Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Setting A Custom User Agent in Screaming Frog
-
Hi all,
Probably a dumb question, but I wanted to make sure I get this right.
How do we set a custom user agent in Screaming Frog? I know its in the configuration settings, but what do I have to do to create a custom user agent specifically for a website?
Thanks much!
- Malika
-
Setting a custom user agent determines things like HTTP/2 so there can be a big difference if you change it to something that might not take advantage of something like HTTP/2
Apparently, it is coming to Pingdom very soon just like it is to Googlebot
http://royal.pingdom.com/2015/06/11/http2-new-protocol/
This Is an excellent example of a user agent's ability to modify the way your site is crawled as well as how efficient it is.
https://www.keycdn.com/blog/https-performance-overhead/
It is important to note that we didn’t use Pingdom in any of our tests because they use Chrome 39, which doesn’t support the new HTTP/2 protocol. HTTP/2 in Chrome isn’t supported until Chrome 43. You can tell this by looking at the
User-Agentin the request headers of your test results.
Pingdom user-agent
Note: WebPageTest uses Chrome 47 which does support HTTP/2.
Hope that clears things up,
Tom
- topic:timeago_earlier,about a month
-
Hi Malika,
Think about screaming frog and what it has to detect in order to do that correctly it needs the correct user agent syntax for it will not be able to make a crawl that would satisfy people.
Using a proper syntax for a user agent is essential and I have tried to be non-technical in this explanation I hope it works.
the reason screaming frog needs the user agent because the user-agent was added to HTTP to help web application developers deliver a better user experience. By respecting the syntax and semantics of the header, we make it easier and faster for header parsers to extract useful information from the headers that we can then act on.
Browser vendors are motivated to make web sites work no matter what specification violations are made. When the developers building web applications don’t care about following the rules, the browser vendors work to accommodate that. It is only by us application developers developing a healthy respect
When the developers building web applications don’t care about following the rules, the browser vendors work to accommodate that. It is only by us application developers developing a healthy respect
It is only by us application developers developing a healthy respect for the standards of the web, that the browser vendors will be able to start tightening up their codebase knowing that they don’t need to account for non-conformances.
For client libraries that do not enforce the syntax rules, you run the risk of using invalid characters that many server side frameworks will not detect. It is possible that only certain users, in particular, environments would identify the syntax violation. This can lead to difficult to track down bugs.
I hope this is a good explanation I've tried to keep it very to the point.
Respectfully,
Thomas
- topic:timeago_earlier,17 days
-
Hi Thomas,
would you have a simpler tutorial for me to understand? I am struggling a bit.
Thanks heaps in advance
-
I think I want something that is dumbed down to my level for me to understand. The above tutorials are great but not being a full time coder, I get lost while reading those.
-
Hi Matt,
I havent had a luck with this one yet.
-
Hi Malika! How'd it go? Did everything work out?
-
happy I could be of help let me know if there's any issue and I will try to be of help with it. All the best
-
Hi Thomas,
That's a lot of useful information there. I will have a go on it and let you know how it went.
Thanks heaps!
-
please let me know if I did not answer the question or you have any other questions
-
this gives you a very clear breakdown of user agents and their set of syntax rules. The following is valid example of user-agent that is full of special characters,
read this please http://www.bizcoder.com/the-much-maligned-user-agent-header
user-agent: foo&bar-product!/1.0a$*+ (a;comment,full=of/delimitersreferences but you want to pay attention to the first URL
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Gecko_user_agent_string_reference
| Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0 |
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15069533/http-request-header-useragent-variable
-
if you formatted it correctly see below
User-Agent = product *( RWS ( product / comment ) )and it was received by your headers yes you could fill in the blanks and test it.
https://mobiforge.com/research-analysis/webviews-and-user-agent-strings
http://mobiforge.com/news-comment/standards-and-browser-compatibility
-
No, you Cannot just put anything in there. The site has to recognize it and ask why you are doing this?
I have listed how to build and already built in addition to what your browser will create by using useragentstring.com
Must be formatted correctly and have it work with a header it is not as easy as it sometimes seems but not that hard either.
You can make & use this to make your own from your Mac or PC
http://www.useragentstring.com/
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/53.0.2747.0 Safari/537.36
how to build a user agent
- https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Gecko_user_agent_string_reference
- https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Setting_HTTP_request_headers
- https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537503(VS.85).aspx
Lists of user agents
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/1061943?hl=en
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537503(v=vs.85).aspx
-
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for responding, much appreciated!
Does that mean, if I type in something like -
HTTP request user agent -
Crawler access V2
&
Robots user agent
Crawler access V2
This will work too?
-
To crawl using a different user agent, select ‘User Agent’ in the ‘Configuration’ menu, then select a search bot from the drop-down or type in your desired user agent strings.
http://i.imgur.com/qPbmxnk.png
&
Video http://cl.ly/gH7p/Screen Recording 2016-05-25 at 08.27 PM.mov
Or
Also see
http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/screaming-frog-guide/
https://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/user-guide/general/#user-agent
https://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/user-guide/
https://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/faq/
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Googlebot being redirected but not users?
Hi, We seem to have a slightly odd issue. We noticed that a number of our location category pages were slipping off 1 page, and onto page 2 in our niche. On inspection, we noticed that our Arizona page had started ranking in place of a number of other location pages - Cali, Idaho, NJ etc. Weirdly, the pages they had replaced were no longer indexed, and would remain so, despite being fetched, tweeted etc. One test was to see when the dropped out pages had been last crawled, or at least cached. When conducting the 'cache:domain.com/category/location' on these pages, we were getting 301 redirected to, you guessed it, the Arizona page. Very odd. However, the dropped out pages were serving 200 OK when run through header checker tools, screaming frog etc. On the face of it, it would seem Googlebot is getting redirected when it is hitting a number of our key location pages, but users are not. Has anyone experienced anything like this? The theming of the pages are quite different in terms of content, meta etc. Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jun 13, 2017, 5:55 AM | Sayers0 -
How does Infinite Scrolling work with unique URLS as users scroll down? And is this SEO friendly?
I was on a site today and as i scrolled down and viewed the other posts that were below the top one i read, i noticed that each post below the top one had its own unique URL. I have not seen this and was curious if this method of infinite scrolling is SEO friendly. Will Google's spiders scroll down and index these posts below the top one and index them? The URLs of these lower posts by the way were the same URLs that would be seen if i clicked on each of these posts. Looking at Google's preferred method for Infinite scrolling they recommend something different - https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2014/02/infinite-scroll-search-friendly.html . Welcome all insight. Thanks! Christian
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | May 20, 2016, 7:00 PM | Sundance_Kidd0 -
Screaming Frog returning both HTTP and HTTPS results...
Hi, About 10 months I switched from HTTP to HTTPS. I then switched back (long story). I noticed that Screaming Frog is picking up the HTTP and HTTPS version of the site. Maybe this doesn't matter, but I'd like to know why SF is doing that. The URL is: www.aerlawgroup.com Any feedback, including how to remove the HTTPS version, is greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Feb 18, 2016, 10:51 PM | mrodriguez14400 -
Layered navigation and hiding nav from user agent
I am trying to deal with the duplicate content issues presented by Magento's layered navigation feature (aka faceted navigation). I installed Amasty's Improved Navigation extension (https://amasty.com/improved-layered-navigation.html) and it offers the option to hide the layered navigation from specific user agents (ie googlebot, bingbot, etc). This seems like cloaking to me and I hesitate to try it, unless hiding faceted navigation from specific user agents is known to be acceptable to Google (white hat practice). Does anyone know if this the case?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | May 27, 2015, 1:31 PM | Kyle_M0 -
Strange 404s in Screaming Frog
I just ran a website (Drupal) through screaming frog and the only 404s I found related to web pages which were the same as URLs already used on the website plus the company phone number so... www.company.com/[their phone number] - www.company.com/services[their phone number] - any ideas what might be causing this problem?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Feb 28, 2015, 12:51 PM | McTaggart0 -
Can't crawl website with Screaming frog... what is wrong?
Hello all - I've just been trying to crawl a site with Screaming Frog and can't get beyond the homepage - have done the usual stuff (turn off JS and so on) and no problems there with nav and so on- the site's other pages have indexed in Google btw. Now I'm wondering whether there's a problem with this robots.txt file, which I think may be auto-generated by Joomla (I'm not familiar with Joomla...) - are there any issues here? [just checked... and there isn't!] If the Joomla site is installed within a folder such as at e.g. www.example.com/joomla/ the robots.txt file MUST be moved to the site root at e.g. www.example.com/robots.txt AND the joomla folder name MUST be prefixed to the disallowed path, e.g. the Disallow rule for the /administrator/ folder MUST be changed to read Disallow: /joomla/administrator/ For more information about the robots.txt standard, see: http://www.robotstxt.org/orig.html For syntax checking, see: http://tool.motoricerca.info/robots-checker.phtml User-agent: *
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Nov 20, 2016, 10:56 PM | McTaggart
Disallow: /administrator/
Disallow: /bin/
Disallow: /cache/
Disallow: /cli/
Disallow: /components/
Disallow: /includes/
Disallow: /installation/
Disallow: /language/
Disallow: /layouts/
Disallow: /libraries/
Disallow: /logs/
Disallow: /modules/
Disallow: /plugins/
Disallow: /tmp/0 -
My website (non-adult) is not appearing in Google search results when i have safe search settings on. How can i fix this?
Hi, I have this issue where my website does not appear in Google search results when i have the safe search settings on. If i turn the safe search settings off, my site appears no problem. I'm guessing Google is categorizing my website as adult, which it definitely is not. Has anyone had this issue before? Or does anyone know how to resolve this issue? Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Aug 16, 2013, 4:49 AM | CupidTeam0 -
How to set up 301 redirect for URL with question mark
I have encountered some issue with 301 redirect and htaccess file. I need to redirect the following url: http://www.domain.com/?specifications=colours/page/3 to: http://www.domain.com/colours The 301 redirect command I wrote in htaccess file is as follow: Redirect 301 /?specifications=colours/page/3 http://www.domain.com/colours And it doesn't work at the moment. What is the correct way to set up 301 redirect here? Your help will be sincerely appreciated!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Feb 15, 2013, 12:46 PM | robotseo0