undefined
Skip to content
Moz logo Menu open Menu close
  • Products
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Pro Home
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Home
    • STAT
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Home
    • Compare SEO Products
    • Moz Data
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis
    • Keyword Explorer
    • Link Explorer
    • Competitive Research
    • MozBar
    • More Free SEO Tools
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO
    • SEO Learning Center
    • Moz Academy
    • SEO Q&A
    • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Agency Solutions
    • Enterprise Solutions
    • Small Business Solutions
    • Case Studies
    • The Moz Story
    • New Releases
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Products
    • Moz Pro

      Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

    • Moz Local

      Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

    • STAT

      SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

    • Moz API

      Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

    • Compare SEO Products

      See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

    • Moz Data

      Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis

      Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

    • Keyword Explorer

      Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

    • Link Explorer

      Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

    • Competitive Research

      Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

    • MozBar

      See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

    • More Free SEO Tools

      Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO

      The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

    • SEO Learning Center

      Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

    • On-Demand Webinars

      Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

    • How-To Guides

      Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

    • Moz Academy

      Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

    • MozCon

      Save on Early Bird tickets and join us in London or New York City

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
    Moz API

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

    Find your plan
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Small Business Solutions

      Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

    • Agency Solutions

      Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

    • Enterprise Solutions

      Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

    • The Moz Story

      Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

    • Case Studies

      Explore how Moz drives ROI with a proven track record of success.

    • New Releases

      Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

    Surface actionable competitive intel
    New Feature

    Surface actionable competitive intel

    Learn More
  • Log in
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Dashboard
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Dashboard
    • Moz Academy
  • Avatar
    • Moz Home
    • Notifications
    • Account & Billing
    • Manage Users
    • Community Profile
    • My Q&A
    • My Videos
    • Log Out

The Moz Q&A Forum

  • Forum
  • Questions
  • Users
  • Ask the Community

Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

  1. Home
  2. SEO Tactics
  3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
  4. Should I use rel=canonical on similar product pages.

Moz Q&A is closed.

After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

Should I use rel=canonical on similar product pages.

Intermediate & Advanced SEO
8
23
4.0k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as question
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
  • mark_baird
    mark_baird last edited by Jun 10, 2013, 6:09 PM

    I'm thinking of using rel=canonical for similar products on my site.

    Say I'm selling pens and they are al very similar. I.e. a big pen in blue, a pack of 5 blue bic pens, a pack of 10, 50, 100 etc. should I rel=canonical them all to the best seller as its almost impossible to make the pages unique. (I realise the best I realise these should be attributes and not products but I'm sure you get my point)

    It seems sensible to have one master canonical page for bic pens on a site that has a great description video content and good images plus linked articles etc rather than loads of duplicate looking pages.

    love to hear thoughts from the Moz community.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • Dr-Pete
      Dr-Pete Staff @BlairKuhnen last edited by Jun 20, 2017, 1:50 PM Jun 20, 2017, 1:50 PM

      There's no perfect solution, but Google's advice is to use rel=prev/next. This looks like pretty classic pagination. Rel-canonical is a stronger signal, but it's generally going to keep pages 2+ from ranking.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • BlairKuhnen
        BlairKuhnen @Dr-Pete last edited by Jun 2, 2017, 6:38 AM Jun 2, 2017, 6:38 AM

        Dr. Pete,

        I have a internal debate going and I was hoping you might be a tie breaker on rel=canonical vs noindex given these paginated pages and might be a good use case for others:

        https://www.newhomesource.com/communityresults/market-269/citynamefilter-cedar-park

        https://www.newhomesource.com/communityresults/market-269/citynamefilter-cedar-park/page-2

        The individual list items are unique, but clearly want to rank for essentially the exact same terms.  Page titles, metas, copy about cit is the same.  Just the list elements are different, but not a 12 pack of pens, 24 pack etc.  Is this tricky or clear?

        Dr-Pete 1 Reply Last reply Jun 20, 2017, 1:50 PM Reply Quote 0
        • Mark-Tillison
          Mark-Tillison @Dr-Pete last edited by Sep 23, 2015, 5:33 AM Sep 23, 2015, 5:33 AM

          Thank you Sir. I think we reached the same conclusion.

          By the way, the it was a just a simple example of the page hierarchy - we're not doing Horror Books 😉

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Dr-Pete
            Dr-Pete Staff @Mark-Tillison last edited by Sep 22, 2015, 5:05 PM Sep 22, 2015, 5:05 PM

            I haven't heard any SEO recommendations or benefits regarding rel="contents". Rel=prev/next has mixed results, but I'd generally only use it for its specific use case of paginated content.

            I guess you could treat V2 as "pages" within V1. If you did that, what you'd need to do is treat the main page as a "View All" page and link to it from each author page. I'm not sure if that's the best approach, but it's more or less Google-approved.

            If the site has decent authority and we're only talking 100s of pages, I might let them all live in the index and see what happens. Let Google sort it out, and then decide if you're ok with the outcome. If the site is low authority and/or we're talking 1000s of pages, I might be more cautious.

            It's hard to speak in generalities - it depends a lot on the quality of the site and nature of the pages, including how much that content is available/duplicated across the web. One problem here is that author pages with lists of books probably exist on many sites, so you have to differentiate yourself.

            Mark-Tillison 1 Reply Last reply Sep 23, 2015, 5:33 AM Reply Quote 1
            • Mark-Tillison
              Mark-Tillison @Dr-Pete last edited by Sep 22, 2015, 9:20 AM Sep 22, 2015, 9:20 AM

              Good. Same page 🙂

              I was looking in to rel=contents and those variations before, but I can't quite decide whether this is worth the effort or not.

              e.g. There's a huge list of resources on a single page, segmented in to categories. The page is HUGE and takes ages to load, so I've been creating new pages for each segment and optimising those pages independently, but there is some common content with the primary page.

              V1: Horror Novels page has a section for each author, each section lists all novels by that author.

              V2: Each Author has a page which lists novels by that author, but links back to the Horror Novels page which is essentially an index of the Author pages. Would you also

              Would you use rel=contents, rel=prev/next or a different approach in this case? From what I've read so far, there doesn't seem any "SEO value" in linking that way.

              I guess we're trying to improve the UX through faster load times and segmenting the information in smaller chunks, but also presenting a number of pages to Google as a body of content rather than a single page without causing issues with duplicate or similar content - we just need to make sure that we're optimising it in the right way, of course.

              Dr-Pete 1 Reply Last reply Sep 22, 2015, 5:05 PM Reply Quote 0
              • Dr-Pete
                Dr-Pete Staff @Mark-Tillison last edited by Sep 22, 2015, 8:54 AM Sep 22, 2015, 8:54 AM

                I would Meta Noindex an "email this page" template. It has no value for SERPs, it's generally at the end of a path, and no one is going to link to it. Just keep it out of the index altogether.

                Mark-Tillison 1 Reply Last reply Sep 22, 2015, 9:20 AM Reply Quote 0
                • Mark-Tillison
                  Mark-Tillison @Dr-Pete last edited by Sep 22, 2015, 5:47 AM Sep 22, 2015, 5:47 AM

                  Thanks Pete

                  So, for a more specific example, if an eCommerce store has an "email this product" page for each product (Magento seems to love doing this and creates a duplicate of the same email page for every product), would you recommend a canonical link for each of those pages to the main Contact page or canonically linking each page to each related product page?

                  From setup, I'd consider NoIndex on all of those pages anyway, but it's a bit late for that once a site has been live for years.

                  The email pages are obviously related to the product page, but the content there isn't anywhere near identical.

                  Or maybe there's a "more appropriate solution" that you alluded to? 😉

                  Dr-Pete 1 Reply Last reply Sep 22, 2015, 8:54 AM Reply Quote 0
                  • Dr-Pete
                    Dr-Pete Staff last edited by Sep 21, 2015, 12:59 PM Sep 21, 2015, 12:59 PM

                    To clarify, that's the official stance - rel=canonical should only be used on true duplicates (basically, URL variants of the same page). In practice, rel=canonical works perfectly well on near-duplicates, and sometimes even on wildly different pages, but the more different you get, the more caution you should exercise. If the pages are wildly different, it's likely there are more appropriate solutions.

                    Mark-Tillison BlairKuhnen 2 Replies Last reply Jun 2, 2017, 6:38 AM Reply Quote 1
                    • Mark-Tillison
                      Mark-Tillison @Dr-Pete last edited by Sep 18, 2015, 9:10 PM Sep 18, 2015, 9:10 PM

                      Hey Pete

                      Can you explain, "you can't use rel=canonical on pages that aren't 100% duplicates" a little further please?

                      Do you mean that only duplicate pages should be canonicalised? Identical pages in two different sub-directories is fine, but two similar pages is not?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Dr-Pete
                        Dr-Pete Staff last edited by Jun 13, 2013, 4:07 PM Jun 13, 2013, 4:07 PM

                        So, here's the problem - if you follow the official uses of our options, then there is no answer. You can't have thin content or Google will slap you with Panda (or, at the very least, devalue your rankings, you can't use rel=canonical on pages that aren't 100% duplicates, and you're not supposed to (according to Google) just NOINDEX content. The official advice is: "Let us sort it out, but if we don't sort it out, we'll smack you down."

                        I don't mean that to be critical of your comment, but I'm very frustrated with the official party line from Google. Practically speaking, I've found index control to be extremely effective even before Panda, and critical for big sites post-Panda. Sometimes, that means embracing imperfect solutions. The right tool for any situation can be complex (and it may be a combination of tools), but rel=canonical is powerful and often effective, in my experience.

                        Mark-Tillison 1 Reply Last reply Sep 18, 2015, 9:10 PM Reply Quote 3
                        • mark_baird
                          mark_baird @Dr-Pete last edited by Jun 12, 2013, 7:17 PM Jun 12, 2013, 7:17 PM

                          It seems to me that for most ecommerce sites (myself included) that canonical is not the answer. If you have to many near identical products on your site it may be better to re evaluate what you have stocking and if you must stock them then the way forward is to make one page that properly explains them and allows purchase rather than many.

                          The only uses I can see for canonical is to consolidate old blogs and articles on similar topics. Using it to tidy an ecommerce site seems to be a misuse of the tool.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Dr-Pete
                            Dr-Pete Staff last edited by Jun 12, 2013, 6:24 PM Jun 12, 2013, 6:24 PM

                            This can get tricky when you dive into the details, but I general agree with Takeshi and EGOL - consolidate or canonicalize. If the products are different brands/versions of a similar item, it's a bit trickier, but these variations do have a way of spinning out of control. In 2013, I think the down side of your index running wild is a lot higher than the up side of ranking for a couple more long-tail terms. It does depend a lot on your traffic, business model, etc., though. I'm not sure any of us can adequately advise you in the scope of a Q&A.

                            mark_baird 1 Reply Last reply Jun 12, 2013, 7:17 PM Reply Quote 1
                            • PremioOscar
                              PremioOscar last edited by Jun 11, 2013, 6:22 AM Jun 11, 2013, 6:22 AM

                              Also I forgot to mention that in this way you also don't have to worry about creating tons of different product descriptions because you will put one description for, let's say, 6 different products.

                              the way we built it, allow us to have just product group pages are reachable; the products pages are indexed and crawled and they have to be there otherwise the whole system wouldn't work, but no optimization is done on them and customers can't see it.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • PremioOscar
                                PremioOscar last edited by Jun 11, 2013, 6:17 AM Jun 11, 2013, 6:17 AM

                                Hello there,

                                I manage an e-commerce site and because we have similar products and issues with duplicate content we have implemented product groups pages with a drop-down menu' listing the different options for a particular product and then we have used the rel="canonical" with the different product pages. In this way we have solved this issue and it works very well.

                                If you do implement it, make sure every passage is done correctly otherwise, as Matt Cutts says, you will have an headache trying to sort it out.

                                Hope it helps

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • EGOL
                                  EGOL last edited by Jun 10, 2013, 9:42 PM Jun 10, 2013, 9:42 PM

                                  Those pen offers are very very similar.  Identical product descriptions except for perhaps number being sold or color or width of the tip.

                                  If these were on my site they would all be on the same page.  One page to concentrate/conserve the linkjuice.  One page to make thicker content.   One page to present all of the options to the customer at same time.  (PITA to click between lots of pages to make up your mind as a shopper).   One page to make maintenance easy.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • mark_baird
                                    mark_baird last edited by Jun 10, 2013, 7:44 PM Jun 10, 2013, 7:44 PM

                                    Thanks

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • TakeshiYoung
                                      TakeshiYoung @mark_baird last edited by Jun 10, 2013, 7:37 PM Jun 10, 2013, 7:37 PM

                                      Yes, I've used this approach for a number of ecommerce clients, and it is very effective. There are many advantages to this approach:

                                      • Eliminating duplicate/thin content across the site
                                      • Focusing link value on a single page instead of spreading out across multiple products
                                      • Less effort creating unique content (one page vs multiple)
                                      • Potentially better user experience

                                      Of course, if you have the resources to write unique content for each of your product pages, that is going to be a better solution. You can still create a landing page in this instance, you just wouldn't canonical the product pages to it.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                      • mark_baird
                                        mark_baird last edited by Jun 10, 2013, 7:13 PM Jun 10, 2013, 7:13 PM

                                        Have you used this approach? If so how effective is it?

                                        TakeshiYoung 1 Reply Last reply Jun 10, 2013, 7:37 PM Reply Quote 0
                                        • TakeshiYoung
                                          TakeshiYoung last edited by Jun 10, 2013, 7:02 PM Jun 10, 2013, 7:02 PM

                                          If you want to rank for "flat head screw driver", the canonical approach can still work. Simply create a landing page for flat head screw drivers, and include all of the flat head screwdriver products from each of the different brands. Then canonical each of the individual product pages up to the main landing page.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • mark_baird
                                            mark_baird @TakeshiYoung last edited by Jun 10, 2013, 6:57 PM Jun 10, 2013, 6:57 PM

                                            I have all the usual colour size attributes on my products. I just used that as a simple example. Its more to do with similar non branded products that are different enough to be "products" but not when I have 15 similar it's impossible to write fully different descriptions. Screwdrivers, screws or paint would have been a better example. There are hundreds of ranges like that. If you had five unimportant brands of screwdriver and you had flat head and philips head. Each one is marginally different (handle style etc) but there is no keyword benefit to having each optimised for say "flat head screwdriver". Having a good range is beneficial to the customer but seems to be detrimental to SEO. Is it better to employ writers to make every description different no matter how complex or should I canonical it?

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • TakeshiYoung
                                              TakeshiYoung last edited by Jun 10, 2013, 6:18 PM Jun 10, 2013, 6:18 PM

                                              Yes, that is a good solution, especially in this post-Panda world. Ideally you would just have one page for Bic pens, with a drop down from which you can select different options such as colors & size. If your shopping cart system doesn't allow you to do that, then the canonical is a good approach. This cuts down on the amount of duplicate content you have and the amount of unique content you need to create.

                                              mark_baird 1 Reply Last reply Jun 10, 2013, 6:57 PM Reply Quote 2
                                              • OlegKorneitchouk
                                                OlegKorneitchouk last edited by Jun 10, 2013, 6:16 PM Jun 10, 2013, 6:16 PM

                                                Have a client in the exact same situation. Check to see if you are currently getting traffic for terms that would be specific to having separate pages (e.g. "50 blue bic pens" versus a more general "bic blue pens"). If you don't, then you should canonical to one page. If you do, I'd keep it as is and work on diversifying the product pages more.

                                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                                • 1 / 1
                                                1 out of 23
                                                • First post
                                                  1/23
                                                  Last post

                                                Got a burning SEO question?

                                                Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.


                                                Start my free trial


                                                Browse Questions

                                                Explore more categories

                                                • Moz Tools

                                                  Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

                                                • SEO Tactics

                                                  Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

                                                • Community

                                                  Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

                                                • Digital Marketing

                                                  Chat about tactics outside of SEO

                                                • Research & Trends

                                                  Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

                                                • Support

                                                  Connect on product support and feature requests.

                                                • See all categories

                                                Related Questions

                                                • Kingalan1

                                                  Best Practices for Title Tags for Product Listing Page

                                                  My industry is commercial real estate in New York City. Our site has 300 real estate listings. The format we have been using for Title Tags are below. This probably disastrous from an SEO perspective. Using number is a total waste space. A few questions:
                                                  -Should we set listing not no index if they are not content rich?
                                                  -If we do choose to index them, should we avoid titles listing Square Footage and dollar amounts?
                                                  -Since local SEO is critical, should the titles always list New York, NY or Manhattan, NY?
                                                  -I have red that titles should contain some form of branding. But our company name is Metro Manhattan Office Space. That would take up way too much space. Even "Metro Manhattan" is long. DO we need to use the title tag for branding or can we just focus on a brief description of page content incorporating one important phrase? Our site is: w w w . m e t r o - m a n h a t t a n . c o m <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
                                                  | Turnkey Flatiron Tech Space | 2,850 SF $10,687/month | <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
                                                  | Gallery, Office Rental | Midtown, W. 57 St | 4441SF $24055/month | <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
                                                  | Open Plan Loft |Flatiron, Chelsea | 2414SF $12,874/month | <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
                                                  | Tribeca Corner Loft | Varick Street | 2267SF $11,712/month | <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
                                                  | 275 Madison, LAW, P7, 3,252SF, $65 - Manhattan, New York |

                                                  Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Dec 20, 2017, 2:10 PM | Kingalan1
                                                  0
                                                • unirmk

                                                  Rel=canonical and internal links

                                                  Hi Mozzers, I was musing about rel=canonical this morning and it occurred to me that I didnt have a good answer to the following question: How does applying a rel=canonical on page A referencing page B as the canonical version affect the treatment of the links on page A? I am thinking of whether those links would get counted twice, or in the case of ver-near-duplicates which may have an extra sentence which includes an extra link, whther that extra link would count towards the internal link graph or not. I suspect that google would basically ignore all the content on page A and only look to page B taking into account only page Bs  links. Any thoughts? Thanks!

                                                  Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jan 17, 2017, 12:32 PM | unirmk
                                                  0
                                                • moon-boots

                                                  How to add Canonical Tags on Opencart Products

                                                  Does anyone know how to add canonical tags to product pages in Opencart? Is this possible to do in htaccess? If so, how specifically should it be written in? Please do not post any links to other pages which reference generic canonical information as I've read them all and none help. I'm looking for an Opencart specific answer, or a way to do it in htaccess.

                                                  Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Oct 4, 2016, 9:12 AM | moon-boots
                                                  0
                                                • Solid_Gold

                                                  Why is rel="canonical" pointing at a URL with parameters bad?

                                                  Context Our website has a large number of crawl issues stemming from duplicate page content (source: Moz). According to an SEO firm which recently audited our website, some amount of these crawl issues are due to URL parameter usage. They have recommended that we "make sure every page has a Rel Canonical tag that points to the non-parameter version of that URL…parameters should never appear in Canonical tags." Here's an example URL where we have parameters in our canonical tag... http://www.chasing-fireflies.com/costumes-dress-up/womens-costumes/ rel="canonical" href="http://www.chasing-fireflies.com/costumes-dress-up/womens-costumes/?pageSize=0&pageSizeBottom=0" /> Our website runs on IBM WebSphere v 7. Questions Why it is important that the rel canonical tag points to a non-parameter URL? What is the extent of the negative impact from having rel canonicals pointing to URLs including parameters? Any advice for correcting this? Thanks for any help!

                                                  Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jan 22, 2016, 3:35 PM | Solid_Gold
                                                  1
                                                • mj775

                                                  Canonical VS Rel=Next & Rel=Prev for Paginated Pages

                                                  I run an ecommerce site that paginates product pages within Categories/Sub-Categories. Currently, products are not displayed in multiple categories but this will most likely happen as time goes on (in Clearance and Manufacturer Categories). I am unclear as to the proper implementation of Canonical tags and Rel=Next & Rel=Prev tags on paginated pages. I do not have a View All page to use as the Canonical URL so that is not an option. I want to avoid duplicate content issues down the road when products are displayed in multiple categories of the site and have Search Engines index paginated pages. My question is, should I use the Rel=Next & Rel=Prev tags on paginated pages as well as using Page One as the Canonical URL? Also, should I implement the Canonical tag on pages that are not yet paginated (only one page)?

                                                  Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Oct 24, 2012, 3:27 PM | mj775
                                                  0
                                                • Omnipress

                                                  Do I need to use canonicals if I will be using 301's?

                                                  I just took a job about three months and one of the first things I wanted to do was restructure the site. The current structure is solution based but I am moving it toward a product focus. The problem I'm having is the CMS I'm using isn't the greatest (and yes I've brought this up to my CMS provider). It creates multiple URL's for the same page. For example, these two urls are the same page: (note: these aren't the actual urls, I just made them up for demonstration purposes) http://www.website.com/home/meet-us/team-leaders/boss-man/
                                                  http://www.website.com/home/meet-us/team-leaders/boss-man/bossman.cmsx (I know this is terrible, and once our contract is up we'll be looking at a different provider) So clearly I need to set up canonical tags for the last two pages that look like this: http://www.omnipress.com/boss-man" /> With the new site restructure, do I need to put a canonical tag on the second page to tell the search engine that it's the same as the first, since I'll be changing the category it's in? For Example: http://www.website.com/home/meet-us/team-leaders/boss-man/ will become http://www.website.com/home/MEET-OUR-TEAM/team-leaders/boss-man My overall question is, do I need to spend the time to run through our entire site and do canonical tags AND 301 redirects to the new page, or can I just simply redirect both of them to the new page? I hope this makes sense. Your help is greatly appreciated!!

                                                  Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Aug 22, 2012, 11:58 AM | Omnipress
                                                  0
                                                • AndrewY

                                                  Max # of Products / Links per Page on E-Commerce Site

                                                  We are getting ready to re-launch our e-commerce site and are trying to decide how many products to list per category page.  Some of of our category pages have upwards of 100 products.  While I'd love to list ALL the products on the root category page (to reduce hassle for customer, to index more products on a higher PR page), I'm a little worried about having it be too long, and containing too many on-page links. Would love some guidance on: Maximum number of internal links on a page If Google frowns on really long category pages Anything else I should be considering when making this decision Thanks for your input!

                                                  Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Feb 25, 2012, 3:28 AM | AndrewY
                                                  2
                                                • donthe

                                                  Paging. is it better to use noindex, follow

                                                  Is it better to use the robots meta noindex, follow tag for paging, (page 2, page 3) of Category Pages which lists items within each category or just let Google index these pages Before Panda I was not using noindex because I figured if page 2 is in Google's index then the items on page 2 are more likely to be in Google's index. Also then each item has an internal link So after I got hit by panda, I'm thinking well page 2 has no unique content only a list of links with a short excerpt from each item which can be found on each items page so it's not unique content, maybe that contributed to Panda penalty. So I place the meta tag noindex, follow on every page 2,3 for each category page. Page 1 of each category page has a short introduction so i hope that it is enough to make it "thick" content (is that a word :-))  My visitors don't want long introductions, it hurts bounce rate and time on site. Now I'm wondering if that is common practice and if items on page 2 are less likely to be indexed since they have no internal links from an indexed page Thanks!

                                                  Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jan 26, 2014, 1:20 AM | donthe
                                                  0

                                                Get started with Moz Pro!

                                                Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                                                Start my free trial
                                                Products
                                                • Moz Pro
                                                • Moz Local
                                                • Moz API
                                                • Moz Data
                                                • STAT
                                                • Product Updates
                                                Moz Solutions
                                                • SMB Solutions
                                                • Agency Solutions
                                                • Enterprise Solutions
                                                Free SEO Tools
                                                • Domain Authority Checker
                                                • Link Explorer
                                                • Keyword Explorer
                                                • Competitive Research
                                                • Brand Authority Checker
                                                • Local Citation Checker
                                                • MozBar Extension
                                                • MozCast
                                                Resources
                                                • Blog
                                                • SEO Learning Center
                                                • Help Hub
                                                • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                                                • How-to Guides
                                                • Moz Academy
                                                • API Docs
                                                About Moz
                                                • About
                                                • Team
                                                • Careers
                                                • Contact
                                                Why Moz
                                                • Case Studies
                                                • Testimonials
                                                Get Involved
                                                • Become an Affiliate
                                                • MozCon
                                                • Webinars
                                                • Practical Marketer Series
                                                • MozPod
                                                Connect with us

                                                Contact the Help team

                                                Join our newsletter
                                                Moz logo
                                                © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                                                • Accessibility
                                                • Terms of Use
                                                • Privacy

                                                Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.