Migration from HTML to Wordpress - SEO Implications?
-
I am in the process of having a wordpress site developed to replace my current HTML site. (I currently have my website in html and a blog in wordpress in a sub directory). I am doing this in phases to try and preserve as much of my good rankings as possible. My first phase is to replicate my site with the exact same pages, meta data, and site structure. I'm hoping that google will see this as not much change and not change my rankings for the worse. I also made it a goal that my site speed tests be at least equal to what they are now. We will have to 301 all of the URLs however since it will be going from /example.html to /example. I believe my blog will also need to move into the root directory as well, so I need to 301 all of those pages.
I plan to wait a couple months for Phase 2. Phase 2 involves replacing old content (photo galleries), and introducing new content (virtual tours, videos, new pages, etc.) One of my reasons for moving to wordpress is to keep up with current trends a little easier since I have very little time. (I am owner, website maintainer, SEO - all on my own).
My question here is three parts. 1. Do you think this strategy will work to preserve my current rankings? 2. Do you have any lessons learned or advice to share with me to make this as smooth as possible? 3. Do I really need to wait to add new content? I might get antsy and want to do it sooner!
Thank you in advance!
-
I think it's a very dangerous idea to migrate your website to another platform on your own. No matter how diligently you do it, you won't be able to maintain your position in the search engines. I say this from personal experience.
It is better to contact the professionals. This team is excellent at helping you migrate your site to WordPress (Heidelberg). -
For lengthy-tail positions, typically you'll no longer see a dramatic drop. In truth, typically no drop in any respect. For some of the greater competitive positions, you most probably will see a mild loss. Some businesses do see a dramatic drop--but maximum probable due to different elements like microphone reviews. Over time, count on to regain the positions of the one in case you recognition on UX.
-
Thank you! I do plan to keep the internal linking the same, except the URL will change of course. The site structure is staying the same, except the blog will be moving to the root directory instead of being in a sub directory.
Thanks for the advice on the XML sitemap!
-
Good to know! Most of my searches are very specific, so I would say they are long-tail keywords.
-
I'd say for any drops, 4-6 weeks is pretty reasonable. To agree with Kevin again, most drops are user error (not doing redirects correctly etc) or as he said, major design/UX changes.
You may want to also be sure to implement an XML sitemap right away, and submit it to Search Console.
Also try to keep your internal linking the same where possible (menus, breadcrumbs, sidebars etc).
-
For long-tail kw positions, generally you will not see a dramatic drop. In fact, many times no drop at all. For some of the more competitive positions, you most likely will see a slight loss. Some companies do see a dramatic drop--but most likely because of other factors. Over time, expect to regain those positions if you focus on ux.
Dan's comments were spot on. I typically launch early on a saturday morning (2am or so) and make sure everything works. If you do launch, and the site blows up, you can always switch the 'a' record to the old site (assuming it is at a different server) and troubleshoot.
-
Thank you, this is also very helpful! I've never used Screaming Frog SEO Spider, so I will look into this! As for scheduling, that's why I am doing this in January. We are a tourism business, so we will peak in Feb / Mar. I'm hoping that 4-6 weeks will be enough to bounce back if we drop any. I do run Google PPC as well, so if it does drop, I'll have to up my PPC campaign. How long does it usually take to settle back out?
-
Thank you! That is very helpful. I will test the 301s! And thanks for letting me know to expect a 15% loss. Will that come back over time? I don't even want to lose one spot! Haha!
-
Hello! Kevin pretty much answered it but just wanted to add a few things:
1. To prioritize pages to check etc, export your top landings pages from Google Analytics. Run those through Screaming Frog SEO Spider in list most to check status codes and be sure they redirect. This way you're accounting for the highest trafficked content as a priority.
2. Schedule the exact switch for a low traffic time of day/week to be cautious.
To reiterate what Kevin said - having working redirects is the essential component here!
-
1. Do you think this strategy will work to preserve my current rankings? Yes, as long as the 301's are done properly and expect around a 15% loss.
2. Do you have any lessons learned or advice to share with me to make this as smooth as possible? Make sure to test the 301's before hand. Specifically, change your hosts file to the ip of domain. Next, go to google and do a site:yourdomainname.com and click on each result and make sure the redirects are done properly. Also, pay attention to Google Search Console, Analytics and etc for 404's and such. Make sure your .htaccess file isn't huge and add a new sitemap and etc.
3. Do I really need to wait to add new content? I might get antsy and want to do it sooner! No, but I would wait until the dust settles (more of a personal preference) as you need to focus on the launch.
Sounds like you have it handled! It's all in the prep and how to handle issues post-launch in a time-sensitive matter. Good luck!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Pageless/Single Page Design and Migration Questions
Hello, We are starting a content audit and migration to a new CMS. We would like to take content and present more on a pageless/Single Page type design instead of having visitors drill down so many levels to find the content. What should we be aware of from an SEO perspective. Here is Example of current pages and structure: http://www.saintpetershcs.com/GraduateMedicalEducation/PediatricResidency/
Web Design | | sphcs
Subpages include: Overview, Curriculum, Faculty, Residents, Benefits, How to APply Here is example of what we would like to do:
http://themeforest.net/item/medicalpress-health-and-medical-wordpress-theme/full_screen_preview/7789703 As you scroll information is populated: Duke Medicine also has something similar. https://www.dukemedicine.org/treatments/cancer What are your thoughts?0 -
Will having two wordpress themes installed hurt seo?
We currently have 3 sites built on WordPress that have little to no blogging capabilities. Currently, all published posts show up on a /category page which does not resemble the traditional blog format and is not aesthetically pleasing. We would like to have a more traditional blog and are considering installing a second wordpress theme on the site which will strictly be used for /blog and all the posts. My question is will having the second WordPress installation on the sites hurt us in any way on the SEO front and if we go this way should we place the install in a subfolder or on a subdomain? Is there anything else we need to worry about with making this transition? Thank you in advance for the advice! Patrick
Web Design | | PlanetDISH0 -
Parallax, SEO, and Duplicate Content
We are working on a project that uses parallax to provide a great experience to the end user, and we are also trying to create a best case scenario for SEO. We have multiple keywords we are trying to optimize. We have multiple pages with the parallax function built into it. Basically each member of the primary navigation is it's own page, with all subpages built below it using the parallax function. Our navigation currently uses the hashbang method to provide custom URL's for each subpage. And the user is appropriately directed to the right section based on that hashbang. www.example.com/About < This is its own page www.example.com/about/#/history < This is a subpage that you scroll to on the About page We are trying to decide what the best method will be for trying to optimize each subpage, but my current concern is that because each subpage is really a part of the primary page, will all those URL's be seen as duplicate content? Currently the site can also serve each subpage as it's own page as well, so without the parallax function. Should I include those as part of the sitemap. There's no way to navigate to them unless I include them in the sitemap, but I don't want Google to think I'm disingenuous in providing them links that don't exist, solely for the purpose of SEO, but truthfully all of the content exists and is available to the user. I know that a lot of people are asking these questions, and there really are no right answers yet, but I'm curious about everyone else's experience so far.
Web Design | | PaulRonin2 -
Migrating to Wordpress
Hi Mozzers, happy friday! I'm moving a new clients website from a really bad CMS to Wordpress and wondered what I need to do to do this, get the A record of the old programmers? If someone could do me a checklist that'd be great! Thanks!
Web Design | | KarlBantleman0 -
Redirect From .aspx to .html if already indexed - Website Redesign
Hi Guys I would like to know if somebody could possibly shed some light on this for me. We are in the process of re-designing our site, but we are keeping all of our content in terms of site structure, internal linking etc. the same. Now we were wondering if it would be a SEO best practice for us to change our pages' extension from .aspx to .html and just put a re-direct from the aspx to the html pages. Or should we keep everything as is, and maybe just revise our on-page seo efforts as well as do some more link-building. I just have to note that we are currently ranking very well for top positions and obviously all these pages are already nicely indexed. And then another question I have is with regards to our mobi site of this same website.Our dev team created it using Responsive Web Design, but they decided to implement techniques that show and hide content based on what device you are viewing it on. So when viewing it on your desktop, it will show content as per normal, but when viewing it on a mobile device it will hide this content and show the content formatted for that specific mobile device. So we are obviously sitting with a case of dup content here.Is this technique acceptable, or is there a workaround/different way of implementing this? Thanks In Advance Dave
Web Design | | DavidZA10 -
Mozcon London 2010: Top 10 tips - Design for SEO PPT Not Available for Download!
Hi - title says it all really! Just watched the video and throughout it they refer to the wireframes/site examples being available via the ppt download. However, even as a PRO member having purchased the DVD bundle I cannot find a link to download the presentation. Can anyone help please? Thanks in advance!
Web Design | | BlakMajik0 -
Local SEO - Title Tag?
For www.bluedotlandscaping.com/fencing.htm in which we mostly only care about Greenvile and Spartanburg counties in SC. Is <title>Patio designs - Water features - Brick patio by Blue Dot Landscaping</title>
Web Design | | SCyardman
good... or or do you prefer... <title>Patio designs - Water features - Brick patio - Greenville, Spartanburg, Simpsonville</title> Thanks for your help, Rich0