How to prevent duplicate content at a calendar page
-
Hi,
I've a calender page which changes every day.
The main url is
/calendarFor every day, there is another url:
/calendar/2012/09/12
/calendar/2012/09/13
/calendar/2012/09/14So, if the 13th september arrives, the content of the page
/calendar/2012/09/13
will be shown at
/calendarSo, it's duplicate content.
What to do in this situation?
a) Redirect from /calendar to /calendar/2012/09/13 with 301? (but the redirect changes the day after to /calendar/2012/09/14)
b) Redirect from /calendar to /calendar/2012/09/13 with 302 (but I will loose the link juice of /calendar?)
c) Add a canonical tag at /calendar (which leads to /calendar/2012/09/13) - but I will loose the power of /calendar (?) - and it will change every day...
Any ideas or other suggestions?
Best wishes,
Georg.
-
Ah... yeah, that's tricky. There's no magic solution, I'm afraid. You've really got three options:
(1) Leave it alone
(2) Re-organize your site architecture to push individual date pages down a level or two, so that they get less internal link-juice.
(3) Re-organize such that you focus search engines on chunks of time or maybe date/aspect combinations, but then de-index the individual date combos. This would take a much better understanding of your site structure than I currently have. The goal would be to focus your index on some smaller combination of pages that still covers 80% of your search traffic.
The big problem is just that this is a lot potential dilution, and I suspect that many of these pages look very similar to Google. I'm also certain that not all pages have the same value, either for SEO or users, so there's some hybrid approach where you could prune back but not lose everything. Long-term, I think that's worth the time and trouble to sort out, but it's not an emergency or something I'd rush into.
-
Hi Peter,
thanks for your answer!
Well, it's even more complicated!
It's an astrology calendar with planet aspect data for each day starting from 1900-01-01 to 2099-12-31, so there are around 73,000 pages, it's a big database.
People are searching for a date and the planet aspects. So I need the "old pages" and the future pages in the index.
People are also searching their birthday and want to know their zodiac. My calendar is providing this info.
This is an example:
http://www.schicksal.com/horoskop/tageshoroskop/1951/09/10The best thing is to do nothing at the moment I think. The alternativ is to cut the content of the current day from the main page and let the user click a button which redirects to the current day page. But this is not user friendly and I will do nothing at them moment.
Any other idea would be great
Best wishes,
Georg.
-
Sadly, the short answer is that you can't have it all. Either you index the separate calendar pages, get more pages/content out there and risk some "thinning" of your index, or you focus on one page, maximize the SEO value, but then lose the individual pages.
I would not 301 or 302 to the individual calendar URLs - that kind of daily URL shifting is going to look suspicious, Google will not re-cache consistently, and you're going to end up with a long-term mess, I strongly suspect.
I actually tend to agree with Muhammed and Paragon that a viable option would be to let the individual days have their own content, but then canonical to the main calendar page to focus the search results. That way, users can still cycle through each individual day, but Google will focus on the core content. In a way, that's how a blog home-page works - the content changes daily, but you're still keeping the bots focused on one URL.
Think of it in terms of usability, too. How valuable is old/outdated content to search users? They might find something relevant on an old page, but they still probably want to see the main calendar and view recent content.
Where are the links to the individual days, if "/calendar" always has today's content? I'm wondering if there's a hybrid approach, like letting the most recent 30 days all have their own URLs, but then redirecting or using rel-canonical to point to the main page after 30 days.
-
What about adding to all of the other pages i.e not to /calendar/ the links will be followed but not indexed by Google.
-
Hi Georg,
Setting up a redirect or canonicalization for the the calendar page in the ways you describe might make it harder to build up any kind of authority for your calendar.
You could consider adding canonicalization for all the individual day pages that points to the main calendar page. ie. Each page /calendar/YYYY/MM/DD would have rel canonlical=/calendar/. Not sure this is the best idea though.
I don't know how your calendar is setup but you could also look at differentiating the pages by doing just a listing of events on the main page and including summaries or detail on the current day page. Or maybe including some additional information about your calendar on the main page like what type of events are included and how to submit events and not including that information on the individual day pages.
I've always taken the approach of minimizing duplicate content as much as possible but not getting excessive with it. I think in a case like this you could do more harm than good. The calendar page is an ever changing page, it's not like you have the exact same static content on two pages.
Hope this helps!
Zach
-
Hi Muhammed,
because the content is different. This would devaluate all calendar pages.
Best wishes,
Georg. -
Hi Georg What about adding canonical tag(s) from each days (/calendar/2012/09/13) calender pages to the main page (/calendar)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Content incorrectly being duplicated on microsite
So bear with me here as this is probably a technical issue and i am not that technical. We have a microsite for one of our partner organisations and recently we have detected that content from our main site appearing in the URLs for the microsite - both in search results and then when you click through to the SERP. However, this content does not exist on the actual website at all. Anyone have a possible explanation for this? I have tried searching the web but nothing. I assume there is something in the set up of the microsite that is associating it with the content on the main site.
Technical SEO | | Discovery_SA0 -
Duplicate content and canonicalization confusion
Hello, http://bit.ly/1b48Lmp and http://bit.ly/1BuJkUR pages have same content and their canonical refers to the page itself. Yet, they rank in search engines. Is it because they have been targeted to different geographical locations? If so, still the content is same. Please help me clear this confusion. Regards
Technical SEO | | IM_Learner0 -
Added 301 redirects, pages still earning duplicate content warning
We recently added a number of 301 redirects for duplicate content pages, but even with this addition they are still showing up as duplicate content. Am I missing something here? Or is this a duplicate content warning I should ignore?
Technical SEO | | cglife0 -
Database driven content producing false duplicate content errors
How do I stop the Moz crawler from creating false duplicate content errors. I have yet to submit my website to google crawler because I am waiting to fix all my site optimization issues. Example: contactus.aspx?propid=200, contactus.aspx?propid=201.... these are the same pages but with some old url parameters stuck on them. How do I get Moz and Google not to consider these duplicates. I have looked at http://moz.com/learn/seo/duplicate-content with respect to Rel="canonical" and I think I am just confused. Nick
Technical SEO | | nickcargill0 -
Search/Search Results Page & Duplicate Content
If you have a page whose only purpose is to allow searches and the search results can be generated by any keyword entered, should all those search result urls be no index or rel canonical? Thanks.
Technical SEO | | cakelady0 -
Similar Content vs Duplicate Content
We have articles written for how to setup pop3 and imap. The topics are technically different but the settings within those are very similar and thus the inital content was similar. SEOMoz reports these pages as duplicate content. It's not optimal for our users to have them merged into one page. What is the best way to handle similar content, while not getting tagged for duplicate content?
Technical SEO | | Izoox0 -
Moz Crawl Reporting Duplicate content on "template" styled pages
We have a lot of detail pages on our site that reference specific scholarships. Each page has a different Title and Description. They also have unique information all regarding the same data points. The pages are displayed in a similar structure to the user so the data is easy to read. My problem is a lot of these pages are being reported as duplicate content when they certainly are not. Most of them are reported as duplicates when they have the same sponsor. They may have the same contact information listed. These two are being reported as duplicate of each other. They share some data but they are definitely different scholarships. http://www.collegexpress.com/scholarships/adelaide-mcclelland-garden-club-scholarship/9254/ http://www.collegexpress.com/scholarships/mary-wannamaker-witt-and-lee-hampton-witt-memorial-scholarship/10785/ Would it help to add a Canonical for each page to themselves? Any other suggestions would be great. Thanks
Technical SEO | | GeorgeLaRochelle0 -
Duplicate content handling.
Hi all, I have a site that has a great deal of duplicate content because my clients list the same content on a few of my competitors sites. You can see an example of the page here: http://tinyurl.com/62wghs5 As you can see the search results are on the right. A majority of these results will also appear on my competitors sites. My homepage does not seem to want to pass link juice to these pages. Is it because of the high level of Dup Content or is it because of the large amount of links on the page? Would it be better to hide the content from the results in a nofollowed iframe to reduce duplicate contents visibilty while at the same time increasing unique content with articles, guides etc? or can the two exist together on a page and still allow link juice to be passed to the site. My PR is 3 but I can't seem to get any of my internal pages(except a couple of pages that appear in my navigation menu) to budge of the PR0 mark even if they are only one click from the homepage.
Technical SEO | | Mulith0