undefined
Skip to content
Moz logo Menu open Menu close
  • Products
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Pro Home
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Home
    • STAT
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Home
    • Compare SEO Products
    • Moz Data
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis
    • Keyword Explorer
    • Link Explorer
    • Competitive Research
    • MozBar
    • More Free SEO Tools
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO
    • SEO Learning Center
    • Moz Academy
    • SEO Q&A
    • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Agency Solutions
    • Enterprise Solutions
    • Small Business Solutions
    • Case Studies
    • The Moz Story
    • New Releases
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Products
    • Moz Pro

      Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

    • Moz Local

      Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

    • STAT

      SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

    • Moz API

      Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

    • Compare SEO Products

      See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

    • Moz Data

      Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis

      Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

    • Keyword Explorer

      Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

    • Link Explorer

      Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

    • Competitive Research

      Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

    • MozBar

      See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

    • More Free SEO Tools

      Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO

      The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

    • SEO Learning Center

      Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

    • On-Demand Webinars

      Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

    • How-To Guides

      Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

    • Moz Academy

      Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

    • MozCon

      Save on Early Bird tickets and join us in London or New York City

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
    Moz API

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

    Find your plan
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Small Business Solutions

      Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

    • Agency Solutions

      Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

    • Enterprise Solutions

      Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

    • The Moz Story

      Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

    • Case Studies

      Explore how Moz drives ROI with a proven track record of success.

    • New Releases

      Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

    Surface actionable competitive intel
    New Feature

    Surface actionable competitive intel

    Learn More
  • Log in
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Dashboard
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Dashboard
    • Moz Academy
  • Avatar
    • Moz Home
    • Notifications
    • Account & Billing
    • Manage Users
    • Community Profile
    • My Q&A
    • My Videos
    • Log Out

The Moz Q&A Forum

  • Forum
  • Questions
  • Users
  • Ask the Community

Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

  1. Home
  2. SEO Tactics
  3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
  4. Canonical tag - but Title and Description are slightly different

Moz Q&A is closed.

After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

Canonical tag - but Title and Description are slightly different

Intermediate & Advanced SEO
3
9
2.1k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as question
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
  • partnerf
    partnerf last edited by Dec 18, 2013, 2:35 AM

    I am building a new SEO site with a "Silo" / Themed architecture.  I have a travel website selling hotel reservations.  I list a hotel page under a city page - example, www.abc.com/Dallas/Hilton.html   Then I use that same property under a segment within the city - example www.abc.com/Dallas/Downtown/Hilton.html, so there are two URLs with the same content

    Both pages are identical, except I want to customize the Title and Description.  I want to customize the title and description to build a consistent theme - for example the /Downtown/Hilton page will have the words "Near Downtown" in the Title and Description, while the primary city Hilton page will not.  So I have two questions about this.

    1. First, is it okay to use a canonical tag if the Title and Description are slightly different?  Everything else is identical.

    2. If so, will Google crawl and comprehend the unique Title and Description on the "Downtown" silo?

    I want Google to see that I have several "supporting" pages to my main landing page(s).  I want to present to Google 5 supporting pages in each silo that each has a supporting keyword theme.  But I'm not sure if Google will consider content of pages that point to a different page using the canonical tag.

    Please see this supporting example:  http://d.pr/i/aQPv

    Thanks for your insights.

    Rob

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • partnerf
      partnerf @Kurt_Steinbrueck last edited by Dec 19, 2013, 9:57 PM Dec 19, 2013, 9:57 PM

      Kurt,

      Just wanted to let you know, I decided to go with option 1 above.  This is the long route, but the purest form of SEO.  It will cost me more money up front, and will take time to develop, but I think its our best bet for the long run.

      Thanks again for your help.  I understand the canonical tag better now.

      Rob

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • partnerf
        partnerf @Kurt_Steinbrueck last edited by Dec 18, 2013, 5:29 PM Dec 18, 2013, 5:29 PM

        Kurt,

        Thanks again for your insights.  I appreciate you taking the time to comprehend my question so thoroughly.  I am still learning this, and its good to get your input.  I am leaning toward doing this without a canonical tag.  I still feel that by adding the canonical tag it should send a clear signal to Google that I'm not trying to manipulate the results, as I'm effectively removing those pages from the index.  But if they "think" (and thats all that matters) I'm trying something wrong, then its probably not worth it.

        I'll have to think about what my best course of action is, as this will have a big impact on how I proceed.

        Thanks again for your input.  I do appreciate it.

        Best,

        Rob

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Kurt_Steinbrueck
          Kurt_Steinbrueck @partnerf last edited by Dec 18, 2013, 4:40 PM Dec 18, 2013, 4:18 PM

          The canonical tag is telling Google to treat that canonical URL as the URL you want them to consider for the content.  It can be used to give credit when you use someone else's content, point Google to the page you want them to list when you have duplicates of your own content, or assist in moving pages from one URL to another (adding a 301 redirect later)  Honestly, I've never heard of someone trying to do what you are suggesting.  I'm not sure exactly how Google would treat that.

          As to whether Google would consider what you're doing as spam, it's a matter of degrees.  If you're doing it a lot, then it's possible they might apply a manual action.  If it's not enough to warrant an action, they may just disregard all but one of the duplicate versions of each page.  Maybe nothing will happen and Google won't notice.  What I can tell you is that they would consider it manipulation if they notice it.

          The simple fact is this.  You could just have one version of the supporting pages and link to that one version from each of the relevant main pages.  There are only two reasons you'd want different versions of the supporting pages.  Either you want to hone the content to get the best conversion rate from users, in which case each page wouldn't actually be duplicate, or you want to manipulate the search rankings by creating a bunch of duplicates of the exact same page to target different keywords.  Clearly, since you don't want to work on the content of each version, you are solely doing this to manipulate the search rankings when the same user experience could be achieved with one copy of the page.

          Please also understand that this isn't personal.  I don't have a problem with what you're doing.  Just be aware that it comes with risks.  If Google discovers it, they may treat a bunch of your pages as duplicates and may even penalize your site and you be back in the forums in a few months asking how to deal with the fact that your rankings just disappeared overnight.  You just have to decide if your willing to take that risk.

          partnerf 2 Replies Last reply Dec 19, 2013, 9:57 PM Reply Quote 2
          • partnerf
            partnerf @partnerf last edited by Dec 18, 2013, 4:09 PM Dec 18, 2013, 4:09 PM

            One more thought.

            I could see Google seeing my strategy as manipulation - trying to rank the same piece of content for multiple keywords if I didn't have a canonical tag on the page.

            But if I reference one page and designate it as canonical I would think that removes the spam aspect.  Do you agree with this?

            What I'm not sure about though is how does Google read a page with a canonical tag on it.  Will they ignore the unique title and description - and I lose the "supporting" pages on my other silos.

            I appreciate your inputs on this - and i'm not trying to argue, just hoping (maybe in vain) I can find an alternative to the 2 options you present above.

            Best,

            Rob

            Kurt_Steinbrueck 1 Reply Last reply Dec 18, 2013, 4:18 PM Reply Quote 0
            • partnerf
              partnerf @Kurt_Steinbrueck last edited by Dec 18, 2013, 4:00 PM Dec 18, 2013, 4:00 PM

              Thanks for your response Kurt.

              This is slowly coming to me.  But if I have five duplicate versions of a hotel property page, and reference one of them as canonical, I would be fine if Google disregarded the other 4 as I only need to rank for one of those pages.

              What I do want to accomplish though, is get a ranking boost for the main page in the silo(s).  I'm hoping that the supporting pages (which are duplicates and have a canonical tag on them) will provide some lift to the top level page in the silo.

              Example:  keyword "hotels in downtown Dallas"  www.abc.com/hotels-in-dallas/downtown/   to get a boost from supporting pages which also have the term "near downtown Dallas" in their title / description.

              Are you saying that Google will not even recognize the unique title / description of the property pages below - because they have a canonical tag referencing a different page?

              If that is the case, then you are right, I am left with the two options you give above.  I don't really like either scenario as option 1 is a lot more work and money, and option 2 really dilutes my theme.  Are you sure that Google considers what I want to do as spam - even though its completely legit?  Just want to double check.  🙂

              Best,

              Rob

              partnerf 1 Reply Last reply Dec 18, 2013, 4:09 PM Reply Quote 0
              • Kurt_Steinbrueck
                Kurt_Steinbrueck @partnerf last edited by Dec 18, 2013, 3:14 PM Dec 18, 2013, 3:14 PM

                Hi Rob,

                I understand what you're trying to do and why; however, you need to understand that it's something the search engines (Google in particular) don't like.  Creating a bunch of duplicate pages to try to target different, similar keywords is considered manipulation, even if each of those keywords are relevant.  The search engines want unique content for different pages.

                In regards to the canonical tag, the pages don't have to be completely exact to use the canonical tag.  After all, it's recommended that if one site uses content from another, they use the canonical tag to give the original site credit.  But there will be lots of different content on the two pages since they'll have unique headers, navigation menus, footers, and possibly title and description tags.  However, using canonical tags the way you are suggesting will defeat your own purpose.  If you have 5 different duplicate versions of the page and setup canonical tags on each to point to one of them, Google is only going to consider that one page.  The others will most likely be disregarded.  Thus, you still won't get the rankings boost for the optimized title and description tags on the other duplicate versions.

                It seems to me you have two options that don't run afowl of Google.

                1. Create different pages for each silo and have unique content for each of those pages.  Not only does this give the search engines what they want, but you have more opportunity to optimize the content for the keywords you are targeting.  Of course it will take a lot more work.
                2. Have only one version of each page, but optimize it for each of the targeted keywords.  This is probably less effective since the optimization will get diluted by targeting so many keywords in the content, but it will be a lot less work.

                Kurt Steinbrueck
                OurChurch.Com

                partnerf 1 Reply Last reply Dec 18, 2013, 4:00 PM Reply Quote 2
                • partnerf
                  partnerf @FedeEinhorn last edited by Dec 18, 2013, 11:53 AM Dec 18, 2013, 11:53 AM

                  Thanks Federico,

                  I think I understand what your recommending.  I just have one more thing to clarify.

                  I plan to build landing pages for a variety of city hotel related terms such as:

                  "hotels in Dallas"
                  "hotels in downtown Dallas"
                  "hotels with suites in Dallas"
                  "three star hotels in Dallas"
                  "hotels with pools in Dallas"

                  Its quite possible that one hotel fits in all of those silos.  So my thought was I would write content for a property one time, and re-use that page in multiple silos.  I am not trying to mislead search engines, just optimizing for a variety of "facts" about that property.

                  I know the canonical tag can be used across domains, so I'm assuming its fine to use it here, even though there is a slight variation in the Title and Description.  What I don't know is whether or not Google will read a page when it encounters a canonical tag, or does it simply stop at that point, and reference the root page.  I'm hoping that I can build a consistently themed silo - all pages with a common keyword.  Given that Google allows users to navigate to the URL of pages that have a canonical tag on them, I'm hoping that Google sees that content, and recognizes me as a subject matter expert.

                  If I can't use the canonical tag, then I would be forced to write different content multiple times for the same property page...

                  Thanks for your advice on this.

                  Rob

                  Kurt_Steinbrueck 1 Reply Last reply Dec 18, 2013, 3:14 PM Reply Quote 0
                  • FedeEinhorn
                    FedeEinhorn last edited by Dec 18, 2013, 3:43 AM Dec 18, 2013, 3:43 AM

                    Hi Rob,

                    I personally wouldn't go the way you are heading... that could be seen by Google as a technique to manipulate search engine results (which you stated it is).

                    But to respond to your question, why don't you use the "definitive" version of the page as the canonical? If the one including "near downtown" is the most accurate (and complete one as I guess the hotel IS near downtown) then you should go with that and noindex the alternatives... although I know that's not your intention, that is the way it should be done.

                    Hope that helps!

                    partnerf 1 Reply Last reply Dec 18, 2013, 11:53 AM Reply Quote 2
                    • 1 / 1
                    1 out of 9
                    • First post
                      1/9
                      Last post

                    Got a burning SEO question?

                    Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.


                    Start my free trial


                    Browse Questions

                    Explore more categories

                    • Moz Tools

                      Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

                    • SEO Tactics

                      Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

                    • Community

                      Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

                    • Digital Marketing

                      Chat about tactics outside of SEO

                    • Research & Trends

                      Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

                    • Support

                      Connect on product support and feature requests.

                    • See all categories

                    Related Questions

                    • seoanalytics

                      Difference hummingbird and rankbrain

                      From my understanding hummingbird is the fact that google is able to parse sentences and link entites to understand the meaning of content in a better way than with just keywords and rankbrain is about user intent, google understands that they are various ways to mean the same thing. Is my understanding correct ? Thank you,

                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jul 2, 2018, 4:46 AM | seoanalytics
                      0
                    • Doylejg3

                      Google Adding Wrong Location to Title Tag on Multi-Branch Business Homepage

                      We're a business with 5 separate locations across 5 cities in Upstate NY.  While doing some visual ad previews in the adwords interface I noticed that Google is altering my title tag and adding the word "Rochester" to the end of it, cutting short my designated title tag. Rochester is the location of our headquarters so not a big deal for 1/5th of our customers.  But to my dismay, the same thing is happening when searching from the geo locations of my other branches.  So when searching for my business in Buffalo (we have a physical address in Buffalo), the title tag in the results still says our company name and "Rochester". This of course is likely leading to confusion and actively harming our organic CTR in our branch locations.  This is happening in all of the remaining 4 branch locations.  I'm at a loss, I tried lengthening the title tag but it still gets cut off. The term Rochester appears (as do the other branch locations) in my meta description for the homepage as well as in the text of the page itself.  I haven't gone so far as to remove that yet and hopefully don't have to. Does anyone have any ideas?  Thank you in advance!

                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Mar 31, 2017, 12:20 AM | Doylejg3
                      0
                    • MIGandCo

                      Is it alright to repeat a keyword in the title tag?

                      I know at first glance, the answer to this is a resounding NO, that it can be construed as keyword stuffing,
                      but please hear me out. I am working on optimizing a client's website and although MOST of the title tags
                      can be optimized without repeating a keyword, occasionally I run into one where it doesn't read right if I
                      don't repeat the keyword. Here's an example: Current title:
                      Photoshop on the Cloud | Adobe Photoshop Webinars | Company Name What I am considering using as the optimized title:
                      Adobe Photoshop on the Cloud | Adobe Photoshop Webinars | Company Name Yes, I know both titles are longer than recommended. In both instances, only the company name gets
                      truncated so I am not too worried about that. So I guess what I want to know is this: Am I right in my original assumption that it is NEVER okay to
                      repeat keywords in a title tag or is it alright when it makes sense to do so?

                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Apr 18, 2015, 3:14 PM | MIGandCo
                      0
                    • ABK717

                      Is a 301 Redirect and a Canonical Tag on Uppercase to Lowercase Pages Correct?

                      We have a medium size site that lost more than 50% of its traffic in July 2013 just before the Panda rollout. After working with a SEO agency, we were advised to clean up various items, one of them being that the 10k+ urls were all mixed case (i.e. www.example.com/Blue-Widget). A 301 redirect was set up thereafter forcing all these urls to go to a lowercase version (i.e. www.example.com/blue-widget). In addition, there was a canonical tag placed on all of these pages in case any parameters or other characters were incorporated into a url. I thought this was a good set up, but when running a SEO audit through a third party tool, it shows me the massive amount of 301 redirects. And, now I wonder if there should only be a canonical without the redirect or if its okay to have tens of thousands 301 redirects on the site. We have not recovered yet from the traffic loss yet and we are wondering if its really more of a technical problem than a Google penalty. Guidance and advise from those experienced in the industry is appreciated.

                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Dec 8, 2014, 7:00 AM | ABK717
                      0
                    • luxresorts

                      Duplicate Title tags even with rel=canonical

                      Hello, We were having duplicate content in our blog (a replica of each post automatically was done by the CMS), until we recently implemented a rel=canonical tag to all the duplicate posts (some 5 weeks ago). So far, no duplicate content were been found, but we are still getting duplicate title tags, though the rel=canonical is present. Any idea why is this the case and what can we do to solve it? Thanks in advance for your help. Tej Luchmun

                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Sep 21, 2015, 3:24 PM | luxresorts
                      0
                    • VanguardCommunications

                      Is it okay to copy and paste on page content into the meta description tag?

                      I have heard conflicting answers to this.   I always figured that it was okay to selectively copy and paste on page content into the meta description tag.....especially if the onpage content is well written.    How can it be duplicate content if it's pulling from the exact same page? Does anybody have any feedback from a credible source about this? Thanks.

                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jul 22, 2014, 8:50 PM | VanguardCommunications
                      1
                    • jorgediaz

                      Canonical Tag and Affiliate Links

                      Hi! I am not very familiar with the canonical tag. The thing is that we are getting traffic and links from affiliates. The affiliates links add something like this to the code of our URL: www.mydomain.com/category/product-page?afl=XXXXXX At this moment we have almost 2,000 pages indexed with that code at the end of the URL. So they are all duplicated. My other concern is that I don't know if those affilate links are giving us some link juice or not. I mean, if an original product page has 30 links and the affiliates copies have 15 more... are all those links being counted together by Google? Or are we losing all the juice from the affiliates? Can I fix all this with the canonical tag? Thanks!

                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | May 17, 2011, 5:37 PM | jorgediaz
                      0
                    • MarieHaynes

                      Why should your title and H1 tag be different?

                      Is it dangerous to have your H1 tag and your title the exact same thing?  My thought was that it's not be the best use of space, but that it couldn't cause harm. What do you think?

                      Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Feb 7, 2014, 4:34 PM | MarieHaynes
                      7

                    Get started with Moz Pro!

                    Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                    Start my free trial
                    Products
                    • Moz Pro
                    • Moz Local
                    • Moz API
                    • Moz Data
                    • STAT
                    • Product Updates
                    Moz Solutions
                    • SMB Solutions
                    • Agency Solutions
                    • Enterprise Solutions
                    Free SEO Tools
                    • Domain Authority Checker
                    • Link Explorer
                    • Keyword Explorer
                    • Competitive Research
                    • Brand Authority Checker
                    • Local Citation Checker
                    • MozBar Extension
                    • MozCast
                    Resources
                    • Blog
                    • SEO Learning Center
                    • Help Hub
                    • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                    • How-to Guides
                    • Moz Academy
                    • API Docs
                    About Moz
                    • About
                    • Team
                    • Careers
                    • Contact
                    Why Moz
                    • Case Studies
                    • Testimonials
                    Get Involved
                    • Become an Affiliate
                    • MozCon
                    • Webinars
                    • Practical Marketer Series
                    • MozPod
                    Connect with us

                    Contact the Help team

                    Join our newsletter
                    Moz logo
                    © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                    • Accessibility
                    • Terms of Use
                    • Privacy

                    Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.