What to do with Deleted Posts?
-
Hi Guys,
To give way to the implementation of Google Panda, I have deleted some of my wordpress blog posts with low quality content.
Now, I am seeing some errors in my Webmasters Tools. What needs to be done so that these errors will be fixed?
Thanks....
-
If they have links pointing to them I agree with you, but if they dont, you should let them 404 or remove them though WMT,
-
Try this plugin to manage redirects from the WP admin panel.
I agree with several others that you should point users either to the homepage or main blog page after deleting those posts. The system will eventually realize what's going on and those errors will go away for you in Webmaster Tools.
-
Absolutely. If there isn't a relevant page then 301 to the home page.. eventually the old page will get removed out the respective indexes
-
I say to the relevant pages, as Duane Forresters of bing said that mass 301's to the one page will be discouned.
-
Thanks Simon...
-
Hi Michael
As there are no suitable alternative pages to 301 redirect them to, then yes, the Homepage will be fine, that will remove the broken links and provide a destination for anybody that clicks on one of the links.
Regards
Simon
-
Agree with all these responses.. add 301 redirects via .htaccess (or relevant technology applicable to your server) that will permanently redirect humans & crawlers to, at least, the home page or a relevant page with similar content.
Some of the deleted pages may still be linked from other sites or internal pages within you site...
-
Hi Simon,
The errors are 404 (Not found). Is it wise to 301 redirect them to the home page? as there are no suitable page for them.
-
Hi Allan, Yes I am referring to thin content and some that are duplicate.
Thanks for the advice, will try removing those in WMT.
-
Hi Michael
That depends on what the errors are that you're seeing in Google Webmaster Tools.
Broken Links (Pages not found) could well be one; if so, identify pages that are still linking to those old blog posts and remove those links or change them to a page that does still exist.
Or you could place a 301 redirect on those old blog post pages to a suitable page that is still live (which would have been good to do originally rather than just deleting the old posts, though you may have implemented 301s already, I don't know what your errors are).
Perhaps those old blog posts are still included in your sitemap.xml; have a look and if so, remove them from the sitemap.
You could also request through GWT that the old blog post URLs be removed from Googles index.
So a few things to have a check of there. Best of luck,
Simon
-
What do you mean by low quality?
unless it was duplicate or very thin content, i would not worry.
but since you have delete them, you need to do nothing, those errore will eventualy go away, but if you have links to those posts, then you might want to do a 301 rediret to a relevant page to keep the link juice. If they were low quality the chanses are they did not have any links to them, so do nothing.
You can go to WMT and remove them from the index immediately, but its is not necessary
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Page Authority on Huffington Post
I was looking into my website backlinks and noticed that a link Huffington Post post has only one page authority while the other post has high page authority like 30 or 40. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/toby-nwazor/is-it-time-to-retire-the-_b_10610052.html Please suggest what can be the issue. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | 1MS0 -
I am looking for the best post and page title template
There seems to be a few schools of thought as to how the title templates in the yoast plugin. currently mine are set with the default templates posts title template (%%title%% %%page%% %%sep%% %%sitename%%) page title template (%%title%% %%page%% %%sep%% %%sitename%%) What are the best options here for proper SEO. I am learning as much as i can but i have searched for a concrete answer here on the net, but found many different responses. What do you all think? What is my best option?
Technical SEO | | donsilvernail0 -
Why Custom Post Types Don't Get Ranked Well
So I have started to use custom post types and have noticed that they don't get ranked very well in Google. On the other hand a post will rank almost immediately. Does anyone know any tricks for making custom post types rank as well as posts in wordpress? Sincerely, Garret
Technical SEO | | eWebify0 -
Google Still Taking 2 - 3 Days to Index New Posts
My website is fairly new, it was launched about 3.5 months ago. I've been publishing new content daily (except on weekends) since then. Is there any reason why new posts don't get indexed faster? All of my posts gets +1's and they're shared on G+, FB and Twitter. My website's at www.webhostinghero.com
Technical SEO | | sbrault740 -
Could a partial repost outrank my original post?
A blogger asked to repost one of my articles. I said they could if they used rel="canonical" However, they're on blogger and not too technically skilled. They couldn't figure it out, so I suggested just reposting part of the article. Here's their repost: http://ditchyourfridge.blogspot.ca/2013/07/graeme-blake-living-without-home.html Is this a good idea or a bad idea?
Technical SEO | | graemeblake0 -
Rel = Canonical in Blog Posting
Hello, I keep coming back to rel=canonical issues! I noticed when I "view pagesource" that my drupal blog posting automatically creates link rel="canonical" href="/sample-blog-title" /< pattern (with the > reversed) in the source code. I'm getting a lot of Rel=Canonical warnings and double content warnings from Seomoz so I've been trying to insert link rel="canonical" href="http://www.example.com/blog/my-awesome-blog-post"< but the page won't retain the code for some reason. I'm entering the code in Plain Text, but saving the document as Full HTML. Is there a better piece of code I can put in to demonstrate that the original blog page is the original source? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | OTSEO0 -
Just read Travis Loncar's YouMoz post and I have a question about Pagination
This was a brilliant post. I have a question about Pagination on sites that are opting to use Google Custom Search. Here is an example of a search results page from one of the sites I work on: http://www.ccisolutions.com/StoreFront/category/search-return?q=countryman I notice in the source code of sequential pages that the rel="next" and rel="prev" tags are not used. I also noticed that the URL does not change when clicking on the numbers for the subsequent pages of the search results. Also, the canonical tag of every subsequent page looks like this: Are you thinking what I'm thinking? All of our Google Custom Search pages have the same canonical tag....Something's telling me this just can't be good. Questions: 1. Is this creating a duplicate content issue? 2. If we need to include rel="prev" and rel="next" on Google Custom Search pages as well as make the canonical tag accurate, what is the best way to implement this? Given that searchers type in such a huge range of search terms, it seems that the canonical tags would have to be somehow dynamically generated. Or, (best case scenario!) am I completely over-thinking this and it just doesn't matter on dynamically driven search results pages? Thanks in advance for any comments, help, etc.
Technical SEO | | danatanseo1