What is the proper URL length? in seo
-
i learned that having 50 to 60 words in a url is ok and having less words is preferable by google.
but i would like to know that as i am gonna include keywords in the urls and i am afraid it will increase the length. is it gonna slighlty gonna hurt me?
my competitors have 8 characters domain url and keywords length of 13
and my site has 15 character domain url and keywords length of 13
which one will be prefered by google.
-
Well to me a proper url link shouldnt be more than 50 in lenght.. i use more below or rather about 60 on my website Timetocare
-
Well to me a proper url link shouldnt be more than 50 in lenght.. i use more below or rather about 60 on my website Timetocare
-
Well to me a proper url link shouldnt be more than 50 in lenght.. i use more below or rather about 60 on my website Timetocare
-
In terms of SEO (Search Engine Optimization), while there's no strict rule for the optimal URL length, it's generally recommended to keep URLs concise, descriptive, and user-friendly. Here are some guidelines and considerations:
-
Short and Descriptive:
- Aim for short and descriptive URLs that give users and search engines a clear idea of the page's content. Avoid unnecessary parameters or overly complex structures.
-
Keywords:
- Include relevant keywords in the URL, especially in the domain and the path. This can help search engines understand the topic of the page.
-
Readability:
- Keep URLs readable by using hyphens to separate words instead of underscores. For example, use "example.com/important-page" instead of "example.com/important_page."
-
Avoid Dynamic Parameters:
- If possible, avoid using dynamic parameters in URLs (e.g., "example.com/page?id=123"). Static, keyword-rich URLs are generally more SEO-friendly.
-
Consistency:
- Maintain consistency in your URL structure across your website. This helps both users and search engines navigate and understand the organization of your content.
-
301 Redirects for Changes:
- If you need to change a URL, use 301 redirects to inform search engines that the content has permanently moved. This preserves SEO value.
-
Limit Length:
- While there's no strict character limit for URLs, it's advisable to keep them reasonably short, ideally under 100 characters. Shorter URLs are easier to remember and share.
-
HTTPS:
- Use HTTPS for secure connections. Search engines tend to favor secure websites, and HTTPS is considered a ranking factor.
Remember that the primary goal is to create URLs that are user-friendly and provide a clear indication of the content. Search engines use URLs to understand the context and relevance of a page, so optimizing them for readability and keywords can positively impact your SEO efforts. Additionally, creating a logical URL structure helps users navigate your site more easily.
-
-
The ideal URL length for SEO is typically under 60 characters. Shorter URLs are easier for search engines to crawl and for users to read and remember. Keeping URLs concise, relevant to the page content, and including keywords can positively impact SEO performance. Avoid lengthy URLs with unnecessary parameters or characters.
-
The appropriate page URL is 75 characters length. And the maximum length of URL in the address bar is 2049 characters. For more info. like this click here.
-
In SEO, there is no strict rule for an ideal URL length, but it's generally recommended to keep URLs concise, relevant, and user-friendly. Here are some guidelines to consider:
Short and Descriptive: Aim for short and descriptive URLs that give users and search engines a clear idea of the page's content. A concise URL is easier to remember and share.
Include Keywords: If possible, include relevant keywords in your URL. This can contribute to the page's SEO, but don't over-optimize by stuffing too many keywords.
Avoid Dynamic Parameters: Clean, static URLs are preferred over URLs with dynamic parameters (e.g., https://azdentalclub.com/). Search engines prefer URLs that are easily readable and don't contain unnecessary parameters.
Hyphens Between Words: Use hyphens (-) rather than underscores (_) to separate words in the URL. Search engines treat hyphens as space, but underscores are not recognized as separators.
Avoid Stop Words: Consider omitting unnecessary stop words (e.g., "and," "or," "but") from your URLs. Focus on the main keywords that represent the page's content.
Be Consistent: Maintain a consistent URL structure across your site. Consistency makes it easier for both users and search engines to navigate and understand your website.
HTTPS: Ensure that your URLs use the secure HTTPS protocol. Google tends to favor secure websites, and HTTPS is a ranking factor.
While there's no strict character limit for URLs, it's generally advisable to keep them under 255 characters. This is because longer URLs may be truncated in search results, making them less user-friendly.
Remember that user experience is crucial, so prioritize creating URLs that are easy to read and understand. Additionally, focus on providing valuable content on your pages, as content quality is a key factor in SEO.
-
The proper URL length for SEO is generally recommended to be under 256 characters. It's important to keep your URLs concise and descriptive. Short and relevant URLs tend to perform better in search engine rankings and are easier for users to remember and share. Including relevant keywords in your URL can also help search engines and users understand the content of the page. Additionally, using hyphens to separate words in the URL is preferred over underscores or other special characters. Overall, aim for clear, concise, and keyword-rich URLs that accurately represent the content of your web pages.
-
50- 60 characters in a URL is good enough and will not be considered spam by Google. However, the vital aspect would be how you use the keywords and whether they are elegantly placed or one is stuffing it. Try to be as descriptive for the search engine, try to make it scannable and break it down.
Try to aim for a low-character URL because it is less likely to be mistaken as spam.
-
length can be detected as spam. You have to pay attention to the length.
-
The optimal length is 50-60 characters. If you're using a plugin like Rankmath or Yoast, they will also tell you which is optimum.
I'm following the Rankmath's guide to URL length and it's working perfectly and getting amazing results on my courier tracking website. -
It is crucial to consistently conduct competitor analysis, paying close attention to the length of their URLs.
A common mistake that many people make is incorporating long-tail keywords into their URLs, which is not considered a good SEO practice.
Personally, I strive to limit my site article URLs to a maximum of 4-5 words. In certain cases where the search volume is relatively low, I may include additional words, but the general best practice is to keep the URL as short as possible.
Once again, I cannot emphasize enough the importance of competitor analysis in shaping your approach.
-
When it comes to URL length for SEO, there is no definitive answer. However, it's generally recommended to keep URLs concise, include relevant keywords, avoid excessive parameters and unnecessary characters, use hyphens as word separators, maintain consistency, and prioritize usability and readability. Remember, URL length is just one factor among many that affect SEO.
-
Somewhere up to 75 characters max, from what I read. Longer than that could cause some difficulties in ranking.
-
While the length of a URL can have some impact on search engine optimization (SEO), it is generally recommended to keep URLs concise and relevant to the content of the page. URLs with fewer words tend to be easier for users to read and remember, and they also tend to be more user-friendly for sharing and linking purposes.
The impact of URL length on SEO is relatively small compared to other factors such as the quality and relevance of the content on your website, backlinks, site speed, user experience, and overall website optimization.
In terms of your specific scenario, where your competitors have 8-character domain URLs and keywords with a length of 13, and your site has a 15-character domain URL and keywords of the same length, it's unlikely that the slight difference in URL length alone would significantly impact your search engine rankings.
Google's algorithms consider numerous factors when determining the relevance and ranking of a website, and URL length is just one of them. It's important to focus on creating high-quality content, using relevant keywords, and ensuring a positive user experience on your website. These factors are likely to have a more substantial impact on your search engine rankings than the length of your URL.
-
I have tried to use proper URL length in my site but in some instances, long tail KWs mess it up. Then you have no option but a more than appropriate URL length
-
but sometimes the the long tail KW makes it difficult to have shorter URL length. for example "how many questions can you ask chatgpt"
-
When it comes to URL length in SEO (Search Engine Optimization), there is no strict rule for the maximum or ideal length. However, it's generally recommended to keep URLs concise, descriptive, and user-friendly. Here are some guidelines to consider:
Descriptive and Relevant: A URL should give users and search engines a clear idea of what the page is about. Including relevant keywords or a brief description of the content can help improve understanding and visibility.
Concise and Readable: Aim for shorter URLs that are easy to read and remember. Long, complex URLs can be confusing and difficult to share. Use hyphens (-) to separate words within the URL safe-ways and avoid using unnecessary characters, numbers, or special characters.
Avoid Keyword Stuffing: While it's important to include relevant keywords, avoid keyword stuffing in URLs. Maintain a natural flow and readability, and prioritize clarity over excessive keyword usage.
Maintain Consistency: Consistency in URL structure can benefit both users and search engines. Use a consistent format throughout your website, which can include using lowercase letters, eliminating unnecessary parameters, and organizing URLs in a logical and hierarchical manner.
-
@calvinkj Always analyze your competitors and analyze the length of their URLs.
Most people do big mistake and add long tail keyword in URL which isn't a good SEO practice.
I always add max. 4-5 words in URL for my site articles and in some articles where search volume is relatively lower, I do add more words but the best practice is have the shorter URL as possible.
Again, competitor analysis is the key
-
Some experience from words and hypehns in domain names
I used a hyphenated site www.octopus-energy-referral.co.uk and it is not doing too well compared to the non-hyphenated name. Similarly I have a site www.octopuscode.co.uk and it is doing really well compared to the hyphenated name because is is short and has fewer key words..
I know this is not a forensic comparison but I believe a non-hyphenated short name with fewer keywords is best if you have a choice.. -
If you haven't read this yet, please do (best practices for URLs).
So, it's a combination of things. As Devi Allen said, less is more. You want to use (and not over-use) descriptive words, separated by hyphens, "keeping URLs as simple, relevant, compelling, and accurate as possible". "To correctly render in all browsers, URLs must be shorter than 2,083 characters."
Which is better, your URL or your competitors? They sound pretty close based on your description but what matters is the actual words used in the URL, the site structure represented by that construct, whether the words truly represent what a visitor will find on the page, and whether the page content will provide visitors with the information they came looking for. URL length is but one of many factors that go into determining whether you or your competitor will rank higher.
-
You already answer it, less word is better.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Negative SEO yes/no?
We receive links from fake websites, these website are copy's from real websites that link to us, but sometimes the links are changes, as for example one link is called 'tank weapon with hitler', we are a insurance comparison website (a bit of topic). The real websites that link to us are copied and placed on .ga .tk etc domains: For example: wahlrsinnsa.ga, loungihngsa.ga, pajapritosa.cf, rgeitsportsa.cf, sospesvoasa.tk I received spam links on other domains with comments spam etc, this doesnt really work, but in this case we really suffer in our rankings (from position 1 to 5 etc). Not sure if this is negative SEO and if this is really the reason we lost some rankings, but it's a bit of a coincidence the domains come in google webmaster in the same period we suffer a downgrade in our rankings. My question: Is this negative SEO, or is it something automatic. And do I need to disavow the links/domains? The real versions of the websites (on other domains with .nl) give the website autority.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | remkoallertz0 -
Negative SEO - Spammy Backlinks By Competitor
Hi Everyone, Someone has generated more than 22k spam backlinks (on bad keywords) for my domain.Will it hurt on my website (SEO Ranking)? Because it is already in the top ranking. How could I remove all the spammy backlinks? How could I know particular competitior who have done this?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | HuptechWebseo0 -
More or Less pages helps in SEO?
Hi all, I have gone through some articles where less pages are suggested and they claim that they will be favoured by Google. I'm not sure as with limited pages, we can only target limited keywords. There might be threat from Google in-terms of doorway pages for more pages. But one of our competitor has many pages like dedicated page for every keyword. And their website ranks high and good for all keywords. I can see three pages created with differnet phrases for same on keyword. If less pages are good, how come this works for our competitor? Thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | vtmoz0 -
Competition cheating on seo
So im trying to rank for O'fallon lawn care. And my competitor bought a domain lawncareofallonmo.com and now ranks number one....there is even a link to "take me to my homepage" What is going on i thought this was so 2008 not 2014.....
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | grnside10 -
What sources do you use to keep on top of SEO news?
I want to try building an RSS feed of SEO news... but not wanting to find myself drowning in materials As such, looking for a short list of recommendations for keeping on top of SEO developments – the impetus is that I'm still discovering changes that happened 2, 3, even 5 years ago, and I want to try and catch these things as they happen. Thinking something actually from Google may be on the list, but some of these sources are pretty on top of things! Seroundtable.com also comes to mind. But what do you use to keep informed? Thanks 🙂
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | ntcma1 -
What is left ethical? What is working for offpage SEO? Very long write up in here and my take on things.
Hello,
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | MarketingOfAmerica
Please ignore misspells and grammar, this was typed quickly as I am spending my time researching not writing a perfect book on it. My goal is to find ethical very hard to get links unlike guest posts which are now dead according to Matt Cutt's blog here http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/guest-blogging/. My journey started with a quick message to Rand Fishkin, he responded the following "Hi Matthew - thankfully, there's literally hundreds of link building methodologies that are still completely legit. Check out http://moz.com/blog/category/link-building and you'll find tons and tons of them. The key is that none are easy, none are particularly scalable, and all of them require doing work that will add value for searchers, for your brand, and for your overall marketing - which is exactly what Google wants to count. Wish you all the best," Thanks Rand Fishkin! So I started my search looking for links that are hard to get other than those that are directories, forum links that are dead and spammy, blog comments which are overused, guest posts, or any type of black hat link. I figured I would start to check what other popular SEO companies were doing and that have been at the top through many of the updates. After running an analysis on the term SEO services I found the following Test 1. I analyzed Main Street Host to start with. If you type in SEO services in Google you can see they are rank 1 for it. After a quick analysis it's easy to see that they have 100's of footer links on clients that they have, some with exact match anchors and some without. My question is, is why is this a viable tactic? Lets take for example the following. If you pull up their http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/ stats and look at the inbound links you will come to an exact match anchor right away that says SEO Marketing Company. I went to the weebly link that they have and found that they have put their name at the bottom of this page. Issue 1 - Why is it ok for this type of link, but it's not ok for a template link? Aren't these links suppose to be penalized? Issue 2 - Nothing on the page is even relevant to their link at all. As we have read before, you need to have links surrounding relevant text. Take a look at their backlinks you and you will find almost all of their high quality links are exact match anchors coming from their clients surrounded by irrelevant text. Why is this working? How is this different than a network? What stops someone from just starting a network and dedicating 1 footer link to a full site and putting up dummy info... Anyone can go to Godaddy and purchase a DA 40+ site or so and throw up $20 of content and a footer link. As I dove deeper into finding what is ethical and working I discovered many of the top SEO companies use this. Not just one, but over 20 of them use this same method. Lets use another example. So I started to look at what they did for their clients. How did I know who they worked for? Simple I assume that since they have their link at the bottom of the page and claim that they do SEO for them, they are indeed working for them. So I analyzed the site we talked about a while ago on the Weebly that they had their link on. It's the Valley Art Weebly link if your checking yourself. I quickly found that they are using a network to rank up some of their clients as well. For example http://firesidebookshop.com/index.html Take a look at the link on this page leading to the art place. At first glance the site doesn't look spammy, but try to buy a book, or even order one. Who has an online book store, but doesn't sell books lol? Who also puts interesting links on their home page? This screams network to me. I am willing to bet the following will happen - Matt Cutts and his spam team will ad something like the following to the algorithm or whatever you would like to call it "ignore link if total outbound dofollow links on full site = x amount or higher" = internal Google disavow tool = bye to guest blogging. So what is everyone going to do? Okay it's time to figure out what that number is right? Lets do some tests and lets say that magic number is 5 to 10 links on a whole site. What does this do? This drives the price of quick SEO up again evening the playing field for others using ethical SEO like myself. How do I figure this? Lets face it black hat SEO will never end as long as someone is able to do it. Now since guest posts are gone, the quick link on quality sites surrounded by enough text to count is gone. This means that it will cost extra money, because everyone will be forced to put a max of x amount of links to be safe and for the links to get noticed on a website. So now they have to purchase an established domain that is high enough quality to pass the correct link juice through to a clients site that they want to rank up. Lets figure a few dollars for a unique IP, another few for the hosting, $40 to $100 for the domain if your lucky on Godaddy auctions, and then $40 for the content to make it look realistic if your getting it for $0.01 a word. Plus the time it takes to setup your site. This price of that $30 Odesk guest post backlink just went up to a min of $100 or so. Diving deeper into what's working and moving past the networks, because I feel this will only work temporarily as well if you are brave enough to use this and I know I am not. It doesn't seem to ethical to me at the end of the day even though some may argue, you are just creating more relevant websites which can maximize your traffic streams. The problem is I have stopped here and am stuck. Sure I have looked at http://moz.com/blog/category/link-building and read the most recent post where it talks about 31 types of links. Most of those links don't apply or are outdated and you shouldn't use them. Some of them talk about forum links,directories, bookmarks.. Those have been tactics for years and sure you may find 1 out of 1000 that are good, but the rest are just spam. I have been over to search engine land, and a handful of other sites. I have talked to many other SEO's as well. They are emailing me asking what they should do after guest posts, because they are unsure. The question is, what is ethical? Let say you have a plumber, or a roofer, .gov links are nearly impossible for them and quite frankly that seems spammy to me to even post them on one. I know what many are going to say, build links as if your not worried about Google and you will grow.. Where are you going to build the links to if everything is unethical? As we know clients will walk if they don't see improvements quickly. What's quickly? I would say around the 3 to 6 month period using ethical SEO. Sure there is onpage, a great blog, etc., but what is there left truly ethical for offpage SEO besides some good press releases, some social profile links like a pinterst, and the normal? I must be missing something! I am not looking for the easy way, I am not afraid to get my hands dirty and work hard. If anyone can show me a quick example of a truly ethical link I would be grateful to see this. I can't seem to wrap my head around something that I can do that will last at this point. If you don't want to share it to the world, please PM me. [edited for formatting by Keri Morgret]0 -
Do rss feeds help seo in 2013?
I have seen answers for this back in 2012 but as we all now things have changed in 2013. My question is Do rss feeds help seo in 2013? Or does google see it as duplicate content (I see that the moz site has RSS ...)
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Llanero0