Duplicate Page Content due to Language and Currency
-
Hi Folks, hoping someone can help me out please
I have a site that I'd like to rank in France and the UK but I'm getting a stack of duplicate content errors due to English and French pages and GBP and EUR prices.
Below is an example of how the home page is duplicated:
http://www.site.com/?sl=en?sl=fr
http://www.site.com/?sl=fr?sl=fr
http://www.site.com
http://www.site.com/?currency=GBP?sl=fr
http://www.site.com/?currency=GBP?sl=en
http://www.site.com/?sl=fr?sl=en
http://www.site.com/?currency=EUR?sl=fr
http://www.site.com/?currency=EUR?sl=en
http://www.site.com/?currency=EUR
http://www.site.com/?sl=en¤cy=EUR
http://www.site.com/?sl=en¤cy=GBP
http://www.site.com/?sl=en
http://www.site.com/?currency=GBP
http://www.site.com/?sl=en?sl=enEach page has the following code in the that updates according to the page you are on:
How do I simplify this and what's the correct approach?
-
Thank you so much Gianlucca! Lots to take away and get fixed.
-
I'm sorry to answer you with a question:
Why are you letting indexing the URLs with currencies?
I mean, the GB URL with Pounds is what you want to have indexed if you're geo-tarketing Great Britain, and not the GB page with the Euro currency.
The same in the case of the French version targeting France.
Said that, I kindly ask you to explain better what mean each URL you pasted in your question, so to able to answer and help you better.
http://www.site.com/?sl=en?sl=fr << What does represent this URL? SL is the language? If so, how can possibly exist a URL with two different language parameters?
http://www.site.com/?sl=fr?sl=fr << If SL is the language parameter, why in this URL it is repeated twice?
http://www.site.com << I suppose this is the canonical URL for your main language, or, instead, is it just the root and then the site applies a 302 redirection accordingly to geo-targeting?
http://www.site.com/?currency=GBP?sl=fr << Do you think is it necessary to let index a page targeting the French marketing but showing prices in Pounds? I do not think so, because the percentage of French users looking for price in another currency than Euro must be something like the 0.000001% of the entire population.
http://www.site.com/?currency=GBP?sl=en << If http://www.site.com/ is in English, targets GB and by default has Pounds as currency, than this URL should be canonicalized toward it.
http://www.site.com/?sl=fr?sl=en << What does represent this URL? SL is the language? If so, how can possibly exist a URL with two different language parameters?
http://www.site.com/?currency=EUR?sl=fr << I see that your site does not have a subfolder structure like /fr/ (and that would be the better way to go), so I imagine that this is the canonical URL for the France targeting home page, which correctly would present Euro as default currency. If it is so, this is the URL your should use in the hreflang annotation for the homepage.
http://www.site.com/?currency=EUR?sl=en << Again, if your English version is meant for geotargeting the GB market, this kind of URL (GB target but Euro as currency) should be not indexed IMHO.
http://www.site.com/?currency=EUR << I suspect this represent the homepage in the main language, but with the currency set up on Euro, correct? If so, it would be the same of the URL here below. In both cases, I would not let these kind of URL to be indexed
http://www.site.com/?sl=en¤cy=EUR << See what I wrote above
http://www.site.com/?sl=en¤cy=GBP << If everything I wrote is correct, this is a duplicate of http://www.site.com/. If it is so, these kinds of URLs should be canonicalized toward the first ones (and this is true also for URLs like the one here below and http://www.site.com/sl=en¤cy=GBP and http://www.site.com/?currency=GBP et al)
http://www.site.com/?sl=en<< See what I wrote above
http://www.site.com/?currency=GBP<< See what I wrote above
http://www.site.com/?sl=en?sl=en << If SL is the language parameter, why in this URL it is repeated twice?Sincerely, from the URLs you gave as example, your site is not ranking not because of the hreflang, but because of the systematic production of duplicated pages, and that is something due to what seems a poor Information Architecture development.
Before even thinking about fixing the hreflang, fix the site.
-
It is generally not a problem if the content is for different users in different countries.
Unfortunately, there is no way to simplify this process. Ideally, it would be improved if you created unique content for the different language and/or groups. Google recommends creating unique content for different regions...What you have done however is correct technically.
Intrigued to see other answers posted...
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Country and Language Specific URL Paths
Wanted to ask everyone a questions: So our company is going to be doing a website that is going to be full of videos. The url path will be country.domain.com/language/slug/content-id. We redirect the user when they go to the different country. So if you're in spain on a train to france your URL will change from es.domain.com/es/slug/content-id to fr.domain.com/es/slug/content-id. Each country can listen to each video in all languages. My question is with hreflang tags and canonicals. Aside from targeting users in a certain country via Google Search Console, how do I eliminate duplication and tell Google which I'd like to show up via which country. In spain I would like es.domain.com/es/slug/content-id to show in Google and would have hreflang tags on each of the es.domain pages but what about fr.domain.com/es/slug/content-id since it would show the same content? I can't canonical to one of them since I need them to show in their respective country. How do I show the difference in language and country without showing duplication?
International SEO | | mattdinbrooklyn0 -
Trying To Use Parent Company's Content In Another Country
Hi, I'm hoping someone can help me out here but this is what I am dealing with: Say John Smith Companies sells Widgets across the United States. They have also formed a company called "Widgets of Canada" in an effort to sell their Blue Widgets only in Canada and I am in responsible for their website. Recently, John Smith Companies completely redesigned their website and it now has a really slick look and is loaded with great widgets content. I would like to take their site and re-purpose it for use in Canada. However, I am concerned about duplicate content. I would be converting all the widget specifications from imperial to metric units, changing the title and description elements and also using a much different folders/ paths. Is this enough to avoid any issues with similar page content? Is there anything I can do with hreflang? Thanks
International SEO | | DohenyDrones0 -
How to interlink 16 different language versions of site?
I remember that Matt Cutts recommended against interlinking many language versions of a site.
International SEO | | lcourse
Considering that google now also crawls javascript links, what is best way to implement interlinking? I still see otherwhise extremely well optimized large sites interlinking to more than 10 different language versions e.g. zalando.de, but also booking.com (even though here on same domain). Currently we have an expandable css dropdown in the footer interlinking 16 different language versions with different TLD. Would you be concerned? What would you suggest how to interlink domains (for user link would be useful)?0 -
Is there any reason to get a massive decrease on indexed pages?
Hi, I'm helping on SEO for a big e-commerce in LatAm and one thing we've experienced during the last months is that our search traffic had reduced and the indexed pages had decreased in a terrible way. The site had over 2 Million indexed pages (which was way too much, since we believe that around 10k would be more than enough to hold the over 6K SKUs) but now this number has decreased to less than 3K in less than 2 months. I've also noticed that most of the results in which the site is still appearing are .pdf or .doc files but not actual content on the website. I've checked the following: Robots (there is no block, you can see that on the image as well) Webmaster Tools Penalties Duplicated content I don't know where else to look for. Can anyone help? Thanks in advance! cpLwX1X
International SEO | | mat-relevance0 -
Include mobile and international versions of pages to sitemap or not?
My pages already have alternate and hreflang references to point to international and mobile versions of the content. If I add 5 language desktop versions and 5 language mobile versions as https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/2620865?hl=en explains, my sitemap will get bulky. What are the pros and cons for referencing all page versions in sitemap and for include just general (English/Desktop) version in sitemap?
International SEO | | poiseo0 -
Duplicate content on .co.uk and .com TLDs with different domain authority
What's the best approach to take for a site that has identical content on the .co.uk and .com versions of the root domain? The .co.uk version has a significantly higher domain authority (54 vs 32 according to Open Site Explorer - see attached screenshot). But it's an international company with its largest customer base in North America and customers in over 60 countries. The company does not intend to localize content. My initial thought before seeing the domain authority was to 301 redirect the .co.uk to the .com domain to consolidate all the link equity under one international TLD. However, I wondered if the higher domain authority for .co.uk would be passed on if we did this. I figured that a non-UK audience would be more likely to trust a .com site. I still think 301 redirecting .co.uk to .com might be the best strategy in the long term. But is there likely to be a dip in rankings and organic search volume in the short term until .co.uk is replaced in the index by .com? I'd really appreciate your thoughts on this. CbVnfSO.png
International SEO | | Torchbox0 -
Is duplicate content really an issue on different International Google engines?
i.e. Google.com v.s. Google.co.uk This relates to another question I have open on a similar issue. So if I open the same e-commerce site (virtually) on company.com and company.co.uk, does Google really view that as duplicate content? I would be inclined to think they have that figured out but I havent had much experience with international SEO...
International SEO | | BlinkWeb0