301 redirect and then keywords in URL
-
Hi,
Matt Cutts says that 301 redirects, including the ones on internal pages, causes the loss of a little bit of link juice.
But also, I know that keywords in the URL are very important.
On our site, we've got unoptimized URLs (few keywords) in the internal pages.
Is it worth doing a 301 redirect in order to optimize the URLs for each main page. 301 redirects are the only way we can do it on our premade cart
For example (just an example) say our main (1 of the 4) keywords for the page is "brown shoes".
I'm wondering if I should redirect something like
to
In other words, with the loss of juice would we come out ahead? In what instances would we come out ahead?
-
Awesome, yes Matt Cutts in that video does imply what you are saying. I also agree with higher CTR (another thing I hadn't thought of!)
Ryan, this is great. Thank you.
-
The closest thing I could find is the below Matt Cutts video. At 40 seconds in Matt specifically states that when using a URL shortener like Bit.ly the URL anchor text and PR will flow through the link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMkltd6dZzU
Even if anchor text did not flow through URL links I would still focus on having user friendly URLs. User CTR is higher on a page with a friendly title versus a page with a bunch of numbers that are otherwise meaningless.
Also, we have limited control over how users link to us. We prefer they use good anchor text but for those who simply copy and paste your URL there isn't much that can be done so it's kind of a moot point.
-
If you're going to redo your URLs, you might look at this post by Lunametrics about Google Analytics friendly sites. It offers a few things to think about so your URLs can also provide you value in your analytics.
http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2010/09/22/designing-google-analytics-friendly-site/
-
Hi Ryan,
I know that anchor text is really important. In my career I've used anchor text such as, if one of the four keywords on a page was "Brown Shoes" then the link would look like
for the best anchor text, but I didn't know that
http://www.zappos.com/brown-shoes
also helped by providing anchor text for "brown shoes" As you said, many times people just use the URL, and I didn't know that Google would separate the URL into pieces and give weight to "brown" and "shoes" since it's in the URL.
In my experience, there's been quite a bit of difference in anchor text between
brown shoe
and
brown shoes
where an exact match is important, and I thought the keywords in the anchor text had to be just words (with spaces) and it is new to me that the URL string works too.
I can see that Google might want to do that, is there any documentation on this? It's OK if there's not.
-
I second all the comments below. That should give you enough professional consensus in this arena to head in the right direction. Redirect with teh keywords, and this will have the best long-term results.
As for Google parsing keywords out of urls or anything else... You will need to remember that for the most part google ignores special characters and parameters in both content and urls. It doesnt matter if the url is in a link or the actual url bar up top, google will treat it the same. Google knows its a url string, and applies its "url parsing logic" to it. So it only makes sense that a full url link would be parsed, just the same way your website url is parsed because it includes the keywords. Its the same logic.
-
I would be happy to supply supporting evidence on any point.
I am a bit unclear on what you are requesting. You want to see documentation that the use of anchor text offers a SEO value?
-
Hi Ryan,
I see what you mean about the technology extensions, I'll avoid them from here on out.
As to the anchor text, I didn't know that Google parsed the anchor text like it does a URL to extract keywords. You are an excellend SEO, so I'd like to just take your word for it, but could you give me more understanding of how keywords in anchor text works just like keywords in URL (parsing the "-" and "/") or a link to a Matt Cutts video that implies this (I just searched and didn't find one).
I can't just take your word for it, even though you're an amazing SEO, since I've found that many advanced SEOs are wrong on a few details (though I think you are great)
Thanks again, this is invaluable information
-
There are a few reasons for not using technology extensions with urls (i.e. html, htm, php, etc)
-
any time you use a redirect there is work involved for you, the server has to check incoming URLs against the list of 301s, etc. They are a normal part of online life, but their use should be minimized. There is a high likelihood you may decide to upgrade your site which would change your .html pages to .php pages. Your URL would be identical except the extension, which would require a 301 for your whole site.
-
any time a 301 is used there is a loss of link authority
-
the extension is not helpful to users and makes your URLs appear more complex and possibly confusing to users
-
a site that shows their extensions is making things easier for anyone who wishes to attack your site. Sure it's a small item, but good security is about taking all the steps you can to make things more difficult for attackers.
With respect to the URL, Google fully understands and adjusts for the slash and dashes in URLs.
how you know it works?
It's fundamental to the concept of anchor text. Take a look at the below two links:
Both of the above links lead to the same place, the SEOmoz home page. What varies is the anchor text. Google is a multi-billion dollar company. They understand to remove the http:// prefix along with the .org/ suffix.
There are many discussions and resources on this topic. One relevant video from Matt Cutts: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRzMhlFZz9I
-
-
Ryan,
I am very impressed by your comments. I've been doing this a long time and I never thought of that.
So if someone's anchor tet is www.shoes.com/brown-sandles
and my keyword is brown sandles
then google will see "brown" and "sandles" even though there is a "/" and an "-" in there too? Could you go into detail about this, and how you know it works?
Also, what is the reasoning besides keeping the .html off of the end of the keyword rich URL?
Again, amazing advice.
-
A couple thoughts to add...
A primary reason keywords in your URL are so important is primarily due to their anchor text value. Yes Google will offer a boost but what amplifies this factor is the fact that most links to your site will include the keyword. People can be lazy and lack knowledge, so they link to your site simply by copying and pasting the URL rather then using anchor text. When that happens the URL is the anchor text. So if your domain is shoes.com then every URL link to your site includes "shoes" in it.
Having keywords deeper in your URL is very helpful for several reasons, but they will never match the power of having them in your root URL.
Also, if you are going to restructure your site I strongly recommend you use technology-free URLs. Remove the .html from the end of your URLs.
-
hi -
i've been through this and can offer a few suggestions:
1.) see if your server can use some sort of rewrite program like isapi rewrite. you can create code to have the page rewrite the url to what you want.
2.) consider moving to a new ecommerce platform (scary, i know) and then using 301's from your old stuff to your new stuff. any ecommerce vendor that is not using seo friendly product url's in 2011 does not deserve your business. if they aren't doing that chances are they may also be behind on such things as pci compliance, security, and general features.good luck!
-
hi -
i've been through this and can offer a few suggestions:
1.) see if your server can use some sort of rewrite program like isapi rewrite. you can create code to have the page rewrite the url to what you want.
2.) consider moving to a new ecommerce platform (scary, i know) and then using 301's from your old stuff to your new stuff. any ecommerce vendor that is not using seo friendly product url's in 2011 does not deserve your business. if they aren't doing that chances are they may also be behind on such things as pci compliance, security, and general features.good luck!
-
The amount of juice you will lose will be made up in the long run by having the keyword in the page name.SEO should be a long-term goal, and having the keyword in the page name is the best situation.
I have, and would recommend, doing it.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Change of URL + SEO Impact
We recently changed the URLs from our site http://www.website.com (old)
On-Page Optimization | | ederdesign
https://website.com/us/en/ (new) Our ranking is plummeting every since and I wonder if the new URL had something to do with it. Do you know if that change, could have impacted the ranking?0 -
Keywords dropping
My website http://www.refrigeratedtransportuk.com/ is dropping like a stone for the keyword 'refrigerated transport'. Even though the page gets a grade A, can anyone help?
On-Page Optimization | | CreativeCow0 -
Should I be using the town or city in url with my keyword or keyphrase?
should I be using the town or city in url with my keyword or keyphrase? So lets say I'm trying to rank for butchers in home town should i put the town in the url as well so www.website.com/butchers-in-mytown is that bad? Or would it be best to just put www.website.com/butchers?
On-Page Optimization | | genkee0 -
Keyword in URL: Ranking Factor?
I've got a site about a specific topic, which we'll call "themes" for the sake of this discussion. I personally like to keep the url structure short and clean (for usability purposes, but mainly because I'm a perfectionist and a minimalist). I feel that adding "themes" to the url structure is a bit redundant. However, nearly every keyword phrase that my site should rank for includes the word "themes." So I'm wondering how much I'm handicapping myself by not including the keyword "themes" in the url? The domain name itself sort of includes the keyword . . . although it's in Italian (I chose the domain for it's brand-ability, not for the keyword). A quick example: My Url Structure: www.themo.com/topic/abc My Competitor's Url Structure: www.sitesample.com/themes/topic/abc For many of the keywords, the competitors with the keyword in the url rank highest. But, I'm not sure how much emphasis to place on this, because from my understanding Google doesn't pay as much attention to url keywords anymore . . . and those sites might just be ranking high because they've been around for so long (which also happens to be the reason why they coincidentally also include the keyword in the url, because they started the site when that was a high ranking factor). Thoughts? Should I just trash my perfectionism and add the keyword to the url structure? (By the way, the site is only a couple months old and doesn't have any significant backlinks to inner pages yet, so changing the url structure wouldn't be a big deal if I decided to do that).
On-Page Optimization | | JABacchetta0 -
301 Problem
Hi Guys, Just have a small problem with a htaccess 301 redirect. I would like to 301: www.old-domain.com & old-domain.com to www.new-domain.com. The site is exactly the same with the same directory structure so i would also like all the subpages to work. Eg: www.old-domain.com/folder/page & old-domain.com/folder/page to www.new-domain.com/folder/page Many thanks
On-Page Optimization | | MSSTORAGE0 -
301 redirects from several sub-pages to one sub-page
Hi! I have 14 sub-pages i deleted earlier today. But ofcourse Google can still find them, and gives everyone that gives them a go a 404 error. I have come to the understading that this wil hurt the rest of my site, at least as long as Google have them indexed. These sub-pages lies in 3 different folders, and i want to redirect them to a sub-page in a folder number 4. I have already an htaccess file, but i just simply cant get it to work! It is the same file as i use for redirecting trafic from mydomain.no to www.mydomain.no, and i have tried every kind of variation i can think of with the sub-pages. Has anyone perhaps had the same problem before, or for any other reason has the solution, and can help me with how to compose the htaccess file? 🙂 You have to excuse me if i'm using the wrong terms, missing something i should have seen under water while wearing a blindfold, or i am misspelling anything. I am neither very experienced with anything surrounding seo or anything else that has with internet to do, nor am i from an englishspeaking country. Hope someone here can light up my path 🙂 Thats at least something you can say in norwegian...
On-Page Optimization | | MarieA1 -
Keyword Self- Cannibalization
I have a question about Keyword Self Cannibalization. I have a web page which is targeting the main keyword as "sarees". But this same page has internal linking from the keywords Benarasi Silk Sarees, Silk Saree, Traditional Sarees, cotton sarees,etc to their respectve pages. We are optimizing those pages separately for their respective keywords as well. When I run on-page report card for these web page from seomoz tool, I got an error says "Avoid Keyword Self-Cannibalization". Is this due to the internal linking from these keywords? Can anybody recommend a solution for this problem?
On-Page Optimization | | semvibe1 -
Meta Keywords
Hello Everyone- Quick question about meta keywords. Most SEO's agree that meta keywords are no longer used as a ranking factor in Google. My question is, if a client comes to me and they already have a bunch of meta keywords on their site what would the smart strategy be? 1. Remove all the meta keyword data from the clients site 2. Scale the meta keywords back by only leaving the top keywords in the code? 3. Do nothing Thanks for all your time! Regards, Bill Parlaman
On-Page Optimization | | wparlaman0