Skip to content
    Moz logo Menu open Menu close
    • Products
      • Moz Pro
      • Moz Pro Home
      • Moz Local
      • Moz Local Home
      • STAT
      • Moz API
      • Moz API Home
      • Compare SEO Products
      • Moz Data
    • Free SEO Tools
      • Domain Analysis
      • Keyword Explorer
      • Link Explorer
      • Competitive Research
      • MozBar
      • More Free SEO Tools
    • Learn SEO
      • Beginner's Guide to SEO
      • SEO Learning Center
      • Moz Academy
      • SEO Q&A
      • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
    • Blog
    • Why Moz
      • Digital Marketers
      • Agency Solutions
      • Enterprise Solutions
      • Small Business Solutions
      • The Moz Story
      • New Releases
    • Log in
    • Log out
    • Products
      • Moz Pro

        Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

      • Moz Local

        Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

      • STAT

        SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

      • Moz API

        Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

      • Compare SEO Products

        See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

      • Moz Data

        Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

      NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
      Moz Pro

      NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

      Learn more
    • Free SEO Tools
      • Domain Analysis

        Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

      • Keyword Explorer

        Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

      • Link Explorer

        Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

      • Competitive Research

        Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

      • MozBar

        See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

      • More Free SEO Tools

        Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

      NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
      Moz Pro

      NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

      Learn more
    • Learn SEO
      • Beginner's Guide to SEO

        The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

      • SEO Learning Center

        Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

      • On-Demand Webinars

        Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

      • How-To Guides

        Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

      • Moz Academy

        Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

      • MozCon

        Save on Early Bird tickets and join us in London or New York City

      Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
      Moz API

      Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

      Find your plan
    • Blog
    • Why Moz
      • Digital Marketers

        Simplify SEO tasks to save time and grow your traffic.

      • Small Business Solutions

        Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

      • Agency Solutions

        Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

      • Enterprise Solutions

        Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

      • The Moz Story

        Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

      • New Releases

        Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

      Surface actionable competitive intel
      New Feature

      Surface actionable competitive intel

      Learn More
    • Log in
      • Moz Pro
      • Moz Local
      • Moz Local Dashboard
      • Moz API
      • Moz API Dashboard
      • Moz Academy
    • Avatar
      • Moz Home
      • Notifications
      • Account & Billing
      • Manage Users
      • Community Profile
      • My Q&A
      • My Videos
      • Log Out

    The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. Home
    2. SEO Tactics
    3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    4. Canonical tag - but Title and Description are slightly different

    Moz Q&A is closed.

    After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

    Canonical tag - but Title and Description are slightly different

    Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    3
    9
    2096
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
    • partnerf
      partnerf last edited by

      I am building a new SEO site with a "Silo" / Themed architecture.  I have a travel website selling hotel reservations.  I list a hotel page under a city page - example, www.abc.com/Dallas/Hilton.html   Then I use that same property under a segment within the city - example www.abc.com/Dallas/Downtown/Hilton.html, so there are two URLs with the same content

      Both pages are identical, except I want to customize the Title and Description.  I want to customize the title and description to build a consistent theme - for example the /Downtown/Hilton page will have the words "Near Downtown" in the Title and Description, while the primary city Hilton page will not.  So I have two questions about this.

      1. First, is it okay to use a canonical tag if the Title and Description are slightly different?  Everything else is identical.

      2. If so, will Google crawl and comprehend the unique Title and Description on the "Downtown" silo?

      I want Google to see that I have several "supporting" pages to my main landing page(s).  I want to present to Google 5 supporting pages in each silo that each has a supporting keyword theme.  But I'm not sure if Google will consider content of pages that point to a different page using the canonical tag.

      Please see this supporting example:  http://d.pr/i/aQPv

      Thanks for your insights.

      Rob

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • partnerf
        partnerf @Kurt_Steinbrueck last edited by

        Kurt,

        Just wanted to let you know, I decided to go with option 1 above.  This is the long route, but the purest form of SEO.  It will cost me more money up front, and will take time to develop, but I think its our best bet for the long run.

        Thanks again for your help.  I understand the canonical tag better now.

        Rob

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • partnerf
          partnerf @Kurt_Steinbrueck last edited by

          Kurt,

          Thanks again for your insights.  I appreciate you taking the time to comprehend my question so thoroughly.  I am still learning this, and its good to get your input.  I am leaning toward doing this without a canonical tag.  I still feel that by adding the canonical tag it should send a clear signal to Google that I'm not trying to manipulate the results, as I'm effectively removing those pages from the index.  But if they "think" (and thats all that matters) I'm trying something wrong, then its probably not worth it.

          I'll have to think about what my best course of action is, as this will have a big impact on how I proceed.

          Thanks again for your input.  I do appreciate it.

          Best,

          Rob

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Kurt_Steinbrueck
            Kurt_Steinbrueck @partnerf last edited by

            The canonical tag is telling Google to treat that canonical URL as the URL you want them to consider for the content.  It can be used to give credit when you use someone else's content, point Google to the page you want them to list when you have duplicates of your own content, or assist in moving pages from one URL to another (adding a 301 redirect later)  Honestly, I've never heard of someone trying to do what you are suggesting.  I'm not sure exactly how Google would treat that.

            As to whether Google would consider what you're doing as spam, it's a matter of degrees.  If you're doing it a lot, then it's possible they might apply a manual action.  If it's not enough to warrant an action, they may just disregard all but one of the duplicate versions of each page.  Maybe nothing will happen and Google won't notice.  What I can tell you is that they would consider it manipulation if they notice it.

            The simple fact is this.  You could just have one version of the supporting pages and link to that one version from each of the relevant main pages.  There are only two reasons you'd want different versions of the supporting pages.  Either you want to hone the content to get the best conversion rate from users, in which case each page wouldn't actually be duplicate, or you want to manipulate the search rankings by creating a bunch of duplicates of the exact same page to target different keywords.  Clearly, since you don't want to work on the content of each version, you are solely doing this to manipulate the search rankings when the same user experience could be achieved with one copy of the page.

            Please also understand that this isn't personal.  I don't have a problem with what you're doing.  Just be aware that it comes with risks.  If Google discovers it, they may treat a bunch of your pages as duplicates and may even penalize your site and you be back in the forums in a few months asking how to deal with the fact that your rankings just disappeared overnight.  You just have to decide if your willing to take that risk.

            partnerf 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • partnerf
              partnerf @partnerf last edited by

              One more thought.

              I could see Google seeing my strategy as manipulation - trying to rank the same piece of content for multiple keywords if I didn't have a canonical tag on the page.

              But if I reference one page and designate it as canonical I would think that removes the spam aspect.  Do you agree with this?

              What I'm not sure about though is how does Google read a page with a canonical tag on it.  Will they ignore the unique title and description - and I lose the "supporting" pages on my other silos.

              I appreciate your inputs on this - and i'm not trying to argue, just hoping (maybe in vain) I can find an alternative to the 2 options you present above.

              Best,

              Rob

              Kurt_Steinbrueck 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • partnerf
                partnerf @Kurt_Steinbrueck last edited by

                Thanks for your response Kurt.

                This is slowly coming to me.  But if I have five duplicate versions of a hotel property page, and reference one of them as canonical, I would be fine if Google disregarded the other 4 as I only need to rank for one of those pages.

                What I do want to accomplish though, is get a ranking boost for the main page in the silo(s).  I'm hoping that the supporting pages (which are duplicates and have a canonical tag on them) will provide some lift to the top level page in the silo.

                Example:  keyword "hotels in downtown Dallas"  www.abc.com/hotels-in-dallas/downtown/   to get a boost from supporting pages which also have the term "near downtown Dallas" in their title / description.

                Are you saying that Google will not even recognize the unique title / description of the property pages below - because they have a canonical tag referencing a different page?

                If that is the case, then you are right, I am left with the two options you give above.  I don't really like either scenario as option 1 is a lot more work and money, and option 2 really dilutes my theme.  Are you sure that Google considers what I want to do as spam - even though its completely legit?  Just want to double check.  🙂

                Best,

                Rob

                partnerf 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Kurt_Steinbrueck
                  Kurt_Steinbrueck @partnerf last edited by

                  Hi Rob,

                  I understand what you're trying to do and why; however, you need to understand that it's something the search engines (Google in particular) don't like.  Creating a bunch of duplicate pages to try to target different, similar keywords is considered manipulation, even if each of those keywords are relevant.  The search engines want unique content for different pages.

                  In regards to the canonical tag, the pages don't have to be completely exact to use the canonical tag.  After all, it's recommended that if one site uses content from another, they use the canonical tag to give the original site credit.  But there will be lots of different content on the two pages since they'll have unique headers, navigation menus, footers, and possibly title and description tags.  However, using canonical tags the way you are suggesting will defeat your own purpose.  If you have 5 different duplicate versions of the page and setup canonical tags on each to point to one of them, Google is only going to consider that one page.  The others will most likely be disregarded.  Thus, you still won't get the rankings boost for the optimized title and description tags on the other duplicate versions.

                  It seems to me you have two options that don't run afowl of Google.

                  1. Create different pages for each silo and have unique content for each of those pages.  Not only does this give the search engines what they want, but you have more opportunity to optimize the content for the keywords you are targeting.  Of course it will take a lot more work.
                  2. Have only one version of each page, but optimize it for each of the targeted keywords.  This is probably less effective since the optimization will get diluted by targeting so many keywords in the content, but it will be a lot less work.

                  Kurt Steinbrueck
                  OurChurch.Com

                  partnerf 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • partnerf
                    partnerf @FedeEinhorn last edited by

                    Thanks Federico,

                    I think I understand what your recommending.  I just have one more thing to clarify.

                    I plan to build landing pages for a variety of city hotel related terms such as:

                    "hotels in Dallas"
                    "hotels in downtown Dallas"
                    "hotels with suites in Dallas"
                    "three star hotels in Dallas"
                    "hotels with pools in Dallas"

                    Its quite possible that one hotel fits in all of those silos.  So my thought was I would write content for a property one time, and re-use that page in multiple silos.  I am not trying to mislead search engines, just optimizing for a variety of "facts" about that property.

                    I know the canonical tag can be used across domains, so I'm assuming its fine to use it here, even though there is a slight variation in the Title and Description.  What I don't know is whether or not Google will read a page when it encounters a canonical tag, or does it simply stop at that point, and reference the root page.  I'm hoping that I can build a consistently themed silo - all pages with a common keyword.  Given that Google allows users to navigate to the URL of pages that have a canonical tag on them, I'm hoping that Google sees that content, and recognizes me as a subject matter expert.

                    If I can't use the canonical tag, then I would be forced to write different content multiple times for the same property page...

                    Thanks for your advice on this.

                    Rob

                    Kurt_Steinbrueck 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • FedeEinhorn
                      FedeEinhorn last edited by

                      Hi Rob,

                      I personally wouldn't go the way you are heading... that could be seen by Google as a technique to manipulate search engine results (which you stated it is).

                      But to respond to your question, why don't you use the "definitive" version of the page as the canonical? If the one including "near downtown" is the most accurate (and complete one as I guess the hotel IS near downtown) then you should go with that and noindex the alternatives... although I know that's not your intention, that is the way it should be done.

                      Hope that helps!

                      partnerf 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • 1 / 1
                      • First post
                        Last post

                      Got a burning SEO question?

                      Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.


                      Start my free trial


                      Browse Questions

                      Explore more categories

                      • Moz Tools

                        Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

                      • SEO Tactics

                        Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

                      • Community

                        Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

                      • Digital Marketing

                        Chat about tactics outside of SEO

                      • Research & Trends

                        Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

                      • Support

                        Connect on product support and feature requests.

                      • See all categories

                      Related Questions

                      • Raymondlee

                        Title tag: Long tail words or keyword dilution?

                        Hi all, I am a newbie to SEO. Lately, I have been struggling to optimize my title tag. Ones say that we should have long tail words in title tags because long tail words improve click through rate and generate quality leads. On the other hand, ones say that putting other words in the title tag will dilute the main keyword that my page ranks for. Do keywords really dilute each other in the title tags? I am really confused. Let me give this an example: Web Design Services | Company Name Web Design Services with Conversion Focused | Company Name Which one would you prefer and why? Thank you.  😄 Best, Raymond

                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Raymondlee
                        0
                      • redgatst

                        Google Ignoring Canonical Tag for Hundreds of Sites

                        Bazaar Voice provides a pretty easy-to-use product review solution for websites (especially sites on Magento): https://www.magentocommerce.com/magento-connect/bazaarvoice-conversations-1.html If your product has over a certain number of reviews/questions, the plugin cuts off the number of reviews/questions that appear on the page. To see the reviews/questions that are cut off, you have to click the plugin's next or back function. The next/back buttons' URLs have a parameter of "bvstate....." I have noticed Google is indexing this "bvstate..." URL for hundreds of sites, even with the proper rel canonical tag in place. Here is an example with Microsoft: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:zcxT7MRHHREJ:www.microsoftstore.com/store/msusa/en_US/pdp/Surface-Book/productID.325716000%3Fbvstate%3Dpg:8/ct:r+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us My website is seeing hundreds of these "bvstate" urls being indexed even though we have a proper rel canonical tag in place. It seems that Google is ignoring the canonical tag. In Webmaster Console, the main source of my duplicate titles/metas in the HTML improvements section is the "bvstate" URLs. I don't necessarily want to block "bvstate" in the robots.txt as it will prohibit Google from seeing the reviews that were cutoff. Same response for prohibiting Google from crawling "bvstate" in Paramters section of Webmaster Console. Should I just keep my fingers crossed that Google honors the rel canonical tag? Home Depot is another site that has this same issue: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:k0MBLFcu2PoJ:www.homedepot.com/p/DUROCK-Next-Gen-1-2-in-x-3-ft-x-5-ft-Cement-Board-172965/202263276%23!bvstate%3Dct:r/pg:2/st:p/id:202263276+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | redgatst
                        1
                      • MIGandCo

                        Is it alright to repeat a keyword in the title tag?

                        I know at first glance, the answer to this is a resounding NO, that it can be construed as keyword stuffing,
                        but please hear me out. I am working on optimizing a client's website and although MOST of the title tags
                        can be optimized without repeating a keyword, occasionally I run into one where it doesn't read right if I
                        don't repeat the keyword. Here's an example: Current title:
                        Photoshop on the Cloud | Adobe Photoshop Webinars | Company Name What I am considering using as the optimized title:
                        Adobe Photoshop on the Cloud | Adobe Photoshop Webinars | Company Name Yes, I know both titles are longer than recommended. In both instances, only the company name gets
                        truncated so I am not too worried about that. So I guess what I want to know is this: Am I right in my original assumption that it is NEVER okay to
                        repeat keywords in a title tag or is it alright when it makes sense to do so?

                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MIGandCo
                        0
                      • couponguy

                        Is a different location in page title, h1 title, and meta description enough to avoid Duplicate Content concern?

                        I have a dynamic website which will have location-based internal pages that will have a <title>and <h1> title, and meta description tag that will include the subregion of a city.  Each page also will have an 'info' section describing the generic product/service offered which will also include the name of the subregion.  The 'specific product/service content will be dynamic but in some cases will be almost identical--ie subregion A may sometimes have the same specific content result as subregion B.  Will the difference of just the location put in each of the above tags be enough for me to avoid a Duplicate Content concern?</p></title>

                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | couponguy
                        0
                      • AWCthreads

                        Google and Product Description Tabs

                        How does Google process a product page with description tabs?  For example, lets say the product page has a tab for Overview, Specifications, What's In the Box and so on. Wouldn't that content be better served in one main product description tab with the tab names used as (htags) or highlighted paragraph separators? Or, does all that content get crawled as a single page regardless of the tabs?

                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AWCthreads
                        0
                      • Cornel_Ilea

                        .com and .edu difference

                        Hello, Can anyone tell me how big is the difference between a PR5 .com and a PR5 .edu Double, triple? How big? Cornel

                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Cornel_Ilea
                        0
                      • mhans

                        Any penalty for having rel=canonical tags on every page?

                        For some reason every webpage of our website (www.nathosp.com)  has a rel=canonical tag. I'm not sure why the previous SEO manager did this, but we don't have any duplicate content that would require a canonical tag. Should I remove these tags? And if so, what's the advantage - or disadvantage of leaving them in place? Thank you in advance for your help. -Josh Fulfer

                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mhans
                        1
                      • kbbseo

                        How does a canonical work and is it necessary to also have a no index, follow tag in place?

                        Across our site, we have canonical tags in place for URLs that contain duplicate content and for URLs without a trailing slash since we are using URLs WITH a trailing slash for all URLs across our site. We also recently added a no index, follow tag to all non-canonical URLs since we noticed a high number of duplicate content URLs in Google Webmaster Tools. The first part of my question is: How does a canonical work? Does the robot read the canonical and immediately go to the canonical URL or does it continue to read past the canonical tag and get to the no index, follow tag if there is one present? The second part of my question is: Is it necessary to have both a canonical tag and no index, follow tag in place? Or should the canonical tag be sufficient to avoid duplicate content? And lastly, if both a canonical tag and no index, follow tag are in place, should they be in a specific order? Canonical tag first then no index, follow tag second or no index, follow tag first then canonical tag second? I would appreciate any insight you can give. Thank you!

                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | kbbseo
                        0

                      Get started with Moz Pro!

                      Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                      Start my free trial
                      Products
                      • Moz Pro
                      • Moz Local
                      • Moz API
                      • Moz Data
                      • STAT
                      • Product Updates
                      Moz Solutions
                      • SMB Solutions
                      • Agency Solutions
                      • Enterprise Solutions
                      Free SEO Tools
                      • Domain Authority Checker
                      • Link Explorer
                      • Keyword Explorer
                      • Competitive Research
                      • Brand Authority Checker
                      • Local Citation Checker
                      • MozBar Extension
                      • MozCast
                      Resources
                      • Blog
                      • SEO Learning Center
                      • Help Hub
                      • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                      • How-to Guides
                      • Moz Academy
                      • API Docs
                      About Moz
                      • About
                      • Team
                      • Careers
                      • Contact
                      Why Moz
                      • Case Studies
                      • Testimonials
                      Get Involved
                      • Become an Affiliate
                      • MozCon
                      • Webinars
                      • Practical Marketer Series
                      • MozPod
                      Connect with us

                      Contact the Help team

                      Join our newsletter
                      Moz logo
                      © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                      • Accessibility
                      • Terms of Use
                      • Privacy

                      Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.