Migrating online store to subdomain using shopify and effects on seo and energy down the road for seo
-
I'm looking for some clarity...
Looking at using Shopify for an existing online store that we have to migrate. Setting up the store with shopify means we will be using a subdomain such as shop.mywebsite.com instead of mywebsite.com/shop.
The following are points to consider when responding
- The client currently has an online store, however it's a proprietary shopping store and CMS that has since gone defunct and they need to migrate to an alternative in order to survive online against new CMS systems that allow the site and its content to be better optimized.
- There is a lot of existing SEO done on the current site that we don't want to loose PR on.
- There is roughly 2000 products
- Client has a fixed budget, dealing with checkout issues, custom work and various other "bugs" seems to be easier controlled with Shopify...thus budget can be used more on content/strategy and migration
- We want to run the main site in Wordpress and are wanting to use Shopify since it supports a gateway, has great features and seems like it would allow us to get more bang for the buck and can focus more on the main site and content strategy and drive traffic to the subdomain store if needed
Or main concern is the effort of migrating 2000+ products to shopify and the traffic and PR it gives the current site will have a negative effect on the main domain itself.
Should we really be considering this path?
The domain is diveidc.com
One main benefit to the subdomain is the ability to clearly segment products from the service portion of the site in the analytics and focus 2 clear strategies and track it in a very defined manner.
We're really on the fence with this...any thoughts are welcome.
-
Yes, all good insight.
We are the developers/agency for the client...and we are only considering this option purely on budget reasons. There is a lot of work to address the move to a new CMS, we require stronger content with the move and on top of it all we have to integrate all content to the new CMS....this equates to a treamedeous amount of work...not the best argument but again, posting this in seomoz allows us to have a nice sounding board.
The current CMS is so poorly geared for today's seo strategies that migration to another CMS is 100% required. Moving hosts isn't the problem. The CMS is.
To illustrate how pour the current CMS is, we can't even touch the root .htaccess file to redirect WWW. Doing so breaks the entire CMS system, insane. Thus we have www.mysite.com and mysite.com directly competing against each other, duplicate content etc. That's just 1 issue of many.
Moving to a new CMS is required, but with this move we have budget constraints wrapped in a very big site, wrapped around seo migration issues, wrapped in making things painless for the client, wrapped in making this all work.
We're looking for any insights knowing very well best practices...but having to deal with the reality of budgets. This could end up being "save a penny today, costs big bucks later".
We understand this is our unique issue and we may have to bite the bullet a bit, go with something like Cart66 and work through the bugs knowing the light at the end of the tunnel will be a brilliant seo/business solution for the client...but may take some painful hours getting there...hours we may have to suck up to keep a happy client and a relationship we've nurtured for some years.
-
What isn't so clear is that 2 years down the road this may be a really bad decision that was made just on budget.
I agree.
You never know how google is going to treat a subdomain.... but I have very few doubts about how they are going to treat a folder on my site.
So, if I was in the situation that you are in... I would move hosts, or change developers, or find something besides Shopify... to run a website that has the highest present and long-term probability to be as highly competitive as possible.
I work really really hard to compete for rankings.. I am not going to let a host, a shopping cart or a developer screw it up.
It's pretty easy to find new hosts, new developers and new shopping carts when you compare that to the huge job of getting 500 new unique domains to link to a store. We are comparing issues of convenience to those that are jugular.
Just me sayin' how I look at this.
-
Yes, we're definitively very aware of this...I'm hoping this post just gives us more brain power to the conversation we're already having internally as an agency knowing we will be loosing a treamedous amount of PR due to products currently being housed within the main domain but knowing that we have to migrate the site out of the existing CMS and go to Wordpress and most likely be using Shopify due to various reasons, mainly around Wordpress and Ecom not playing so hot together and a 3rd party provider (Shopify) cuts a lot of the de-bug work out of the picture allowing us to focus the budget on a content strategy more than build/de-bug time.
To give a bit more of a insight to the type of items the clients website currently caters to. There are 2 sales funnels, one being products and another being services. The products are all scuba dive equipment and the services are all local scuba courses. Currently the site ranks well in a local market for both, however services only ranks well locally while products tend to do much better regionally.
Ranking locally for services is fine, since you can't be in New York and take a scuba course being offered in Vancouver. But, people do query "scuba dive courses" globally and if we get the content strategy right the clients rank will go up regardless of the services being local or not which will benefit products or anything else on the site and vice versa.
Now, going ecom with Wordpress isn't fun. There's no real bullet proof solution that doesn't require some serious elbow grease to get the kinks worked out. Drupal isn't an option for budget reasons. Knowing this we are leaning towards Shopify, a rented solution that offsets some of the headache allowing us to focus on content strategy more than the build and bettering the seo of the overal site and shop...it feels like s safe bet.
I also read that search engines are a bit more aware of what you are doing with subdomains especially when the content you segmenet in to the subdomain is 1 type of content. movies.mysite.com for instance tells search engines it's 1 type of content...so shop.mysite.com essentially says "it's all products 24/7" and we start to focus 2 strategies, metrics and marketing. 1) for the products subdomain and 2) for the services. Sucks we can't cross-share the love, but lead-gen pages may be able to compensate for this as well as other content strategies we would put in place.
What isn't so clear is that 2 years down the road this may be a really bad decision that was made just on budget.
Just a train of thought...
-
I have one concern.
There is a big difference in ranking potential between store.domain.com and domain.com/store/
With domain.com/store/ the pages in the store benefit from the authority and linkpower accumulated by the main website. However, with store.domain.com the benefit is much less.
That alone would have me reject a solution that requires moving the store to a subdomain.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Site with both subfolders and subdomains
Hi everyone,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | medi_
I'm working on a website that has a quite extensive subfolder structure for product and multilingual purposes.
domain.com/en
domain.com/it
domain.com/fr
domain.com/en/category
domain.com/it/category
domain.com/fr/category
domain.com/en/category/product
domain.com/it/category/product
domain.com/fr/category/product
domain.com/en/category/product/region
domain.com/it/category/product/region
domain.com/fr/category/product/region
and so on... We will soon be launching a completely different service, which would make the subfolder structure become even more complex. As John Mueller recently stated that Subdomains and Subfolders are treated the same by Google, I am now considering building that new service under subdomains for product reason, and for the sake of clarity. 1- Would my subdomains inherit the authority of my main domain?
2- Do I have to keep the language folders with the subdomain structure?
e.g.:
new-service.domain.com/en
nouveau-service.domain.com/fr
nuovo-servizio.domain.com/it OR
new-service.domain.com
nouveau-service.domain.com
nuovo-servizio.domain.com Looking forward to reading you!0 -
Any Angular2 SEOs?
We are having a few issues with blog integration into an Angular2 website and would love an SEO referral. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | vinadvisor0 -
SEO Menu Question
I have a question regarding to the SEO benefits of different types of menus. Recently, I have noticed an increasing number of websites with the sort of menu like at www.sportsdirect.com, where there is only one main dropdown and then everything is a sub-menu of the sub-menus if that makes sense. Is this approach more, less or equal beneficial to what you see at http://www.wiggle.co.uk/ where there are multiple initial dropdown menus? Appreciate the feedback.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | simonukss0 -
Using subdomains for related landing pages?
Seeking subdomain usage and related SEO advice... I'd like to use multiple subdomains for multiple landing pages all with content related to the main root domain. Why?...Cost: so I only have to register one domain. One root domain for better 'branding'. Multiple subdomains that each focus on one specific reason & set of specific keywords people would search a solution to their reason to hire us (or our competition).
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nodiffrei0 -
Wordpress.com content feeding into site's subdomain, who gets SEO credit?
I have a client who had created a Wordpress.com (not Wordpress.org) blog, and feeds blog posts into a subdomain blog.client-site.com. My understanding was that in terms of SEO, Wordpress.com would still get the credit for these posts, and not the client, but I'm seeing conflicting information. All of the posts are set with permalinks on the client's site, such as blog.client-site.com/name-of-post, and when I run a Google site:search query, all of those individual posts appear in the Google search listings for the client's domain. Also, I've run a marketing.grader.com report, and these same results are seen. Looking at the source code on the page, however, I see this information which leads me to believe the content is being credited to, and fed in from, Wordpress.com ('client name' altered for privacy): href="http://client-name.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/could_you_survive_a_computer_disaster.jpeg">class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2050" title="Could_you_survive_a_computer_disaster" src="http://client-name.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/could_you_survive_a_computer_disaster.jpeg?w=150&h=143" I'm looking to provide a recommendation to the client on whether they are ok to continue moving forward with this current setup, or whether we should port the blog posts over to a subfolder on their primary domain www.client-site.com/blog and use Wordpress.org functionality, for proper SEO. Any advice?? Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | grapevinemktg0 -
Franchise sites on subdomains
I've been asked by a client to optimise a a webpage for a location i.e. London. Turns out that the location is actually a franchise of the main company. When the company launch a new franchise, so far they have simply added a new page to the main site, for example: mysite.co.uk/sub-folder/london They have so far done this for 10 or so franchises and task someone with optimising that page for their main keyword + location. I think I know the answer to this, but would like to get a back up / additional info on it in terms of ranking / seo benefits. I am going to suggest the idea of using a subdomain for each location, example: london.mysite.co.uk Would this be the correct approach. If you think yes, why? Many thanks,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Webrevolve0 -
Domain migration strategy
Imagine you have a large site on an aged and authoritative domain. For commercial reasons the site has to be moved to a new domain, and in the process is going to be revamped significantly. Not an ideal starting scenario obviously to be biting off so much all at once, but unavoidable. The plan is to run the new site in beta for about 4 weeks, giving users the opportunity to play with it and provide feedback. After that there will be a hard cut over with all URLs permanently redirected to the new domain. The hard cut over is necessary due to business continuity reasons, and real complexity in trying to maintain complex UI and client reporting over multiple domains. Of course we'll endeavour to mitigate the impact of the change by telling G about the change in WMC and ensuring we monitor crawl errors etc etc. My question is whether we should allow the new site to be indexed during the beta period? My gut feeling is yes for the following reasons: It's only 4 weeks and until such time as we start redirecting the old site the new domain won't have much whuffie so there's next to no chance the site will ranking for anything much. Give Googlebot a headstart on indexing a lot of URLs so they won't all be new when we cut over the redirects Is that sound reasoning? Is the duplication during that 4 week beta period likely to have some negative impact that I am underestimating?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Charlie_Coxhead0 -
Expiring URL seo
a buddy of mine is running a niche job board and is having issues with expiring URLs. we ruled it out cuz a 301 is meant to be used when the content has moved to another page, or the page was replaced. We were thinking that we'd be just stacking duplicate content on old urls that would never be 'replaced'. Rather they have been removed and will never come back. So 410 is appropriate but maybe we overlooked something. any ideas?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | malachiii0