Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Unsolved How should I update the grouping of keywords in a google ads account
-
hi, I have a google adwords account running for a while in a fairly competitive market in a major city so there is only one geo location with many suburbs or council areas as popular searched. I have keywords that are 2-4 words long and very similar. I have had one keyword in its own campaign, several in one campaign and a location campaign. The location campaign has several adgroups for specific suburbs.
My question is that the most popular search terms are similar but in different campaigns and I am wondering if this is not the best way.
for example I have these keywords in separate campaigns as exact match and phrase match
rubbish removal
rubbish removal near me
rubbish removal WashingtonBut the way google uses exact match seems to be changing and I am concerned these would be best in one adgroup. Also these keywords trigger similar phrases, for example, waste removal.
Is it best to put them in one campaign with one ad group or one campaign with separate adgroups, or leave as is. As competition has increased I need to bid for top of page now and need to keep budget rises as little as possible..
-
I am new to Google Ads API and currently ... The code example you shared is how to change the keyword for an ad group rather than updating the keyword itself.
-
I would echo what other users have suggested here; the way Google has changed 'Exact match' recently means it allows for close variants, so there will be overlap. Particularly for very similar keywords such as "rubbish removal" and "rubbish removal near me", as you have suggested here.
If you were going to put these keywords in the same campaign but segment them by ad group then I'd recommend adding ad group level negative keywords to ensure you're getting a true picture of each keyword's performance. For example in the ad group containing 'rubbish removal' only you'd want to have 'near me' as an ad group level negative keyword.
This granular approach tends to work well for high volume keywords so it really depends on search volume. As with anything in Google Ads - test and learn!
-
It can be beneficial to group similar keywords together in the same campaign or ad group, as it can help you manage your bids and budgets more effectively. It can also help ensure that your ads are showing to the right audience for those specific keywords.
In your case, since the search terms "rubbish removal", "rubbish removal near me", and "rubbish removal Washington" are all related to the same service, it may be helpful to group them together in the same campaign or ad group. This way, you can ensure that your ads are showing to the right audience for all of these related search terms, and you can manage your bids and budgets more effectively across these keywords.
However, you should also keep in mind that each keyword can have different search volumes, competition levels, and performance metrics, so it may be helpful to create separate ad groups within the same campaign for each keyword to allow you to set specific bids and budgets for each one. You can also use negative keywords to ensure that your ads are not showing for irrelevant search terms, which can help improve your ad relevance and reduce your overall costs.
Overall, the best approach will depend on your specific goals and performance metrics, so it may be helpful to experiment with different campaign and ad group structures and analyze the results to determine what works best for your business.
-
@Kateparish Thank you. You have pretty much confirmed what I was thinking. I cant use Broad match though, its to general and brings up searches that are irrelevant and for other types of businesses eg removalists
-
Thank you.
<a href=”https://www.eminozturkhukuk.com” rel=”dofollow”>Beylikdüzü avukat</a>
-
@salliWW It sounds like you have a few different campaigns and ad groups for your Google AdWords account targeting various areas and keywords related to rubbish removal. As you've mentioned, Google's exact match algorithm has been changing, so it may be worth reviewing your current campaign structure to see if there are opportunities to optimize your account and reduce costs.
Here are a few things you could consider:
Consolidate campaigns and ad groups: If you have similar keywords that trigger similar phrases, consolidate them into one campaign with separate ad groups. It can simplify your account structure and make managing your bids and budgets easier.
Use broad match modified keywords: Consider using broad match modified keywords instead of exact match or phrase match. It can help you capture more relevant search queries and reduce the number of campaigns and ad groups you need to manage.
Use negative keywords: Negative keywords can help you exclude irrelevant search queries and reduce costs. For example, you could use "free" or "DIY" as negative keywords to exclude searches for free or do-it-yourself rubbish removal.
Monitor your campaigns regularly: Analyze your campaigns and adjust your bids and budgets as needed to maintain your ad position and achieve your advertising goals. Consider using automated bidding strategies to help you optimize your bids and save time. -
Updating the grouping of keywords in a Google Ads account can be done by following these steps:
Sign in to your Google Ads account and navigate to the "Keywords" tab.
Review your current keyword groupings and determine which keywords need to be moved or added to new groups.
Click on the checkbox next to the keywords you want to move or add to a new group.
Click on the "Edit" drop-down menu and select "Move to ad group."
In the pop-up window, choose the ad group you want to move the keywords to or create a new ad group by selecting "Create new ad group" and giving it a name.
Click "Move" to complete the process.
It's important to keep your keyword groupings organized and relevant to your ad groups to ensure that your ads are targeted to the right audience and have a higher chance of converting. You can also use tools like Google's Keyword Planner to help you identify new keywords and group them together based on relevance and search volume.
If you any query regarding this then you can [contact us freely](link https://pcsoresults.ph/) without any hesitation. -
HI SalliWW,
It would be best to have all your similar keywords in one campaign with separate ad groups. This will allow you to better manage your budget and ensure that your ads are being shown to the right audience. Having multiple campaigns with similar keywords can lead to competition within your own campaigns and result in wasted ad spend.In terms of exact match, Google has recently changed the way it works, but it is still a powerful tool for targeting specific keywords. You should consider using a combination of broad match, phrase match, and exact match to ensure that you are reaching a wide audience while also targeting specific keywords.
Additionally, you can use negative keywords to ensure that your ads are not shown to irrelevant search queries. This can help you to further optimize your campaigns and improve your ROI.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Website is flagged as Compromised Site by Google
Hi everyone, We have been running Google Ads for a while now and last week all of our Google Ads were paused with reason Compromised Site. We reached out to Google and they identify this page as one of the affected page: https://manpower.com.vn/vi/dich-vu-san-dau-nguoi-and-tu-van-nhan-su-cap-cao? The malicious links they found are:
Paid Search Marketing | | ManpowerVietnam
• googie-anaiytics[.]com
• vty68[.]net We have asked our Website vendor to scan and they found nothing. We would be greatly appreciated if you could help. I tried Google Search Console and even the tool Google Safe Browsing that Google itself suggested but both the tools showed that our website does not have any malicious links at all. And yet Google Ads support team keeps telling us our page contains these links. I am wondering if anyone in the community has experienced this before and how did you address this issue. Or could you guys please help to share any tools that you know can do a deep scan on this page and if possible our entire website to help us identify where the links are located? Please let me know if you need any additional information from us and I would be happy to provide it.3 -
"Duplicate without user-selected canonical” - impact to Google Ads costs
Hello, we are facing some issues on our project and we would like to get some advice. Scenario
Paid Search Marketing | | Alex_Pisa
We run several websites (www.brandName.com, www.brandName.be, www.brandName.ch, etc..) all in French language . All sites have nearly the same content & structure, only minor text (some headings and phone numbers due to different countries are different). There are many good quality pages, but again they are the same over all domains. Current solution
Currently we don’t use canonicals, instead we use rel="alternate" hreflang="x-default": <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-BE" href="https://www.brandName.be/" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-CA" href="https://www.brandName.ca/" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-CH" href="https://www.brandName.ch/" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-FR" href="https://www.brandName.fr/" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-LU" href="https://www.brandName.lu/" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="x-default" href="https://www.brandName.com/" /> Naturally this si reflected in ""Duplicate without user-selected canonical” . Issue
We create the same ad in Google Ads for 2 domains. So the content is mostly identical, ads are identical, target URLs differ only in domain. Yet Google Ads “Quality score” is different (10/10 vs. 6/10) and “Landing page experience” is very different (Above average vs. Average). Some members of our team think lower “Landing page experience” increases the Google Ads costs, which I personally don't believe, but I want to double check. Question: Can “Duplicate without user-selected canonical” issue decrease the “Landing page experience” rating and as result can it cause higher Google ads costs? Any suggestions/ideas appreciated, thanks. Regards.0 -
How to deal with the InCorrect Price Issue for the Google Shopping Product Listing Ads?
Hello All, Yesterday when i was checking with the one of the search term for "canvas prints"..i come to know that one of the advertiser EasyCanvasPrints.com is showing Incorrect price. On Search result they guys are showing $7.46 incorrect price for the PLA - Product listing ads. Go to below links: https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&site=webhp&tbs=vw:l,mr:1,seller:8521978&tbm=shop&q=canvas+prints&sa=X&ved=0CJkGELMrahUKEwjmj-PSgfzIAhUHBY4KHc0VBBQ https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=canvas+prints&tbm=shop https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=canvas+prints&start=0 But when we click on it then i can not this price $7.46 http://www.easycanvasprints.com/single-canvas?singlecanvas=1&height=19&width=14&pcode=5345334C6B74647246774137536C786768544B5458776C35644F747855796D39&utm_source=google_base&utm_medium=data_feed I have done various claim and send to Google support about this misguiding price for the Easy Canvas Prints but they not taking any actions on it. Guy Can u please help me how can i pass this message to Google to take actions for this advertiser? Waiting for your reply Regards Dinesh
Paid Search Marketing | | CommercePundit0 -
Google Shopping Feed being blocked by robots.txt
I had created a manual Google Shopping Feed that was working fine, and then someone well meaning put a block in my robots.txt file so Google couldn't read the images folder. because of this, Google now won't accept my feed. I changed the robots.txt file to allow them to read the images again, but it's been 3 days now and I'm still getting the error saying my products are disallowed because the robots.txt file won't let them scan for images. Does anyone know how long it will take for Google to see it again?
Paid Search Marketing | | sparrowdog0 -
Best practice to separate paid from organic conversions in Google Analytics
I have a PPC campaign for a client with standalone landing pages with a form, not reachable from the website (although in the same domain). I've added the AdWords conversion code to the "thank you" page and I also added a Goal in
Paid Search Marketing | | DoMiSoL
Google Analytics whose counter is increased every time the thank you page is reached. This way I can track conversions with both AdWords and Analytics. Is that correct? Should I import back in AdWords the goals from Analytics, as suggested in the AdWords account? I have another landing page with a form in the website, where I send users coming from
organic search, so I set up a second goal in Analytics for the thank you page of this form. Is this the reason why I am supposed to import in AdWords the analytics' goals, so that I could see both kind of conversions in both accounts? But the most important question is: If I send both PPC/organic visitors to the same landing page is there still a way to separate PPC from Organic conversions? Thank you very much for your advice. DoMiSoL Rossini0 -
Why does my google analytics show a massive discrepancy from facebook's reported website clicks?
We're running a Facebook news feed ad that is pointing at our homepage. Facebook says that for yesterday there were 47 website clicks. Google analytics shows 15 total visitors from facebook with 3 of them landing on the homepage. I understand that there is likely going to be some discrepancy with users accidentally clicking and clicking back before the page loads, but this seems a little insane. I tested the ad using a page that pulls the Analytics cookie data using php and it is working properly so I don't understand what's happening. The url isn't tagged with utm parameters, which is going to be fixed. Anyone experience this or have any insight as to what could be this issue? Is this click fraud? Edit: For more clarification I was checking on my completely unfiltered google analytics profile/view.
Paid Search Marketing | | spencerhjustice0 -
Increasing Google Ad spend - is it worth it
Hi We are currently spending approx £500 pcm on google ad words however if I increased this spend to £4000 pcm what kind of results would this achieve? For example would it just be more visits per day as the budget is larger? Also what is the best way to track the success of an adwords campaign - the ultimate goal of the campaign would be to generate a lead whether this be a phone call, email or using our book an appointment form. Our service covers a geographical area (Scotland) and for organic search we are doing well 1st pages listings for searches such as pvc doors edinburgh etc so I am unsure whether it's worth increasing my PPC spend or put more resource into SEO, or even Facebook ads?
Paid Search Marketing | | ocelot0 -
Multiple keyword match types - same ad group, or separate ad groups?
Hi guys, Looking at an account that has historically used broad matching, and i'd now like to take some of the better performing keywords and duplicate as phrase and/or exact match to increase the quality of traffic to the landing pages. I know I can add red shoes, "red shoes" and [red shoes] to the same ad group, however I've also read that people are creating separate groups for each match type. Other than easy of management (same group), or more granular targeting of ads (separate groups), should I go with either approach, or a blend of the two? My key objective in this restructure is to drop the currently high bounce rate on the landing pages by improving the relevance of the incoming traffic. Cheers, Jez
Paid Search Marketing | | jez0000