Schema for Plastic Surgery Procedure
-
Hi, i am doing Schema and don't know what type of property i should use for treatments like liposuction or botox or stuff like that. Would you use MedicalProcedure Markup?
Thanks for helping me.
-
I would only use a specific schema on specific pages
it adds to the site gives google a way to show the content/data in new ways
Like the home page should have Local Plastic Surgery markup
The blog should have post markup
The contact us page should have local business mark up as well with the address never mark up any content that's not visible to google. Meaning visible to you as well.
Take a look.
https://moz.com/blog/structured-data-for-seo-1
https://moz.com/blog/structured-data-for-seo-2
https://yoast.com/what-is-structured-data/
Sincerely,
Tom
-
Hi, thanks for your detailed answer.
The only reason why i want to do that is to make clear, that the service liposuction is on this page to enhance rankings. If it doesn't make an seo difference i would totally skip it but i read an article that this should help to boost them. To make the page shop with reviews is not my goal since i would have to make 34 markups for 34 services.
Would you use the Plastic Surgery markup on all pages or only on specific ones?
Thanks, Ronald
-
PS
I would not mark up liposuction simply because it would only be marked up in a review or something like that it's not a profession it's very unlikely that it will actually be Schema.org/liposuction
Use /PlasticSurgery
It will cover everything like liposuction and other plastic surgery related content.
All the best, Tom
-
PlasticSurgery
Thing > Organization > LocalBusiness > MedicalBusiness > PlasticSurgery
Thing > Place > LocalBusiness > MedicalBusiness > PlasticSurgery
A specific branch of medical science that pertains to therapeutic or cosmetic repair or re-formation of missing, injured or malformed tissues or body parts by manual and instrumental means.<label for="morecheck"></label>
- Canonical URL: http://schema.org/PlasticSurgery
I used https://www.rankranger.com/schema-markup-generator Go local then medical specialty
Then picked Local then medical from a drop-down (see https://imgur.com/AshLea7.png )
Please read the three URLs below keep in mind the community question that was answered spectacularly was answered when JSON-LD was not the standard. Regardless the answer still makes a lot of sense
- https://schema.org/PlasticSurgery
- https://readtiger.com/https/schema.org/MedicalSpecialty
- https://moz.com/community/q/how-to-create-schema-for-medical-specialties-services
Hope This helps,
Tom
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Schema Markup for property list
My Client has a Real Estate directory with many landing pages for specific properties and locations, example: https://www.laguiainmobiliaria.com.mx/casas-en-venta-queretaro/ This landing page is a list of New Houses in Queretaro. The properties appear dynamically, because this landing pages works trough a WP Query. So the list changes every week. We are preparing each listing to have a Product Markup as trulia. But what would be the appropiate markup for the list of properties? An itemlist markup seems imposible because the list is dynamical, so maybe Markup as an article? in the description: List of houses in Queretaro?
Algorithm Updates | | Trazo1 -
Schema Mark up - Product Listing Pages
Hi I know you can add product schema to a product page, but can you add mark up to a product listing/category page? If so, which one would you use? I saw the item list mark up but didn't think this was relevant. Thank you
Algorithm Updates | | BeckyKey0 -
Google live blog schema
Live blog markup was rolled out to a selected group of publishers last year 2015. I'm trying to find out whether it has been released to other publishers yet (we are a news site). Not seeing any updates about it anywhere and wondering how I can find out if/when it will be available. This is the latest I can see which is not much help https://developers.google.com/search/pilot/open/live-blogs. Any insider info would be very much appreciated.
Algorithm Updates | | hjsand2 -
Use of http://schema-creator.org boost ranking
Hello all if we use http://schema-creator.org for structured html will it increase our ranking too. has it any benefit for SEO?
Algorithm Updates | | adnan11010 -
What is your experience with markups (schema.org) in terms of SEO and best practice learnings?
Hi, I am looking to implement schema markups into a variety of websites and currently wondering about best practices. I am working on energy providers, building material, e-retailers, social association among others. While I understand every single one of these is an individual case, I could do with some advices from you, guys. Which markups would you consider key for search engines? I would have naturally chosen markups to highlight the business name, location and products but there is so much more to schema.org! Thanks,
Algorithm Updates | | A_Q0 -
Schema.org Microdata or Microformats - Which Should We Use
Hi All, I'm wondering what would be the better alternative - schema.org microdata or microformats. I am aware that search engines such as Google, Yahoo, and Bing recognize Schema.org as the standard. Question is, will it have any negative affect? Our web developer here says that schema.org microdata may result in negative html. I don't think that it will affect our SEO, but I guess that's also something to shed some light on. So, what's the consensus here - should we implement schema.org or go with microformats - or, does it really make any difference?
Algorithm Updates | | CSawatzky1 -
Does Schema.org markup create a conflict with Power Reviews' standard microformat markup for e-commerce product pages?
Does anyone have experience implementing Schema.org markup on e-commerce websites that are already using Power Reviews (now Bazaar)? In Google's documentation they say that it's generally not a good idea to use two types of semantic markup for the same item (reviews in this case), but I wouldn't think that there would be a problem marking up other items on the page with Schema such as price, stock status, etc... Anyone care to provide some insight? Also in a related topic, have you all noticed that Google has really dialed back the frequency in which they display rich snippets for product searches? A few weeks ago the site that I'm referring to had hundreds of products that were displaying snippets, now it seems that only about 10% (roughly) of them are still showing. Thanks everybody.
Algorithm Updates | | BrianCC0 -
Product microdata from Schema.org
An article (http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/2011/11/18/step-up-your-e-commerce-seo-game-with-product-microdata.aspx?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter) is claiming that using this product micro data (http://schema.org/Product) might help product pages rank better. Do you have any experience using these tags and would it be worth the time to implement these on a site with 1000's of products? Would it make sense to selectively implement them on specific products that actually have a good chance of ranking high instead?
Algorithm Updates | | pbhatt0