Only One Canonical URL Tag
-
HI, I'm an SEO novice - company owner with no money so doing it all myself with help from my web designer using wordpress. Ive just completed some seo and done the moz page scoring analysis for optimisation and gained 92% - however - there is one outstanding issue on canonical url tags - i.e.
recommened fix = The canonical URL tag is intended to refer duplicate pages to a single canonical URL. To ensure the search engines properly parse the canonical source, your page should use only one version of this tag in the header. See Canonical URL Tag - the Most Important Advancement in SEO Practices Since Sitemaps
Ive gone through the page code and can see I have 2 rel=canonical references - am I able to simply delete one - how do I do this if its been created by the yoast/wordpress plug-in?
Many thanks in advance for any help!
-
Smart move. Let me know if I can be of any more help then does this answer your question?
-
hi thomas, yes - we are keeping the yoast plug-in but switching the rss feed plug-in to a different one that will enable us to switch off the canonical ref.
-
You have an RSS feed that is adding a canonical to your own site?
RSS normally can add canonical's to third-party sites I don't think that the issue is Yoast I believe it is with the RSS post importer.
this is the second best SEO plugin you can use
https://wordpress.org/plugins/all-in-one-seo-pack/
every decent word press seo plugin will add canonical's you can choose to turn off canonical's on Yoast however I would do this using the RSS post importer
In case your are using WordPress SEO plugin, you’ll have to add a filter in the functions.php file just before the closing of PHP as shown in the screenshot below.
See
http://i.imgur.com/cr7IU4W.jpg
Here is the exact code:
add_filter( 'wpseo_canonical', '__return_false' );
It will disable canonical tags across the site and no page, no post and no archive will show this tag. But if you want to disable tagging function on certain posts, pages or category archives, you’ll have to use this code instead of the code mentioned above.
function wpseo_canonical_exclude( $canonical ) {global $post;if (is_single( '348' )) {$canonical = false;}return $canonical;}
As you know every post, page, category or any another archive has its own unique ID in the wordpress. So in the above example we used 348 which is the post ID for a specific post where the canonical tag will not show. If you don’t know how to find the ID, here is a good article for you. To hide this tag from multiple posts, use this code.
function wpseo_canonical_exclude( $canonical ) {global $post;is_single( array( 17, 19, 1, 11 ) ) {$canonical = false;}return $canonical;}
I still strongly recommend that you keep the canonical on via plug-in and not via RSS there are too many things that it could miss and cause problems for you.
I hope this helps,
Tom
-
HI Tom, thankyou very much for your help and information on this. We have now investigated where the second canonical url was coming from and we found that the plugin we use to import the daily feed (RRS Post Importer) is also adding in it’s own canonical URL (as well as the yoast seo). We are now going to look at switching in a different plug-in for this which will give us functionality to delete the rel-canonical reference, as the one we have doesn't enable you to do this.
Again, thanks for your help.
Kind regards
Matthew
-
here is a CSV file showing the pages with more than one canonical you must make it so there's only one canonical per a page
here is the CSV
Bigger photo http://i.imgur.com/cqcTN0h.png
<colgroup><col width="420"> <col width="184"> <col span="3" width="87"> <col width="199"> <col width="304"> <col span="3" width="87"></colgroup>
| Directives - Canonical | | | | | | | | | |
| Address | Occurrences | Meta Robots 1 | X-Robots-Tag 1 | Meta Refresh 1 | Canonical Link Element 1 | Canonical Link Element 2 | HTTP Canonical | rel=“next†| rel=“prev†|
| http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/ | 3 | noodp | | | http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/ | http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/ | | | |
| http://www.completetenders.com/ | 2 | noodp | | | http://www.completetenders.com/ | | | | |
| http://www.completetenders.com/services/tendering-process/ | 3 | noodp | | | http://www.completetenders.com/services/tendering-process/ | http://www.completetenders.com/services/tendering-process/ | | | |
| http://www.completetenders.com/services/tender-writing/ | 3 | noodp | | | http://www.completetenders.com/services/tender-writing/ | http://www.completetenders.com/services/tender-writing/ | | | |
| http://www.completetenders.com/open-tenders/ | 2 | noodp | | | http://www.completetenders.com/open-tenders/ | | | | |all the best,
Tom
-
I just checked the URL you referenced you have duplicate canonical tags I checked it using screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/
please look at the data below.
You need to remove one of them you should only have one.
so instead of this
- Canonical Link Element 1 http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/
- Canonical Link Element 2 http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/
you get
- Canonical Link Element 1 http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/
See
URL Encoded Address http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/
Content text/html; charset=UTF-8
Status Code 200
Status OK
Size 150645
Title 1 Bid Management / End-to-end Tendering Support
Meta Description 1 Professional Bid Management Consultants / Bid Solutions to Win Contracts / Everything You Need / Expert Advice on 07429 191305
H1-1 Bid Management
H2-1 Bid Management
H2-2 View More
Meta Robots 1 noodp
Canonical Link Element 1 http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/
Canonical Link Element 2 http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/
Word Count 723
Level 0
Inlinks 14
Outlinks 23 -
Look at your source code on these pages use command-F (on Mac) or control F (on PC) to search for the term "canonical" if you do not see it more than once on the page it should be no issue.
"the only difference I can see is the first one uses '...' and the second one uses "..."
The canonical link? If there are two canonical bags on the same page make sure to remove the one that is not pointing to your preferred page or make sure the canonical is self-referencing. But make certain there are no more than one canonical tag like this below
Look for
Also, I would use
- https://www.deepcrawl.com/ allowing free site crawls right now
- and/or
- https://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/ free up to 500 pages.
Just to confirm you do not have duplicate canonical's both tools will let you know for sure is will checking the source code of the page that is flagged. if it does not have duplicates I would report it to The Moz they are awesome at getting back to you and answering these types of issues if there is in fact only one canonical per a page.
I hope that helps,
Tom
-
Hi Gents, thanks for your replies.
Tom - Ive looked in detail at both the canonical references in the header on my page at they both look the same -
Line 23 -
href='http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/' />
Line 133 –
href="http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/" />
the only difference I can see is the first one uses '...' and the second one uses "..."
can you confirm if I should amend this in yoast or whether this is something that only moz is picking up as two different canonicals?
-
you are correct you should only have one canonical tag on a page Max
Because you're using WordPress Yoast SEO plug-in I can tell you that it automatically adds canonical URL for you when you are modifying thing that should be pointing somewhere else you have to go into the advanced area in the photo below.
So all of these URLs would show the same content:
- http://example.com/wordpress/seo-plugin/ you would want to point them all to the first URL via canonical
- http://example.com/wordpress/seo-plugin/?isnt=it-awesome
- http://example.com/wordpress/seo-plugin/?cmpgn=twitter
- http://example.com/wordpress/seo-plugin/?cmpgn=facebook
for more information on how to use that plug-in and remember only one per page and if the page is duplicate content pointed to the page that you want Google to assume is the owner of that content.
If you get stuck ask me or reference this below.
https://yoast.com/rel-canonical/
All the best,
Tom
-
Hi,
You could, but I would try to find out where the other one is coming from. Basically the second rel canonical tag will overwrite the first in most cases. So trying to find out how you delete one with keeping the right one would make most sense. You're at least on the right path!
Martijn.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
URL is Inaccesible
Hi, I have tried this url: https://www.3dquickprinting.com/ on Moz onpage grader but it responds "Sorry, but that URL is inaccessible." I have checked my Robots.txt but it does not have any entry to block MOZ crawler. Please see: #User-Agent: *
Moz Bar | | HiteshP
#Crawl-Delay: 30 #For robots.txt
User-agent: BLEXBot
Disallow: /
User-agent: MJ12bot
Disallow: /
User-agent: TwengaBot
Disallow: /
User-agent: 008
Disallow: /
User-agent: WotBox
Disallow: / Please advice what to do get rid from this error. Thanks,0 -
On-Page Grader URL inaccessible when copy/pasted but not when edited
Hi!, I've looked through multiple topics on this but none quite seem to fit what's going on - hopefully someone can help! I get the error message 'Sorry, but that URL is inaccessible.' when I copy and paste a url from my site into the search e.g. http://www.orbussoftware.com/enterprise-architecture/ However if I edit this to https the search completes fine. Since we redesigned our site approx 6 months ago, we've found most of our rankings have completely dropped off, and now I'm getting this error I'm wondering if it has something to do with how our site is structured? If I'm getting this error with Moz does that mean Google could be having issues too? Or is it all just a strange quirk? Thanks!
Moz Bar | | JennaOrbus0 -
On-Page Grader "Sorry, but that URL is inaccessible."
We have a new client with a squarespace page. http://www.mountainhouseestate.com The Moz On-Page grader returns the error "Sorry, but that URL is inaccessible." for all pages. Possibly related, Google seems to hate their site. Even a search for "mountain house estate" returns lousy results. Bing/Yahoo has no problem with it.
Moz Bar | | Duke_Ferris1 -
URL not returning a page successfully
I am trying to use the on page grader however it is not working with my website. The url is: http://www.britishhardwoods.co.uk/ Can anyone help?
Moz Bar | | British_Hardwoods0 -
Site crawl errors - download list of all urls
Hi Ive provided my clients developers with the pdf reports of crawl errors but these seem to miss some urls I see there are lots of csv file download/email options Will the email csv button send a report of everything listing all urls that are missing from the pdfs ? if not will the more specific csv reports Would be good if i can press 1 button and get all issues listed with all urls It does look like this happens but i just want confirmed best way asap since need to provide reports urgently, any guidance much appreciated ? All Best Dan
Moz Bar | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
How do you feel when Moz marks one of your questions as "answered?"
Hi everyone, This is not meant to be snarky at all, so I just want to preface my question with that. So, since the new re-branded Moz rolled out last year, I'm sure many of you have noticed that if you ask a question and it is answered by a Moz associate, your question is marked as "answered." I'm sorry, but I don't like this. Here's why, I'm the one who asked the question. I should be the one who determines if the answer was adequate for me, or if it didn't sufficiently answer my question. This is particularly true when my question doesn't have to do with a customer service issue or a Moz tool question. If I ask a question about SEO, Content, CRO, marketing or any other subject, I feel like it should be me and only me who determines whether or not I feel like my question is answered. In addition to this, Moz is actually depriving themselves of useful UGC by shutting down questions in this way. How? Because when the rest of us who frequent the Q & A see a question that's already been marked as "answered" we tend not to open it, read it and respond, because we think that person has already gotten what they needed....when in fact, it could be that a Moz associate has jumped in and marked their question as answered when it really wasn't. Consequently, we all miss out. I propose/move that Moz associates can only mark questions as "answered" when they pertain directly to Q & A about Moz tools, service and support. All other questions must be marked as "answered" only by the asker or closed as "answered" after they have been dormant for 6 months or more. Can I get a second (motion) ?
Moz Bar | | danatanseo4 -
Canonicals in crawling reports
The crawling reports gives info about several meta data missing, what about the lack of a canonical tag? This would be nice too... and images without alt tag (or empty).
Moz Bar | | KBC0