Why is this site ranked #1 in Google with such a low DA (is DA not important anymore?)
-
Hi Guys,
Would you mind helping me with the below please? I would like to get your view on it and why Google ranks a really new domain name #1 with super low domain authority? Or is Domain Authority useless now in Google? It seems like from the last update that John Mueller said that they do not use Domain Authority so is Moz Domain Authority tool not to take seriously or am I missing something?
There is a new rehab in Thailand called
https://thebeachrehab.com/ (Domain authority 13)It's ranked #1 in Google.co.th for these phrases:
drug rehab thailand but also for addiction rehab thailand.
So when checking the backlink profile it got merely 21 backlinks from really low DA sites (and some of those are really spammy or not related).
Now there are lots of sites in this industry here which have a lot higher domain authority and have been around for years. The beach rehab is maybe only like 6 months old. Here are three domains which have been around for many years and have much higher DA and also more relevant content. These are just 3 samples of many others...
<cite class="iUh30">https://www.thecabinchiangmai.com (Domain Authority 52)</cite>https://www.hope-rehab-center-thailand.com/ (Domain Authority 40)https://www.dararehab.com (Domain Authority 32)
These three sites got lots of high DA backlinks (DA 90++) from strong media links like time.com, theguardian.com, telegraph.co.uk etc. (especially thecabinchiangmai.com) but the other 2 got lots of solid backlinks from really high DA sites.
So when looking at the content, thebeachrehab.com has less content as well.
Can anyone have a look and let me know your thoughts why Google picks a brand new site, with DA 13 and little content in the top compared to competition? I do not see the logic in this?
Cheers
John -
A brand new website, even here in Calgary, AB. These sites outrank DA50's while they might have a DA05, but the content is 10 X more valuable.
Also, the technical & on-page SEO from this new website could have been perfected, & this plays a major role, as well!
-
I agree with the other answers on the following points;
- Moz DA is not a Google metric
- In territories like Thailand and spaces related to drugs, Google tends to have less of an idea of what is spammy or not
- On-page optimisation across your site is a great way to improve your rankings
- Giving your users the best possible experience is a great way to get long-term success.
However, I wouldn't go as far as to say that Google pays no attention whatsoever to links. I think you can treat these findings as frustrating but informative - from what you are seeing, that site having a worse backlink profile is not preventing them from ranking. So for those searches, backlinks don't seem to be as big a deciding factor. From there I'd start identifying what factors are correlated with rankings and, provided those things are above-board and won't come back to bite you (here I mean - don't buy links etc.) then try emulating that stuff while you continue to build and improve your own site.
My new favourite phrase is "You are the Igniterman"
-
'truly' positive SEO metrics (backlinks from quality sites, high authority scores) don't count as much in less competitive query-spaces (world-wide "drug rehab thailand" has only 390 average monthly searches) and they also don't count as much in bad-neighborhood query-spaces
-
if very few users use a certain query-space, Google won't spend as much time refining it
-
if a query-space connects with bad neighborhood sites (drugs, unlicensed medicine, gambling, pornography) then Google won't spend as much time refining it
It seems that whilst 'rehabilitation' centers have noble intentions, obviously they also connect with the theme of 'drugs' and recreational drug usage, which is negative. Google is improving all the time, but it's not perfect yet. If an authoritative source talks about drugs (government initiatives and stuff like FRANK) then the authority carried over from connected reputable institutions stops the negative query-space from causing so much damage
In the instance that most of the results are from unknown institutions which may not be very reputable (like various rehab centers in Thailand) then the query-space may be much more noisy without much effort from Google in terms of cleaning it up
Google also gets into a bit of a muddle with negative query-spaces. The user wants to find something related to "drugs", but usually links from sites about "drugs" result in negative SEO authority, so how do they sort results in negative query-spaces? Clearly they have their methods but understandably this whole area of the web isn't ranked very accurately by Google
My suspicion is that, Google has a simplistic view here where they think the user is searching for drug-related sites, which is something Google usually doesn't want to condone. The query-space is noisy as the result of colliding positive and negative metrics shooting across a perceived negative query-space. You might even find that in some negative query-spaces, you could rank better with more negative signals (go figure)
-
-
I believe that Google uses information about the expertise, authority and trustworthyness of a website's authors. To make this happen, you must display it obviously. One way is to have author pages that present information about the author such as education, work experience, publishing history and more. Link to these from each article on the website that the author writes.
We were not doing this well, but then we spent time on it. Shortly thereafter, a Google update occurred and our pages rose nicely in the SERPs. Not a little increase, it was a surprising increase.
Are there sites with lesser credentials and lower quality content ranking above us. Yes, in many places, but we are also above them in many places. These things are not silver bullets. There are still many factors used in the rankings - and it can take time for Google to find and appreciate all elements of a website.
But, we spend zero time looking at our links, zero time looking at the links of our competitors, zero time looking at DA. I can't tell you the last time I looked at DA and have no intentions of looking at it anytime soon. I am too busy working on new content, improving old content, and trying to make the site operate better. I am spending my energy where it makes an impact that my visitors can see and use and share and link to.
You are the igniterman. Get busy.
-
Hi Roman,
Thanks for this. I am with you on all these but still that site is ranked #1 which is very strange. We have taken a very deep look at the backlink profile so this is why it's perplexing cause that site has only a few spammy backlinks compared to the others. I know what you mean no follow but those 3 others have many more relevant and higher quality backlinks, and still that guy ranks ahead.
If you look at them and compare onsite you can see the other 3 sites have more and better content, they have the necessary titles and meta tags etc. Still that site ranks way ahead.
So you do not think Google uses any trust/authority factors when ranking websites?
Thanks
John
-
Hi Egol,
Thanks for this, but when you compare the content on that site, it's less content and inferior as well to all those three. That site does not have the credentials as well. Not even a certified rehab in Thailand. Their site is not that useful as well compared to the other sites. I am with you in making the best site, so it's very strange that Google would rank such a site in the top because it's not following that logic.
So you do not think Google uses Authority/Trust when ranking websites?
Best
John
-
As Egol mentioned the Domain Authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score developed by Moz that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). https://moz.com/learn/seo/domain-authority
So is a unit measure created by Moz sometimes can be useful sometimes not and of course, has nothing to do with Google
In the other hands, there are many factors involved in ranking a website such as
On page optimization: meta-tittles, meta descriptions, content length, internal backlinks, website performance, internal backlinks, site structure, schemas and so on.
Off-page: which basically means backlinks but is not that simple of who has more backlinks, but to analyze the backlink profile of website you need to keep in mind the type of the link ( follow or no follow) the anchor text distribution, the content of article where you get the backlink and so on.
You mentioned links from sites like times.com well let me tell you something usually this big sites usually give you a no-follow backlink which for SEO purpose is useless. So if you really need to understand what is happening need to make an in-deep analysis of all do-follow backlinks, all the anchor text, all the on-page and so on.
-
Hi John,
You are placing way too much importance on DA. Google does not use DA in its rankings. Google most likely has never looked at the DA of the websites you are talking about. Your post uses "DA" or "Domain Authority" in almost every sentence, sometimes two or three times.
I suggest stop looking at DA and work to make the best website possible. Don't allow DA to be a decoy that takes you away from doing the work needed to win on the web.
So, get some coffee, and make a map of what it will take for you to have the best possible website in your niche. Then start working on it every day. Make sure you have the credentials needed to be taken seriously and valued by both your visitors and Google. If you don't have them, get them. Education is the key to writing the credible content that is needed to win on the web.
E
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I Even Bother Trying To Recover This Site After Google Penguin?
Hello all, I would like to get your opinion on whether I should invest time and money to improve a website which was hit by Google Penguin in April 2014. (I know, April 2014 was nearly 2 years ago. However, this site has not been a top priority for us and we have just left until now). The site is www.salmonrecipes.net Basically, we aggregated over 700 salmon recipes from major supermarkets, famous chefs, and others (all with their permission) and made them available on this site. It was a good site at the time but it is showing its age now. For a few years we were occasionally #1 on Google in the US for "salmon recipes", but normally we would be between #2 and #4. We made money from the site almost entirely through Adsense. We never made a huge amount, but it paid our office rent every month, which was handy. We also built up an email database of several thousand followers, but we've not really used this much. (Yet). In the year from 25th April 2011 to 24th April 2012 the site attracted just over 500k visits. After the rankings dropped due to Google Penguin, traffic dropped by 77% in the year from 25th April 2011 to 24th April 2012. Rankings and traffic have not recovered at all, and are only getting worse. I am happy to accept that we deserved our rankings to fall during the Google Penguin re-shuffle. I stupidly commissioned an offshore company to build lots of links which, in hindsight, were basically just spam, and totally without any real value. However they assured me it was safe and I trusted them, despite my own nagging reservations. Anyway, I have full details of all the links they created, and therefore I could remove many of these 'relatively' easily. (Of course, removing hundreds of links would take a lot of time). My questions ... 1. How can I evaluate the probability of this site 'recovering' from Google Penguin. I am willing to invest time/money on link removal and new (ethical) SEO work if there is a reasonable chance of regaining a position in the top 5 on Google (US) for "salmon recipes" and various long-tail terms. But I am keen to avoid spending time/money on this if it is unlikely we will recover. How can I figure out my chances? 2. Generally, I accept that this model of site is in decline. Relying on Google to drive traffic to a site, and on Google to produce revenue via its Adsense scheme, is risky and not entirely sensible. Also, Google seems to provide more and more 'answers' itself, rather than sending people to e.g. a website listing recipes. Given this, is it worth investing any money in this at all? 3. Can you recommend anyone who specialises in this kind of recovery work. (As I said, I have a comprehensive list of all the links that were built, etc). OK, that is all for now. I am really looking forward to whatever opinions you may have about this. I'll provide more info if required. Huge thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | smaavie
David0 -
Multiple Versions of Mobile Site
Hey Guys, We have recently finished the latest version of our mobile site which means currently we have 2 mobile sites. Depending on what device and Os will depend on which site you will be presented with.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | seekjobs
e.g.
iPhone 3 or 4 users on iOS4 will get version 1 of our mobile site
iPhone 5 users on iOS5 will get the new version (version 2) of our mobile site. Our old mobile site is currently indexed in Google and performing pretty well.
Since the launch of the second mobile site we have not see any major changes to our visibility in Google and so was curious My main concern here is duplicate content so I am curious can Google detect that we have 2 mobile site that we serve depending on device? And if Google can detect this, why has our sites not been penalized! Thanks, LW I know the first thing that comes to your mind is Duplicate content0 -
Are back links from audio sites any good?
In light of G's view of links from directories and other sources I have heard that links for audio sites like soundcloud.com can be beneficial. Has anyone had any positive experiences building likes from sources like this?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Aikijeff0 -
New Site Structure
Greetings SEOmoz Team and Users, I need some advise, our site has more products to offer so I am try to optimize the index for a general term and each page product for it's own main keyword. Our site offers accommodation such apartments, hotels and vacation rentals so this is my structure: Index: Main Keyword 1 | Keyword 2 | Site name(brand name) Page Product 1: Main Keyword 1 | Keyword 2 | Site name (brand name) Page Product 2: Main Keyword 1 | Keyword 2 | Site name (brand name) Also can I use the brand name at the end of title tag with separate words ? example: londonescape or london escape or londonescape.net London Apartments | short term london apartments | London Escape or London Apartments | short term london apartments | LondonEscape I think ''London Escape'' is better because has more popularity. Looking forward to hear from you. Thanks, Giuseppe
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | WorldEscape0 -
Why does Google recommend schema for local business/ organizations?
Why does Google recommend schema for local business/ organizations? The reason I ask is I was in Structed Data Testing Tool, and I was running some businesses and organizations through it. Yet every time, it says this "information will not appear as a rich snippet in search results, because it seems to describe an organization. Google does not currently display organization information in rich snippets". Additionally, many of times when you do search the restaurant or a related query it will still show telephone number and reviews and location. Would it be better to list it as a place, since I want to have its reviews and location show up thanks? I would be interested to hear what everyone else opinions are on this thanks.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | PeterRota0 -
Any Benefit to Artificially Boosting the CTR for rank?
I've read articles that indicates Google will provide a higher rank to listing with higher click through rates (i.e, http://bit.ly/132mUd0, "If a search result achieves a higher than average click through rate then it may be given a higher ranking.") First, this seems like a chicken-and-egg scenario: it seems like results with higher rank will have higher CTR from increased exposure, no? Second, if this was an accurate ranking signal, it seems like it would be so easy to black hat (as well as other web usage signals, such as goal conversions and time on site). I'd just pay some Indian dude to search for my website on different IPs and click through in the SERP. Your thoughts about this scenario?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | ExploreConsulting0 -
Google Sitemaps & punishment for bad URLS?
Hoping y'all have some input here. This is along story, but I'll boil it down: Site X bought the url of Site Y. 301 redirects were added to direct traffic (and help transfer linkjuice) from urls in Site X to relevant urls in Site Y, but 2 days before a "change of address" notice was submitted in Google Webmaster Tools, an auto-generating sitemap somehow applied urls from Site Y to the sitemap of Site X, so essentially the sitemap contained urls that were not the url of Site X. Is there any documentation out there that Google would punish Site X for having essentially unrelated urls in its sitemap by downgrading organic search rankings because it may view that mistake as black hat (or otherwise evil) tactics? I suspect this because the site continues to rank well organically in Yahoo & Bing, yet is nonexistent on Google suddenly. Thoughts?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | RUNNERagency0 -
Multiple domains pointed at one site
I know things are changing and the things Google thinks are cheating searchers from finding what they are really looking for are changing too. So, I have multiple domain names that are related to my site, but not the actual site name. For instance, I have a certification program called Certified NetAnalyst that has a few domains for it... .com, .org and other derivatives like NetAnalyst. I would like to point the domains to my main company web site and not create a site just for the certification. Does Google think it is cheating to point domain names with my company branding names to my main web site? What about domain name forwarding to a specific URL, like taking the certification name domains and pointing them to the certification page instead of the main site? Wondering if one could no follow (don't know how to do that) the domain forwarding links so it is not duplicate content? Is that possible in some way? Could you put another robots.txt file with excludes in the domain forwarding url landing page so it would not be duplicate content? For the future I want all SEO "juice" to go to the main domain, but the keyword value of the domain names is valuable. I sure would be grateful if someone that has a good understanding and specific recent experience with Google policy and enforcement could offer some sage and practical advice and perhaps a case study example where Google "likes it" or on the other hand a good explanation of why I may not wish to do this! Thank You! Bill Alderson www.apalytics.com
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Packetman0071