Website Redesign and Migration to Squarespace killed my Ranking
-
My old website was dated, ugly, impossible to update and a mess between hard-coded pages and WP, but we were ranking #1 in the organic searches for our key words.
I just redesigned my website using Squarespace. I kept most of the same text on the pages (for key words) and kept the same Meta-Tags and Title Tags for each page as much as possible.
Once I was satisfied that I had done as much on-page optimization as I could, I changed the IP in our Domain Name Registry so that it would point to our new website on the Squarespace host. And our new website was live!
...Then I watched in dismay as our ranking fell into oblivion.
I think this might have something to do with not doing any 301 redirects from the old website and losing all of my link juice.
Is this the case? And, if so, how do I fix it?
Our website url is www.kanataskinclinic.ca
Thanks
-
Really sorry to hear the new site is still struggling, Nicolas. In some quick indexing tests, it certainly appears that your blog posts are being indexed, and I'm seeing them in the search results for the specific post titles. [See screenshot attached] It's possible this may have picked up in the 10 days since you posted this.
I'm assuming you submitted your site's xml sitemap to the correct www version of your Google Search Console? What does the sitemaps report indicate as far as the number of pages indexed compared the number submitted?
Certainly one of the tradeoffs of a site tool like Squarespace is that you have far less control of the code to implement technical SEO, but it shouldn't be so problematic that you lose rankings completely.
If you're interested, I'd be happy to share a short Skype chat to try to narrow down the issues. You can send me a private message through my account here at Moz.
Paul
-
Why thank you!
Did some of that info help you out as well?
p.
-
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your detailed response. And sorry for the delay in my reply. I am currently focused on updating my knowledge on SEO as much as possible so that I can figure out what happened to our website ranking.
I have re-directed all the major pages on my website, and continue to redirect pages as I come across them, but there are fewer and fewer and I don't think they're very important.
I did discover some other troubling problems, though: I tried using the "view as text" feature of Google Cache to see how Google sees our site....And it looks terrible!
- There is a lot of duplicate content, including page titles, which is horrifying.
- Duplicate and even triplicate content arises where I used their carousels and sliders,
- The images do not have their original filenames, just some generic SquareSpace "static" name.
- There is little, if any alt text, and I'm not always sure where it comes from, as I didn't put it there.
To make matters worse, even though our website has been live for over a month, and I have submitted it to Google for indexing several times already, my blog posts still do not show up on Google. Even the ones that are featured on our home page. Even if you type their titles right into Google's search bar.
Ugh! It took me several months to build our new website, and I was very proud of the result. It looks beautiful. But, if it's that ugly to Google, I'm going to have to look for other options.
-
Paul, you rock!
-
Most welcome - happy to see another Canuck hereabouts
My mom's just down the road from you in Arnprior.
If you were able to get the initial broken links review corrected within two weeks, that's great - not much of the authority should have dissipated.
However to note - the 404s in Search Console aren't the only ones that need to be fixed - they're just the ones Google has noticed and alerted you to so far. The problem with relying on GSC to tell you what to fix is that, by the time it has shown up in the Console, Google has already hit a 404 and been told it's a missing page. It's totally reactive, instead of proactive.
I'd strongly recommend you also use the other methods I mentioned to get more of the old URLs found & redirected as well before Google notices they're borked. It's also ideal if you can try to get the owners of the most valuable sites that linked to you in the past to update their links to point directly to the new pages. It's a bit of a battle, but even just a few updated can make a difference.
As far as how long until "link juice starts flowing" by which I assume you mean "rankings and traffic start to return" - the only real answer is "it depends", I'm afraid. You'll want to submit your new sitemap to GSC so that you can track the progress of the indexing of your new site's pages (on Squarespace, the URL to submit is www.kanataskinclinic.ca/sitemap.xml). You should also do this for Bing's Webmaster Tools.
Since URLs and content have changed, it's going to take some time for your site to fully re-index and for Google to understand the value of the new content. Could be from a few weeks to a month. It would also help to submit a few of the main section pages using the Fetch as Google tool in GSC and to get some new, strong incoming links to the site's pages. Good social links, and at least one or two new ones from relevant sites.
Lemme know if you have further ??s
Paul
-
Just to clarify, our new website was just launched two weeks ago. Hopefully, I haven't lost too much power from the old links?
-
Hi P.
Thank you so much for your informative reply.
I took your advice and went into my Google Search Console and checked for 404 errors. Google made it easy by listing all of the broken URLs. They even thoughtfully allowed me to download the list into a Google Doc so that I could keep track of my work as I fixed them.
I then went into my SquareSpace control panel and added 301 redirects for the broken pages. It was surprisingly easy to do, and they provided very clear, step-by-step instructions to help.
After doing this, I checked my Google Search Console to see if anything had changed. I was pleasantly surprised to see that the redirects were working immediately. Wow, fast!
Now that this problem is resolved, how soon does the link juice start flowing? In other words, how soon do you think it will affect our ranking?
-
And just to add - there is a shelf life on recovering all that page and link equity. The longer those old URLs 404, the more of the power of the old pages will erode away.
Two month is a long time - don't dally on getting those redirects started immediately.
P.
-
Regardless of the possible issues with the new design, yes, if you changed to new URLs on the new site and didn't implement correct 301-redirects from all the old URLs, you have essentially thrown away all the ranking authority and inbound links contributed by all of your old pages except the home page.
Since most homepages only rank for a small portion of the total number of terms for an established website, that's the primary cause of your immediate problem.
To fix it, you have some hard work ahead of you to capture as many of the old URLs as possible and write redirects to the new URLs. These old pages can be captured in a number of ways. The easiest initial method is to look up all the 404 errors in you Google Search Console, sort them by date, then start fixing all the ones after the date of the site change.
You can also use your Analytics data - create a report of all the page URLs of your site that received traffic in the year before the change, then sort them by highest traffic to prioritise where to start creating rewrites. You can also capture the current 404 errors in your Analytics data for high-priority pages to get redirected.
For a final more high tech solution, you can use Screaming Frog SEO Crawler to crawl the archive.org WayBack Machine version of your site to capture as many old URLs as possible.
Hope all that makes sense?
Paul
-
Not using 301s could be a big part of the problem. Do your old backlinks all point to existing pages on the new domain?
-
Hello,
According to Wayback machine, you've migrated your website after April,13.
https://web.archive.org/web/20160413071802/http://www.kanataskinclinic.ca/
We can see clearly that you have changed everything ! Design, photos... So you've changed the UX ! Text is important but Google takes user engagement into account, and if users are not reassured by your new design, you will never get back your positions ! In old design buttons are clearly identifiable, it's more simple to navigate, some menus are youseful like "Why choose us ?"... I think you'd better improve old design and navigation and forget the new one !
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Which one is better for ranking?
Hello community My question is most of the domains on the first page has non-WWW URL thereby If I consider High domain authoritative sites including https://moz.com/ and https://ahrefs.com/ : the site URL is without www on the contrary, when I take Google it has https://www.google.co.in/ It just confused me, could anyone solve my issue that which one is better for SEO?
Web Design | | Tabassum0 -
Seperating Different Parts Of The Website
Hi There, I have a client with two parts to his business both for different types of customer with different language and copy needed. At the moment they have one website and I am trying to figure out the most search engine friendly way to present these different types. So for example if a client came in looking for service A, he would see the home page for service A and if he came in looking for service B he would come across the home page for service B. I know I could have seperate service pages for each service he provides, but I think it would be off putting to come to a home page of a site and see completely unrelated services on one page. I hope I am explaining myself here. As far as I can see the options are:- subdomains for servicea.examplesite.com, serviceb.examplesite.com and a split page (see attachement) where you click which you are interested in (don't like this idea) seperate websites a home page which shows all the services (too confusing) Any advice would be most grateful. Regards Neil MpYSKqN
Web Design | | nezona0 -
Making a website menu + structure + hierarchies + kw research
When making a new website structure I assume we all think about SEO but at the same time as we can't forget UX.
Web Design | | ceranoktan
How much of your KW research would you implement in menu \ website structure?
What do you think is important to think about when making a website structure? Thank you in advance, BR,
Ceran0 -
Website subscribe form.
Hello, Im working on a clients website and I have 2 box's. One is a subscription box and the other is a newsletter sing up. Subscription box is a google feedburner where every time there is a new post, it automatically notifies the readers. Whats the best strategy to have subscribe box since its confusing for readers when you have 2 forms. Thank you for your help.
Web Design | | KentR0 -
Website Redesign 301 Question
Hey Moz gang, I have a question that I believe I know how I'm going to handle, but just wanted some feedback from the Moz community on best practices. At my company, we're going through a site redesign. At the moment, our site is deeper than it should be with many one-off feature pages. For example, we have a Features page that then links to individual pages for each specific feature. One goal we have set for the redesign is a condensing of the pages in order to make the site more user-friendly, easy to manage and content rich. My question is this. We have a lot of these individual pages that I want to essentially kill and merge into one page. It is okay (best practice) to 301 all of those individual feature specific pages to the single Features page since that is now where all of that content lives?? I want to retain the link juice that those pages have gained over time, but I don't want to get penalized for too many 301's to a single page. Any advice or previous experience would be awesome 🙂 Thanks, Lance
Web Design | | RobinBryant10 -
Does redesigning a website affects SEO results
We have a website and we are getting good traffic to it. Its a travel related domain registered many years back. Now its ranking high for most of the potential keywords even if it is not at all SEO friendly (Domain is an exact match keyword). We are planning to redesign it. Will that affect the SEO Ranking? We need to ask some more doubts: 1. When redesigning we are planning to change the inner page URL. So it it wise to redirect (301) old URL to the new URL? Old url will not be there after redesigning. But its currently having page ranks. 2. Can we redirect more than one old url to a single new page? 3. Google new updates said "they will be going to diminish the exact match results domains". Does that updates affects us? 4. Any more suggestions for the redesigning?
Web Design | | jjv0 -
Redesign of an ecommerce site
I was just wondering how we should deal with filters and pagination with our ecommerce website. We can do nofollow or noindex, follow or canonical for both filters and pagination. Which one we should choose and why? By the way we are trying to create more sub categories to avoid too many pages but we have 1,000s products and we still end up with a quite high amount of pages. I've read a few conflicting seomoz QA about this issue. Many Thanks
Web Design | | Jvalops0 -
Could Website redesign be a cause of drop in rankings?
We had a complete redesign of our website and moved it over to wordpress several months ago. As url's changed, we had appropriate 301 redirects done. Rankings for our top keywords dropped, but others remained intact. Our SEO company told us rankings drop when a redesign is done, but I thought if we did all redirects properly (which they approved), it wouldn't be much of a problem. Additionally, we've been steadily adding good new content. Any advice?
Web Design | | rdreich490