Question about understanding Google Ranking System
-
Hi,
I have too many question that I need answer to understand Google ranking system. I have been analyzing different website in different niche, but puzzling to understand how Google rank actually. Some websites have good number of backlinks with good SEO metrics, but some low SEO profiled websiites outrank good sites.
I am here with my first question.
I am working for one client website who sell sex toys online. So we are optimizing keywords like sex toys, buy sex toys, sex shop, sex toy store and too many keywords to rank on google.ca. My client website is cupidboutique.com. We have some competitors that I want to mention below:
1. PinkCherry: This is one of our big competitor. They have 2 domain one is for US and one is for Canada. Both websites ranking well for different keywords. Basically .ca domain is more successful than .com domain. But I am surprise why Google consider the websites for rank. If you see, both websites are identical, that means both website have same product, same category structure, and the most important all products description are duplicate on each domain. On google webmaster guideline, google mention that if 2 domain have identical content, then Google ignore the duplicate one in ranking. But still both websites ranking for different search term.
I compare the SEO metrics of our domain and their .ca domain, there is not big difference. Our websites also have good number of links, good PA/DA, even more good number of social sharing than them. But our rankings are not even comparable with them. They are ranking within 20-30th on Google for different product category keywords, but not our.
2. Hushcanada: This is another website ranking well, but I a surprise how? This website is ranking on very high competitive keyword with very fewer number of backlinks. Their PA/DA, number of backlinks, social sharing all metrics are very few. Their business also established recently that is 2013, which I found through archive.org, whereas our client business has been running since 2003-2004. As a Ecommerce business website their homepage is not showing any product , their catalog can be found under "shop online" page only.
There are even some more websites ranking well with very low SEO metrics in this niche.
If Google is not looking for these SEO staff, then what other staff Google looks to rank website?
Hope I will get some favorable answer of my question.
-
I'm having trouble getting hotme.ca to rank for anything competitive - I can get it in #1 for "Toronto sex toys", but here you've got a strong local SEO impact, which could easily over-ride a lot of standard organic signals.
In most cases, it's not that they're hiding anything in their link profile, but one of a few explanations:
(1) Other sites have inflated PA/DA due to spammy links. We've just introduced spam scoring recently, but keep in mind that PA/DA are generally measures of overall ranking strength, and they don't account for quality/spam. In an industry where spammy is common, and especially when you've got tons of sites in the 20s and 30s, these numbers can leave out a lot.
(2) We're not crawling a lot of the weaker or lower-quality links. We tend to take a quality-over-quantity approach in MozScape, but if an entire industry relies on low-quality links, Google could be seeing more than we're seeing.
(3) Other factors are over-riding these link signals, as Massimiliano says. On-page is definitely one, technical issues is another, and local factors (as I mentioned above).
When someone is masking a link profile, what we usually see is that they're 301-redirecting other domains to that domain (and we aren't seeing those links directly). Typically, though we'd see those 301-redirects, and I'm not seeing that for hotme.ca.
Truth is, if they are doing something unethical, there's almost nothing you can do about it, unless it's flat-out illegal. In SEO, chasing your competitors bad behavior is almost always a completely waste of time - believe me, I've done it for clients (and it was a colossal waste of time and money). You have to focus on your site and what you can do.
-
First, I really think you are underestimating the importance of on-page optimization. If you read that backlinks are all that it matters, it's true, but given that the html code is not a mess. And even so, when comparing two websites with a similar backlink profile, the more on-page optimized wins.
Second, let's take hotme.ca, for which keywords are you analyzing its ranking?
-
Guys,
Please lets talk about a specific topic. What you said about our website I will fix the things.
So I have some specific question on the websites that ranking high in this niche. As I said previously most of websites ranking in this niche, showing very few backlinks as well as low DA/PA and all scores showing as on majestic, Hrefs and open site explorer. What I guess they are either hiding the backlink data or there are something that I am not able to find out.
No# 1 website in this niche is spencersonline.com and this is vital that this website ranking on #1. All of their SEO score is very high as compare to other competitor's website.
Open Site Explorer Data for this website:
PA/DA: 61/68, Number of linking root domain: 3370, Facebook/Twitter/Google Plus sharing: 2830/1575/1141
Now I am showing you some websites that ranking on good position in this niche, with low score:
hotme.ca:
DA/PA: 24/28, Linking Root Domain: 14 Only, Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus sharing: 750/93/296industrialuv.com
DA/PA: 25/37, Linking Root Domain: 40 Only, Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus sharing: 0/15/78loveshop.ca
DA/PA: 20/30, Linking Root Domain: 24 Only, Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus sharing: 7/3/3hushcanada.com
DA/PA: 22/30, Linking Root Domain: 23 Only, Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus sharing: 11/16/20Can you think that a website with only 14 linking root domain can rank in such a high competitive niche. I am asking do these websites hiding their backlinks or are they doing unethical way to rank high?
-
So, I've got you around #43 for "adult sex toys" (just to pick one), and PinkCherry.ca around #11.
It's tough, because there are a ton of sites in the first few pages with DA/PAs in the 20s-40s. This is a tricky range that covers a lot of sites - it's not particularly strong, and it can be easily skewed by bad links or hurt by technical issues.
I don't see any evidence of an outright penalty situation. I see a lot of small technical issues and sub-optimal on-page (such as the internal linking mentioned on Massimiliano's comments) that could make a difference, but it's hard to say how much of a difference.
At first glance, I do tend to agree that the link profile is dubious. I see a ton of free directory links, for example. They range from ok to things that look outright spammy, like:
http://seolinkcloud.org/Society_/Sexuality/?p=15
Now, any one of these directories by itself is no big deal, but if you have a link profile built on this stuff and a lack of a strong core to offset it, you can end up seeing your site devalued. Unfortunately, when you're in that 30s range for DA, this is a common problem - the strong links aren't strong enough to offset the moderately spammy links.
The good news is that I think some small-scale link clean-up, a focus on stronger/better links, and some technical changes could actually go a long way for you. I'm not seeing a smoking gun here (and admittedly Q&A can't replace a full audit), but mostly a lot of small things that may be adding up to harm the site.
-
I'd tend to agree that the top menu is spreading link equity far and wide - I'm seeing something like 800 internal links from the home-page. It doesn't give Google any sense of hierarchy and could really be harming the top category pages from performing well.
This home-page size is also huge - I know that's not uncommon for an e-commerce site, but you've got something like 1MB just of Javascript and multiple 200K images. This isn't penalty-level stuff, but it can really weaken your ability to rank, and generally isn't great for conversion either. The giant scrolling banner images would be an easy thing to lose - I don't know of one UX/conversion person who thinks those are good for sales, and they just take a huge amount of code and load-time.
-
That megamenu is giving that page too many external links.
Choose a main keyword for each page and optimize for it, choose some (few sematically related) secondary keywords and try to optimize the page for them without jeopardaizing the first.
Please go again through MOZ guides and blog post and very nice whiteboard friday videos to better understand what "optimize" mean.
Once done if you will look back at the source code of those pages you will notice yourself they don't smell nicely.
Depending on the keyword competition level you may need to get some backlinks for those keywords, which means generate good quality links from relevant websites, within relevant content, without a spammy anchor, etc...
Work page by page, keyword by keyword. It's a long and draining process.
-
Hi,
Thank you for your reply. I don't understand what you say by "that megamenu is overkilling with external links". Can you please explain what you mean by that?
You are saying about pagegrader and onpage SEO of Hushcanada.
This website is ranking for different keywords like "sex toys", "sex toys online", "sex shop", "sex store".
But no any keyword phrase they even mentioned on any part of their website. Only "sex toy" keyword has been mentioned on title tag. For each keyword Moz page grader gave "F" grade. For a low competitive keyword it can be acceptable, but they are ranking with such a high competitive keyword.
There are some more niche, that I am seeing this type of ranking puzzle. Do you think that Google take some other major metrics to rank a website?
-
If I look at your backlink profile with ahrefs, there's few I don't like, I am referring to anchortexts stuffed with keywords which doesn't look natural to me, and I assume google would not consider them natural either.
Your competitor pinkcherry doesn't look much better, but that should not give you much comfort. And btw they have much more linking root domains so they beat you anyhow.
It's the on page which is really an issue in my opinion. Just starting with following advices from MOZ page grader would help a lot.
Take this page http://www.cupidboutique.com/vibrators which I assume from your early comment you would like to see ranked better than your competitors for the keyword "vibrators", and look at the source code. Starting from the head there's a lot I don't like, if you want to rank for vibrators, trim the title, that megamenu is overkilling with external links, the keyword density is overwhelming, and 50 h2 tag are simply too much. And content is thin.
You should rethink it. If you look at hushcanada.com page source for their best ranking results for the keyword vibrators you will see it's much much much better.
Pinkcherry rules because of the links, hushcanada beat you because of their onpage.
-
Hi,
Yes I know pinkcherry.ca have some more number of backlinks than us, but not that much high as compare to our website. But hushcanada have very fewer number of backlinks, but if you see, their rankings are even better than pinkcherry and our website. For many keywords (such as sex toys, sex toys online, sex shop) they rank on first page.
Regarding backlinks anchor text, no website have anchor rich backlinks, most of anchor texts are irrelevant to keywords. I checked using Hrefs and Majestic SEO too.
As you said something wrong on my onpage, whats wrong are you saying about. I did not do any different things.
Thank you.
-
Hi Peter,
Thank you for your response. As per your questions, I am providing below some keyword ranking comparison for our website and pinkcherry:
sex toys: Pinkcherry.ca - 27, Cupidboutique.com - nowhere
adult toys - Pinkcherry.ca - 17, Cupidboutique.com - nowhere
adult sex toys - Pinkcherry.ca - 12, Cupidboutique.com - 60
Vibrators - Pinkcherry.ca - 12, Cupidboutique.com - Nowhere
These are some example only. There are too many keywords that they are rankings, but not we.
Now I am showing you their duplicate product URL pages:
http://www.pinkcherry.ca/5-function-p-e-prostate-massager-vibe-in-black
http://www.pinkcherry.com/5-function-p-e-prostate-massager-vibe-in-black
http://www.pinkcherry.ca/9-function-p-e-prostate-massager-vibe-in-black
http://www.pinkcherry.com/9-function-p-e-prostate-massager-vibe-in-black
http://www.pinkcherry.ca/anal-fantasy-beginner-s-fantasy-kit
http://www.pinkcherry.com/anal-fantasy-beginner-s-fantasy-kit
These are also just example, all of their products are duplicate each other.
Can you please analyze this and inform me what they are doing to achieve good ranking, which I am not doing.
Thank You.
<colgroup><col width="197"></colgroup>
| adult sex toys | -
I can see the total number of referring domains decreasing for cupidboutique.com while it's increasing for the two others. That's not good.
Usual metrics, like DA/Trust etc... are definitely better for pinkcherry who also has more backlinks, but cupidboutique values are supposely better than hushcanada.
But... The count of positions in SERP top 50 is surprisingly low for cupidboutique (209) when compared to pinkcherry (1.2k) and hushcanada (823), something is definitely wrong with your SEO on-page in my opinion; but it could also be your backlink profile, you should check anchor text diversity and backlink diversity.
-
Could you provide a sample of a couple of phrases where you're popping up below these competitors?
In the case of Pink Cherry, there are many ways to operate a .com and .ca site without it looking like duplicate content to Google. If the sites are properly targeted, and Google doesn't think they're trying to "double dip", so to speak (rank two identical sites in one country), they can operate two sites in English without any penalties. There are risks and trade-offs, but it can certainly be done successfully.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Linkedin question
Hello Mozzers, In April we split our company in two, creating a new company in the process. We updated our Linkedin company page with the new branding etc, but I can't find anywhere we can change the url, which is still the old company trading style name. I've sent a support ticket to Linkedin, but I don't expect an answer all that fast so was wondering if any of you had experience with this problem and could point me in the right direction? Thank you so much! Amelia
Social Media | | CommT0 -
How do we rank 2nd for this keyword
Hello, We want to rank 2nd for this keyword: NLP Training Here's our site: nlpca.com We currently rank near the bottom of the first page. What we have to work with: One top authority person in our field, with a little bit of time to write content, one other top authority person with a little more time, One very skilled employee that has a long history in our field, is not an authority, but writes good blog posts. She writes some of the content, the authorities write the rest. What else we have to work with: We can't really do outreach in this industry as it would be weird to send all of our competitors, which are also our colleagues and friends, link requests. I don't think it would be appropriate to ask people to share or +1 us either. We can produce content, we've added a blog and we're adding a "What is NLP?" Article. We have good video capability. Also, perhaps an infographic would help as a linkable asset, but I don't know what that could be about. Maybe an eye accessing cues infographic - see this page on eye accessing cues - http://www.nlp-practitioners.com/interactive/nlp-eye-access-cues-game.php Basically, there is general knowledge about the differences in eye accessing cues from person to person and culture to culture. I assume we need something to boost our DA. Anyways, your thoughts on how we can move up for "NLP Training"?
Social Media | | BobGW0 -
FB Sharing Contest Tracking Question?
We are going to give-a-way a PS4 through a social media contest. Likes, g+ circles and shares, but I wasn't sure if there was a problem tracking shares. I always thought I could just look at my FB posts and it would say how many shares. All I want to do is people to give someone an extra entry for sharing one of my post on his or her FB page. However, I've read that tracking shares can be difficult. I think the shares that are difficult to track are the ones beyond what I need, like if a 3rd party shared it or something, but I'm not sure. I want the contest to be as accurate as possible. Can anybody confirm or correct my thinking, please? Happy Thanksgiving Eve! Ruben
Social Media | | KempRugeLawGroup0 -
Google Play rankings?
Hi everyone, I've spent the last hour or two googling information on Google Play app rankings, and a few websites mention that standard pagerank of the app page is taken into account when calculating rankings. This seems to make sense, though I'd estimate it's probably not a large factor, with daily downloads being a much higher factor IMO. So my question is, how much of a factor does standard link-building for a Google Play app webpage have in the rankings?. We're trying to increase exposure of an app we've built (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.onedirection), and though we seem to have more downloads, reviews and +1's than others, we seem to be ranking beneath them. Thanks, Chris.
Social Media | | PixelKicks1 -
Google+ Is this listing Claimed or Not?
I'm working on a dentist website. I logged in using their gmail account. I then searched for the practice name with the city and state then found their listing. I clicked on the link that has the Google reviews and it brought me to their Google+ page. If I click on Manage this page, it takes me to my client Google places dashboard page where I can edit some information.... even though I am having a hard time uploading images. Getting a "Cannot upload images at this time" Error The weird thing is that if I hit the browser back button and then Manage this page again, it takes me to the page where I can claim the business. I click on the blue link that says "If you own this place, claim it and edit it directly", I get a message that says "You may only access listings that you own. If you created this listing with a different Google Account, please log into that account and try again. If you've deleted this listing, you may create it again in Google Places Any clues on what is going on? Please see images attached. iyonJ.jpg Zqe7K.jpg
Social Media | | Czubmeister0 -
Would great contents alone, be enough for ranking high?
Hi and thank you everyone for reading this post. Recently I had purchased a business including the domain. The website has been around for over 10 years with some links pointing back to it including couple of links from dmoz. I am in the process of up dating the website but most of the pages are not relevant anymore and thus will not be in the new website. I have couple of questions: 1. Since some of those old pages are getting some backlinks, would it be prudent to keep the url and 301 it to say homepage or another page? I want to work out the best way of utilising the current backlinks. Is this the best way? 2. The website is in a highly competitive industry and I want to add a lot of informative contents. The contents will be well written (professionally) and not for the sake of SEO but for providing valuable information for users. Whilst I'm adding the contents, what would be best way of drawing attention of the potential users to it? If I release the same content as a way of notes in its FB page, would that be considered as duplicate content in the eyes of Google? Or should I just share the link on FB? What are the other mediums available that considered to be effective for sharing contents. I'm also thinking about guest blogging for selected blogs. Would this be an effective way of increasing the authority of my website? I should say that at the moment the site has a PA of 44 for the homepage and DA of 35. Are these numbers OK? Thanks again.
Social Media | | nojan0 -
What can Google tell from a video?
I notice that Youtube apparently does kind of an automatic transcription. What can Google tell about a video? Is it comparing text from a voice recognition transcript? Can it take compare the waveform of a video signal and see how different a video is from another video? I'm putting together a variety of videos that are similar for different pages and wondering how much do I have to change for each video. I remember one time I attempted to launch a video that was an exact copy but with a different file name, title and tags and Youtube said, "hey, that's the same video!" Thanks!
Social Media | | 945010 -
Google Plus 1 button appearance
Has anyone had issues with the creative control google is maintaining with the Plus 1 button. I have a client who is very strict on their design structure and wants to make the google button appear in style with their theme. Has anyone encountered this or knows a moderately easy solution besides hacking away? THanks!
Social Media | | malachiii0