Folders or no folders in url?
-
What's best for SEO: a folder or no folder?
For example: https://domain.com/arizona-dentist/somecontent or just https://domain.com/somecontent.
The website has 100+ pages with "dentist" within the content of the somecontent pages, as well as specific pages for /arizona-dentist/. Also, the breadcrumb for the somecontent page would appear something like follows: Arizona Dentist > Some Content ... you can find the somecontent page from the Arizona Dentist page.
I didn't include folders in the path because I did not want the url to be too long. In terms of where it is showing up on google search results...it is within the top 3-4 on the first page when searching Arizona dentist come content.
The website is pretty organized even without subfolders because it was made using Umbraco.
I am wondering if using folders will increase the SEO ranking, or if it really doesn't and could hurt it if paths become too long; especially since it's not doing too bad in the search ranking right now.
-Thanks in advance for any help.
-
No problem,
I have just been going through the links and the consensus seems to be that it is best to leave alone.
So yes I would leave it alone, but keep in mind for future sites as keywords in URLs are a ranking factor but only a small one. I haven't found anything that does an analysis of keyword in URL versus short URL for mobile which would be interesting.
Thanks for your patience whilst we sorted that out.
-
Thank you very much! I will look at those links.
I think your last line sums everything up! It might be best to leave things as is right now, since the site won't grow that much larger for the time being (not that I am aware of anyway).
-
Have you done an analysis to see if there is any difference in mobile and desktop? I ask as the main reason for shorter URLs is to make them mobile friendly as far as i am aware.
I think as long as you are consistent across all of your URL structures and the information and pages are in an organised manner then you will be OK.
I am not totally convinced that removing the lawyer from the URL would have much of a negative or positive impact on the results you are seeing. Unfortunately without testing fully there is no way to know. And I wouldn't want to test something like this on a production site that is starting to see traffic.
Side note: it is good practice having the keyword in the URL where it naturally makes sense
Also another consideration is do you plan on adding a lot more pages in the future? if you do then you need to consider the benefits of organising the site now before you add those pages against leaving as is.
I am not that familiar with Umbraco unfortunately.
I have done some more digging and found some more pages that may help.
https://www.hobo-web.co.uk/search-engine-friendly-urls/
https://moz.com/blog/15-seo-best-practices-for-structuring-urls
I know i seem to be sitting on the fence here, I am not really sure which is the best way to move forward.
If you are planning on adding lots more pages or categories then i would seriously consider tidying the URLs up with 301 redirects to save on work in the future.(again this needs considering against the potential affects on SERPS and traffic)
If you are not planning on adding lots more pages then I would leave as is.
-
Thank you for your responses!
It does help! The site has been around for ~1 year and within the last 6 months has been doing well but could do better.
So you would leave out "law" or "lawyer" in the folders (eg: /business/commercial-contracts instead of /business-law(yer)/commercial-contracts). This would require changing the category pages to remove "lawyer" (eg: /business-lawyer/ page would now become /business/); the 301 redirects are not a problem with Umbraco.
So it is a question of whether changing the /business-lawyer/ page to remove lawyer, and then organizing each page (some-content) inside the appropriate categories (i.e. /business/some-content) would help or hurt the site. Right now the /business-lawyer/ page is doing quite well, so changing the page to remove "lawyer" would need to be offset by adding more content referring to lawyers within the page, and this might not guarantee the same link juice. However, by organizing the some-content pages inside the various categories those pages might increase.
I guess there is no way of knowing without doing it, but the risk of losing the juice for /business-lawyer/ might outweigh any POTENTIAL benefit of adding the some-content to each category (/business/some-content), which based alone on the url path might not help SEO given the fact that "business" is just 1 of 3 keywords typed into google ("business lawyer [the target area]"). I think I might just leave it alone without adding some-content to each category, but instead keeping the url path short and some-content directly after the domain.
What are your thoughts based on this rationale? Again, I really do appreciate your help!
-
Thanks for sharing the link and extra info that has cleared things up greatly for me.
Having looked at the site(nice site by the way) I would say your question now depends on how old the site is and how well each page is currently doing.
If i was to make a site like that from the start i would use the categories you have used under practice areas to separate the content into different areas. I would probably avoid using law in each category however i don't think it will make to much difference.
If the site has been around for a while then i would leave as is unless you want to go to the effort of 301 the pages to the new URL's. it might be a good idea to 301 the old URLS if google has already indexed some of the pages even if it is a new site.
Looking at the site you have 6 referring domains so either option is open to you, it depends on the timescale you have to do it.
Remember though a nicely organised site that is well categorised with good internal linking, will help your users and the search engines navigate the site and understand the topic of the page.
If you do it, I would use your favourite crawl bot to make sure that there are no broken URLS.
Does this help?
-
This post is deleted! -
No problem, I am sure we can come to a sensible resolution.
If all of your site is related to dentist then I think I would leave that out of the folder names and use the other terms like cavity or root-canal as the folder names.
If however your site is about various different services in different cities then you have a few options.
Possible folder and URL structures.
- somedomain/cavity/somecontent
- somedomain/city/cavity/somecontent
- somedomain/somecontent
- somedomain/city/dentist/cavity/somecontent
- somedomain/dentist/city/cavity/somecontent
- somedomain/dentist/cavity/somecontent
There are pros and cons to each of the above and it really depends on where your site breaks down into different offerings of content.
If your site is all about dentists and you have different content for each city then option 2 is probably good as it will help visitors and search engines see they are in the right place.
if you have different services and the content for each city is different then option 5 may work.
The big question is how and where you differentiate your content. There are loads of options but the main thing is to make sure it is consistent and that you are not duplicating content across pages. The duplication of content also means you are not using the same content rehashed with different city names in it. (sorry if i am teaching you to suck eggs).
To be able to give a more detailed answer i would need to have a look at the site or for you to provide more detail or examples.
I am though more than happy to help as best i can.
I have just been looking for sites that may have similar issues but cant find any, can you share what the site does in more detail without giving away information you do not want to share?
-
Thank you for your reply. That is very detailed.
Perhaps I didn't give the greatest example. Instead of Arizona-dentist being the folder, perhaps a specific 'city'-dentist as the main folder. The target audience is people looking for a dentist within that specific city.
I am worried about keyword stuffing...because the main folder pages would all have the word "dentist" in them...so for example: 'city'-dentist/somecontent would be one folder and page; another folder would be /cavity-dentist/somecontent2; another would be /root-canal-dentist/somecontent3; etc.
It's very complicated to weigh up the pros and cons, and actually arrive at a logical conclusion.
-
Hi Bellezze,
For me the answer is that it depends.
That is if it makes sense to structure your website into categories then use the subfolders. It sound like you have a fair number of pages, therefore using the folders in the URL may help both your users understand where they are and the search engines to put your pages into the relevant categories.
That is to use your example:
https://domain.com/arizona-dentist/somecontent or just https://domain.com/somecontent.
The first link helps to put the content into the category of Arizona dentist the 2nd link just shows the content.
So if you were to have
https://domain.com/michigan-dentist/somecontent
https://domain.com/ohiio-dentist/somecontent
Then i think it would make sense to use the folders, just make sure that the content isn't duplicated for each category.
However if there is no difference in each state (using your example) then i would either look to use just dentist as the folder or to leave out the folders completely.
Remember you can use keywords as the folders, as long as you are not stuffing keywords in there.
This link may also be useful.
https://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-friendly-url-structure-2/202790/
I hope this helps.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should we include URLs with parameters in the sitemap?
Hi, I wanted to know whether we can include URLs with search parameters in the sitemap. Currently, we are trying to append structured data for our job listing page. There happens to be a large number of job listings around 1000 pages with unique job-id and location. Should we add these pages in the sitemap or is there any other solution to this? Regards, Tejas
Algorithm Updates | | tejasbansode0 -
301 redirect to URL plus anchor tag???
Hi - my company has just had a site redesign completed, and our "old" site we have landing pages for a full product line. The new design has taken the content from those landing pages and placed them into one long scrolling page. We currently rank well on the "old" landing pages but now all that content is contained in a single page with anchor tags throughout attached to the headings. Can you set up 301's to anchor tags? Example: old site www.mysite.com/products/automotive/auto-parts.html new site: www.mysite.com/products/automotive#auto-parts
Algorithm Updates | | Jenny10 -
Anchor name URLs & anchor blocks: how Google sees them?
Hi guys, Anchor name URLs & anchor blocks: how Google sees them? As far as I know Google hasn't ever recommended anchor name URLs and anchor blocks, mostly when you have one page site, but I have ran into an organic result with an hyper-link to an anchor name URL. anchor name link There is a proper link and there aren't on the page and the code the words "Jump to". It means Google has put those words there and it has also taken the header of that block as anchor text. Why has Google placed that link? The query is "faqs umbrella company", so I thought that Google has seen "faqs umbrella company" like "what is the most popular faq about umbrella companies?" and therefore perhaps the correct answer could be "Is an umbrella company the only option I have? What are the alternatives?". Although, IMHO the most popular FAQ on Umbrella Companies should always be "what is an umbrella company". Unfortunately, that page is only worthy of third Google organic result page and there is no hint of rich snippet or any kind of conversational/KBT optimisation on its source code. no-rich-snippet Someone has any idea of why Google shows that link and if it's something that we can optimise in our pages? Cheers Pierpaolo IhwGwkb.jpg VWORt5F.jpg
Algorithm Updates | | madcow780 -
Is having an identical title, h1 and url considered "over optimization"? Is it better to vary?
To get some new pages out without over-thinking things, I decided to line up the title tag, h1 tag and URLs of my pages exactly. They are dynamically generated based on the content the user is viewing (internal search results pages) They're not ranking very well at the moment, but there are a number of factors that are likely to blame. But, in particular, does anyone know if varying the text in these elements tends to perform better vs. having them all identical? Has there been any information from Google about this? Most if not all of the "over optimization" content I have seen online pertains to backlinks, not on-page content. It's easy to say, "test it!" And of course, that's just what I'm planning to do. But I thought I would leverage the combined knowledge of this forum to see what information I could obtain first, so I can do some informed testing, as tests can take a while to see results. Thanks 🙂
Algorithm Updates | | ntcma0 -
Canonical URLs being ignored?
Hi Guys, Has anybody noticed canonical URLs being ignored where they were previously obeyed? I have a site that is doing this at the moment and just wondered if this was being seen elsewhere and if anyone knows what the solution is? Thanks, Elias
Algorithm Updates | | A_Q0 -
Images added to website automatically become URLs - is this an issue?
Hello Mozzers! I've just been trawling through a website and noticed all of the images had their own URLs. There's a bespoke CMS and that's how it works with images... So out of 1447 urls, 1314 are images. Firstly, is this an issue / problem from an SEO perspective. If it is, how should I deal with it? Thanks in advance, Luke
Algorithm Updates | | McTaggart0 -
Increased 404 and Blocked URL Notifications in Webmaster Tools
In the last 45 days, I am receiving an increasing number of 404 alerts in Google Webmaster Tools. When I audit the notifications, they are not "new" broken links, these are all links that have been pointing to non-existent pages for years that for some reason Google is just notifying me about them. This has also coincided with about a 30% drop in organic traffic from late April to early May. The site is www.petersons.com and its been around for a while and the site attracts a fair amount of natural links so in the 2 years I've managed the campaign I've done very little link-building. I'm in the process of setting up redirects for these urls but why is Google now notifying me of years old broken links and could that be one of the reasons for my drop in traffic. My second issue is my I am being notified that I am blocking over 8,000 urls in my Robots file when I am not. I attached a screenshot. Here is a link to a screenshot. http://i.imgur.com/ncoERgV.jpg
Algorithm Updates | | CUnet0 -
Organic Traffic dropped 50%. Anyone want to have a stab at why? (URL listed)
Just curious what the pro's on here think is the reason why our site got hammered recently. The URL is www.jobshadow.com. We've got gobs of quality content that had been ranking for quite a few keywords. Even one from Rand himself http://www.jobshadow.com/interview-with-seo-and-seomoz-founder-rand-fishkin/ Rankings for even the exact match domain keyword 'Job Shadow' have been pummeled. Anyway, we've got a pretty solid link profile I would think. We also have a very high user time on the site, thus suggesting the organic traffic was engaged when Google ranked us for those keywords. We have lots of unsolicited inbound links and even recent ones from PBS. I'm not really sure what it takes to please the "machine" at this point. Curious as to what everyone here thinks.
Algorithm Updates | | arkana0