undefined
Skip to content
Moz logo Menu open Menu close
  • Products
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Pro Home
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Home
    • STAT
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Home
    • Compare SEO Products
    • Moz Data
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis
    • Keyword Explorer
    • Link Explorer
    • Competitive Research
    • MozBar
    • More Free SEO Tools
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO
    • SEO Learning Center
    • Moz Academy
    • SEO Q&A
    • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Agency Solutions
    • Enterprise Solutions
    • Small Business Solutions
    • Case Studies
    • The Moz Story
    • New Releases
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Products
    • Moz Pro

      Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

    • Moz Local

      Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

    • STAT

      SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

    • Moz API

      Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

    • Compare SEO Products

      See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

    • Moz Data

      Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis

      Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

    • Keyword Explorer

      Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

    • Link Explorer

      Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

    • Competitive Research

      Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

    • MozBar

      See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

    • More Free SEO Tools

      Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO

      The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

    • SEO Learning Center

      Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

    • On-Demand Webinars

      Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

    • How-To Guides

      Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

    • Moz Academy

      Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

    • MozCon

      Save on Early Bird tickets and join us in London or New York City

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
    Moz API

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

    Find your plan
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Small Business Solutions

      Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

    • Agency Solutions

      Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

    • Enterprise Solutions

      Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

    • The Moz Story

      Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

    • Case Studies

      Explore how Moz drives ROI with a proven track record of success.

    • New Releases

      Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

    Surface actionable competitive intel
    New Feature

    Surface actionable competitive intel

    Learn More
  • Log in
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Dashboard
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Dashboard
    • Moz Academy
  • Avatar
    • Moz Home
    • Notifications
    • Account & Billing
    • Manage Users
    • Community Profile
    • My Q&A
    • My Videos
    • Log Out

The Moz Q&A Forum

  • Forum
  • Questions
  • Users
  • Ask the Community

Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

  1. Home
  2. SEO Tactics
  3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
  4. Are pages with a canonical tag indexed?

Moz Q&A is closed.

After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

Are pages with a canonical tag indexed?

Intermediate & Advanced SEO
3
17
17.8k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as question
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
  • fablau
    fablau last edited by Mar 31, 2013, 5:01 PM

    Hello here,

    here are my questions for you related to the canonical tag:

    1. If I put online a new webpage with a canonical tag pointing to a different page, will this new page be indexed by Google and will I be able to find it in the index?

    2. If instead I apply the canonical tag to a page already in the index, will this page be removed from the index?

    Thank you in advance for any insights!

    Fabrizio

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • fablau
      fablau @mememax last edited by Apr 3, 2013, 10:24 PM Apr 3, 2013, 10:24 PM

      Yes, I will look into doing that on GWT.

      Was a nice and useful chat indeed! Thank you again.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • mememax
        mememax @fablau last edited by Apr 3, 2013, 6:53 PM Apr 3, 2013, 6:53 PM

        Sorry Fabrizio I got mad with my old answer 🙂

        that canonical doesn't make sense with a noindex, with noindex follow.you're completely fine.

        Summing up I think that you have many parameters so you should try to write them down and define the role of each one.

        Then add them in GWT and choose there which are the ones which doesn't add any value and which you want to "block" (instead of putting a noindex).

        The valuable ones (the one which adds value and changes content) should contain the self canonical and paginated next/prev. If you can get rid of unesful parameters it could be better so to have cleaner and shorter urls.

        Just be sure that you're mainly using the most important parameters so you're consistent with your strategy.

        Hope this will clear your doubts, it was a nice chat! 🙂

        fablau 1 Reply Last reply Apr 3, 2013, 10:24 PM Reply Quote 0
        • fablau
          fablau @Dr-Pete last edited by Apr 3, 2013, 5:46 PM Apr 3, 2013, 5:46 PM

          Yes, actually I could get rid of the lpg parameter (it wasn't really needed!), so now the tag definitions are (for the 3rd page of the Guitar index):

          <LINK rel="<a class="attribute-value">next</a>" href="[http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=4](view-source:http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=4)"> <LINK rel="<a class="attribute-value">prev</a>" href="[http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=2](view-source:http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=2)"> <LINK rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>" href="[http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3](view-source:http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3)">
          

          Now, the only doubt I still have is to add or not add the noindex tag to the page when it is requested to be displayed in a different way (such as the "table view" or a different item display order). In my opinion, if I stick with the canonical tag I don't need a noindex directive. What do you think?

          mememax 1 Reply Last reply Apr 3, 2013, 6:53 PM Reply Quote 0
          • Dr-Pete
            Dr-Pete Staff @mememax last edited by Apr 3, 2013, 3:00 PM Apr 3, 2013, 3:00 PM

            Yeah, to be fair, I'm not clear on what all of the additional parameters (like "lpg=") do, so this can get tricky fast. Basically, look at it this way:

            If the URL is:
            example.com/page=3?param=x

            Then the tags should point to:

            Rel=prev:
            example.com/page=2?param=x

            Rel=next:
            example.com/page=4?param=x

            Rel=canonical:
            example.com/page=3 (no parameters)

            Some parameters may not be indexed and/or functional, though, so individual cases can vary. You may choose to ignore some parameters in Google Webmaster Tools, for example. It gets tricky as the parameter list grows.

            fablau 1 Reply Last reply Apr 3, 2013, 5:46 PM Reply Quote 0
            • fablau
              fablau @mememax last edited by Apr 3, 2013, 1:33 PM Apr 3, 2013, 1:32 PM

              Mememax, after thinking I have some doubts though about what you have suggested.

              Why I want to put a noindex tag to the page displaying the list in "table view" if I already have a canonical tag pointing to the "regular view" page? Wouldn't the canonical tag be enough for the purpose of telling that the "real" canonical page is the "regular view" version? I am asking this because if I want to apply a noindex tag to that kind of different view, I may want to do the same to the list displayed with a different order, and for any other different way of displaying the list, etc... hence just using the canonical tag would be appropriate, pointing always to the "regular list" view, no matter what kind of "filtering" or "different view' option is selected. What do you think?

              In other words, I don't think I need to include a noindex tag for any different kind of view the user requests as long as I provide a canonical tag pointing to the regular view list.

              Am I correct?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • fablau
                fablau @mememax last edited by Apr 2, 2013, 9:48 PM Apr 2, 2013, 9:48 PM

                Yes, thank you Mememax, I agree with you 100%. That makes perfect sense and I will work on that tomorrow morning. I am eager to know Dr. Peter thoughts and confirmation.

                On my side, I think I got it cleared-up now. Thank you very much again!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • fablau
                  fablau @Dr-Pete last edited by Apr 2, 2013, 9:46 PM Apr 2, 2013, 9:46 PM

                  Thank you ! That makes sense now.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • mememax
                    mememax @fablau last edited by Apr 2, 2013, 7:39 PM Apr 2, 2013, 7:39 PM

                    Hey Fabrizio, I think that what Google states in their guidelines is that you have two choices:

                    • if you have a view all page, you should noindex and follow all your other pages so google will deliver only that page
                    • if you don't have a view all page or if you prefer to show paginated series (i.e. to make pages lighter and quicker to deliver to users) you may consider to use rel next/prev.

                    In this second case it may happen that you also add filters or session ids in the urls of those pages, in that case you should consider adding a self referentail canonical tag to avoid duplicates. But this is only if you cover this case, if you're looking to canonicalize correctly your paginated series you may not use the self canonical tag, because if not properly implemented this may get you a bit of extra work.

                    In this page for example

                    I found this:

                    http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3&lpg=0">

                    Which  I don't think is what you want to do.

                    Also if you set the page to view as a table: your url changes to http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3&viewlistflag=1

                    and while the canonical should remain the same (well done but I think you should get rid of the lpg parameter in the canonical), the rel next prev should change accordingly IMO.

                    So instead of being:

                    prev: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=2&lpg=20
                    next: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=4&lpg=60

                    you should offer the next and prev page of the filtered url:

                    next: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=4&lpg=60&viewlistflag=1
                    prev: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=2&lpg=20&viewlistflag=1

                    Or in this case (since the content is almost the same you may consider the list page as the canonical of the table one putting there a noindex.

                    Summing up, IMO: in this page http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3

                    you'll have:

                    prev: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=4&lpg=60
                    next: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=2&lpg=20
                    (optional) a self canonical to http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3

                    In this page (and in other filtered pages if you have apply the same idea):
                    http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3&viewlistflag=1

                    You'll have:

                    noindex,follow and canonical to the list page:
                    http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3

                    maybe dr peter can correct me if I'm wrong but I think this should be more consistent like this. Sorry for the huge answer

                    fablau Dr-Pete 3 Replies Last reply Apr 3, 2013, 3:00 PM Reply Quote 0
                    • Dr-Pete
                      Dr-Pete Staff @fablau last edited by Apr 2, 2013, 4:17 PM Apr 2, 2013, 4:17 PM

                      Wow, yes - sorry about that. I've updated it. Google original write-up actually covers this case, too (it's toward the end):

                      http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/09/pagination-with-relnext-and-relprev.html

                      fablau 1 Reply Last reply Apr 2, 2013, 9:46 PM Reply Quote 0
                      • fablau
                        fablau @Dr-Pete last edited by Apr 2, 2013, 4:01 PM Apr 2, 2013, 4:01 PM

                        Please, have a look at the page below, I have modified the canonical tag as suggested:

                        http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3&lpg=40

                        Is that correct?

                        Thank you again very much.

                        mememax 1 Reply Last reply Apr 2, 2013, 7:39 PM Reply Quote 0
                        • fablau
                          fablau @Dr-Pete last edited by Apr 2, 2013, 3:53 PM Apr 2, 2013, 3:52 PM

                          Thank you Peter, I guess you meant to have the "canonical" tag as last tag in your example above, and also the previous rel=next and rel=prev definitions should be inverted:

                          Am I correct? That makes sense. If so, I will update my site to reflect this.

                          Thank you for the link!

                          Dr-Pete 1 Reply Last reply Apr 2, 2013, 4:17 PM Reply Quote 0
                          • Dr-Pete
                            Dr-Pete Staff @fablau last edited by Apr 2, 2013, 4:17 PM Apr 2, 2013, 3:03 PM

                            This gets tricky fast. Google currently wants rel=prev/next to contain the parameters currently in use (like sorts) for the page you're on and then wants you rel-canonical to the non-parameterized version. So, if the URL is:

                            http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=3&lpg=40

                            ...then the tags should be...

                            Yeah, it's a bit strange. They have suggested that it's ok to rel-canonical to a "View All" page, but with the kind of product volume you have, that's generally a bad idea (for users and search). The have specifically recommended against setting rel-canonical to Page 1 of search results, especially if you use rel=prev/next.

                            Rel=prev/next will still show pages in the index, but I've found it to work pretty well. The other option is the more classic approach to simple META NOINDEX, FOLLOW pages 2+. That can still be effective, but it's getting less common.

                            Adam Audette has generally strong posts about this topic - here's a good, recent one:

                            http://searchengineland.com/the-latest-greatest-on-seo-pagination-114284

                            fablau 2 Replies Last reply Apr 2, 2013, 4:01 PM Reply Quote 0
                            • fablau
                              fablau @Dr-Pete last edited by Apr 1, 2013, 7:10 PM Apr 1, 2013, 7:10 PM

                              Thank you for your post, and I think you have just opened a doubt I had, and that's exactly what also concerned me.

                              Have a look at this typical category page of ours:

                              http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html

                              For that category pagination, I have implemented the rel=prev/next as suggested by Google, but being afraid to be penalized for duplicate content, I also put a canonical tag pointing at the first page of that index. Should I have put the canonical tag pointing to the page series itself?

                              Something like:

                              http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html?cp=2

                              
                              for the second page instead of the general:
                              
                              

                              http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Guitar.html

                              as I am currently doing?

                              Thanks!

                              Dr-Pete 1 Reply Last reply Apr 2, 2013, 3:03 PM Reply Quote 0
                              • Dr-Pete
                                Dr-Pete Staff last edited by Apr 4, 2013, 11:01 AM Apr 1, 2013, 4:33 PM

                                I have to disagree on this one. If Google honors a canonical tag, the non-canonical page will generally disappear from the index, at least inasmuch as we can measure it (with "site:", getting it to rank, etc.). It's a strong signal in many cases.

                                This is part of the reason Google introduced rel=prev/next for paginated content. With canonical, pages in the series aren't usually able to rank. Rel=prev/next allows them to rank without clogging up the index (theoretically). For search pagination, it's generally a better solution.

                                If your paginated content is still showing in large quantities in the index, Google may not be honoring the canonical tag properly, and they could be causing duplicate content issues. It depends on the implementation, but they recommend these days that you don't canonical to the first page of search results. Google may choose to ignore the tag in some cases.

                                fablau 1 Reply Last reply Apr 1, 2013, 7:10 PM Reply Quote 4
                                • fablau
                                  fablau @mememax last edited by Mar 31, 2013, 10:12 PM Mar 31, 2013, 10:12 PM

                                  Thank you very much, that makes perfect sense. In my case, I am talking exactly about paginated content, and that's probably why all pages are in the index despite they are canonicalized to point to the main page. So, I guess that even if you have thousands of paginated pages indexed (mine is a pretty big e-commerce website), that's not going to be an issue. Am I right?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • mememax
                                    mememax last edited by Mar 31, 2013, 10:08 PM Mar 31, 2013, 7:40 PM

                                    Normally the only thing which will prevent a page from ranking is noindex tag. If you don't want to have it indexed just noindex it, if that page has been laready indexed, put the noindex tag and delete from index using GWT option.

                                    Concerning the canonical tag thing, it will consolidate the seo value in one page but it won't prevent those page to appear in rankings, however you may have two cases:

                                    1. the two or more pages are identical. In that case google may accept the canonicalization and show always the original page.
                                    2. the two or more pages are slightly different, it's the case of paginated pages which are canonicalized using rel next/prev. In that sense the whole value will be consolidated in page 1 but then the page which will be shown in the rankings will be the one which responds to that query, for example if someone is looking for blue glass, google will return the page which shows blue glass listing if that's different from the first one.

                                    Hope this may help you!

                                    fablau 1 Reply Last reply Mar 31, 2013, 10:12 PM Reply Quote 4
                                    • 1 / 1
                                    1 out of 17
                                    • First post
                                      1/17
                                      Last post

                                    Got a burning SEO question?

                                    Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.


                                    Start my free trial


                                    Browse Questions

                                    Explore more categories

                                    • Moz Tools

                                      Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

                                    • SEO Tactics

                                      Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

                                    • Community

                                      Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

                                    • Digital Marketing

                                      Chat about tactics outside of SEO

                                    • Research & Trends

                                      Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

                                    • Support

                                      Connect on product support and feature requests.

                                    • See all categories

                                    Related Questions

                                    • odihost

                                      Google does not want to index my page

                                      I have a site that is hundreds of page indexed on Google. But there is a page that I put in the footer section that Google seems does not like and are not indexing that page. I've tried submitting it to their index through google webmaster and it will appear on Google index but then after a few days it's gone again. Before that page had canonical meta to another page, but it is removed now.

                                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Feb 28, 2017, 3:58 AM | odihost
                                      0
                                    • Tylerj

                                      Should I use noindex or robots to remove pages from the Google index?

                                      I have a Magento site and just realized we have about 800 review pages indexed. The /review directory is disallowed in robots.txt but the pages are still indexed. From my understanding robots means it will not crawl the pages BUT if the pages are still indexed if they are linked from somewhere else. I can add the noindex tag to the review pages but they wont be crawled. https://www.seroundtable.com/google-do-not-use-noindex-in-robots-txt-20873.html Should I remove the robots.txt and add the noindex? Or just add the noindex to what I already have?

                                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Feb 28, 2017, 12:24 PM | Tylerj
                                      0
                                    • Andy.Drinkwater

                                      How long to re-index a page after being blocked

                                      Morning all! I am doing some research at the moment and am trying to find out, just roughly, how long you have ever had to wait to have a page re-indexed by Google. For this purpose, say you had blocked a page via meta noindex or disallowed access by robots.txt, and then opened it back up. No right or wrong answers, just after a few numbers 🙂 Cheers, -Andy

                                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jun 16, 2016, 11:42 AM | Andy.Drinkwater
                                      0
                                    • friendoffood

                                      Pages are Indexed but not Cached by Google. Why?

                                      Here's an example: I get a 404 error for this: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.qjamba.com/restaurants-coupons/ferguson/mo/all But a search for qjamba restaurant coupons gives a clear result as does this: site:http://www.qjamba.com/restaurants-coupons/ferguson/mo/all What is going on?  How can this page be indexed but not in the Google cache? I should make clear that the page is not showing up with any kind of error in webmaster tools, and Google has been crawling pages just fine.  This particular page was fetched by Google yesterday with no problems, and even crawled again twice today by Google  Yet, no cache.

                                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jan 30, 2015, 12:55 PM | friendoffood
                                      2
                                    • FPD_NYC

                                      De-indexing product "quick view" pages

                                      Hi there, The e-commerce website I am working on seems to index all of the "quick view" pages (which normally occur as iframes on the category page) as their own unique pages, creating thousands of duplicate pages / overly-dynamic URLs. Each indexed "quick view" page has the following URL structure: www.mydomain.com/catalog/includes/inc_productquickview.jsp?prodId=89514&catgId=cat140142&KeepThis=true&TB_iframe=true&height=475&width=700 where the only thing that changes is the product ID and category number. Would using "disallow" in Robots.txt be the best way to de-indexing all of these URLs? If so, could someone help me identify how to best structure this disallow statement? Would it be: Disallow: /catalog/includes/inc_productquickview.jsp?prodID=* Thanks for your help.

                                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Oct 16, 2013, 11:56 PM | FPD_NYC
                                      0
                                    • Rubix

                                      Do you add 404 page into robot file or just add no index tag?

                                      Hi, got different opinion on this so i wanted to double check with your comment is. We've got /404.html page and I was wondering if you would add this page to robot text so it wouldn't be indexed or would you just add no index tag? What would be the best approach? Thanks!

                                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Sep 13, 2013, 2:39 PM | Rubix
                                      0
                                    • NakulGoyal

                                      Wildcard Redirects & Canonical Tags

                                      I have an interesting situation. Current URLs Example1: www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234.html
                                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234-1.html
                                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234-1-1.html Canonical on All Above URLs:
                                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234.html New URL:
                                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-4567.html Current URLs Example2: www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234+10.html
                                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234+10-1.html
                                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234+10-1-1.html Canonical on All Above URLs:
                                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234+10.html New URL:
                                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-6789.html Current URLs Example3: www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234+10+5.html
                                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234+10+5-1.html
                                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234+10+5-1-1.html Canonical on All Above URLs:
                                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234+10+5.html New URL:
                                      www.domain.com/american-red-widgets-cid-6789+5.html I want to make sure all variations of the above URL redirect to the new URLs.  However, as you see in Example 3, we are dealing with variables that are passed on. (+5 in this case). Question 1: What wildcard 301 redirect / regular expression can I use to tackle these ? Question 2: If we redirect www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234+10+5.html to www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-6789+5.html and www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-6789+5.html contains the canonical tag www.domain.com/american-red-widgets-cid-6789+5.html, any concerns or red flags here ?

                                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Feb 5, 2013, 11:13 PM | NakulGoyal
                                      0
                                    • mhans

                                      Any penalty for having rel=canonical tags on every page?

                                      For some reason every webpage of our website (www.nathosp.com)  has a rel=canonical tag. I'm not sure why the previous SEO manager did this, but we don't have any duplicate content that would require a canonical tag. Should I remove these tags? And if so, what's the advantage - or disadvantage of leaving them in place? Thank you in advance for your help. -Josh Fulfer

                                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jan 30, 2016, 4:49 PM | mhans
                                      1

                                    Get started with Moz Pro!

                                    Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                                    Start my free trial
                                    Products
                                    • Moz Pro
                                    • Moz Local
                                    • Moz API
                                    • Moz Data
                                    • STAT
                                    • Product Updates
                                    Moz Solutions
                                    • SMB Solutions
                                    • Agency Solutions
                                    • Enterprise Solutions
                                    Free SEO Tools
                                    • Domain Authority Checker
                                    • Link Explorer
                                    • Keyword Explorer
                                    • Competitive Research
                                    • Brand Authority Checker
                                    • Local Citation Checker
                                    • MozBar Extension
                                    • MozCast
                                    Resources
                                    • Blog
                                    • SEO Learning Center
                                    • Help Hub
                                    • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                                    • How-to Guides
                                    • Moz Academy
                                    • API Docs
                                    About Moz
                                    • About
                                    • Team
                                    • Careers
                                    • Contact
                                    Why Moz
                                    • Case Studies
                                    • Testimonials
                                    Get Involved
                                    • Become an Affiliate
                                    • MozCon
                                    • Webinars
                                    • Practical Marketer Series
                                    • MozPod
                                    Connect with us

                                    Contact the Help team

                                    Join our newsletter
                                    Moz logo
                                    © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                                    • Accessibility
                                    • Terms of Use
                                    • Privacy

                                    Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.