Side bar menu, good or bad idea.
-
Hi everyone,
I have a little problem.
Not that long ago I launched my new site. Everything seems ok, but I'm not sure if it was clever idea to have additional side bar menu option. I wanted relevant content to be accessible very easy without dropdown in main menu.
It looks ok on desktop, but we have a problem with mobile devices. Even main menu is a bit confusing and sidebar at the moment is at the bottom of each page. When I placed it on top of the page, we had problem with tablet users as it is showing side menu with blank page and content is almost below the fold.
I have a tool installed called usability tools and it shows how visitors are using my site.
The hard bit is that nobody on mobile devices are using sidebar and that means people visit one page and leave without exploring any additional resources.
Me and my developer are discussing that maybe we should have two main menu bars instead of sidebar, but I have no idea how this looks in real life.
What is the best practises for sidebar menus these days? Maybe we have a designer here who can help me with this and do some work?
My site is https://a-fotografy.co.uk/
Thank you for all help in input in advance.
Regards,
Armands
-
The little box you talking about.
Make a small table or div and float it to left.
When you say duplicate menu at the bottom, do you mean main menu or sidebar menu.
You can do either. Anything you want.
-
Ok I will wait to get it through. We can have a chat about this.
Thanks,
A
-
Yup. Phone will be real and have confirmation to avoid incidental clicks.
No - adding subcats into menu will make navigation heavy for mobile users. Click hamburger, click category, click subcategory, click sub-subcategory. No way someone to nagivate there.I sent you mine contacts on your site where we can discuss "boring details".
-
I love idea of including phone as I get mainly people calling me anyway. But if that would be active phone number which dials straight away, that could be cool.
Yes we have hamburger now. Let me get this right as I think we think the same. Are you recommending to add those subcategories ( gallery, prices, partners ) to the main existing hamburger, yes? And then make whole menu sticky, yes?
Thanks for your help.
A
-
Well everything is doable - but remember about users first.
So - lets imagine that i'm looking for someone to be official photograph of mine wedding or engagement or baby photo session. So first if i look is text "i'm photograph that can make your special events memorable...". Ok - you have such text. Second is gallery, 3rd some reviews and pricing. Now in mobile design people just can't reach to them and you get visits with 1 page per session. Right?
That's why i think that "Hamburger Gallery Partners Price" could work. Hamburger is actual menu as now - just need to make it sticky with "Gallery Partners Price". WHY?
Let's assume that i'm on mobile and browsing for "Edinburgh wedding photographer". I see results (term is SERP - search engine result pages) and i click on your site. So i start reading your texts. And as i scroll down to them - sticky menu appear on top. And users can click on them - in result you can have user convinced that "here is the man". So they can give you a call or fill contact form.
2nd Idea - place somewhere in sticky menu "phone" icon that will be linked to your phone using "callto:here-is-your-phone-number". So give user another way to book you.
-
Hi Peter,
Just looked up what means hamburger and I'm good now
So for my mobile site.
Do you think it could make sense to make 3 level menu. So main menu, sub category and then gallery, price etc menu?
Or Make main menu sticky and then hamburger with sub category and gallery, price etc menu?
Here is another thought I had,
What if I could make main menu as hamburger. Like I have now. Main menu and subcategory, but make sticky menu on top for side bar options ( prices, gallery etc?)
Do you think that could be doable?
Thanks Peter.
-
Thanks Peter,
Now you are talking far too clever for me What is hamburger icon?
Also how do you do A/B testing for the site. Do you make two sites?
I'm not a developer, but can pass this onto him. Or maybe I can hire here to get this job done.
Thank you Peter.
-
Hi Egol,
Thanks for reply. I'm trying to link up relevant pages with hypertext.
The little box you talking about. Where ddi you see that? Did you use tablet or phone? I guess it might be that widget box you talking about. I'm taking that away and will place as an image in actual content.
Good advise about menu of related articles.
When you say duplicate menu at the bottom, do you mean main menu or sidebar menu. At the moment I have only sidebar menu at the bottom.
Thank you Egol.
-
Skeleton have JS to NOT include sticky menu on mobile. But was nice example about mine idea and first that i remember quick during writing this comment.
Second idea is sticky menu with "Hamburger_icon Gallery Partners Price" for mobile and normal (just as now) for desktop. This probably can skip confusing users about menu and hierarchical structure of your website.
But as i said - A/B testing is needed.
-
Thank you for advise Peter.
I just looked at the sticky option. The skeleton you mentioned. I opened page on my mobile, but I didn't see the main menu. It was on my desktop, but not on the mobile so I'm not sure how does it work on mobile. Especially with two menus.
Does it mean that I would have two sticky menus on top? Like my main navigation one and one with secondary menu options?
I like idea of sticky, but just need to make sure that I don't confuse user
-
The hard bit is that nobody on mobile devices are using sidebar and that means people visit one page and leave without exploring any additional resources.
Go to a few of your pages and find opportunities to link to your own content.
- As the hypertext that wikipedia overuses in some people's opinion.
- In little boxes that float to the left side of your mobile pages (use images and text that elicit clicks)
- As a large menu of related articles at the bottom of your page (look at the provocative images presented in the Outbrain, Taboola, and similar widgets - you don't have to be nasty or naughty like some of them - there are many other ways to earn a click)
- in a search box at the bottom of your article and invite readers to use it
- you don't need a sidebar to entice people to visit another page... just show them what you have that is relevant, what is popular, what is new, what is outrageous - depending upon your audience.
- duplicate your menu at bottom of the page
-
And this is the point where you clearly can see that RWD (responsive web design) isn't "one-size-fit-all" solution.
You have few choices but all are weird - double menu, hamburger + kebap menu, sticky menu on left, etc. But as i said this is weird. And only A/B test can show how they works.
I think that best in your case is to try sticky menu on top. One of best example is here:
http://getskeleton.com/
but you need to watch this on desktop. When you scroll down you can see that "Intro Code Examples More" is sticky on top. In your site you need to make changes to "Gallery Partners Pricing". This menu can be sticky even for desktop. This will bring more size in width for main content.As i said - only A/B test can show who's right. Because all double menus have better navigation but in reality confuses user with "paradox of choice".
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Menu setup
I'm looking for feedback on menu structure to be SEO friendly. This is setup with ubmenu. What I am gathering is that because of the amount of items it could cause issues with google because it is exceeding the maximum links per page, currently the come shows 153 links. I'm not sure what to do since people search for all these terms in the menu, but I don't want to be penalized. also saw this http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/127191-SEO-Simplifying-Navigation-Cuts-Performance so im really confused. http://www.familychristiandoors.com/
Web Design | | familychristiandoors1 -
Internal Linking: What is the best practice for pages not included in Nav bar?
I never quite understood why internal linking was such a big deal for SEO, but now I'm having second thoughts and perhaps understanding it more. I always thought since most websites have a navigation feature--usually the menu bar located at the top and often another one in the footer--that internal navigation was usually already built in to most websites and therefore, a silly topic to make a fuss over; however, I may be the silly one after all. I am now creating pages that are not included in the navigation so.... What is the best practice for this? If I am creating say, pages for certain locations and those location pages begin to number in the hundreds, it makes my navigation bar a little too cumbersome to have all those pages in a drop down menu. So I made a Locations page and just link to all those pages from that page (and from nowhere else). But now I'm wondering if this could be a bad internal linking practice and perhaps hurt my online visibility as an SEO ranking factor. Is this a crawl problem? And if so, is there a better option that provides a good visitor experience while appeasing the search engines.
Web Design | | Dino640 -
Footer links on my site... bad for passing page rank?
i've been told that it is possible that google discounts the weight or page rank passed in footer links of websites and my website has the navigation to many of my pages in the footer of each page. My whole website is about 20 pages so each page has links to the 5 most popular pages at the top and the rest of the links are in the footer of each page. Am i losing page rank by having these links in the footer? Should i make my navigation different? I have lots of articles on my site so i thought it might be not only helpful to my readers but give my pages an seo boost if i placed in context links in the body of my articles to other pages of my site. Does this sound like a good idea? Thanks mozzers! Thanks mozzers!
Web Design | | Ron100 -
Are wordpress themes like from themeforest bad?
Hi to all. Ok so as I read around the internet I see a lot of people who dislike theme forest and using their themes. I have a them from them, the Avada theme. Ok so they have made a TON of money. But would so many people buy the theme if it was that bad? Going forward, my question is, are wordpress themes a bad thing to do? I feel like its peer pressure to switch to a framework like Genesis. There are so many people who state that a framework and child theme is the way to go. But I am using this avada theme and having under 2.5 sec load times. A lot of people say the code is bloated and is horrible. I understand this and got a cache plugin that makes a huge difference. But I do want to learn and I do want to approach websites in a positive way. So if you have any thoughts on themes, please tell me your thoughts. I am no developer, so they seem to work, but is it at a price? Like bad seo and serps? Thank you chris
Web Design | | asbchris0 -
Too many Internal Links: A good thing or bad thing?
According to Moz i have over 500 links on some pages, GWT says about 400 with most (90%) having about 210 links. When I eyeball the site it should have no more than 30 to 40, but my web agency tells me its because the way the CMS works (DotNetNuke) that all pages are linked via the top navigation. Does this mean that my internal linking strategy is flawed before i even start to consider which pages I want to have more links to? Our site www.over50choices.co.uk was rebranded & moved to the new CMS in June 2013. Should i be concerned or is this OK? Ash
Web Design | | AshShep10 -
Parallax websites - good for SEO?
A client of mine is redesigning their site using a vertical Parallax & upon doing some research I've stumbled across Drew Barrymore's site: http://flowerbeauty.com/ - which also uses Parallax. What I like in particular is that the site changes URLs as you scroll down. If you go direct to one of those URLs you'll notice unique meta data (albeit poorly optimised). All pages are indexed fine in Google (https://www.google.com/#bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=f8873f78dfbb8c5e&q=site:flowerbeauty.com) I'm just wondering if this is considered ok as the user experience is good and they're not doing anything manipulative, however, there's duplicate content and a potential case of cloaking at hand. I think this approach may be ok for my client for a product features page or a global office locations page since I can break up the sections nicely and split a really long page featuring a lot of content into separate URLs. Whereas Flower Beauty have done it across the whole site... i.e. one page of HTML = the whole site. What do you guys think?
Web Design | | wojkwasi0 -
After a website redesign, what is the impact and is it a good practice to use /v2/ naming convention?
Hi mightyful SEOMoz community. We just launched a redesign of our commercial website from https://www.data-field.com to https://www.data-field.com/v2/ All URLs from previous website were 301 permanent redirect to the appropriate page in the new website, and the root domains ( /, /v2/ ) send the users to their own language content /v2/en/, /v2/fr/, /v2/zh/ Up to here everything is fine. But then I setup the usual "Share" buttons, only to find that they were displaying a "0" count. Then I realized that it was because of the root URL change from / to /v2/ My question is the following: 1. Is using /v2/ a good practice? 2. If yes, then should I link the Social tool to https://www.data-field.com/ ( only ) instead of linking it to the actual page in the address bar? Thanks for your answers.
Web Design | | NicolasE0 -
Siloing and navigation menu linking
Still trying to understand siloing and how it relates to displaying links in the navigation menu. I'm working on optimizing a site for a lawyer friend. His site consists of 4 top level pages - index, attorney profile, practice areas, and contact. Then, there are 2 folders that contain all the 2nd-level pages for his 2 practice areas - personal injury and business litigation. The website in question is www(dot)comitzlaw(dot)com. From what I read about siloing before taking the 30-day SEOMoz trial (which I really like so far, by the way), I set the main (left hand) menu up as follows: The 4 top level pages only display the "collapsed" navigation menu, which only links to the index pages for personal injury and business litigation. Go anywhere in personal injury, and all pages link to the "expanded" personal injury navigation (links to auto accidents page, wrongful death, motorcycle accidents, etc.) but the "collapsed" business litigation section and vice versa for business litigation's links to personal injury. I did this because, as I understand, it keeps the practice area links on topic (like in a car sales example where you want a Ford section linking to Ford pages and Chevy pages linking to Chevy pages). Just wondering if anyone thinks I have this set up right. Wondering if the home page should display the "expanded" navigation menu instead or if all top level pages should show the expanded? Appreciate any thoughts on this. Thanks.
Web Design | | c2g0