Rankings Last, google says no flags
-
I have a site thatsit.net.au I have never really promoted, but it used to
rank ok, the other day I decided I should spend some time on it as its my own
site and potential customers expect to see my own site rank well. I did a bit
of checking and in Bing I come up in first 4 for Web Development Perth, that is in
the .au TLD for Australia,
but in Google I am like 700+.If I take this line out of my home page and put it in quotes “a local Perth web development company” I see I am the only person in the world to have
this long tail query in both Bing and Google. If I search for the same without
quotes in Bing I come up first. If I do so in Google, I come up absolutely last.
I thought I must be flagged, but Google have replied that there is no manual
action taken on my site.I have no answer for this, It is hard to believe if I am the only person in
the world to have a long tail term that I would come last for it.Any ideas? I hope Matt Cutts reads this, and can come up with an explanation
besides write good and useful content. -
I agree link count is not the end all, but when Gianluca said I had only a few links
the focus was on that, where I don’t think that is the case and wanted the
focus back off that. To say that he had a point would also go against the statement
the number of links not being important rather the quality. OSE explorer I
found never has many links for new campaigns, and only having 5 campaign slots,
I did not have it loaded until a few days ago. I believe it finds the pages
relevant to the campaigns, that my understanding based of observation only, I expect
to see more next crawl . But I don’t think links is the problem. As I stated I was
number one for my company name, now I came no where, with the same or less
links.As for
Bing and Google not having a correlation I disagree, they do correlate very
well, it’s not a rule, but if you rank well in one you will rank well in the
other. I have always seemed to rank better with sites in Bing than Google, but generally
if I make progress in one I make progress in the other. To say the comparison
is completely worthless does not hold waterLook at
all the factors I have mentioned and I think, there is something wrong, take my
point about my company name, I Used to rank number one, now I don’t rank at all.
I made a site thatsitsolutions.net.au, with no links only a few days old, ranks
number 4.Imagine you search for a query, how to make pumpkin pie, you would expect some page with that exact phrase to be more important than a page that just happens to have those words in the content. This is what how search engines work, they work on meaning and relevance, not just matching words. If I was looking for a local Perth web developer I would expect the exact phrase to rank higher then a page with the words spread throughout the page.
As for the being my site, I have many sites and built and promoted many more, I am not sentimental
about my site, I am concerned that it has dropped out of the rankings to last
place.I have mentioned
that I don’t even rank for my company name where I had been number one for
years, that is not normal. That and all the other points I think I have a very
good case for being concerned.I hope
that it’s just a temp problem, that’s all I can say. As for actions I can take,
I think the best action I can take is try to work out why my rankings have dropped,
I really don’t think that doing a bit of link building is the answer. If you
have any specific action items that can explain the drop then I’m all ears, but
I am not asking for SEO help, I have done very well in SEO besides this
problem. -
In my experience link counts are a meaningless metric. You have twice mentioned having 500+ links. Many individuals can change a single forum signature and gain literally thousands of links overnight. One of those links has some value and all the rest combined have almost no value.
The important consideration is number of unique linking root domains, and the statistics of the pages which link to you. Based on OSE, your site lacks any real off-site support. In looking at your site, there is no social engagement either.
I can point out that OSE can be up to 60 days behind, but you also mentioned you have not done any recent SEO work for the site so I presume that means no recent link building.
I agree with you that your site deserves a better ranking, but you also need to acknowledge there are a LOT of sites out there with good enough content to earn rankings ahead of you, and many with more off-page support. Even this SEOmoz Q&A thread with an exact phrase match only ranks around 500 for the phrase search.
i should state once more i rank very very well in bing
I used to make that comparison but I learned some time ago it is completely worthless. I have repeatedly found instances where I ranked as #1 in Bing and not in the top 50 for Google, and vice-versa. Bing and Google are two separate companies which pull data independently and have completely different algorithms and standards. The results tend to line up only for the best sites.
Have look at page 50 or 60 you will see some that are hard to believe the should be above me
I did exactly as you asked, and I disagree. I already mentioned this Q&A which beats your page clearly on the offpage factors.
At the bottom of page 50 of Google.com SERPs for "a local Perth web development company" is the following result: http://www.exa.com.au/local-web-services.php
It is not a great result. I see link spam on the page along with other SEO issues, but that page also has a DA of 69, PA of 41 and should definitely outrank you (my opinion).
I know this is your site. I know you have put time and effort into the site. My best suggestion is to take a deep breath and a fresh analysis of your site. You have plenty of opportunities. If you wish shoot me an e-mail Ryan@Vitopian.com and I can share some specific action items I noticed. I assume you have noticed many of them as well.
-
See image, I have over 500 links. Many with keywords in link
textI understand the difference between broad and exact and phrase,
having the exact is usually best phrase second and broad last. Having the exact
match you would not expect to come last. You would expect to come first if you
were the only one to have it.I did test on this, and never did I get such a bad result
from any other site. Some times you may not be at the top, but if you have the exact
you can expect to be, well not last.Take the term Web Development Perth, I have it in my title, I
am well optimized for it. Yet I come 700+ out of 800+, and yesterday I was last
again.Let’s not forget, I ranked ok until recently. Somebody has
to come last for each term, but to come last so often, well what are the odds
of that.Even for my company name ThatsIT Solutions I used to come
first. I now come 900+ out of 1000, I made a site a few days ago with no links
that comes 4th for the term.Have a look at some of the sites that beat me, not at the top of cause they will be well optimized, have look at page 50 or 60 you will see some that are hard to believe the should be above me.
i should state once more i rank very very well in bing,
I only hope this is a temp problem
-
Hi Alan.
When you use quotation marks, that triggers Google to use a particular algorithm which only seeks exact matches. Web pages are scanned looking for the exact quote, and results are returned which match. It changes the search results completely in a similar manner to how local search uses a different algorithm then universal search.
When you remove the quotation marks, the entire body of a web page is considered. Google's algorithm then determines relevancy based on off-page factors and on-page factors. It is a completely different world of search. I believe you understand this aspect, but still are having difficulty believing the results, so I will add a bit more detail.
The attached image is from page 10 of Google.com results. You can see your search query at the top "a local Perth web development company". Take a look at the bold text in the search results. Notice that "companies" is a bold word meaning Google considers it a match for your query. Also notice that "design" is a bold word. Clearly Google feels "design" is a match for "development" in this circumstance.
I was trying to take a look at page 50 of the results and landed on page 48. I noticed your SEOmoz Q&A is at the top of page 48. See image #2. Your site is much better optimized for "Web Development Perth" but since the entire phrase is considered and offpage is 50%+ of SEO, you can clearly see how the DA of the SEOmoz site comes into play.
Your page is optimized for "Web Development Perth". At first glance it seems to me you should rank better then 700, but with so much competition, Gianluca's suggestion that not having enough quality offpage support seems valid.
-
I just checked Bing WMT and I have 500+ links from a variety
of domains including SEOMoz, many with my keyword in link text, but even if I had 2, I would not expect to come last in the world for a long tail term that only I have on my web site in the whole world.The fact that I come up first in Bing and the fact that I ranked
quite well not long ago, did you read my post?I also have another site that ranks relatively well for the same
term that has very few links and not optimised for the term.No it is not normal to come last under such circumstances.
-
Hi Alan...
did you think that maybe it is not the on page optimization failing, but the off site one?
The SEOmoz toolbar tells me that your site has 3 root linking domains linking to the home page for a total of 9 inbound links. Then, checking further with Oper Site Explorer, what I see is that really are just 2 the followed backlinks owned by your home paege from 2 root linking domains.... ah! the anchor text of the links is usually your domain name.
These numbers are surely not enough in order to compete with the sites that rank in the first page in Google.com.au for the "Web Development Perth" query:
- interweb.com.au > 646 root domains linking the hp
- cluedesign.com.au > 400
- sumo.com.au > 332
- perthweb.com.au > 348
- apiix.com > 51 (but high mozRank)
and so on.
Also the sites in second result page have at least 30 root domain name linking.
What do I want to tell with this? That before going directly to the conclusion that your site had been flagged, penalized, hacked or what so ever dramatic event an SEO can imagine, we must always consider if the problem is not simpler, as it seems to be in your case. From what I've seen, it is not Google flagging your site, but your site not being enough optimized on the web popularity side. Try to engage more and obtain more links from more root domain names and also more social signal, and you will see Google rewarding your job with better ranking.
Ciao
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Not Indexing Submitted Images
Hi Guys! My question isn't too dissimilar to one asked a couple of years ago, regarding Google and image indexing, but having put my web address into a Google image search, I get a return of 15 images, so something isn't right. 5 months ago I submitted our 'new' site to Google webmaster. We have just moved it onto a Shopify platform. They (Shopify) are good at providing places to add titles and Alt tags and likewise we fill them in (so that box ticked!) However I have noticed over the last couple of months that despite 161 images being submitted, only 51 have been indexed. Furthermore and as I said earlier, when you put our site, site:http://www.hartnackandco.com into Google images, it only returns a total of 15 images. Any suggestions and help would be wonderful! Cheers Nick
Technical SEO | | nick_HandCo0 -
When will all of Google Maps be the same again?
As many of you are aware that the pigeon update was only applied to the new Google maps resulting in very different search results for Google local business. When you search for a business on old Google maps then you get totally different results vs the new Google maps. Some businesses totally disappeared completely from the search results. I have done my research and found out that it's because the new Algo was only applied to the new maps. Also new algo does not apply to other countries. Well the reason I posted this topic is because I have noticed that all the new Google Business listings I am verifying for my clients are all being put under the old Google maps and not the new ones. They come up fine when searching from old maps but not the new ones. I understand Google has not rolled out the pigeon on all data centers but why? Will Google eventually roll out the update to old maps? Since Google is adding businesses to old google maps then what's the point of even adding new listings?
Technical SEO | | bajaseo0 -
Google webmaster showing 0 indexed, yet I can see them all them Google search?
I can see them all the pages showing up in Google when i search for my site. But in webmaster tools under the sitemaps section in the indexed pages - the red bar is showing 0 indexed pages, even though they seem to be indexed. Any idea why is this showing like this? I don’t really think it’s that important as the pages are still indexed, but it just seems odd. Please see in the image.
Technical SEO | | Perfect0070 -
Not ranking on Google
Hi all, I am optimising a site which is a hotel directory for a small island in the Mediterranean - Malta. The site is www.maltahotelsonline.com. I did a keyword research and optimised the page. However I am now at link building stage. Since we do not have many links the site is still not ranking very well for the desired keywords (ranking fine on Bing and Yahoo yet not on Google). As a result there isn't much traffic on the site. 1. Is there any particular issue that you can spot on this site that is not allowing it to rank well on Google? 2. Any suggestions on link-building please?
Technical SEO | | ICON_Malta0 -
Google Sitelinks
Is there anyway to control the sitelinks under a listing in Google? I have a group of lawyers where 1 of the them is showing up in the sitelinks. They want all of the lawyers to show up. Right now it is showing 1 lawyer, about page, contact us page, etc. Thanks!!!!
Technical SEO | | SixTwoInteractive0 -
When is the last time Google crawled my site
How do I tell the last time Google crawled my site. I found out it is not the "Cache" which I had thought it was.
Technical SEO | | digitalops0 -
Why did our site drop in Google rankings?
My site's URL (web address) is: http://tinyurl.com/3svn2l9 Hi there, We operate a travel site that lists numerous tours, accommodation and activities. Since 6th August 2011 we have dropped from top 10 SERP rankings of our pages to around result number 100 (page 10) and losing massive amount of visitors via Google Search. Our Yahoo and Bing rankings are still in the top10. We need your advice and quick! The last changes we have made are the following: -redirected the non-www version to the www version on the 1st August -bought advertising with a follow link in a sidebar that is being populated across the site (+4000 pages) about 2 months ago -added a blog to the website 2 weeks ago and posted 2 posts to date. Additionally, our website structure allows visitors (and bots) to see the same listings via different URLs which caused duplicate content. This has been the case since the launch of our website about 1 year ago. To prevent this duplicate content we have placed canonical tags on the individual listings pages. Why did our site all of a sudden plummet in the rankings?
Technical SEO | | Robbern0