Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Unsolved Using Weglot on wordpress (errors)
-
Good day to you all,
Does anyone have experience of the errors being pulled up by Moz about the utility of the weglot plugin on Wordpress?
Moz is pulling up URLs such as:
https://www.ibizacc.com/es/chapparal-2/?wg-choose-original=false
These are classified under "redirect issues" and 99% of the pages are with the ?wg-choose parameter in the URL.
Is this having an actual negative impact on my search or is it something more Moz related being highlighted. Any advice be appreciated and a resolution ..
Im thinking I could exclude this parameter.
-
You're encountering flags from Moz regarding redirect issues on URLs with the ?wg-choose parameter likely related to the Weglot plugin for WordPress. Here's the breakdown:
The Issue: URLs with the ?wg-choose parameter indicate Weglot's involvement in language selection. Moz might be flagging these as redirects because the parameter alters the URL.
Impact on SEO: While these flags might seem concerning, the impact on SEO is likely minimal. The parameter itself doesn't necessarily redirect users, and search engines are increasingly sophisticated at handling dynamic URLs.
Possible Solutions:Exclude the Parameter: You can explore excluding the ?wg-choose parameter in Moz's settings if it's causing clutter in your reports. This wouldn't change the plugin's functionality but would remove those specific flags.
Focus on High-Impact Issues: Moz offers valuable insights, but prioritize addressing critical SEO issues like broken links or slow page speed over these potentially minor flags.
In a nutshell, these Weglot-related flags might be more Moz-related than a critical SEO concern.Chat GPT is a large language model from OpenAI that you can use to find the causses and fixes of your WordPress errors.
-
@skvisaguruku Despite my efforts in Bing Webmaster Tools, the site gets indexed seamlessly on Google, but the Bing.com search engine consistently refuses to index the homepage. I've taken several steps to address this issue, including submitting XML sitemaps, enhancing the homepage copy, optimizing site loading times, disavowing spam and poor-quality backlinks, and repeatedly requesting indexing. I've even installed the IndexNow plugin to improve the chances of getting indexed. Despite investing both time and money into resolving this issue, it persists. This leads me to question whether the domain might be penalized in Bing, prompting me to consider the possibility of starting over with a new domain.
-
Good day!
The errors being flagged by Moz related to the weglot plugin on WordPress, specifically the URLs with the "?wg-choose" parameter, fall under "redirect issues." While Moz identifies these, it's crucial to assess whether they have a tangible negative impact on your search performance.
Considering the nature of the parameter and its prevalence in the flagged URLs, it seems more Moz-related than a direct SEO concern. To potentially address this, you can consider excluding the "?wg-choose" parameter, which might resolve the issue flagged by Moz. However, it's essential to monitor your site's overall performance and search rankings independently to ensure there are no unintended consequences.
.
.
(Canada PR requirements for Indian)( After Biometric how long to get Canada study visa) -
Hello,
The URLs you mentioned with the "?wg-choose" parameter are flagged by Moz as "redirect issues." This may not necessarily have a direct negative impact on your search rankings, but it could be affecting how Moz crawls and analyzes your website.
To address this in Moz, you might consider excluding the "?wg-choose" parameter in your Moz settings. However, it's essential to ensure that this parameter doesn't play a critical role in your website's functionality before making changes.
If these URLs are not causing issues in terms of user experience or search performance, it could be a Moz-specific matter rather than a critical SEO concern. You may want to monitor your website's overall performance and seek assistance from Moz support for a more tailored solution.
Best regards.
.
.
(Canada PR) -
@alwaysbeseen Hello,
Yes, I have experience with Moz reporting issues related to the Weglot plugin on WordPress. The URLs you provided with the "?wg-choose" parameter are being classified under "redirect issues" by Moz. It's crucial to assess whether these issues are impacting your search performance or if they are more specific to Moz's reporting.
Considering that 99% of the pages are flagged with this parameter, it's worth investigating the potential impact on your search visibility. One solution could be excluding this parameter to see if it resolves the reported issues.
I recommend testing the exclusion of the "?wg-choose" parameter and monitoring the impact on your site's performance. Additionally, you may want to reach out to Weglot's support or community forums to see if others have experienced similar issues and if there are specific recommendations for optimizing the plugin's performance.
Best of luck with resolving the issue!
-
@alwaysbeseen Good day! Yes, Moz is highlighting "redirect issues" related to URLs with the "?wg-choose" parameter when using the Weglot plugin on WordPress. While Moz is flagging these as potential problems, it's important to assess whether they are negatively impacting your search performance.
The presence of parameters in URLs can sometimes cause search engines to treat them as separate pages, potentially affecting SEO. In this case, it seems like a parameter related to the Weglot plugin.
To address this, considering excluding the "?wg-choose" parameter could be a viable solution. This can be done through tools like Google Search Console or by configuring your website's robots.txt file. However, it's crucial to monitor your website's performance after making changes to ensure there are no unintended consequences.
Remember, Moz is a tool that provides insights, and while it's a valuable resource, the actual impact on search results may vary. Regularly monitoring your website's performance and staying informed about SEO best practices will help ensure a positive online presence. If you have further questions or concerns, consulting with a professional SEO expert could provide tailored advice for your specific situation.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Moz API Spam Score - Backlinks
Hi, everyone I am trying to get my website DA up. I have analyzed my competitors and thanks to Moz I have idea and insights of how my competitors get backlinks. But, some of them are old school techniques. Also my website has some PBNs no follow backlinks does it affect my website ranking? Their spam score is 10-40. But other competitors has them as well. Does anyone know indepth on this topic?
Link Building | | RejinKayastha0 -
How to Boost Your WordPress Website Speed to 95+ (Without Premium Plugins)
I'm reaching out for some advice on improving my WordPress website's speed. I'm currently using a free theme for this fusion magazine and aiming for a score of 95+ on Google PageSpeed Insights. I'm aware that premium plugins can significantly enhance performance, but I'm hoping to achieve similar results using primarily free solutions and manual optimizations.
Technical SEO | | mohammadrehanseo0 -
Why Product pages are throwing Missing field "image" and Missing field "price" in Wordpress Woocommerce
I have a wordpress wocommerce website where I have uploaded 100s of products but it's giving me error in GSC under merchant listing tab. When I tested it show missing field image and missing field price. I have done everything according to https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/structured-data/product#merchant-listing-experiences and applied fixed i.e. images are 800x800 and price range is also there. What else can be done here?!merchant listing.jpg
Technical SEO | | Ravi_Rana0 -
What's the best way to search keywords for Youtube using Moz Keyword explorer?
I want to optimize my youtube channel using identified keywords, but I'm concerned that the keywords I'm identifying work well for SERP's but might not be how people search in Youtube. How do a distinguish my keywords to be targeted for Youtube?
Moz Pro | | Dustless0 -
Should I set blog category/tag pages as "noindex"? If so, how do I prevent "meta noindex" Moz crawl errors for those pages?
From what I can tell, SEO experts recommend setting blog category and tag pages (ie. "http://site.com/blog/tag/some-product") as "noindex, follow" in order to keep the page quality of indexable pages high. However, I just received a slew of critical crawl warnings from Moz for having these pages set to "noindex." Should the pages be indexed? If not, why am I receiving critical crawl warnings from Moz and how do I prevent this?
Moz Pro | | NichGunn0 -
Htaccess and robots.txt and 902 error
Hi this is my first question in here I truly hope someone will be able to help. It's quite a detailed problem and I'd love to be able to fix it through your kind help. It regards htaccess files and robot.txt files and 902 errors. In October I created a WordPress website from what was previously a non-WordPress site it was quite dated. I had built the new site on a sub-domain I created on the existing site so that the live site could remain live whilst I created on the subdomain. The site I built on the subdomain is now live but I am concerned about the existence of the old htaccess files and robots txt files and wonder if I should just delete the old ones to leave the just the new on the new site. I created new htaccess and robots.txt files on the new site and have left the old htaccess files there. Just to mention that all the old content files are still sat on the server under a folder called 'old files' so I am assuming that these aren't affecting matters. I access the htaccess and robots.txt files by clicking on 'public html' via ftp I did a Moz crawl and was astonished to 902 network error saying that it wasn't possible to crawl the site, but then I was alerted by Moz later on to say that the report was ready..I see 641 crawl errors ( 449 medium priority | 192 high priority | Zero low priority ). Please see attached image. Each of the errors seems to have status code 200; this seems to be applying to mainly the images on each of the pages: eg domain.com/imagename . The new website is built around the 907 Theme which has some page sections on the home page, and parallax sections on the home page and throughout the site. To my knowledge the content and the images on the pages are not duplicated because I have made each page as unique and original as possible. The report says 190 pages have been duplicated so I have no clue how this can be or how to approach fixing this. Since October when the new site was launched, approx 50% of incoming traffic has dropped off at the home page and that is still the case, but the site still continues to get new traffic according to Google Analytics statistics. However Bing Yahoo and Google show a low level of Indexing and exposure which may be indicative of the search engines having difficulty crawling the site. In Google Analytics in Webmaster Tools, the screen text reports no crawl errors. W3TC is a WordPress caching plugin which I installed just a few days ago to speed up page speed, so I am not querying anything here about W3TC unless someone spots that this might be a problem, but like I said there have been problems re traffic dropping off when visitors arrive on the home page. The Yoast SEO plugin is being used. I have included information about the htaccess and robots.txt files below. The pages on the subdomain are pointing to the live domain as has been explained to me by the person who did the site migration. I'd like the site to be free from pages and files that shouldn't be there and I feel that the site needs a clean up as well as knowing if the robots.txt and htaccess files that are included in the old site should actually be there or if they should be deleted... ok here goes with the information in the files. Site 1) refers to the current website. Site 2) refers to the subdomain. Site 3 refers to the folder that contains all the old files from the old non-WordPress file structure. **************** 1) htaccess on the current site: ********************* BEGIN W3TC Browser Cache <ifmodule mod_deflate.c=""><ifmodule mod_headers.c="">Header append Vary User-Agent env=!dont-vary</ifmodule>
Moz Pro | | SEOguy1
<ifmodule mod_filter.c="">AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/css text/x-component application/x-javascript application/javascript text/javascript text/x-js text/html text/richtext image/svg+xml text/plain text/xsd text/xsl text/xml image/x-icon application/json
<ifmodule mod_mime.c=""># DEFLATE by extension
AddOutputFilter DEFLATE js css htm html xml</ifmodule></ifmodule></ifmodule> END W3TC Browser Cache BEGIN W3TC CDN <filesmatch ".(ttf|ttc|otf|eot|woff|font.css)$"=""><ifmodule mod_headers.c="">Header set Access-Control-Allow-Origin "*"</ifmodule></filesmatch> END W3TC CDN BEGIN W3TC Page Cache core <ifmodule mod_rewrite.c="">RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /
RewriteCond %{HTTP:Accept-Encoding} gzip
RewriteRule .* - [E=W3TC_ENC:_gzip]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE} w3tc_preview [NC]
RewriteRule .* - [E=W3TC_PREVIEW:_preview]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} !=POST
RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} =""
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} /$
RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE} !(comment_author|wp-postpass|w3tc_logged_out|wordpress_logged_in|wptouch_switch_toggle) [NC]
RewriteCond "%{DOCUMENT_ROOT}/wp-content/cache/page_enhanced/%{HTTP_HOST}/%{REQUEST_URI}/_index%{ENV:W3TC_PREVIEW}.html%{ENV:W3TC_ENC}" -f
RewriteRule .* "/wp-content/cache/page_enhanced/%{HTTP_HOST}/%{REQUEST_URI}/_index%{ENV:W3TC_PREVIEW}.html%{ENV:W3TC_ENC}" [L]</ifmodule> END W3TC Page Cache core BEGIN WordPress <ifmodule mod_rewrite.c="">RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /
RewriteRule ^index.php$ - [L]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteRule . /index.php [L]</ifmodule> END WordPress ....(((I have 7 301 redirects in place for old page url's to link to new page url's))).... #Force non-www:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.domain.co.uk [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://domain.co.uk/$1 [L,R=301] **************** 1) robots.txt on the current site: ********************* User-agent: *
Disallow:
Sitemap: http://domain.co.uk/sitemap_index.xml **************** 2) htaccess in the subdomain folder: ********************* Switch rewrite engine off in case this was installed under HostPay. RewriteEngine Off SetEnv DEFAULT_PHP_VERSION 53 DirectoryIndex index.cgi index.php BEGIN WordPress <ifmodule mod_rewrite.c="">RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /WPnewsiteDee/
RewriteRule ^index.php$ - [L]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteRule . /subdomain/index.php [L]</ifmodule> END WordPress **************** 2) robots.txt in the subdomain folder: ********************* this robots.txt file is empty **************** 3) htaccess in the Old Site folder: ********************* Deny from all *************** 3) robots.txt in the Old Site folder: ********************* User-agent: *
Disallow: / I have tried to be thorough so please excuse the length of my message here. I really hope one of you great people in the Moz community can help me with a solution. I have SEO knowledge I love SEO but I have not come across this before and I really don't know where to start with this one. Best Regards to you all and thank you for reading this. moz-site-crawl-report-image_zpsirfaelgm.jpg0 -
What is the logarithmic scale used for domain authority?
I want to quantify how much better a score of 80 is compared to 60. Or 60 compared to 30 etc.... What is the logarithm base? Thanks, Rik
Moz Pro | | garypropellernet0