If those comments are generating traffic it's ok, but I'd apply a nofollow tag to the links. They're simply not natural.
- Home
- Robert_G
Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Robert_G
@Robert_G
Job Title: Editor
Company: GnetAds
Jasmine Business Directory's Blog
Favorite Thing about SEO
SEO is the new "art deco"!
Latest posts made by Robert_G
-
RE: Houzz Comment Links
-
RE: Blog articles on website vs submitting to article submission sites
I'd mix things. The best, most informative, image rich article should go on the client's website (they'll attract natural links over time, which are the best), some good articles could be written for gust blogging (work only with high quality blogs), a few articles on article directories.
-
RE: Limit on Google Removal Tool?
It's been a while since I haven't used GWT, but I thing you have a limit of 500 requests/day or something like that.
As soon as those requests are processed the counter resets.
-
RE: Limit on Google Removal Tool?
Hi BJ
I'd use the URL removal tool only after I'd make sure that I used rel=canonical (to point out which is the actual URL Google should consider "legit", use noindex, follow meta tag for the pages you don't want google to index - like tag or category pages or subpages -).
You can also use strings when removing pages, which may be way more effective than removing them one by one: eg: http://www.example.com/category/ - Google will remove all matching URLs.
But I strongly advise you to make sure you minimize as much as you can the duplicate content generation and use the two methods I highlighted above.
Hope it helps.
-
RE: Disabling archives in wordpress
Philip,
Letting Google to follow the archive pages, helps it to determine the website's hierarchy.
Google can handle duplicate content of a website.
Excluding tag or category archives from Google's index, may lead to loosing some visitors. Here is a nice wrap up regarding this issue.
If you use Yoast's SEO plugin, you can let Google index only the main page of the archive pages and noindex the rest of them (page1, page 2 etc.)
I would place a noindex meta tag for date archives, though.
Hope that helps, cheers.
-
RE: Home page or landing page?
Keyword stuffing your homepage isn't the best decision. I'd keep my homepage something like:
Company Ltd.: Web development solutions (anyway, something that best describes your entire site, company)
The landing page(s) could have a title like:
****Company Ltd.: Web design services
or
Web design services | Company Ltd.
Good luck.
Best posts made by Robert_G
-
RE: Home page or landing page?
Keyword stuffing your homepage isn't the best decision. I'd keep my homepage something like:
Company Ltd.: Web development solutions (anyway, something that best describes your entire site, company)
The landing page(s) could have a title like:
****Company Ltd.: Web design services
or
Web design services | Company Ltd.
Good luck.
-
RE: Limit on Google Removal Tool?
It's been a while since I haven't used GWT, but I thing you have a limit of 500 requests/day or something like that.
As soon as those requests are processed the counter resets.
-
RE: Disabling archives in wordpress
Philip,
Letting Google to follow the archive pages, helps it to determine the website's hierarchy.
Google can handle duplicate content of a website.
Excluding tag or category archives from Google's index, may lead to loosing some visitors. Here is a nice wrap up regarding this issue.
If you use Yoast's SEO plugin, you can let Google index only the main page of the archive pages and noindex the rest of them (page1, page 2 etc.)
I would place a noindex meta tag for date archives, though.
Hope that helps, cheers.
-
RE: Houzz Comment Links
If those comments are generating traffic it's ok, but I'd apply a nofollow tag to the links. They're simply not natural.
Coder, designer, editor.
Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.