Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
How do you disallow HTTPS?
-
I currently have a site (startuploans.org) that runs everything as http, recently we decided to start an online application to process loan apps. Now, for one certain section we configured ssl to work (https://www.startuploans.org/secure/).
If I go to the HTTPS url for any of my other pages they show up...I was going to just 301 everything from https but because it is in a subdirectiory I can't...
Also, canonical URL's won't work either because it's a totally different system and the pages are generated in an odd manor.
It's really just 1 page that needs to be disallowed..
Is there any way to disallow all HTTPS requests from robots.txt while keeping all the HTTP requests working as normal?
-
Hi Rick,
Your first thought was correct. If you apply the noindex meta tag to every page in the secure part of the site, then all of those pages will be de-indexed and you will have no duplicate content problem.
For Wordpress, you just need to install a plugin that allows you to edit and apply page elements and meta tags. My preference is Yoast SEO. If you do a plugin search from your dashboard you will find it.
Hope that helps,
Sha
-
Perfect. This is the answer I was looking for...I will just use the meta tag globally in HTTPS....BUT...what about the fact that my entire site is duplicated in HTTPS?
It's all good for the /secure/ part, but what about my Wordpress install...how do I handle that? Maybe my best option is to just load 2 different robots.txt files...
-
Hi Rick,
If you wish to use the robots.txt method to disallow all or part of your site's https protocol, you simply need to load two separate robots.txt files.
The http and https protocols are basically viewed by bots as if they were two completely separate root domains (which I guess you already know as you have mentioned the fact that port 443 is used for the secure protocol).
Google's advice is that to use this method, you should have a separate robots.txt file for each protocol with code as follows:
For your http protocol (http://www.startuploans.org/robots.txt
User-agent: *
Allow: /For the https protocol (https://www.startuploans.org/robots.txt
User-agent: *
Disallow: /However, blocking crawlers with robots.txt is not the most reliable method for excluding pages from Search engines. The reason for this is that the page will continue to be indexed if it happens to be found via a link from another page. Basically, the robots.txt is the sign on the front door that says "Please stay out of our house", but it is never seen by the people who enter via the rear exit or climb in a window!
The most reliable method of excluding pages is to add the noindex meta tag as suggested by MagentoWebDeveloper and Alan.When a bot encounters the noindex meta tag it will send a signal to the search engine to de-index the page and there is no further problem.
I would generally use noindex, follow rather than noindex, nofollow as the nofollow tag will stop the flow of link value through your site. In most cases, as long as the noindex is in place, there is no reason to be worried about the links on the pages being followed.
You should NEVER use both methods at the same time.
Hope that helps,
Sha
-
I agree. Best practices dictate that the proper answer is to block the entire folder from indexing.
-
Why not just NO INDEX / NO FOLLOW the page? What is the reason behind this? Do you want Google not to index your https page? Duplicate content? All checkouts have https.
-
I should have added that -the code above goes in the htaccess...that code would deliver two different robots.txt files based on if it's port 443 (secure) or the normal robots.txt file if it's any other port (normal).
Is there any easier way? I feel like one misstep on this and I could block bots from my site.
-
Nope...thanks though
Code is no problem for us...it's just a technical question. Here is what I want:
I want to restrict robots from the HTTPS version (secure) of my site while leaving the HTTP version (unsecure) perfectly normal and accessible by bots.
Basically what I am asking is..is this the best way (below)? Is there a simpler way...to my knowledge robots.txt doesn't support protocols so doing something like disallow:https://......yada yada won't work.
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} ^443$
RewriteRule ^robots.txt$ robots_ssl.txt [L] -
Hello Rick,
First caveat is I am not sure what you want to accomplish: You want it so that once the app is done, the person is no longer in https:// ?? If that is it, then while I am not sure I will be able to help, I want to clarify the issue.
Currently, you have one page that is https: and that is your loan app page with url of https://startuploans.org/secure/site/step1 (I did not get a step two on my test, but the next page was https://startuploans.org/secure/step3.) You want a person to finish the app, and then not be in https when they return to the site?
I am not a coder per se, but I am wondering if y ou change the target on the menu link to the secure pages to open in a new window there would be no option to go back. once finished, page 3 have an option to close to secure my information. Then, they are left at the page they were on before going to application.
Now, if none of this was what you wanted, I owe you a beer.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Redirect to http to https - Pros and Cons
Hi, I know its best practice to redirect a website from http to https, instead of having many entry point to your website. When a website has been running for a long time on http and https, what are the SEO Pros and Cons of implementing a redirect from Http to Https?
Technical SEO | | FreddyKgapza1 -
Http to https redirection issue
Hi, i have a website with http but now i moved to https. when i apply 301 redirection from http to https & check in semrush it shows unable to connect with https & similar other tool shows & when i remove redirection all other tools working fine but my https version doesn't get indexed in google. can anybosy help what could be the issue?
Technical SEO | | dhananjay.kumar10 -
Redirecting HTTP to HTTPS - How long does it take Google to re-index the site?
hello Moz We know that this year, Moz changed its domain to moz.com from www.seomoz.org
Technical SEO | | joony
however, when you type "site:seomoz.org" you still can find old urls indexed on Google (on page 7 and above) We also changed our site from http://www.example.com to https://www.example.com
And Google is indexing both sites even though we did proper 301 redirection via htaccess. How long would it take Google to refresh the index? We just don't worry about it? Say we redirected our entire site. What is going to happen to those websites that copied and pasted our content? We have already DMCAed their webpages, but making our site https would mean that their website is now more original than our site? Thus, Google assumes that we have copied their site? (Google is very slow on responding to our DMCA complaint) Thank you in advance for your reply.0 -
Http to https - is a '302 object moved' redirect losing me link juice?
Hi guys, I'm looking at a new site that's completely under https - when I look at the http variant it redirects to the https site with "302 object moved" within the code. I got this by loading the http and https variants into webmaster tools as separate sites, and then doing a 'fetch as google' across both. There is some traffic coming through the http option, and as people start linking to the new site I'm worried they'll link to the http variant, and the 302 redirect to the https site losing me ranking juice from that link. Is this a correct scenario, and if so, should I prioritise moving the 302 to a 301? Cheers, Jez
Technical SEO | | jez0000 -
Googlebot does not obey robots.txt disallow
Hi Mozzers! We are trying to get Googlebot to steer away from our internal search results pages by adding a parameter "nocrawl=1" to facet/filter links and then robots.txt disallow all URLs containing that parameter. We implemented this late august and since that, the GWMT message "Googlebot found an extremely high number of URLs on your site", stopped coming. But today we received yet another. The weird thing is that Google gives many of our nowadays robots.txt disallowed URLs as examples of URLs that may cause us problems. What could be the reason? Best regards, Martin
Technical SEO | | TalkInThePark0 -
Allow or Disallow First in Robots.txt
If I want to override a Disallow directive in robots.txt with an Allow command, do I have the Allow command before or after the Disallow command? example: Allow: /models/ford///page* Disallow: /models////page
Technical SEO | | irvingw0 -
Duplicate content and http and https
Within my Moz crawl report, I have a ton of duplicate content caused by identical pages due to identical pages of http and https URL's. For example: http://www.bigcompany.com/accomodations https://www.bigcompany.com/accomodations The strange thing is that 99% of these URL's are not sensitive in nature and do not require any security features. No credit card information, booking, or carts. The web developer cannot explain where these extra URL's came from or provide any further information. Advice or suggestions are welcome! How do I solve this issue? THANKS MOZZERS
Technical SEO | | hawkvt10 -
Should I set up a disallow in the robots.txt for catalog search results?
When the crawl diagnostics came back for my site its showing around 3,000 pages of duplicate content. Almost all of them are of the catalog search results page. I also did a site search on Google and they have most of the results pages in their index too. I think I should just disallow the bots in the /catalogsearch/ sub folder, but I'm not sure if this will have any negative effect?
Technical SEO | | JordanJudson0