How are 301s reported in GA?
-
Does anyone have any insight on exactly how on-site 301s are reported in Google Analytics? My direct traffic seems to climb at the same rate as my organic with absolutely no off-line promotion. I have a suspicion that the 301s that I have built to re-coupe traffic being sent to old pages are being reported as direct. Any validity to this?
-
Lou, I agree that it is odd that your'e seeing simultaneous upticks in traffic from the different mediums, but I wouldn't say it's out of the realm of natural possibility. As for your original question, I think you've mostly figured it all out. But allow me to do my best to clarify: The GA snippet would never actually fire on the old URL in the case of an old URL 301 redirecting to a new URL. 301s DO preserve referral information. So an old link on example.com that links to your OLD url will track in GA as landing on the new URL with example.com as a referrer. There are a few instances where the referral information will be lost, most (all) of them are detailed in the previously linked thread here: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google Analytics/thread?tid=51c7a2aa222f415e&hl=en Mike
-
No PPC or email, I have been pushing straight organic with a lot of 301 work.
Just real weird to see a jump like this in direct traffic that mimics the referral and organic trends.
Thanks again for the feedback.
-
I agree with you that the answer is quite generic. Altho Google is able to know where the traffic is referred from. Via HTTP Headers you could already easily find out where a page will refer to, like I did with this case when using a 301 redirect. While Google isn't probably using this option it is possible as you see.
I especially like your reference, because a couple of months later the guy who replied invented the wheel again and is implying in this article the opposite in my opinion.
To get some more information about your question, did you sent out recently some email campaigns or started up some SEA/ PPC campaigns?
-
Thanks for the reply. I get what you are saying, but there is something that just isn't quite right about the answer in the article. A 301 happens on the server side, so google wouldn't know about it. Additionally, no page (let alone tracking code) exists for the old urls that now have redirects. I would think that in order to qualify it as a referrer, google would have to know where the traffic was referred from ... no? I think I would feel better if the article you referenced actually stated 301 instead of a redirect (possibly client-side) that COULD be tracked by google.
Here is something I found where there are conflicting answers to the same question I have here, maybe some others here on SEOMoz can weigh in on this as well.
-
Hi Lou,
I can't make this answer any longer: Your answer could be found within this help article of Google Analytics. To make this a bit more efficient: "If your site uses redirects, the redirecting page becomes the landing page's referrer."
So according to this, this is not causing the increase of your direct traffic.
Hope this helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Big discrepancy between GA an GSC
Hey! I would really appreciate if someone could help me on this 🙂 I have a website with separate mobile and desktop versions, on GSC I see a huge drop in the number of clicks on the mobile website and an increase in the number of clicks on the desktop website, however this isn't reflected at all in GA. GA shows that mobile traffic hasn't increased for any version of the website and the webpages losing traffic according to GSC are flat/growing on GA (even if I look at traffic coming from organic only). Has anyone experienced something similar or has any possible explanation? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | Anna_90 -
Connect AMP to the same website GA property or not
Hi, Asking this on behalf of a client:"I know Google recommends setting up a separate GA property for AMP which they note in a few places:https://developers.google.com/analytics/devguides/collection/amp-analytics/https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/6343176?hl=en
Reporting & Analytics | | MediaCause
From what we can tell this is because the tracking for AMP will measure things differently than the current analytics.js library. I also think it's related to the GA cookie and how it's set differently for AMP pages.But won't this cause drop-off in user journey information? For example, if a user views an AMP blog article but then clicks to our site from a link within the article. I think we would then track this as two separate users and the pages/visit would be off. I found this article which explains a tech way to connect AMP to the same website GA property but it seems a little too much of a work-around:https://www.simoahava.com/analytics/google-analytics-client-id-amp-pages/ Do you think we should just do what Google recommends and set up AMP as a separate property in GA?" --> Does anyone know if there could be any issues with this workaround?Thanks,0 -
GA Event: to use this feature visit: EVENT-TRACKING.COM
Hi guys, Two days ago our Google Analytics Event tracker began to show this Event/Label, etc. I cannot find its source. Anybody knows what is this about? Thanks for your answers. Ana
Reporting & Analytics | | anagentile1 -
Google Webmaster Tools During GA Transition?
I'm working with a client that is launching a new website. Google Webmaster Tools can just be disconnected, then reconnected to the new Google Analytics property, correct? Without any data loss in Webmaster Tools? Thanks! Becky
Reporting & Analytics | | Becky_Converge0 -
Google Analytics Auto Report Config
Buonpormeriggio from 15 degrees C, very cloudy wetherby UK 🙂 In Google Analytics I love how you can eMail dashboard reports as illustrated here:
Reporting & Analytics | | Nightwing
http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc53/zymurgy_bucket/philpotts-tweak-auto-date-range-2_zps3e2b3e50.jpg But a client wants a weekly report but with a week range from Tues to Mon so my question is please:
How do you or can you tweak the date range so when you select weekly it doesnt spit out the standard Mon to sunday report (or Whatever it is). Thanks is advance,
David0 -
GA Regex Help Needed!
Hi mozzers, I am just discovering the RegEx world so I need your help. I would like to create an advanced segment to track 40 specific pages that have very different URIs from each other. Can you tell me how using RegEx? The dimension would be "landing pages" then not sure... Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | Ideas-Money-Art0 -
What does "on first page" mean in seomoz ranking reports?
Hi - When reports here show numbers of keywords appearing "on first page", there must be some implicit assumption made about the number of results listed per page. 1. Can anyone tell me what that assumption is? Is it 10? 20? 2. What about universal results Local links? If the answer to number one is, for instance, 20 results per page, then are there any assumptions made about the number of universal results Local links included? I'm just trying to understand what the reports mean. Thanks, Tim
Reporting & Analytics | | tcolling0 -
Custom GA tracking and link value
Hi I'm working on a real estate agents web site which has a lots of links coming from paid listings in real estate linstings sites (this in France so I'm not sure examples will mean anything but basically the agents have 900 house listings in each site and each listing has a backlink) In analytics these are classified as referals and that's fine for the moment But because sites provide different types of links, we are considering tagging all paid links with analytics utm codes. Mainly to learn which ads are actually providing qualified traffic (providing contacts). I'm guessing that currently these links, there are thousands, bring seo value to my client's web site and are not considered as paid links. Will adding the analytics codes to these links cause a loss of their value by clearly indicating to Google that we paid for them? What's the current thinking on this? I'm tempted not to be worried about being honest about the origin of these links but I'm worried that there is a real danger of loosing current ranking Any arguments FOR tagging paid links ? Thanks for you help Neil
Reporting & Analytics | | NeilInFrance0