Negative SEO Click Bot Lowering My CTR?
-
I am questioning whether one of our competitors is using a click bot to do negative SEO on our CTR for our industry's main term.
Is there any way to detect this activity?
Background:
We've previously been hit by DoS attacks from this competitor, so I'm sure their ethics/morals wouldn't prevent them from doing negative SEO.
We sell an insurance product that is only offered through broker networks (insurance agents) not directly by the insurance carriers themselves. However, our suspect competitor (another agency) and insurance carriers are the only ones who rank on the 1st page for our biggest term. I don't think the carrier sites would do very well since they don't even sell the product directly (they have pages w/ info only)
Our site and one other agency site pops onto the bottom of page one periodically, only to be bumped back to page 2. I fear they are using a click bot that continuously bounces us out of page 1...then we do well relatively to the other pages on page 2 and naturally earn our way back to page 1, only to be pushed back to page 2 by the negative click seo...is my theory.
Is there anything I can do to research whether my theory is right or if I'm just being paranoid?
-
Thanks! I figured as much, but I wanted to hear it from another guru rather than assuming on my own.
I appreciate it
-
Google do not use it in a page's ranking (see here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgBw9tbAQhU). And since the referral spam is never actually on your site, but only activating your tracking code it shouldn't hurt you.
Besides, I don't think I've seen a site out there who hasn't been hit by referral spam. Some haven't been hit as hard, but still have seen it to some degree. Just set up some filters & segments so you can analyse on the real data. I found it very helpful to read this and this.
-
Thanks! I agree with everything you said. We'll be sure to remove and disavow any negative links.
As you can see from the images I posted above, we are getting quite a bit of referral spam that we need to address.
Any idea if the referral spam can negatively impact Google measurement of user experience / dwell time? I don't simply want to block it in analytics if it is poorly reflecting on our site.
-
Hi there
From an organic standpoint, I am really not sure - maybe someone can take a look for you there.
You could (and really should) check your referral spam (here's another resource) - from there you can remove and disavow possible links that are hurting your profile.
But again, from an organic standpoint, I am not entirely sure, and even then, I am not sure how you can prove it's malicious without hard proof.
I would focus on the links above and see what moves the needle for you. That's really the most you can do from my vantage point at the moment.
Hope this helps! Good luck!
-
Great links Patrick!
These are all things we're constantly working on. The info on dwell time was of particular interest. Thanks!
We might be wearing tin foil hats a bit, but the past actions of the competition have unfortunately led us down that path of thinking.
Is there any way for us to try to confirm whether click bots are being used to artificially boost the rankings of sites for a particular keyword? I can't think of any way to detect that activity.
-
Here are what sites it appears to be coming from.
-
Great tip Tim! You were right on the money. Thank you so much
We did find Russian bots with awful user experience hitting our site starting in April. My webmaster is looking in how to handle this. Any suggestions to get him started?
-
I don't believe they are clicking on my site and providing Google data that I have a bad user experience.
Instead, I think they may be providing an artificially good experience for their site and others that don't directly sell our product. As a result, my user experience is lowered relative to the others.
Once again, it's just a theory based on their prior behavior and what is actually showing in the SERPS, but something I am concerned about. If I'm right, I don't believe I'll be able to detect, nor do anything about it short of having my own click bot, which I won't do.
-
I know this may not be the case, but have you checked your site analytics to see if it is being hit by a number of these Russian bot / crawler style entities that have been doing the rounds of late, if so this could be another of the reasons you are seeing additional bounced number growing.
I found I had a few and over the last few weeks I have made an effort to remove a lot of this negative referral traffic and crawlers.
-
Hi LSlversen
I like your thinking here - to me it sounds like what your users are searching and what they are getting aren't meeting expectations. I would look into that and make sure you are on the right path with what kind content / expectations you are setting.
Here's a bit of reference to what LSlversen is chatting about. Check it out. I would take a step back, ask some hard questions, and prioritize on how you want to attack issues. You'll be better off - I highly doubt there are click bots happening.
Hope this helps a bit more!
-
I guess that's the problem...there are thousands of reasons of why the rankings are what they are and there is no way to determine if a click bot is being used. Is there?
Even if one is being used, I suppose the only thing I could do, is use one myself to counteract it, which I don't like the sound of.
-
Without knowing all the details of the case, maybe it has something to do with searcher intent? Seeing as it's only websites who don't sell the product, maybe that's exactly what the searchers are looking for?
If people who search it are clicking and spending a long time on the top results that are full of info, then it might signal to Google that they found a good result and more of that kind (information pages) will come up higher.
Again, I don't know if this is the case, but it might be a possible explanation for it.
-
Thanks for the reply Patrick
If we had 100% proof, we would have reported to Google and the FBI. Unfortunately, like most DoS attacks, it could not be traced back to anyone.
We rank well for every other industry term. The fact that sites that don't even directly sell the product make me question if something weird is going on here. My dream scenario (as is theirs I'm sure) would be to be on the first page, as the lone website that actually sells my product directly. The other sites don't rank well for any other keyword in our industry...just the biggest volume keyword.
I sent you a private message with our URL and the keyword.
-
Hi there
Can you provide a URL for your company that we can take a look into? Also, do you have proof (whether current or previously as you stated) that this other company has been attacking your site? If so, you should be reporting that to Google. I wouldn't do this though unless you are ABSOLUTELY 100% SURE this company or SEO team is doing this, and you can PROVE it. If you can't, then don't.
If you could though, please provide your URL. As you said you could be being paranoid and it could be a number of things such as your:
On-site SEO
Content
Backlinks Industry & keyword difficulty
etc....that could be hurting your rankings. It'd be easier to gauge with a URL.
Hope this helps! Good luck!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Infinite Scrolling on Publisher Sites - is VentureBeat's implementation really SEO-friendly?
I've just begun a new project auditing the site of a news publisher. In order to increase pageviews and thus increase advertising revenue, at some point in the past they implemented something so that as many as 5 different articles load per article page. All articles are loaded at the same time and from looking in Google's cache and the errors flagged up in Search Console, Google treats it as one big mass of content, not separate pages. Another thing to note is that when a user scrolls down, the URL does in fact change when you get to the next article. My initial thought was to remove this functionality and just load one article per page. However I happened to notice that VentureBeat.com uses something similar. They use infinite scrolling so that the other articles on the page (in a 'feed' style) only load when a user scrolls to the bottom of the first article. I checked Google's cached versions of the pages and it seems that Google also only reads the first article which seems like an ideal solution. This obviously has the benefit of additionally speeding up loading time of the page too. My question is, is VentureBeat's implementation actually that SEO-friendly or not. VentureBeat have 'sort of' followed Google's guidelines with regards to how to implement infinite scrolling https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2014/02/infinite-scroll-search-friendly.html by using prev and next tags for pagination https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/1663744?hl=en. However isn't the point of pagination to list multiple pages in a series (i.e. page 2, page 3, page 4 etc.) rather than just other related articles? Here's an example - http://venturebeat.com/2016/11/11/facebooks-cto-explains-social-networks-10-year-mission-global-connectivity-ai-vr/ Would be interesting to know if someone has dealt with this first-hand or just has an opinion. Thanks in advance! Daniel
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Daniel_Morgan1 -
Reputable SEO companies
I am looking for a reputable SEO company to assist in link building. I have done many searches and find that there are many sites that have a "top 10." However I am finding they are listed there due to paying large amounts of money. Any recommendations on companies that can show real results and are not charging extreme amounts of money while using minimum wage interns to do all the work with crappy results. I had a few people suggest "internet marketing ninjas" if anyone has used, chime in. Thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | nchachula0 -
SEO companies that own linking properties
Hi everyone, I do some SEO work for a personal injury attorney, and due to his profession, he gets cold-called by every digital marketing company under the sun. He recently got called by a company that offers packages that include posting in multiple directories (all on domains they own), creating subdomains for search listings, and PR services like writing and distributing press releases for distribution to multiple media outlets. The content they write will obviously not be local. All this and more for less than $500 a month! I'm curious if any of you have any experience with companies like this and whether you consider them black hat. I realize I'm asking you to speculate on a very broad description of what they offer, but their linking strategies sound risky to me. What experiences have you had with companies like this? Do you know anyone who has ever gotten a penalty using these tactics? Thanks, in advance, for sharing your thoughts.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | ptdodge0 -
How to save website from Negative SEO?
Hi, I have read couple of good blog post on Negative SEO and come to know about few solution which may help me to save my website during Negative SEO. Here, I want to share my experience and live data regarding Negative SEO. Someone is creating bad inbound links to my website. I come to know about it via Google webmaster tools. Honestly, I have implemented certain solutions like Google disavow tool, contact to certain websites and many more. But, I can see negative impact on organic visits. Organic visits are going down since last two months. And, I am thinking, These bad inbound links are biggest reasons behind it. You can visit following URLs to know more about it. Can anyone share your experience to save website from negative SEO? How can I save any website from Negative SEO (~Bad Inbound Links) https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BxyEDFdgDN-iR0xMd2FHeVlzYVU/edit https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxyEDFdgDN-iMEtneXU1YmhWX2s/edit?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxyEDFdgDN-iSzNXdEJRdVJJVGM/edit?usp=sharing
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | CommercePundit0 -
Explain To Me How Negative SEO ISNT Real?
I'm seeing lots of "offers" springing up to do negative SEO on your competitors. I know people keep insisting this sort of thing is just a bogeyman, but follow my logic here: We know the Penguin update PENALIZED, and not just devalued "over optimization." Read: exact match keyword links. We know that if your link profile is too "unnaturally" keyword heavy, (it should be majority your brand or your domain or your company name, etc) you get penalized. Again, not devalued, PENALIZED. Ok. So what is to stop a blackhatter from using one of those software bots to just kill a competitor? Knowing the above two points, lets say a website is ranking for "cool widgets". Why not just create a bunch of exact match keyword spam links for "cool widgets" targeting that website. In a while, the Penguin penalty kicks in and bammo. The thing that scares me about the post Penguin landscape is that google has specifically named an activity ("over optimization") that will get you PENALIZED. So, don't do that, right? Except, that means they've explicitly outlined an activity that will be penalized, and is easy for others to do to you, and that you would be powerless to prevent. I await the usual "this is an age old worry that has never come true" replies. But if you reply that way, ask yourself, can you refute the logic of the points above? And also... oh no... It's happening. I'm seeing it.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | brianmcc1 -
What do you think of Theme pyramids for SEO?
Hi, Just been reading up on theme pyramids, I have seen these before but found a good article on the subject going into quite some detail. http://www.canonicalseo.com/theme-pyramids/ Using the word 'Pyramid' does scream black hat to me but looking at the structure, this must be the best way for internal linking. Even the keyword structure looks good, Example: homepage - shoes category - red shoes sub category - size 7 red shoes Building anchor text links for shoes, red shoes or size 7 red shoes will benefit all 3 terms. Negative/Positive comments please.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | activitysuper0 -
SEO Experiment with Google Docs
Please check out this doc - https://docs.google.com/document/d/19VS4SnVvq6VJHQAIrB3CX7iL1ivZU4DH6fyfrHLsNFk/edit Any insights will be highly appreciated! Oleksiy
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | wcrfintl0 -
Is this SEO correct?
Please view website http://www.staddonsbeds.co.uk. In the footer is the keywords the client is aiming for. These pages have been created separately to the sitemap. Is this tactic and pages white hat seo or is this considered black hat seo such as gateway pages? Could you please confirm Thanks Paul
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | paulbaguley0