 7 local spot for the keyword Van Nuys Bail bonds but have discovered a site which has barely any back links and is not even a year old on top results. Their backlinks are from lower authority domains than what we have. How could this site be beating a 7 year old pr2 website? The site I'm working on is http://bbbail.com/ The site that is ranking in 5th spot local with pr0 is http://www.vipbailbonds.org/ is it maybe because it is a .org site? Also I notice that all websites in top spots have www, could that be a factor as well?
Technical SEO | | jesse13410 -
How to move a site slowly
I've got a site that I started back in 2001 (www.jaaroncaststone.com) to sell what I was making, concrete countertops and sinks. Well we're going to be discontinuing the concrete products in a month or so and want to start pointing all the links from the old site to a new one dedicated to a single product (www.jaaron-wood-countertops.com). I don't want to do a full 301 on the old site just yet but can I put a canonical tag on the index and about us pages pointing to the new site now so the search engines start looking that way or should I wait and do a full 301 when the day comes to pull the old site?
Technical SEO | | JAARON0 -
How does Ping services help your site
Hi i am trying to understand how services such as pingler.com help your site. I think i understand about the google ping service which tells google that you have updated a page but how does pingler work. Pingler claims that it sends traffic to your site but i do not understand this. Any help would be great
Technical SEO | | ClaireH-1848861 -
Canonical on ecommerce site
I have read tons of guides about canonical implementaiton but still am confused about how I should best use it. On my site with tens of thousands of urls and thousands of afiiliates and shopping networks sending traffic, is it smart to simply add the tag to every page and redirect to the same url. In doing this would that solve the problem of a single page having many different entrances with different tracking codes? Is there a better way to handle this? Also is there any potential problems with rolling out the tag to all pages if they are simply refrencing themselves in the tag? Thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | Gordian0