undefined
Skip to content
Moz logo Menu open Menu close
  • Products
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Pro Home
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Home
    • STAT
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Home
    • Compare SEO Products
    • Moz Data
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis
    • Keyword Explorer
    • Link Explorer
    • Competitive Research
    • MozBar
    • More Free SEO Tools
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO
    • SEO Learning Center
    • Moz Academy
    • SEO Q&A
    • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Agency Solutions
    • Enterprise Solutions
    • Small Business Solutions
    • Case Studies
    • The Moz Story
    • New Releases
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Products
    • Moz Pro

      Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

    • Moz Local

      Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

    • STAT

      SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

    • Moz API

      Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

    • Compare SEO Products

      See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

    • Moz Data

      Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis

      Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

    • Keyword Explorer

      Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

    • Link Explorer

      Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

    • Competitive Research

      Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

    • MozBar

      See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

    • More Free SEO Tools

      Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO

      The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

    • SEO Learning Center

      Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

    • On-Demand Webinars

      Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

    • How-To Guides

      Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

    • Moz Academy

      Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

    • MozCon

      Save on Early Bird tickets and join us in London or New York City

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
    Moz API

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

    Find your plan
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Small Business Solutions

      Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

    • Agency Solutions

      Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

    • Enterprise Solutions

      Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

    • The Moz Story

      Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

    • Case Studies

      Explore how Moz drives ROI with a proven track record of success.

    • New Releases

      Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

    Surface actionable competitive intel
    New Feature

    Surface actionable competitive intel

    Learn More
  • Log in
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Dashboard
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Dashboard
    • Moz Academy
  • Avatar
    • Moz Home
    • Notifications
    • Account & Billing
    • Manage Users
    • Community Profile
    • My Q&A
    • My Videos
    • Log Out

The Moz Q&A Forum

  • Forum
  • Questions
  • Users
  • Ask the Community

Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

  1. Home
  2. SEO Tactics
  3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
  4. Canonical tag - but Title and Description are slightly different

Moz Q&A is closed.

After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

Canonical tag - but Title and Description are slightly different

Intermediate & Advanced SEO
3
9
2.1k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as question
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
  • partnerf
    partnerf last edited by Dec 18, 2013, 2:35 AM

    I am building a new SEO site with a "Silo" / Themed architecture.  I have a travel website selling hotel reservations.  I list a hotel page under a city page - example, www.abc.com/Dallas/Hilton.html   Then I use that same property under a segment within the city - example www.abc.com/Dallas/Downtown/Hilton.html, so there are two URLs with the same content

    Both pages are identical, except I want to customize the Title and Description.  I want to customize the title and description to build a consistent theme - for example the /Downtown/Hilton page will have the words "Near Downtown" in the Title and Description, while the primary city Hilton page will not.  So I have two questions about this.

    1. First, is it okay to use a canonical tag if the Title and Description are slightly different?  Everything else is identical.

    2. If so, will Google crawl and comprehend the unique Title and Description on the "Downtown" silo?

    I want Google to see that I have several "supporting" pages to my main landing page(s).  I want to present to Google 5 supporting pages in each silo that each has a supporting keyword theme.  But I'm not sure if Google will consider content of pages that point to a different page using the canonical tag.

    Please see this supporting example:  http://d.pr/i/aQPv

    Thanks for your insights.

    Rob

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • partnerf
      partnerf @Kurt_Steinbrueck last edited by Dec 19, 2013, 9:57 PM Dec 19, 2013, 9:57 PM

      Kurt,

      Just wanted to let you know, I decided to go with option 1 above.  This is the long route, but the purest form of SEO.  It will cost me more money up front, and will take time to develop, but I think its our best bet for the long run.

      Thanks again for your help.  I understand the canonical tag better now.

      Rob

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • partnerf
        partnerf @Kurt_Steinbrueck last edited by Dec 18, 2013, 5:29 PM Dec 18, 2013, 5:29 PM

        Kurt,

        Thanks again for your insights.  I appreciate you taking the time to comprehend my question so thoroughly.  I am still learning this, and its good to get your input.  I am leaning toward doing this without a canonical tag.  I still feel that by adding the canonical tag it should send a clear signal to Google that I'm not trying to manipulate the results, as I'm effectively removing those pages from the index.  But if they "think" (and thats all that matters) I'm trying something wrong, then its probably not worth it.

        I'll have to think about what my best course of action is, as this will have a big impact on how I proceed.

        Thanks again for your input.  I do appreciate it.

        Best,

        Rob

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Kurt_Steinbrueck
          Kurt_Steinbrueck @partnerf last edited by Dec 18, 2013, 4:40 PM Dec 18, 2013, 4:18 PM

          The canonical tag is telling Google to treat that canonical URL as the URL you want them to consider for the content.  It can be used to give credit when you use someone else's content, point Google to the page you want them to list when you have duplicates of your own content, or assist in moving pages from one URL to another (adding a 301 redirect later)  Honestly, I've never heard of someone trying to do what you are suggesting.  I'm not sure exactly how Google would treat that.

          As to whether Google would consider what you're doing as spam, it's a matter of degrees.  If you're doing it a lot, then it's possible they might apply a manual action.  If it's not enough to warrant an action, they may just disregard all but one of the duplicate versions of each page.  Maybe nothing will happen and Google won't notice.  What I can tell you is that they would consider it manipulation if they notice it.

          The simple fact is this.  You could just have one version of the supporting pages and link to that one version from each of the relevant main pages.  There are only two reasons you'd want different versions of the supporting pages.  Either you want to hone the content to get the best conversion rate from users, in which case each page wouldn't actually be duplicate, or you want to manipulate the search rankings by creating a bunch of duplicates of the exact same page to target different keywords.  Clearly, since you don't want to work on the content of each version, you are solely doing this to manipulate the search rankings when the same user experience could be achieved with one copy of the page.

          Please also understand that this isn't personal.  I don't have a problem with what you're doing.  Just be aware that it comes with risks.  If Google discovers it, they may treat a bunch of your pages as duplicates and may even penalize your site and you be back in the forums in a few months asking how to deal with the fact that your rankings just disappeared overnight.  You just have to decide if your willing to take that risk.

          partnerf 2 Replies Last reply Dec 19, 2013, 9:57 PM Reply Quote 2
          • partnerf
            partnerf @partnerf last edited by Dec 18, 2013, 4:09 PM Dec 18, 2013, 4:09 PM

            One more thought.

            I could see Google seeing my strategy as manipulation - trying to rank the same piece of content for multiple keywords if I didn't have a canonical tag on the page.

            But if I reference one page and designate it as canonical I would think that removes the spam aspect.  Do you agree with this?

            What I'm not sure about though is how does Google read a page with a canonical tag on it.  Will they ignore the unique title and description - and I lose the "supporting" pages on my other silos.

            I appreciate your inputs on this - and i'm not trying to argue, just hoping (maybe in vain) I can find an alternative to the 2 options you present above.

            Best,

            Rob

            Kurt_Steinbrueck 1 Reply Last reply Dec 18, 2013, 4:18 PM Reply Quote 0
            • partnerf
              partnerf @Kurt_Steinbrueck last edited by Dec 18, 2013, 4:00 PM Dec 18, 2013, 4:00 PM

              Thanks for your response Kurt.

              This is slowly coming to me.  But if I have five duplicate versions of a hotel property page, and reference one of them as canonical, I would be fine if Google disregarded the other 4 as I only need to rank for one of those pages.

              What I do want to accomplish though, is get a ranking boost for the main page in the silo(s).  I'm hoping that the supporting pages (which are duplicates and have a canonical tag on them) will provide some lift to the top level page in the silo.

              Example:  keyword "hotels in downtown Dallas"  www.abc.com/hotels-in-dallas/downtown/   to get a boost from supporting pages which also have the term "near downtown Dallas" in their title / description.

              Are you saying that Google will not even recognize the unique title / description of the property pages below - because they have a canonical tag referencing a different page?

              If that is the case, then you are right, I am left with the two options you give above.  I don't really like either scenario as option 1 is a lot more work and money, and option 2 really dilutes my theme.  Are you sure that Google considers what I want to do as spam - even though its completely legit?  Just want to double check.  🙂

              Best,

              Rob

              partnerf 1 Reply Last reply Dec 18, 2013, 4:09 PM Reply Quote 0
              • Kurt_Steinbrueck
                Kurt_Steinbrueck @partnerf last edited by Dec 18, 2013, 3:14 PM Dec 18, 2013, 3:14 PM

                Hi Rob,

                I understand what you're trying to do and why; however, you need to understand that it's something the search engines (Google in particular) don't like.  Creating a bunch of duplicate pages to try to target different, similar keywords is considered manipulation, even if each of those keywords are relevant.  The search engines want unique content for different pages.

                In regards to the canonical tag, the pages don't have to be completely exact to use the canonical tag.  After all, it's recommended that if one site uses content from another, they use the canonical tag to give the original site credit.  But there will be lots of different content on the two pages since they'll have unique headers, navigation menus, footers, and possibly title and description tags.  However, using canonical tags the way you are suggesting will defeat your own purpose.  If you have 5 different duplicate versions of the page and setup canonical tags on each to point to one of them, Google is only going to consider that one page.  The others will most likely be disregarded.  Thus, you still won't get the rankings boost for the optimized title and description tags on the other duplicate versions.

                It seems to me you have two options that don't run afowl of Google.

                1. Create different pages for each silo and have unique content for each of those pages.  Not only does this give the search engines what they want, but you have more opportunity to optimize the content for the keywords you are targeting.  Of course it will take a lot more work.
                2. Have only one version of each page, but optimize it for each of the targeted keywords.  This is probably less effective since the optimization will get diluted by targeting so many keywords in the content, but it will be a lot less work.

                Kurt Steinbrueck
                OurChurch.Com

                partnerf 1 Reply Last reply Dec 18, 2013, 4:00 PM Reply Quote 2
                • partnerf
                  partnerf @FedeEinhorn last edited by Dec 18, 2013, 11:53 AM Dec 18, 2013, 11:53 AM

                  Thanks Federico,

                  I think I understand what your recommending.  I just have one more thing to clarify.

                  I plan to build landing pages for a variety of city hotel related terms such as:

                  "hotels in Dallas"
                  "hotels in downtown Dallas"
                  "hotels with suites in Dallas"
                  "three star hotels in Dallas"
                  "hotels with pools in Dallas"

                  Its quite possible that one hotel fits in all of those silos.  So my thought was I would write content for a property one time, and re-use that page in multiple silos.  I am not trying to mislead search engines, just optimizing for a variety of "facts" about that property.

                  I know the canonical tag can be used across domains, so I'm assuming its fine to use it here, even though there is a slight variation in the Title and Description.  What I don't know is whether or not Google will read a page when it encounters a canonical tag, or does it simply stop at that point, and reference the root page.  I'm hoping that I can build a consistently themed silo - all pages with a common keyword.  Given that Google allows users to navigate to the URL of pages that have a canonical tag on them, I'm hoping that Google sees that content, and recognizes me as a subject matter expert.

                  If I can't use the canonical tag, then I would be forced to write different content multiple times for the same property page...

                  Thanks for your advice on this.

                  Rob

                  Kurt_Steinbrueck 1 Reply Last reply Dec 18, 2013, 3:14 PM Reply Quote 0
                  • FedeEinhorn
                    FedeEinhorn last edited by Dec 18, 2013, 3:43 AM Dec 18, 2013, 3:43 AM

                    Hi Rob,

                    I personally wouldn't go the way you are heading... that could be seen by Google as a technique to manipulate search engine results (which you stated it is).

                    But to respond to your question, why don't you use the "definitive" version of the page as the canonical? If the one including "near downtown" is the most accurate (and complete one as I guess the hotel IS near downtown) then you should go with that and noindex the alternatives... although I know that's not your intention, that is the way it should be done.

                    Hope that helps!

                    partnerf 1 Reply Last reply Dec 18, 2013, 11:53 AM Reply Quote 2
                    • 1 / 1
                    1 out of 9
                    • First post
                      1/9
                      Last post

                    Got a burning SEO question?

                    Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.


                    Start my free trial


                    Browse Questions

                    Explore more categories

                    • Moz Tools

                      Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

                    • SEO Tactics

                      Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

                    • Community

                      Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

                    • Digital Marketing

                      Chat about tactics outside of SEO

                    • Research & Trends

                      Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

                    • Support

                      Connect on product support and feature requests.

                    • See all categories

                    Related Questions

                    • TanyaKorteling

                      Meta-description issue in SERPs for different countries

                      I'm working with a US client on the SEO for their large ecommerce website, I'm working on it from the UK. We've now optimised several of the pages including updating the meta-descriptions etc. The problem is when I search on the keyword iin the UK I see the new updated version of the meta-description in SERPs results. BUT when my client searches on the same keyword in the US they're see the old version of the meta-description. Does any one have any idea why this is happening and how we can resolve it? Thanks Tanya

                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Apr 8, 2024, 5:36 PM | TanyaKorteling
                      0
                    • redgatst

                      Google Ignoring Canonical Tag for Hundreds of Sites

                      Bazaar Voice provides a pretty easy-to-use product review solution for websites (especially sites on Magento): https://www.magentocommerce.com/magento-connect/bazaarvoice-conversations-1.html If your product has over a certain number of reviews/questions, the plugin cuts off the number of reviews/questions that appear on the page. To see the reviews/questions that are cut off, you have to click the plugin's next or back function. The next/back buttons' URLs have a parameter of "bvstate....." I have noticed Google is indexing this "bvstate..." URL for hundreds of sites, even with the proper rel canonical tag in place. Here is an example with Microsoft: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:zcxT7MRHHREJ:www.microsoftstore.com/store/msusa/en_US/pdp/Surface-Book/productID.325716000%3Fbvstate%3Dpg:8/ct:r+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us My website is seeing hundreds of these "bvstate" urls being indexed even though we have a proper rel canonical tag in place. It seems that Google is ignoring the canonical tag. In Webmaster Console, the main source of my duplicate titles/metas in the HTML improvements section is the "bvstate" URLs. I don't necessarily want to block "bvstate" in the robots.txt as it will prohibit Google from seeing the reviews that were cutoff. Same response for prohibiting Google from crawling "bvstate" in Paramters section of Webmaster Console. Should I just keep my fingers crossed that Google honors the rel canonical tag? Home Depot is another site that has this same issue: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:k0MBLFcu2PoJ:www.homedepot.com/p/DUROCK-Next-Gen-1-2-in-x-3-ft-x-5-ft-Cement-Board-172965/202263276%23!bvstate%3Dct:r/pg:2/st:p/id:202263276+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Apr 12, 2016, 7:59 AM | redgatst
                      1
                    • 94501

                      Null Alt Image Tags vs Missing Alt Image Tags

                      Hi, Would it be better for organic search to have a null alt image tag programatically added to thousands of images without alt image tags or just leave them as is. The option of adding tailored alt image tags to thousands of images is not possible. Is having sitewide alt image tags really important to organic search overall or what? Right now, probably 10% of the sites images have alt img tags. A huge number of those images are pages that aren Thanks!

                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jan 7, 2016, 3:14 PM | 94501
                      0
                    • teconsite

                      Pagination parameters and canonical

                      Hello, We have a site that manages pagination through parameters in urls, this way: friendly-url.html
                      friendly-url.html?p=2
                      friendly-url.html?p=3
                      ... We've rencently added the canonical tag pointing to friendly-url.html for all paginated results. In search console, we have the "p" parameter identified by google. 
                      Now that the canonical has been added, should we still configure the parameter in search console, and tell google that it is being use for pagination? Thank you!

                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Oct 12, 2015, 6:51 PM | teconsite
                      0
                    • couponguy

                      Is a different location in page title, h1 title, and meta description enough to avoid Duplicate Content concern?

                      I have a dynamic website which will have location-based internal pages that will have a <title>and <h1> title, and meta description tag that will include the subregion of a city.  Each page also will have an 'info' section describing the generic product/service offered which will also include the name of the subregion.  The 'specific product/service content will be dynamic but in some cases will be almost identical--ie subregion A may sometimes have the same specific content result as subregion B.  Will the difference of just the location put in each of the above tags be enough for me to avoid a Duplicate Content concern?</p></title>

                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Mar 31, 2014, 6:07 PM | couponguy
                      0
                    • Felix_LLC

                      After reading of Google's so called "over-optimization" penalty, is there a penalty for changing title tags too frequently?

                      In other words, does title tag change frequency hurt SEO ? After changing my title tags, I have noticed a steep decline in impressions, but an increase in CTR and rankings. I'd like to once again change the title tags to try and regain impressions. Is there any penalty for changing title tags too often? From SEO forums online, there seems to be a bit of confusion on this subject...

                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Sep 26, 2013, 11:53 AM | Felix_LLC
                      0
                    • Zanox

                      Should you use a canonical tag on translated content in a multi-language country?

                      A customer of ours has a website in Belgium. There two main languages in Belgium: Dutch and French.
                      At first there was only a Dutch version with a .be extension. Right now they are implementing the French Belgium version on the URL website.be/fr. All of the content and comments will be translated. Also the URL’s will change from Dutch to French, so you've got two URL’s with the same content but in another language. Question: Should you use a canonical tag on translated content in a multi-language country? I think Google will understand this is just for the usability for a Multilanguage country. What do you guys think???

                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Aug 7, 2013, 6:14 AM | Zanox
                      0
                    • NakulGoyal

                      Wildcard Redirects & Canonical Tags

                      I have an interesting situation. Current URLs Example1: www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234.html
                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234-1.html
                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234-1-1.html Canonical on All Above URLs:
                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234.html New URL:
                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-4567.html Current URLs Example2: www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234+10.html
                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234+10-1.html
                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234+10-1-1.html Canonical on All Above URLs:
                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234+10.html New URL:
                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-6789.html Current URLs Example3: www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234+10+5.html
                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234+10+5-1.html
                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234+10+5-1-1.html Canonical on All Above URLs:
                      www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234+10+5.html New URL:
                      www.domain.com/american-red-widgets-cid-6789+5.html I want to make sure all variations of the above URL redirect to the new URLs.  However, as you see in Example 3, we are dealing with variables that are passed on. (+5 in this case). Question 1: What wildcard 301 redirect / regular expression can I use to tackle these ? Question 2: If we redirect www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-1234+10+5.html to www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-6789+5.html and www.domain.com/red-widgets-cid-6789+5.html contains the canonical tag www.domain.com/american-red-widgets-cid-6789+5.html, any concerns or red flags here ?

                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Feb 5, 2013, 11:13 PM | NakulGoyal
                      0

                    Get started with Moz Pro!

                    Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                    Start my free trial
                    Products
                    • Moz Pro
                    • Moz Local
                    • Moz API
                    • Moz Data
                    • STAT
                    • Product Updates
                    Moz Solutions
                    • SMB Solutions
                    • Agency Solutions
                    • Enterprise Solutions
                    Free SEO Tools
                    • Domain Authority Checker
                    • Link Explorer
                    • Keyword Explorer
                    • Competitive Research
                    • Brand Authority Checker
                    • Local Citation Checker
                    • MozBar Extension
                    • MozCast
                    Resources
                    • Blog
                    • SEO Learning Center
                    • Help Hub
                    • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                    • How-to Guides
                    • Moz Academy
                    • API Docs
                    About Moz
                    • About
                    • Team
                    • Careers
                    • Contact
                    Why Moz
                    • Case Studies
                    • Testimonials
                    Get Involved
                    • Become an Affiliate
                    • MozCon
                    • Webinars
                    • Practical Marketer Series
                    • MozPod
                    Connect with us

                    Contact the Help team

                    Join our newsletter
                    Moz logo
                    © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                    • Accessibility
                    • Terms of Use
                    • Privacy

                    Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.