undefined
Skip to content
Moz logo Menu open Menu close
  • Products
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Pro Home
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Home
    • STAT
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Home
    • Compare SEO Products
    • Moz Data
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis
    • Keyword Explorer
    • Link Explorer
    • Competitive Research
    • MozBar
    • More Free SEO Tools
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO
    • SEO Learning Center
    • Moz Academy
    • SEO Q&A
    • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Agency Solutions
    • Enterprise Solutions
    • Small Business Solutions
    • Case Studies
    • The Moz Story
    • New Releases
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Products
    • Moz Pro

      Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

    • Moz Local

      Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

    • STAT

      SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

    • Moz API

      Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

    • Compare SEO Products

      See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

    • Moz Data

      Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis

      Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

    • Keyword Explorer

      Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

    • Link Explorer

      Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

    • Competitive Research

      Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

    • MozBar

      See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

    • More Free SEO Tools

      Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO

      The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

    • SEO Learning Center

      Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

    • On-Demand Webinars

      Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

    • How-To Guides

      Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

    • Moz Academy

      Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

    • MozCon

      Save on Early Bird tickets and join us in London or New York City

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
    Moz API

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

    Find your plan
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Small Business Solutions

      Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

    • Agency Solutions

      Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

    • Enterprise Solutions

      Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

    • The Moz Story

      Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

    • Case Studies

      Explore how Moz drives ROI with a proven track record of success.

    • New Releases

      Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

    Surface actionable competitive intel
    New Feature

    Surface actionable competitive intel

    Learn More
  • Log in
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Dashboard
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Dashboard
    • Moz Academy
  • Avatar
    • Moz Home
    • Notifications
    • Account & Billing
    • Manage Users
    • Community Profile
    • My Q&A
    • My Videos
    • Log Out

The Moz Q&A Forum

  • Forum
  • Questions
  • Users
  • Ask the Community

Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

  1. Home
  2. SEO Tactics
  3. Technical SEO
  4. New "Static" Site with 302s

Moz Q&A is closed.

After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

New "Static" Site with 302s

Technical SEO
5
11
4.8k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as question
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
  • danny.wood
    danny.wood last edited by Oct 15, 2013, 1:24 PM

    Hey all,

    Came across a bit of an interesting challenge recently, one that I was hoping some of you might have had experience with!

    We're currently in the process of a website rebuild, for which I'm really excited. The new site is using Markdown to create an entirely static site. Load-times are fantastic, and the code is clean. Life is good, apart from the 302s.

    One of the weird quirks I've realized is that with oldschool, non-server-generated page content is that every page of the site is an Index.html file in a directory. The resulting in a www.website.com/page-title will 302 to www.website.com/page-title/.

    My solution off the bat has been to just be super diligent and try to stay on top of the link profile and send lots of helpful emails to the staff reminding them about how to build links, but I know that even the best laid plans often fail.

    Has anyone had a similar challenge with a static site and found a way to overcome it?

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
    • arun76
      arun76 @danny.wood last edited by Nov 8, 2013, 5:38 PM Nov 8, 2013, 5:38 PM

      Wow. I wasn't expecting such a detailed and awesome answer Danny. Thanks so much, I'm in the process of migrating away from S3 anyways (for other reasons) though you're right in that I'm going to miss the cost & load times.

      I'm using Middleman for now, though the technical part of my brain is indeed interested in how you're going to accomplish the Jekyll solution. I'll look out for your post!

      And thanks for the tip on my site. Another thing to add to the list 🙂

      Arun

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • danny.wood
        danny.wood @arun76 last edited by Nov 8, 2013, 5:22 PM Nov 8, 2013, 5:22 PM

        Hey Arun,

        Thanks for posting! I was beginning to think that I was the only Inbound guy anywhere that had to deal with this kind of issue 😉

        Yup, I created the same bug with redirect loops trying to get around the slash issue. The problem is that S3 doesn't consider the slash as part of the rewrite data unless something comes after it.

        Ultimately, my number one suggestion would be to go with a different service that allows you to install a Server App like Nginx or Apache. Others have agreed that redirections set up through a server app are the way that they feel the most comfortable that link equity is being passed.

        If you're dead-set on S3, which I would understand as the load times are crazy-awesome-insane, I may have a solution for you soon. Our dev team is working on a script for Jekyll + S3 sites that will essentially create extension-less files (i.e. example.com/contact) that contain meta refresh + rel canon.

        The script will use a list of desired redirections + rules that is structured the same way an htaccess file would be. I can't speak to how it will get past S3's default 302ing yet, but I know that it will use CURL. Look for a YouMoz post soon from me!

        Anyways, I hope my notes here help! I'm gonna try and make that post soon after the script is created. Just as a last note, in taking a look at your site I noticed that a lot of the internal links on your homepage don't have the trailing slash in them. I would definitely start there and add those slashes, and perform a "submit page + linked page" to Webmaster Tools after!

        arun76 1 Reply Last reply Nov 8, 2013, 5:38 PM Reply Quote 2
        • arun76
          arun76 last edited by Nov 8, 2013, 2:41 PM Nov 8, 2013, 2:41 PM

          Hi Danny-

          I've got the exact same issue (static site on S3 redirecting with 302s), and surprisingly can't find a lot of information out there. If I do a S3 metadata based redirect from (for example) /blog to /blog/ I just end up in a redirect loop.

          I checked out your site and it still looks like you're working on it. Did you end up figuring anything out? If there's any way that I can help get to a solution I'd be happy to spend some time on it.

          Thanks!

          Arun

          danny.wood 1 Reply Last reply Nov 8, 2013, 5:22 PM Reply Quote 0
          • topic:timeago_earlier,23 days
          • danny.wood
            danny.wood @DaveSottimano last edited by Oct 16, 2013, 4:49 PM Oct 16, 2013, 4:49 PM

            Thanks for the reply David!

            Yup, I think that this has just been a case of wrapping my head around a new way of doing things (i.e. redirections in the AWS bucket config rather than using .htdocs). Static sites are a crazy combination of complicated and simple!

            Thanks! We're using Jekyll somewhat, although we've had issues with the image hosting. I've actually had better results using the local github client + "Mou", a local Markdown editor.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • MatShepSEO
              MatShepSEO @danny.wood last edited by Oct 16, 2013, 4:19 PM Oct 16, 2013, 3:41 PM

              Nice! (for speed at least)

              I would show your team some examples of external URLs pointing at the non trailing slash versions of your pages and explain the downside of the 302 redirect. Also consider that people and bots visiting those URLs will be adding overhead to your server, and on Amazon that will equal increased cost (small as it may be, the pennies add up!)

              Reading the link you provided it looks like the default behaviour of the page metadata redirect under the s3 console is to create a 301 redirect. That makes me think the 302 is coming from somewhere else. Look at the following URL:

              http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/HowDoIWebsiteConfiguration.html

              It looks like you can add advanced redirects under "Enable website hosting -> edit redirection rules". I'd explore if there are redirects listed there and maybe chat to your developers further.

              While you are it I spotted two other issues for you to consider. Currently the index.html files in your directories resolve to the same page as your main directory. I would 301 those pages back to the parent directory (slash version). Or you could add canonical URLs pointing back to the parent directory (with trailing slash). I'd make a case for adding canonical URLs to all pages.

              Also, you currently have a number of redirect chains e.g.

              http://www.strutta.com/resources/posts/share-your-contests-and-sweepstakes-all-over-social-media 301 redirects to http://www.strutta.com/resources which 302 redirects to http://www.strutta.com/resources/.

              You need to find the original redirect and change it to 301 redirect to the trailing slash version of the directory. Screaming Frog can help you find these redirect chains.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • DaveSottimano
                DaveSottimano @danny.wood last edited by Oct 16, 2013, 3:37 PM Oct 16, 2013, 3:37 PM

                Hi Danny!

                I don't have much to add here, I think the guys have it right in that you'll need to figure out how to make the 301 work. I quickly read that documentation, then realized I wasn't a robot, so I found this: http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2012/10/amazon-s3-support-for-website-redirects.html which was a bit more friendly.

                I wish I could help you out more, but I'm not using AWS. I'm assuming you'll be able to use wildcard or regex matching somewhere, and that should solve your problem.

                Great site by the way, anything you're using to help out with the static blog? (Jekyll, Octopress?)

                danny.wood 1 Reply Last reply Oct 16, 2013, 4:49 PM Reply Quote 2
                • danny.wood
                  danny.wood @MatShepSEO last edited by Oct 16, 2013, 3:18 PM Oct 16, 2013, 3:18 PM

                  Follow-up answer:

                  Our new website (Strutta.com) is entirely static, hosted on S3. No Apache, just straight HTML files. No apache means no htaccess.

                  Instead of using htaccess, we have to use the S3 Console: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/how-to-page-redirect.html

                  As far as I can tell, this sets up redirects the same way. Although this doesn't answer my initial question, I'm going to try using the control panel later on today to see if 301ing the directories there to include the / will get recognized before whatever is causing the 302 currently

                  DaveSottimano MatShepSEO 2 Replies Last reply Oct 16, 2013, 3:41 PM Reply Quote 1
                  • danny.wood
                    danny.wood @MatShepSEO last edited by Oct 16, 2013, 3:00 PM Oct 16, 2013, 3:00 PM

                    Thanks all,

                    I think the problem is coming from the fact that we're hosted on Amazon Webservices, and the devs are using the "aws bucket config" settings to institute redirects instead of htaccess. SEO vs Dev Battle time.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • MatShepSEO
                      MatShepSEO last edited by Oct 16, 2013, 3:00 PM Oct 16, 2013, 2:43 PM

                      Hey Danny,

                      As Maximilian suggested above the best solution is going to be to change those 302s to 301s. I generally like to redirect to trailing slash URLs for directories and non trailing slash URLs for files/pages (that's that standard convention). I find in practice hardly anyone who links organically ever includes a trailing slash when linking to a page, but when it's the homepage I don't worry about it too much, browsers and Google can figure that out.

                      Basically you need to figure out where the 302 is coming from and hopefully it is in your .htaccess file. If you can edit your .htaccess file you need to change that to a 301 redirect, or you could remove the redirect and just use a canonical URL pointing at the / version of the page. I would prefer to go with the 301 though. Just be sure to look at how these redirects are being implemented and in what order, you don't want to end up with redirect chains either.

                      Can you get access to your .htaccess file or is the server running something funky?

                      danny.wood 2 Replies Last reply Oct 16, 2013, 3:18 PM Reply Quote 1
                      • Milian
                        Milian last edited by Oct 16, 2013, 3:00 PM Oct 15, 2013, 11:41 PM

                        Perhaps this is too obvious, but can you not change the 302 to 301's?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • 1 / 1
                        1 out of 11
                        • First post
                          1/11
                          Last post

                        Got a burning SEO question?

                        Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.


                        Start my free trial


                        Browse Questions

                        Explore more categories

                        • Moz Tools

                          Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

                        • SEO Tactics

                          Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

                        • Community

                          Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

                        • Digital Marketing

                          Chat about tactics outside of SEO

                        • Research & Trends

                          Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

                        • Support

                          Connect on product support and feature requests.

                        • See all categories

                        Related Questions

                        • CREW-MARKETING

                          Quick Fix to "Duplicate page without canonical tag"?

                          When we pull up Google Search Console, in the Index Coverage section, under the category of Excluded, there is a sub-category called ‘Duplicate page without canonical tag’.  The majority of the 665 pages in that section are from a test environment. If we were to include in the robots.txt file, a wildcard to cover every URL that started with the particular root URL ("www.domain.com/host/"), could we eliminate the majority of these errors? That solution is not one of the 5 or 6 recommended solutions that the Google Search Console Help section text suggests.  It seems like a simple effective solution.  Are we missing something?

                          Technical SEO | Nov 13, 2018, 1:07 PM | CREW-MARKETING
                          1
                        • tbinga

                          Schema markup for products is missing "price": Is this bad?

                          Hey guys, So a current client of mine has an e-commerce shop with a few hundred products. They purposely choose to keep the prices off of their website, which is causing errors in Google Webmaster Tools. Basically the error shows: Error: Structured Data > Product (markup: schema.org) Error type: missing price 208 items with error Is this a huge deal? Or are we allowed to have non-numerical prices for schema ie. "call for quote"

                          Technical SEO | Aug 29, 2014, 4:15 PM | tbinga
                          1
                        • Jeepster

                          Rel="Follow"? What the &#@? does that mean?

                          I've written a guest blog post for a site. In the link back to my site they've put a rel="follow" attribute. Is that valid HTML? I've Googled it but the answers are inconclusive, to say the least.

                          Technical SEO | Feb 15, 2013, 4:58 PM | Jeepster
                          0
                        • eli.boda

                          Does the rel="bookmark" tag have any SEO impication?

                          I'm assuming the rel="bookmark" tag doesn't have any SEO implications but I just wanted to make sure it wasn't viewed like a nofollow by search engines.

                          Technical SEO | Jul 6, 2012, 11:13 PM | eli.boda
                          0
                        • ChrisRoberts-MTI

                          NoIndex/NoFollow pages showing up when doing a Google search using "Site:" parameter

                          We recently launched a beta version of our new website in a subdomain of our existing site. The existing site is www.fonts.com with the beta living at new.fonts.com. We do not want Google to crawl the new site until it's out of beta so we have added the following on all pages: However, one of our team members noticed that google is displaying results from new.fonts.com when doing an "site:new.fonts.com" search (see attached screenshot). Is it possible that Google is indexing the content despite the noindex, nofollow tags? We have double checked the syntax and it seems correct except the trailing "/". I know Google still crawls noindexed pages, however, the fact that they're showing up in search results using the site search syntax is unsettling. Any thoughts would be appreciated! DyWRP.png

                          Technical SEO | May 4, 2012, 7:08 PM | ChrisRoberts-MTI
                          0
                        • Sharer

                          Rel="external"

                          Hi all, I got a link and its off a site and marked up with rel="external". Is this a followed or nofollowed link? Does it pass link juice? Thanks

                          Technical SEO | May 1, 2012, 5:42 PM | Sharer
                          0
                        • dcmike

                          Hyphenated Domain Names - "Spammy" or Not?

                          Some say hyphenated domain names are "spammy". I have also noticed that Moz's On Page Keyword Tool does NOT recognize keywords in a non-hyphenated domain name. So one would assume neither do the bots. I noticed obviously misleading words like car in carnival or spa in space or spatula, etc embedded in domain names and pondered the effect. I took it a step further with non-hyphenated domain names. I experimented by selecting totally random three or four letter blocks - Example: randomfactgenerator.net - rand omf act gene rator Each one of those clips returns copious results AND the On-Page Report Card does not credit the domain name as containing "random facts" as keywords**,** whereas www.business-sales-sarasota.com does get credit for "business sales sarasota" in the URL. This seems an obvious situation - unhyphenated domains can scramble the keywords and confuse the bots, as they search all possible combinations. YES -  I know the content should carry it but - I do not believe domain names are irrelevant, as many say. I don't believe that hyphenated domain names are not more efficient than non hyphenated ones - as long as you don't overdo it. I have also seen where a weak site in an easy market  will quickly top the list because the hyphenated domain name matches the search term - I have done it (in my pre Seo Moz days) with ft-myers-auto-air.com. I built the site in a couple of days and in a couple weeks it was on page one. Any thoughts on this?

                          Technical SEO | Oct 11, 2011, 11:27 AM | dcmike
                          0
                        • gallantc

                          Starting a new product, should we use new domain or subdomain

                          I'm working with a company that has a high page rank on it's main domain and is looking to launch a new business / product offering.  They are evaluating either creating a subdomain or launching a brand new domain.  In either case, their current site will link contextually to the new site.  Is there one method that would be better for SEO than the other? The new business / product is related to the main offering, but may appeal to different / new customers.  The new business / product does need it's own homepage and will have a different conversion funnel than the existing business.

                          Technical SEO | Aug 30, 2011, 6:21 PM | gallantc
                          0

                        Get started with Moz Pro!

                        Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                        Start my free trial
                        Products
                        • Moz Pro
                        • Moz Local
                        • Moz API
                        • Moz Data
                        • STAT
                        • Product Updates
                        Moz Solutions
                        • SMB Solutions
                        • Agency Solutions
                        • Enterprise Solutions
                        Free SEO Tools
                        • Domain Authority Checker
                        • Link Explorer
                        • Keyword Explorer
                        • Competitive Research
                        • Brand Authority Checker
                        • Local Citation Checker
                        • MozBar Extension
                        • MozCast
                        Resources
                        • Blog
                        • SEO Learning Center
                        • Help Hub
                        • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                        • How-to Guides
                        • Moz Academy
                        • API Docs
                        About Moz
                        • About
                        • Team
                        • Careers
                        • Contact
                        Why Moz
                        • Case Studies
                        • Testimonials
                        Get Involved
                        • Become an Affiliate
                        • MozCon
                        • Webinars
                        • Practical Marketer Series
                        • MozPod
                        Connect with us

                        Contact the Help team

                        Join our newsletter
                        Moz logo
                        © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                        • Accessibility
                        • Terms of Use
                        • Privacy

                        Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.