Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
One of my Friend's website Domain Authority is Reducing? What could be the reason?
-
Hello Guys,
One of my friend's website domain authority is decreasing since they have moved their domain from HTTP to https.
There is another problem that his blog is on subfolder with HTTP.
So, can you guys please tell me how to fix this issue and also it's losing some of the rankings like 2-5 positions down.Here is website URL: myfitfuel.in/
here is the blog URL: myfitfuel.in/mffblog/ -
http://www.redirect-checker.org/index.php
http://www.contentforest.com/seo-tools/redirect-checker
See http://i.imgur.com/mIqqCla.png
Redirecting all traffic to the www SSL domain
You can force all of your traffic to go to the
wwwdomain, and to use SSL, even if they did not request it initially.ensure www.
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www. [NC]
RewriteRule ^ https://www.%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]ensure https
RewriteCond %{HTTP:X-Forwarded-Proto} !https
RewriteRule ^ https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]Redirecting all traffic to the bare SSL domain
With dedicated load balancers or who have purchased a slot on the UCC certificate on shared load balancers have the option of redirecting all traffic to the bare domain using the HTTPS protocol:
# Redirecting http://www.domain.com and https://www.domain.com to https://domain.com RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.(.+)$ [NC] RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://%1%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]Redirecting http://domain.com to https://domain.com
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off
RewriteCond %{HTTP:X-Forwarded-Proto} !https
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]An example of how the requests work
The preceding examples of how and when you would use a rewrite are complex; here's a breakdown of the scenarios, which may help you determine what your website really needs.
A security warning will occur on a bare domain only if the request specifically includes the https protocol, like https://mysite.com, and there's no SSL certificate on the load balancer that covers the bare domain. A request for
http://mysite.comusing the http protocol, however, will not produce a security warning because a secure connection to the bare domain has not been requested.| Domain | DNS record type | IP/Hostname |
| www.mysite.com | CNAME | dc-2459-906772057.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com |
| mysite.com | A | 123.45.67.89 |For AWS ELB,
www.mysite.comhas a CNAME record that points to the hostname of the elastic load balancer (ELB), because that's where the SSL certificate is installed when it's uploaded using the self-service UI. But, bare domains/non-FQDNs like mysite.com can't have CNAME records without something like Route 53, so it must point to the elastic IP address of the balancer pair behind the ELB.If there's a redirect in the
.htaccessfile that will take all requests for the bare domain and redirect them towww, due to how the DNS records are set up, this is what happens if you requesthttp://example.com:- The request for
http://mysite.comhits the load balancers behind the ELB. - The
.htaccessrule 301 redirects request tohttps://www.mysite.com. - A new request for
https://www.mysite.comhits the ELB where the certificate lives and everything is happy, secure, and green.
But, if a specific request is sent to
https://mysite.comwith the https protocol, here's what happens:- A request for
https://mysite.comhits the load balancers behind the ELB. - Your browser displays the normal security warning.
- You examine the certificate and decide to move ahead.
- The .
htaccessrule 301 redirects request tohttps://www.mysite.com. - A new request for
https://www.mysite.comhits the ELB where the cert lives and everything is happy, secure, and green.
Redirecting all HTTP traffic to HTTPS
In the following example, the server variable
HTTP_X_FORWARDED_PROTOis set tohttpsif you're accessing the website using HTTPS, the following code will work with yourRedirect HTTP to HTTPS
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off
RewriteCond %{HTTP:X-Forwarded-Proto} !https
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]Redirecting all HTTPS traffic to HTTP
In addition, if visitors to a customer's website are receiving insecure content warnings due to Google indexing documents using the HTTPS protocol, traffic may need to be redirected from HTTPS to HTTP.
The rule is basically the same as the preceding example, but without the first
Rewritecondition. If no SSL certificate is installed, the value of%{HTTPS}is always set tooff, even when you are accessing the website using HTTPS. Use the following rule set in this case:Redirect HTTPS to HTTP
RewriteCond %{HTTP:X-Forwarded-Proto} =https
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]Redirecting from a bare domain to the www subdomain
SSL certificates can not cover the bare domain for websites unless you are using Route 53 or some other similar provider. This is because the SSL certificates for Acquia Cloud Professional websites are placed on an Elastic Load Balancer (ELB). While ELBs require CNAME records for domain name resolution, bare domains require an IP address in an A-record for the domain name (DNS) configuration and cannot have CNAME records. Therefore, it's not possible to terminate traffic to bare domains on the ELB where your SSL certificate is located without Route 53.
Even if all requests for the bare domain are redirected to
www, visitors to ELB websites that explicitly request the bare domain using the HTTPS protocol, likehttps://mysite.com, will always receive a security warning in their browser before being redirected tohttps://www.mysite.com. For a more detailed explanation of why this happens, refer to the An example of how the requests work section.Redirect http://domain.com to http://www.domain.com
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www. [NC]
RewriteRule ^ http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]Redirecting all traffic to the www SSL domain You want this!
You can force all of your traffic to go to the
wwwdomain, and to use SSL, even if they did not request it initially.ensure www.
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www. [NC]
RewriteRule ^ https://www.%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]ensure https
RewriteCond %{HTTP:X-Forwarded-Proto} !https
RewriteRule ^ https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]Redirecting all traffic to the bare SSL domain
AWS dedicated load balancers or who have purchased a slot on the UCC certificate on our shared load balancers have the option of redirecting all traffic to the bare domain using the HTTPS protocol:
Redirecting http://www.domain.com and https://www.domain.com to https://domain.com
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.(.+)$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://%1%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]Redirecting http://domain.com to https://domain.com
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off
RewriteCond %{HTTP:X-Forwarded-Proto} !https
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]As an example, if you wanted to ensure that all the domains were redirected to
https://www.except for Acquia domains acquia-sites.com, you would use something like this:ensure www.
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !prod.acquia-sites.com [NC] # exclude Acquia domains
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www. [NC]
RewriteRule ^ https://www.%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]ensure https
RewriteCond %{HTTP:X-Forwarded-Proto} !https
RewriteRule ^ https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]elb 2.2.15 | intermediate profile | OpenSSL 1.0.1e | link
Oldest compatible clients : Firefox 1, Chrome 1, IE 7, Opera 5, Safari 1, Windows XP IE8, Android 2.3, Java 7
This Amazon Web Services CloudFormation template will create an Elastic Load Balancer which terminates HTTPS connections using the Mozilla recommended ciphersuites and protocols.
{ "AWSTemplateFormatVersion": "2010-09-09", "Description": "Example ELB with Mozilla recommended ciphersuite", "Parameters": { "SSLCertificateId": { "Description": "The ARN of the SSL certificate to use", "Type": "String", "AllowedPattern": "^arn:[^:]*:[^:]*:[^:]*:[^:]*:.*$", "ConstraintDescription": "SSL Certificate ID must be a valid ARN. http://docs.aws.amazon.com/general/latest/gr/aws-arns-and-namespaces.html#genref-arns" } }, "Resources": { "ExampleELB": { "Type": "AWS::ElasticLoadBalancing::LoadBalancer", "Properties": { "Listeners": [ { "LoadBalancerPort": "443", "InstancePort": "80", "PolicyNames": [ "Mozilla-intermediate-2015-03" ], "SSLCertificateId": { "Ref": "SSLCertificateId" }, "Protocol": "HTTPS" } ], "AvailabilityZones": { "Fn::GetAZs": "" }, "Policies": [ { "PolicyName": "Mozilla-intermediate-2015-03", "PolicyType": "SSLNegotiationPolicyType", "Attributes": [ { "Name": "Protocol-TLSv1", "Value": true }, { "Name": "Protocol-TLSv1.1", "Value": true }, { "Name": "Protocol-TLSv1.2", "Value": true }, { "Name": "Server-Defined-Cipher-Order", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-DES-CBC3-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES128-GCM-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES256-GCM-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES128-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES256-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES128-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES256-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DES-CBC3-SHA", "Value": true } ] } ] } } }, "Outputs": { "ELBDNSName": { "Description": "DNS entry point to the stack (all ELBs)", "Value": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "ExampleELB", "DNSName" ] } } } }- You can get managed Magento hosting here.
- https://www.armor.com/security-solutions/armor-complete/
- https://www.mgt-commerce.com/
- https://www.rackspace.com/en-us/digital/magento
- https://www.cogecopeer1.com/en/services/managed-it/ecommerce/magento/
- https://www.cogecopeer1.com/en/services/cloud/mission-critical/
- https://www.engineyard.com/magento
- https://www.cloudways.com/en/magento-managed-cloud-hosting.php
- https://www.rochen.com/magento-hosting/
- http://www.tenzing.com/ecommerce-hosting-2/magento-optimized-hosting-on-aws/
- https://www.siteground.com/dedicated-hosting.htm#tab-3
- https://www.siteground.com/cloud-hosting.htm#tab-2
- https://www.siteground.com/speed
- The request for
-
May I ask did your friend modify any of the site structure aside from adding HTTPS?
make sure you have followed all the steps in this list by Google link to your and the list below. There are more resources
if needed. Read what Google's John Mueller has to say on the subject of redirects.
Official Google moving to HTTS how to
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6033049
** tools you can use**
- https://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/log-file-analyser/
- https://www.deepcrawl.com
- https://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/
** a very important checklist make sure you do this one below.**
SEO checklist to preserve your rankings
-
Make sure every element of your website uses HTTPS, including widgets, java script, CSS files, images and your content delivery network.
-
Use 301 redirects to point all HTTP URLs to HTTPS. This is a no-brainer to most SEOs, but you'd be surprised how often a 302 (temporary) redirect finds its way to the homepage by accident
-
Make sure all canonical tags point to the HTTPS version of the URL.
-
Use relative URLs whenever possible.
-
Rewrite hard-coded internal links (as many as is possible) to point to HTTPS. This is superior to pointing to the HTTP version and relying on 301 redirects.
-
Register the HTTPS version in both Google and Bing Webmaster Tools.
-
Use the Fetch and Render function in Webmaster Tools to ensure Google can properly crawl and render your site.
-
Update your sitemaps to reflect the new URLs. Submit the new sitemaps to Webmaster Tools. Leave your old (HTTP) sitemaps in place for 30 days so search engines can crawl and "process" your 301 redirects.
-
Update your robots.txt file. Add your new sitemaps to the file. Make sure your robots.txt doesn't block any important pages.
-
If necessary, update your analytics tracking code. Most modern Google Analytics tracking snippets already handle HTTPS, but older code may need a second look.
-
Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS). This response header tells user agents to only access HTTPS pages even when directed to an HTTP page. This eliminates redirects, speeds up response time, and provides extra security.
-
If you have a disavow file, be sure to transfer over any disavowed URLs into a duplicate file in your new Webmaster Tools profile.
-
NGINX
Add the following to your Nginx config.
server { listen 80; server_name domain.com www.domain.com; return 301 https://domain.com$request_uri; }Apache
Add the following to your
.htaccessfile.RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off RewriteRule (.*) https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L] -
** Here are some more extremely helpful resources**
-
https://www.seroundtable.com/google-seo-http-to-https-migration-checklist-19268.html
It is not abnormal for a site to see a dip in rankings or search visibility after migration or a change of structure. I have a very regimented list that I stick to and have not seen anything dip for more than three days, but all sites are unique, and Google indexes all sites differently.
Depending on your domain authority you may or may not have a higher crawl budget based on whether or not you tell Google you are making these changes will make an enormous difference in whether or not your site recovers quickly or sees a dip in traffic.
I hope this is helpful and remember Google has to reindex everything.
Thomas
-
It makes no sense that you would have your blog on a subfolder that was non-encrypted why did you choose to do this? I like the site to be 100% encrypted?
Read the second post first please
http://www.myfitfuel.in/mffblog/ should be https://www.myfitfuel.in/mffblog/
why not https?
if your hosting provider does not allow you to use HTTP/2 I suggest adding a WAF four as little as $20 a month you can run your site on HTTP/2
Now the cost of Akamai might scare people just from hearing the name, but I can assure you there are very good pricing options now that companies are competing against them in the same area. One thing in my opinion that no other CDN Waf company has is the amount of points of presence or pops/ Akamai exceeds over 250
https://community.akamai.com/community/web-performance/blog/2015/01/26/enabling-http2-h2-in-akamai
https://www.cloudflare.com/http2/
https://www.incapsula.com/cdn-guide/cdn-and-ssl-tls.html
when you switch your entire site over to https, then you can use the Google change of address tool and migrate your site to HTTPS
This should be encrypted you don't need a next or certificate you want to encrypt the entire site ideally. Add it to Google Webmaster Tools four times
- http://www.myfitfuel.in/
- http://myfitfuel.in/
- https://www.myfitfuel.in/
- https://myfitfuel.in/ Canonical chooses this in Webmaster tools like the site you want traffic to go to.
https://support.google.com/webmasters/topic/6029673?hl=en&ref_topic=6001951
https://www.deepcrawl.com/knowledge/best-practice/the-zen-guide-to-https-configuration/
https://www.deepcrawl.com/knowledge/best-practice/hsts-a-tool-for-http-to-https-migration/
elb 2.2.15 | intermediate profile | OpenSSL 1.0.1e | link
Oldest compatible clients : Firefox 1, Chrome 1, IE 7, Opera 5, Safari 1, Windows XP IE8, Android 2.3, Java 7
This Amazon Web Services CloudFormation template will create an Elastic Load Balancer which terminates HTTPS connections using the Mozilla recommended ciphersuites and protocols.
{ "AWSTemplateFormatVersion": "2010-09-09", "Description": "Example ELB with Mozilla recommended ciphersuite", "Parameters": { "SSLCertificateId": { "Description": "The ARN of the SSL certificate to use", "Type": "String", "AllowedPattern": "^arn:[^:]*:[^:]*:[^:]*:[^:]*:.*$", "ConstraintDescription": "SSL Certificate ID must be a valid ARN. http://docs.aws.amazon.com/general/latest/gr/aws-arns-and-namespaces.html#genref-arns" } }, "Resources": { "ExampleELB": { "Type": "AWS::ElasticLoadBalancing::LoadBalancer", "Properties": { "Listeners": [ { "LoadBalancerPort": "443", "InstancePort": "80", "PolicyNames": [ "Mozilla-intermediate-2015-03" ], "SSLCertificateId": { "Ref": "SSLCertificateId" }, "Protocol": "HTTPS" } ], "AvailabilityZones": { "Fn::GetAZs": "" }, "Policies": [ { "PolicyName": "Mozilla-intermediate-2015-03", "PolicyType": "SSLNegotiationPolicyType", "Attributes": [ { "Name": "Protocol-TLSv1", "Value": true }, { "Name": "Protocol-TLSv1.1", "Value": true }, { "Name": "Protocol-TLSv1.2", "Value": true }, { "Name": "Server-Defined-Cipher-Order", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-ECDSA-DES-CBC3-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "ECDHE-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES128-GCM-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES256-GCM-SHA384", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES128-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES256-SHA256", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES128-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "AES256-SHA", "Value": true }, { "Name": "DES-CBC3-SHA", "Value": true } ] } ] } } }, "Outputs": { "ELBDNSName": { "Description": "DNS entry point to the stack (all ELBs)", "Value": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "ExampleELB", "DNSName" ] } } } }** here are some fantastic resources from https://mozilla.github.io/server-side-tls/ssl-config-generator/ for setting up your server These things need to be put in place**
Nginx 1.10.1 | intermediate profile | OpenSSL 1.0.1e | link
Oldest compatible clients : Firefox 1, Chrome 1, IE 7, Opera 5, Safari 1, Windows XP IE8, Android 2.3, Java 7
server { listen 80 default_server; listen [::]:80 default_server; # Redirect all HTTP requests to HTTPS with a 301 Moved Permanently response. return 301 https://$host$request_uri; } server { listen 443 ssl http2; listen [::]:443 ssl http2; # certs sent to the client in SERVER HELLO are concatenated in ssl_certificate ssl_certificate /path/to/signed_cert_plus_intermediates; ssl_certificate_key /path/to/private_key; ssl_session_timeout 1d; ssl_session_cache shared:SSL:50m; ssl_session_tickets off; # Diffie-Hellman parameter for DHE ciphersuites, recommended 2048 bits ssl_dhparam /path/to/dhparam.pem; # intermediate configuration. tweak to your needs. ssl_protocols TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2; ssl_ciphers 'ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:AES128-GCM-SHA256:AES256-GCM-SHA384:AES128-SHA256:AES256-SHA256:AES128-SHA:AES256-SHA:DES-CBC3-SHA:!DSS'; ssl_prefer_server_ciphers on; # HSTS (ngx_http_headers_module is required) (15768000 seconds = 6 months) add_header Strict-Transport-Security max-age=15768000; # OCSP Stapling --- # fetch OCSP records from URL in ssl_certificate and cache them ssl_stapling on; ssl_stapling_verify on; ## verify chain of trust of OCSP response using Root CA and Intermediate certs ssl_trusted_certificate /path/to/root_CA_cert_plus_intermediates; resolver <ip dns="" resolver="">; .... }</ip>Apache 2.4.18 | intermediate profile | OpenSSL 1.0.1e | link
Oldest compatible clients : Firefox 27, Chrome 30, IE 11 on Windows 7, Edge, Opera 17, Safari 9, Android 5.0, and Java 8
<virtualhost *:443="">... SSLEngine on SSLCertificateFile /path/to/signed_certificate_followed_by_intermediate_certs SSLCertificateKeyFile /path/to/private/key # Uncomment the following directive when using client certificate authentication #SSLCACertificateFile /path/to/ca_certs_for_client_authentication # HSTS (mod_headers is required) (15768000 seconds = 6 months) Header always set Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=15768000" ...</virtualhost> # intermediate configuration, tweak to your needs SSLProtocol all -SSLv3 SSLCipherSuite ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:AES128-GCM-SHA256:AES256-GCM-SHA384:AES128-SHA256:AES256-SHA256:AES128-SHA:AES256-SHA:DES-CBC3-SHA:!DSS SSLHonorCipherOrder on SSLCompression off SSLSessionTickets off # OCSP Stapling, only in httpd 2.3.3 and later SSLUseStapling on SSLStaplingResponderTimeout 5 SSLStaplingReturnResponderErrors off SSLStaplingCache shmcb:/var/run/ocsp(128000)After you change the architecture of any website it normally takes a little bit of a dive. John Mu stated Google would not be punishing people to redirect to encrypted sites so while that might be true it doesn't mean Google has figured out what is going on yet.
I think you need to get Google crawling your site and have it in Webmaster tools with all of the pages redirected to https including adding things like HSTS and HTTP/2 to speed up your site.
Hope this helps,
Tom
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is domain authority lost if you create a 301 redirect but mark it as noindex, nofollow?
Hi everyone, Our company sells products in various divisions. While we've been selling Product A and Product B under our original brand, we've recently created a new division with a new domain to focus on a Product B. The new domain has virtually no domain authority (3) while the original domain has some (37). We want customers to arrive on the new domain when they search for key search terms related to Product B instead of the pages that previously existed on our main website. If we create 301 redirects for the pages and content on the main site and add noindex, nofollow tags, will we lose the domain authority that we have from our original domain because the pages now have the noindex, nofollow tags? I read a few blog posts from Moz that said there isn't any domain authority lost with 301 redirects but I'm not sure if that is true if the pages are noindex, nonofollow. Do you follow? 🙂 Apologies for the lengthy post. Love this community and the great Moz team. Thanks, Joe
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jgoehring-troy0 -
Should I redirect a domain we control but which has been labeled 'toxic' or just shut it down?
Hi Mozzers: We recently launched a site for a client which involved bringing in and redirecting content which formerly had been hosted on different domains. One of these domains still existed and we have yet to bring over the content from it. It has also been flagged as a suspicious/toxic backlink source to our new domain. Would I be wise to redirect this old domain or should I just shut it down? None of the pages seem to have particular equity as link sources. Part of me is asking myself 'Why would we redirect a domain deemed toxic, why not just shut it down.' Thanks in advance, dave
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Daaveey0 -
Should I Add Location to ALL of My Client's URLs?
Hi Mozzers, My first Moz post! Yay! I'm excited to join the squad 🙂 My client is a full service entertainment company serving the Washington DC Metro area (DC, MD & VA) and offers a host of services for those wishing to throw events/parties. Think DJs for weddings, cool photo booths, ballroom lighting etc. I'm wondering what the right URL structure should be. I've noticed that some of our competitors do put DC area keywords in their URLs, but with the moves of SERPs to focus a lot more on quality over keyword density, I'm wondering if we should focus on location based keywords in traditional areas on page (e.g. title tags, headers, metas, content etc) instead of having keywords in the URLs alongside the traditional areas I just mentioned. So, on every product related page should we do something like: example.com/weddings/planners-washington-dc-md-va
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | pdrama231
example.com/weddings/djs-washington-dc-md-va
example.com/weddings/ballroom-lighting-washington-dc-md-va OR example.com/weddings/planners
example.com/weddings/djs
example.com/weddings/ballroom-lighting In both cases, we'd put the necessary location based keywords in the proper places on-page. If we follow the location-in-URL tactic, we'd use DC area terms in all subsequent product page URLs as well. Essentially, every page outside of the home page would have a location in it. Thoughts? Thank you!!0 -
Too many backlinks from one domain?
I've been in the process of creating a tourism-based website for the state of Kansas. I'm a photographer for the state, and have inked a nice little side income to my day job as a web designer by selling prints from Kansas (along with my travels elsewhere). I'm still in the process of developing it, but it's at least at a point that I need to really start thinking about SEO factor of the amount of backlinks I have from it going back to my main photography website. The Kansas site is at http://www.kansasisbeautiful.com and my photography website is http://www.mickeyshannon.com. This tourism website will serve a number of purposes: To promote the state and show people it's not just a flat, boring place. To help promote my photography. The entire site is powered by my photography. To sell a book I'm planning to publish later this year/early next year of Kansas images. To help increase sales of photography prints of my work. What I'm worried about is the amount of backlinks I have going from the Kansas site to my photography site. Not to mention every image is hosted on my photography domain (no need to upload to two domains when one can serve the same purpose). I'm currently linking back to my site on most pages via a little "Like the Photos? Buy a print" link in the top right corner. In addition, when users get to the website map, all photo listings click back to a page on my photography site that they can purchase prints. And the main navigation also has a link for "Photos" that takes them to my Kansas photo galleries on my photography website as well. The question I have: Is it really bad SEO-wise to have anywhere from 1 to 10+ backlinks on every page from one domain (kansasisbeautiful.com) linking back to mickeyshannon.com? Would I be better served moving all of the content from kansasisbeautiful into a subdirectory on my photography site (mickeyshannon.com/kansas/) and redirecting the entire domain there? I haven't actually launched this website yet, so I'm trying to make the right call before pushing it to the public. Any advice would be appreciated!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | msphoto0 -
Should you allow an auto dealer's inventory to be indexed?
Due to the way most auto dealership website populate inventory pages, should you allow inventory to be indexed at all? The main benefit us more content. The problem is it creates duplicate, or near duplicate content. It also creates a ton of crawl errors since the turnover is so short and fast. I would love some help on this. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Gauge1230 -
Removing poor domain authority backlinks worth it?
Hey Moz, I am working with a client on more advanced SEO tactics. This client has a reputable domain authority of 67 and 50,000+ backlinks. We're wanting to continue SEO efforts and stay on top of any bad backlinks that may arise. Would it be worth asking websites (below 20 domain authority) to remove our links? Then, use the disavow tool if they do not respond. Is this a common SEO practice for continued advanced efforts? Also, what would your domain authority benchmark be? I used 20 just as an example. Thanks so much for your help. Cole
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ColeLusby1 -
Do Q&A 's work for SEO
If I create a good community in my particular field on my SEO site and have a quality Q&A section like this etc (ripping of MOZ's idea here sorry, I hope it's ok) will the long term returns be worth the effort of creating and man ageing this. Is the user created content of as much use as I think it will be?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mark_baird0 -
Multiple Domain names pointing at one website
Hello, A collegue has asked if we can buy multiple domain names which contain keywords and point them at our website. Is this good practise or will it be seen as spam? Will these domains actually get ranked? I'm sure I'm not the first person to raise this but can't seem to find any questions and answers about this. Thanks Mark
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | markc-1971830