Crawl Diagnostics Error Spike
-
With the last crawl update to one of my sites there was a huge spike in errors reported. The errors jumped by 16,659 -- majority of which are under the duplicate title and duplicate content category.
When I look at the specific issues it seems that the crawler is crawling a ton of blank pages on the sites blog through pagination.
The odd thing is that the site has not been updated in a while and prior to this crawl on Jun 4th there were no reports of these blank pages.
Is this something that can be an error on the crawler side of things?
Any suggestions on next steps would be greatly appreciated. I'm adding an image of the error spike
-
This would be another issue. I would need to look at the code to give you more insight. But off the bat I assume that this is an issue regarding mislabeling the rel=next and rel=prev. They can be kind of tricky to work with on a broad based update due to the fact that they are intended to refer to specific pages. If you do not have the end page labeled Google says :
"When implemented incorrectly, such as omitting an expected rel="prev" or rel="next" designation in the series, we'll continue to index the page(s), and rely on our own heuristics to understand your content."
I would look into this first. If the answer is still elusive to you the next option would probably be finding a different set of eyes on the code to see if there are any minor oversights that you may have overlooked.
-
One last thing;
It seems that I have a game plan for addressing this issue, but as I think about this one thing has me concerned in the way Roger crawled the site.
The site has maybe a total of 100 articles, which would account for ?Page=10, but what I'm seeing is errors on ?Page=104. When you look at that page its a blank. Where is Roger coming up with that parameter?
Do you think this is a Roger issue or something else?
-
Makes sense
-
Unless you have some super secret page that is buried somewhere deep down in your site that you can ONLY get to from those pages, it wouldn't make sense to have them follow the links. All that will happen is they land on the next page, scrape it to the noindex tag and move on. They won't index and this just waste your sites bandwidth and slows everything else down. If it's a noindex it should usually be a nofollow unless you are looking to track conversions or some other specific only navigable through those pages.
-
Hey Jake;
Whats your option of using "nofollow" vs "follow" on the pages i'm blocking from indexing? Is there a reason to prevent them from following the links on these pages?
-
Cool glad we could help!
if you want to clean up your code and are posting site wide for them I would recommend the none tag
Accounts for both
noindex, nofollow
-
Thank you again for the input, the goal here is not provide accurate reporting and ensure that the site conforms to the search engines requirements.
Currently the "?page=" parameter is not blocked through . it sounds like this maybe the issue.
I will update the code to address that and see what kind of results we get with the next update. I think this is best addressed at the code level, rather then the robots.txt.
Thanks
-
Rodger crawls like the Google bot and takes his hints from the robot.txt file. So whatever Rodger is seeing is usually what the other spiders are seeing as well. From time to time I have encountered slight glitches to the SEOmoz crawler as they change and update their algorithm.
When it comes down to it, Google examines a link profile through a microscope akin to the Large Hadron Collider. where as we have to examine it through a magnifying glass from 1935.
The wonderful people here at SEOmoz are always trying to give us a better view, but it is still imperfect. I would say if all else fails and this report continues to show errors in moz then get your reports for your clients directly from webmaster tools.
-
** How do I tell Roger no to crawl these blank pages?**
Any easy solution is to block roger in robots.txt
User-agent: rogerbot
Disallow: [enter pages you do not wish to be crawled]
But a better solution would be to fix the root problem. If your only goal is to provide clean reporting to your client the above will work. If your goal is to ensure your site is crawled correctly by Google/Bing, then Jake's suggestion will work. You can help Google and Bing understand your site by telling them how to handle parameters.
I would prefer to fix the root issue though. Do the pages which are being reported as duplicate content have the "noindex" tag on them? If so, you can report the issue to the moz help desk (help@seomoz.org) so they can investigate the problem.
-
Hey Jake;
Thanks for your feedback, i did make some changes to the code (posted in the reply to Jamie). I'll take a closer look at the webmaster tools to make sure things are OK on that end.
FYI: The "rel=prev / rel=next tags" are implemented
I added code to manage
to pages that are accessed through
- /Blog/?tag=
- /Blog/category/
- /Blog/archive.aspx
As a secondary concern, with Roger now reporting all these issues in SEOMoz, I provide these reports to my clients and thus having 16k errors is not a good PR thing. How do I tell Roger no to crawl these blank pages?
-
It looks like Rodger found his way into your variable URLs!
This could definitely cause a problem if the engine crawlers are seeing this path as well. Have you made any changes to the code on your site or the URL structure lately?
Regardless, you might want to examine in your Webmaster Tools for both Google and Bing.
For Google you will want to check the blocked URL's under the Health menu. This will give you the information on what pages are and are not blocked. If you notice that the Head Match term you are looking to exclude is not listed make sure that you upload the term to the robots.txt file on your site. Other fixes for this include canonicalisation tagging or the implementation of the rel=prev / rel=next tags. There are a few other ways that are more complicated and I recommend avoiding unless absolutely necessary.
But good news everyone! Google has a few ways to go about fixing the indexation.
Bing is a little Different but just as easy. In the Bing Webmaster Tools under the Index tab, there is a tool called URL Nor<a class="cpad Subject message-low-priority-icon marginleft5 bold">malization</a> you can tell the crawlers to exclude a portion of the query string without changing anything on your database. It also automatically finds and suggests <a class="cpad Subject message-low-priority-icon marginleft5 bold">query parameters for normalization as well. This is a recent change for Bing and could account for the sudden jump in warnings.</a>
I hope this helps and you keep being awesome!
-
Hey Jamie;
In an effort to block crawling of pages on the blog that are essentially duplicating content I added coded (on (4/16) to insert :
to pages that are accessed through
/Blog/?tag=
/Blog/category/
/Blog/archive.aspx
I did not do this for
/Blog/?page=
There were no changes to the robots.txt
There were no updates to canonical tag
There were no updates to pagination
Thanks for your prompt reply
-
Can you share what changes have been made to the site? A few ways this can happen are:
-
a change to the robots.txt file
-
a change to your site's template either removing a canonical tag, a noindex tag, or altering your pagination in any way such as modifying paginated titles
-
resolving an onsite issue which prevented crawling of these pages
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
In Crawl Diagnostics, length of title element is incorrect
Hey all, It appears the Moz crawler is misreading the number of characters in my website's page titles. It shows 72 characters for the following page's title element: http://giavan.com/products/orange-crystal-chain-necklace-with-drop The page title for this web page is: Orange Crystal Chain Necklace with Drop | Giavan which is 48 characters. As it stands, this page title is displayed at 48 characters in Google SERPs. I am getting "This Element is Too Long" issue on 925 pages, which is just about the entire site. These issues appeared after I added additional Shopify (Liquid) code to the page title. If you inspect the code, you will see title element looks a bit odd with extra spacing and line breaks. What I'd like to know is whether or not it's necessary to rewrite the Shopify code, for SEM purposes. My feeling is that it's okay because the page titles look fine in SERPs but those 925 Moz crawl errors are kind of scary. Thanks for your help!
Moz Pro | | RichAlbanese0 -
SEO on-demand crawl
what happened to the on-demand crawl you could do in PRO when they switched to the new MOZ site?
Moz Pro | | Vertz-Marketing0 -
Why would my site return an error when using Open Site Explorer to crawl it?
I have built several new sites over the last few months for others, but recently built a new one for myself. I have gone through most of the checklists from this site to address on-page SEO, and now I am looking at link building. When using Open Site Explorer, I receive an error saying that no information about the URL is available, even when I add competitor sites. Wondering if this is a common issue and if there is a convenient remedy? thanks!
Moz Pro | | MindSpark0 -
Crawl Errors from URL Parameter
Hello, I am having this issue within SEOmoz's Crawl Diagnosis report. There are a lot of crawl errors happening with pages associated with /login. I will see site.com/login?r=http://.... and have several duplicate content issues associated with those urls. Seeing this, I checked WMT to see if the Google crawler was showing this error as well. It wasn't. So what I ended doing was going to the robots.txt and disallowing rogerbot. It looks like this: User-agent: rogerbot Disallow:/login However, SEOmoz has crawled again and it still picking up on those URLs. Any ideas on how to fix? Thanks!
Moz Pro | | WrightIMC0 -
How to remove Duplicate content due to url parameters from SEOMoz Crawl Diagnostics
Hello all I'm currently getting back over 8000 crawl errors for duplicate content pages . Its a joomla site with virtuemart and 95% of the errors are for parameters in the url that the customer can use to filter products. Google is handling them fine under webmaster tools parameters but its pretty hard to find the other duplicate content issues in SEOMoz with all of these in the way. All of the problem parameters start with ?product_type_ Should i try and use the robot.txt to stop them from being crawled and if so what would be the best way to include them in the robot.txt Any help greatly appreciated.
Moz Pro | | dfeg0 -
How do i get rid of a duplicate page error when you can not access that page?
How do i get rid of a duplicate page error when you can not access that page? I am using yahoo store manager. And i do not know code. The only way i can get to this page is by copying the link that the error message gives me. This is the duplicate that i can not find in order to delete. http://outdoortrailcams.com/busebo.html
Moz Pro | | tom14cat140 -
Historical error info on SEOMoz?
Is it possible to get a report of errors that were on a site back in April? Does SEOMoz keep that data available? There was a big decline in the number of errors on one of my sites and I'm trying to go back and see what it was. --Steve
Moz Pro | | Aggie0