Hi Ya'll.

I'm transitioning our http version website to https.  Important question:

Do images have to have 301 redirects? If so, how and where?

Please send me a link or explain best practices.

Best,

Shawn

Hi Scott, you can actually find out specific locations via Google Ad Preview:

https://adwords.google.com/apt/AdPreview?__u=1000000000&__c=1000000000

Enjoy!

Shakur,

Thank you.  Is there a way to implement those tactics via Yoast SEO?

I made a post for it here as well:

https://wordpress.org/support/topic/pagination-meta-title-and-description-best-practices?replies=1#post-6309222

Hello,

Getting a lot of duplicate title and meta description errors via google webmaster tools.

For best SEO practices, do i no-index the page/2's, page/3's...?

More importantly, i see how MOZ did it by adding "page 3" to their titles such as http://moz.com/blog?page=3.  Is that a better way of doing it?  If so, how do i do that on Yoast SEO?

Thank you so much!

Hi,

Hopefully someone can help my dilemma! I am trying to wrap review schema (schema.org/review). However, it's stumping me because of our WordPress theme "Flawless." If any are familiar with this particular theme you'll know that there is the normal visual/text portion of the page-editing portion of WordPress, but there is also a page-building section which is unique to Flawless. In this instance, a Testimonial "Content/Post Type Item" has been used. This was where the page was constructed and wherein the problem lies.

If I wrap schema around it like I normally would, the page distorts on the front end and becomes a garbled mess. I've been trying to solve the problem and the closest I've gotten has been to copy the source-code of the Flawless themed Testimonial Content/Post Type Item into the "Text" portion of Wordpress to replicate the Flawless page-builder.

I thought "yay! I can wrap schema around this for sure!" but I'm still encountering some problems. If I'm using the structured data markup helper from Google, and copying and pasting the HTML I'd like (with the corresponding schema "header") I get an error on the Structured Data Testing Tool saying "Incomplete schema data."

I've tried looking for plugins that would help me, but all that I've seen adds duplicate content to the page. If there's a way to wrap review schema on this page—it would make my day!

Thanks for the help!

@Oleg,

We didn't receive a penalty letter, but our traffic and search queries impression went down when there was an algorithm update with footer links.

I don't have the original list of subdomains that removed our footer links, is it really necessary for Google?  I mean, can't they realize that there aren't SO MANY links coming from Blogspot anymore?  And is there a section in disavow links where i can upload a list of removed links i can show Google?  Or do i just state that I removed so many with a list of the subdomains in a written notice when doing a disavow (never done a disavow, so this is new to me).

THis problem won't continue either because we stopped our partnership with the blog template devloper, so anything after 2 years ago and on...we are not a part of new consumer blogs.

Looking forward to your reply and other suggestions.

Hello,

I have a hosting company that partnered up with a blogger template developer that allowed users to download blog templates and have my footer links placed sitewide on their website.  Sitewides i know are frowned upon and that's why i went through the rigorous Link Audit months ago and emailed every webmaster who made "WEBSITENAME.Blogspot.com" 3 times each to remove the links.

I'm at a point where i have 1000 sub users left that use the domain name of "blogspot.com".  I used to have 3,000!

Question: When i disavow these links in Webmaster tools for Google and Bing, should i upload all 1000 subdomains of "blogspot.com" individually and show Google proof that i emailed all of them individually, or is it wise to just include just 1 domain name (www.blogspot.com) so Google sees just ONE big mistake instead of 1000.

This has been on my mind for a year now and I'm open to hearing your intelligent responses.