Skip to content
    Moz logo Menu open Menu close
    • Products
      • Moz Pro
      • Moz Pro Home
      • Moz Local
      • Moz Local Home
      • STAT
      • Moz API
      • Moz API Home
      • Compare SEO Products
      • Moz Data
    • Free SEO Tools
      • Domain Analysis
      • Keyword Explorer
      • Link Explorer
      • Competitive Research
      • MozBar
      • More Free SEO Tools
    • Learn SEO
      • Beginner's Guide to SEO
      • SEO Learning Center
      • Moz Academy
      • SEO Q&A
      • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
    • Blog
    • Why Moz
      • Agency Solutions
      • Enterprise Solutions
      • Small Business Solutions
      • Case Studies
      • The Moz Story
      • New Releases
    • Log in
    • Log out
    • Products
      • Moz Pro

        Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

      • Moz Local

        Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

      • STAT

        SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

      • Moz API

        Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

      • Compare SEO Products

        See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

      • Moz Data

        Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

      NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
      Moz Pro

      NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

      Learn more
    • Free SEO Tools
      • Domain Analysis

        Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

      • Keyword Explorer

        Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

      • Link Explorer

        Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

      • Competitive Research

        Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

      • MozBar

        See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

      • More Free SEO Tools

        Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

      What is your Brand Authority?
      Moz

      What is your Brand Authority?

      Check yours now
    • Learn SEO
      • Beginner's Guide to SEO

        The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

      • SEO Learning Center

        Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

      • On-Demand Webinars

        Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

      • How-To Guides

        Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

      • Moz Academy

        Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

      • SEO Q&A

        Insights & discussions from an SEO community of 500,000+.

      Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
      Moz API

      Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

      Find your plan
    • Blog
    • Why Moz
      • Small Business Solutions

        Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

      • Agency Solutions

        Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

      • Enterprise Solutions

        Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

      • The Moz Story

        Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

      • Case Studies

        Explore how Moz drives ROI with a proven track record of success.

      • New Releases

        Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

      Surface actionable competitive intel
      New Feature

      Surface actionable competitive intel

      Learn More
    • Log in
      • Moz Pro
      • Moz Local
      • Moz Local Dashboard
      • Moz API
      • Moz API Dashboard
      • Moz Academy
    • Avatar
      • Moz Home
      • Notifications
      • Account & Billing
      • Manage Users
      • Community Profile
      • My Q&A
      • My Videos
      • Log Out

    The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. Home
    2. SEO Tactics
    3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    4. Should I use rel=canonical on similar product pages.

    Moz Q&A is closed.

    After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

    Should I use rel=canonical on similar product pages.

    Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    8
    23
    4009
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
    • mark_baird
      mark_baird last edited by

      I'm thinking of using rel=canonical for similar products on my site.

      Say I'm selling pens and they are al very similar. I.e. a big pen in blue, a pack of 5 blue bic pens, a pack of 10, 50, 100 etc. should I rel=canonical them all to the best seller as its almost impossible to make the pages unique. (I realise the best I realise these should be attributes and not products but I'm sure you get my point)

      It seems sensible to have one master canonical page for bic pens on a site that has a great description video content and good images plus linked articles etc rather than loads of duplicate looking pages.

      love to hear thoughts from the Moz community.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Dr-Pete
        Dr-Pete Staff @BlairKuhnen last edited by

        There's no perfect solution, but Google's advice is to use rel=prev/next. This looks like pretty classic pagination. Rel-canonical is a stronger signal, but it's generally going to keep pages 2+ from ranking.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • BlairKuhnen
          BlairKuhnen @Dr-Pete last edited by

          Dr. Pete,

          I have a internal debate going and I was hoping you might be a tie breaker on rel=canonical vs noindex given these paginated pages and might be a good use case for others:

          https://www.newhomesource.com/communityresults/market-269/citynamefilter-cedar-park

          https://www.newhomesource.com/communityresults/market-269/citynamefilter-cedar-park/page-2

          The individual list items are unique, but clearly want to rank for essentially the exact same terms.  Page titles, metas, copy about cit is the same.  Just the list elements are different, but not a 12 pack of pens, 24 pack etc.  Is this tricky or clear?

          Dr-Pete 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Mark-Tillison
            Mark-Tillison @Dr-Pete last edited by

            Thank you Sir. I think we reached the same conclusion.

            By the way, the it was a just a simple example of the page hierarchy - we're not doing Horror Books 😉

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Dr-Pete
              Dr-Pete Staff @Mark-Tillison last edited by

              I haven't heard any SEO recommendations or benefits regarding rel="contents". Rel=prev/next has mixed results, but I'd generally only use it for its specific use case of paginated content.

              I guess you could treat V2 as "pages" within V1. If you did that, what you'd need to do is treat the main page as a "View All" page and link to it from each author page. I'm not sure if that's the best approach, but it's more or less Google-approved.

              If the site has decent authority and we're only talking 100s of pages, I might let them all live in the index and see what happens. Let Google sort it out, and then decide if you're ok with the outcome. If the site is low authority and/or we're talking 1000s of pages, I might be more cautious.

              It's hard to speak in generalities - it depends a lot on the quality of the site and nature of the pages, including how much that content is available/duplicated across the web. One problem here is that author pages with lists of books probably exist on many sites, so you have to differentiate yourself.

              Mark-Tillison 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Mark-Tillison
                Mark-Tillison @Dr-Pete last edited by

                Good. Same page 🙂

                I was looking in to rel=contents and those variations before, but I can't quite decide whether this is worth the effort or not.

                e.g. There's a huge list of resources on a single page, segmented in to categories. The page is HUGE and takes ages to load, so I've been creating new pages for each segment and optimising those pages independently, but there is some common content with the primary page.

                V1: Horror Novels page has a section for each author, each section lists all novels by that author.

                V2: Each Author has a page which lists novels by that author, but links back to the Horror Novels page which is essentially an index of the Author pages. Would you also

                Would you use rel=contents, rel=prev/next or a different approach in this case? From what I've read so far, there doesn't seem any "SEO value" in linking that way.

                I guess we're trying to improve the UX through faster load times and segmenting the information in smaller chunks, but also presenting a number of pages to Google as a body of content rather than a single page without causing issues with duplicate or similar content - we just need to make sure that we're optimising it in the right way, of course.

                Dr-Pete 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Dr-Pete
                  Dr-Pete Staff @Mark-Tillison last edited by

                  I would Meta Noindex an "email this page" template. It has no value for SERPs, it's generally at the end of a path, and no one is going to link to it. Just keep it out of the index altogether.

                  Mark-Tillison 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Mark-Tillison
                    Mark-Tillison @Dr-Pete last edited by

                    Thanks Pete

                    So, for a more specific example, if an eCommerce store has an "email this product" page for each product (Magento seems to love doing this and creates a duplicate of the same email page for every product), would you recommend a canonical link for each of those pages to the main Contact page or canonically linking each page to each related product page?

                    From setup, I'd consider NoIndex on all of those pages anyway, but it's a bit late for that once a site has been live for years.

                    The email pages are obviously related to the product page, but the content there isn't anywhere near identical.

                    Or maybe there's a "more appropriate solution" that you alluded to? 😉

                    Dr-Pete 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Dr-Pete
                      Dr-Pete Staff last edited by

                      To clarify, that's the official stance - rel=canonical should only be used on true duplicates (basically, URL variants of the same page). In practice, rel=canonical works perfectly well on near-duplicates, and sometimes even on wildly different pages, but the more different you get, the more caution you should exercise. If the pages are wildly different, it's likely there are more appropriate solutions.

                      Mark-Tillison BlairKuhnen 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • Mark-Tillison
                        Mark-Tillison @Dr-Pete last edited by

                        Hey Pete

                        Can you explain, "you can't use rel=canonical on pages that aren't 100% duplicates" a little further please?

                        Do you mean that only duplicate pages should be canonicalised? Identical pages in two different sub-directories is fine, but two similar pages is not?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Dr-Pete
                          Dr-Pete Staff last edited by

                          So, here's the problem - if you follow the official uses of our options, then there is no answer. You can't have thin content or Google will slap you with Panda (or, at the very least, devalue your rankings, you can't use rel=canonical on pages that aren't 100% duplicates, and you're not supposed to (according to Google) just NOINDEX content. The official advice is: "Let us sort it out, but if we don't sort it out, we'll smack you down."

                          I don't mean that to be critical of your comment, but I'm very frustrated with the official party line from Google. Practically speaking, I've found index control to be extremely effective even before Panda, and critical for big sites post-Panda. Sometimes, that means embracing imperfect solutions. The right tool for any situation can be complex (and it may be a combination of tools), but rel=canonical is powerful and often effective, in my experience.

                          Mark-Tillison 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                          • mark_baird
                            mark_baird @Dr-Pete last edited by

                            It seems to me that for most ecommerce sites (myself included) that canonical is not the answer. If you have to many near identical products on your site it may be better to re evaluate what you have stocking and if you must stock them then the way forward is to make one page that properly explains them and allows purchase rather than many.

                            The only uses I can see for canonical is to consolidate old blogs and articles on similar topics. Using it to tidy an ecommerce site seems to be a misuse of the tool.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Dr-Pete
                              Dr-Pete Staff last edited by

                              This can get tricky when you dive into the details, but I general agree with Takeshi and EGOL - consolidate or canonicalize. If the products are different brands/versions of a similar item, it's a bit trickier, but these variations do have a way of spinning out of control. In 2013, I think the down side of your index running wild is a lot higher than the up side of ranking for a couple more long-tail terms. It does depend a lot on your traffic, business model, etc., though. I'm not sure any of us can adequately advise you in the scope of a Q&A.

                              mark_baird 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • PremioOscar
                                PremioOscar last edited by

                                Also I forgot to mention that in this way you also don't have to worry about creating tons of different product descriptions because you will put one description for, let's say, 6 different products.

                                the way we built it, allow us to have just product group pages are reachable; the products pages are indexed and crawled and they have to be there otherwise the whole system wouldn't work, but no optimization is done on them and customers can't see it.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • PremioOscar
                                  PremioOscar last edited by

                                  Hello there,

                                  I manage an e-commerce site and because we have similar products and issues with duplicate content we have implemented product groups pages with a drop-down menu' listing the different options for a particular product and then we have used the rel="canonical" with the different product pages. In this way we have solved this issue and it works very well.

                                  If you do implement it, make sure every passage is done correctly otherwise, as Matt Cutts says, you will have an headache trying to sort it out.

                                  Hope it helps

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • EGOL
                                    EGOL last edited by

                                    Those pen offers are very very similar.  Identical product descriptions except for perhaps number being sold or color or width of the tip.

                                    If these were on my site they would all be on the same page.  One page to concentrate/conserve the linkjuice.  One page to make thicker content.   One page to present all of the options to the customer at same time.  (PITA to click between lots of pages to make up your mind as a shopper).   One page to make maintenance easy.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • mark_baird
                                      mark_baird last edited by

                                      Thanks

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • TakeshiYoung
                                        TakeshiYoung @mark_baird last edited by

                                        Yes, I've used this approach for a number of ecommerce clients, and it is very effective. There are many advantages to this approach:

                                        • Eliminating duplicate/thin content across the site
                                        • Focusing link value on a single page instead of spreading out across multiple products
                                        • Less effort creating unique content (one page vs multiple)
                                        • Potentially better user experience

                                        Of course, if you have the resources to write unique content for each of your product pages, that is going to be a better solution. You can still create a landing page in this instance, you just wouldn't canonical the product pages to it.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                        • mark_baird
                                          mark_baird last edited by

                                          Have you used this approach? If so how effective is it?

                                          TakeshiYoung 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • TakeshiYoung
                                            TakeshiYoung last edited by

                                            If you want to rank for "flat head screw driver", the canonical approach can still work. Simply create a landing page for flat head screw drivers, and include all of the flat head screwdriver products from each of the different brands. Then canonical each of the individual product pages up to the main landing page.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                            • mark_baird
                                              mark_baird @TakeshiYoung last edited by

                                              I have all the usual colour size attributes on my products. I just used that as a simple example. Its more to do with similar non branded products that are different enough to be "products" but not when I have 15 similar it's impossible to write fully different descriptions. Screwdrivers, screws or paint would have been a better example. There are hundreds of ranges like that. If you had five unimportant brands of screwdriver and you had flat head and philips head. Each one is marginally different (handle style etc) but there is no keyword benefit to having each optimised for say "flat head screwdriver". Having a good range is beneficial to the customer but seems to be detrimental to SEO. Is it better to employ writers to make every description different no matter how complex or should I canonical it?

                                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                              • TakeshiYoung
                                                TakeshiYoung last edited by

                                                Yes, that is a good solution, especially in this post-Panda world. Ideally you would just have one page for Bic pens, with a drop down from which you can select different options such as colors & size. If your shopping cart system doesn't allow you to do that, then the canonical is a good approach. This cuts down on the amount of duplicate content you have and the amount of unique content you need to create.

                                                mark_baird 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                                • OlegKorneitchouk
                                                  OlegKorneitchouk last edited by

                                                  Have a client in the exact same situation. Check to see if you are currently getting traffic for terms that would be specific to having separate pages (e.g. "50 blue bic pens" versus a more general "bic blue pens"). If you don't, then you should canonical to one page. If you do, I'd keep it as is and work on diversifying the product pages more.

                                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                                  • 1 / 1
                                                  • First post
                                                    Last post

                                                  Got a burning SEO question?

                                                  Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.


                                                  Start my free trial


                                                  Browse Questions

                                                  Explore more categories

                                                  • Moz Tools

                                                    Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

                                                  • SEO Tactics

                                                    Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

                                                  • Community

                                                    Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

                                                  • Digital Marketing

                                                    Chat about tactics outside of SEO

                                                  • Research & Trends

                                                    Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

                                                  • Support

                                                    Connect on product support and feature requests.

                                                  • See all categories

                                                  Related Questions

                                                  • Vitzz

                                                    Is it ok to repeat a (focus) keyword used on a previous page, on a new page?

                                                    I am cataloguing the pages on our website in terms of which focus keyword has been used with the page. I've noticed that some pages repeated the same keyword / term. I've heard that it's not really good practice, as it's like telling google conflicting information, as the pages with the same keywords will be competing against each other. Is this correct information? If so, is the alternative to use various long-winded keywords instead? If not, meaning it's ok to repeat the keyword on different pages, is there a maximum recommended number of times that we want to repeat the word? Still new-ish to SEO, so any help is much appreciated! V.

                                                    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Vitzz
                                                    1
                                                  • Solid_Gold

                                                    Why is rel="canonical" pointing at a URL with parameters bad?

                                                    Context Our website has a large number of crawl issues stemming from duplicate page content (source: Moz). According to an SEO firm which recently audited our website, some amount of these crawl issues are due to URL parameter usage. They have recommended that we "make sure every page has a Rel Canonical tag that points to the non-parameter version of that URL…parameters should never appear in Canonical tags." Here's an example URL where we have parameters in our canonical tag... http://www.chasing-fireflies.com/costumes-dress-up/womens-costumes/ rel="canonical" href="http://www.chasing-fireflies.com/costumes-dress-up/womens-costumes/?pageSize=0&pageSizeBottom=0" /> Our website runs on IBM WebSphere v 7. Questions Why it is important that the rel canonical tag points to a non-parameter URL? What is the extent of the negative impact from having rel canonicals pointing to URLs including parameters? Any advice for correcting this? Thanks for any help!

                                                    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Solid_Gold
                                                    1
                                                  • luxresorts

                                                    Duplicate Title tags even with rel=canonical

                                                    Hello, We were having duplicate content in our blog (a replica of each post automatically was done by the CMS), until we recently implemented a rel=canonical tag to all the duplicate posts (some 5 weeks ago). So far, no duplicate content were been found, but we are still getting duplicate title tags, though the rel=canonical is present. Any idea why is this the case and what can we do to solve it? Thanks in advance for your help. Tej Luchmun

                                                    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | luxresorts
                                                    0
                                                  • aactive

                                                    Yoast & rel canonical for paginated Wordpress URLs

                                                    Hello, our Wordpress blog at http://www.jobs.ca/career-resources has a rel canonical issue since we added pagination to the front page and category-pages. We're using Yoast and it's incorrectly applying a rel-canonical meta tag referencing page 1 on page 2, 3, etc. This is a known misuse of the rel-canonical tag (per Google's Webmaster Blog - http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.ca/2013/04/5-common-mistakes-with-relcanonical.html, which says rel-canonical should be replaced with rel-prev and rel-next for page 2, 3, etc.). We don't see a way to specify anywhere in Yoast's options to correct this behaviour for page 2, 3, etc. Yoast allows you to override a page's canonical URL, otherwise it automatically uses the Wordpress permalink. My question is, does anyone know how to configure Yoast to properly replace rel-canonical tags with rel-prev and rel-next for paginated URLs, or do I need to look at another plugin or customize the behavior directly in my child theme code? This issue was brought up here as well: http://moz.com/community/q/canonical-help, but the only response did not relate to Yoast. (We're using Wordpress 3.6.1 and Yoast "Wordpress SEO" 1.4.18)

                                                    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | aactive
                                                    0
                                                  • Bryan_Loconto

                                                    When removing a product page from an ecommerce site?

                                                    What is the best practice for removing a product page from an Ecommerce site? If a 301 is not available and the page is already crawled by the search engine A. block it out in the robot.txt B. let it 404

                                                    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bryan_Loconto
                                                    0
                                                  • SDLOnlineChannel

                                                    Is it ok to use both 301 redirect and rel="canonical' at the same time?

                                                    Hi everyone, I'm sorry if this has been asked before. I just wasn't able to find a response in previous questions. To fix the problems in our website regarding duplication I have the possibility to set up 301's and, at the same time, modify our CMS so that it automatically sets a rel="canonical" tag for every page that is generated. Would it be a problem to have both methods set up? Is it a problem to have a on a page that is redirecting to another one? Is it advisable to have a rel="canonical" tag on every single page? Thanks for reading!

                                                    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SDLOnlineChannel
                                                    0
                                                  • Visually

                                                    Are there any negative effects to using a 301 redirect from a page to another internal page?

                                                    For example, from http://www.dog.com/toys to http://www.dog.com/chew-toys. In my situation, the main purpose of the 301 redirect is to replace the page with a new internal page that has a better optimized URL. This will be executed across multiple pages (about 20). None of these pages hold any search rankings but do carry a decent amount of page authority.

                                                    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Visually
                                                    0
                                                  • mhans

                                                    Any penalty for having rel=canonical tags on every page?

                                                    For some reason every webpage of our website (www.nathosp.com)  has a rel=canonical tag. I'm not sure why the previous SEO manager did this, but we don't have any duplicate content that would require a canonical tag. Should I remove these tags? And if so, what's the advantage - or disadvantage of leaving them in place? Thank you in advance for your help. -Josh Fulfer

                                                    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mhans
                                                    1

                                                  Get started with Moz Pro!

                                                  Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                                                  Start my free trial
                                                  Products
                                                  • Moz Pro
                                                  • Moz Local
                                                  • Moz API
                                                  • Moz Data
                                                  • STAT
                                                  • Product Updates
                                                  Moz Solutions
                                                  • SMB Solutions
                                                  • Agency Solutions
                                                  • Enterprise Solutions
                                                  Free SEO Tools
                                                  • Domain Authority Checker
                                                  • Link Explorer
                                                  • Keyword Explorer
                                                  • Competitive Research
                                                  • Brand Authority Checker
                                                  • MozBar Extension
                                                  • MozCast
                                                  Resources
                                                  • Blog
                                                  • SEO Learning Center
                                                  • Help Hub
                                                  • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                                                  • How-to Guides
                                                  • Moz Academy
                                                  • API Docs
                                                  About Moz
                                                  • About
                                                  • Team
                                                  • Careers
                                                  • Contact
                                                  Why Moz
                                                  • Case Studies
                                                  • Testimonials
                                                  Get Involved
                                                  • Become an Affiliate
                                                  • MozCon
                                                  • Webinars
                                                  • Practical Marketer Series
                                                  • MozPod
                                                  Connect with us

                                                  Contact the Help team

                                                  Join our newsletter

                                                  Access all your tools in one place. Whether you're tracking progress or analyzing data, everything you need is at your fingertips.

                                                  Moz logo
                                                  © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                                                  • Accessibility
                                                  • Terms of Use
                                                  • Privacy

                                                  Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.