Keyword confusion
-
Thanks for taking the time to read through this.
I'm currently optimizing a website and have a few structural questions:
-
How should one view targeting keywords with respect to the home page of any given site? EG -> If the home page has the preferred keywords at the beginning of title and the page follows most if not all the recommendations from SEOMOZ tools, why are sub pages outranking my root domain for the set of keywords I'm after?
-
When sub pages use my homepage keyword as the 2nd keyword in its respective title, does that give the overall homepage more power for the keyword it's after?
EG. Homepage Title "ABC DEF - DEF ABC - XYZ | Company name
I'm targeting "ABC DEF" for the home page
Subpage title -> "DEF ABC - ABC DEF - XYZ | Company Name.
The sub page keyword is "DEF ABC"
-
-
I don't understand why you insist on cramming SEO and Kingston in the title of every single page you make. It isn't necessary. I would suggest stepping back from SEO mode and going into functional mode. Ask yourself what would really make your site the best site for information on SEO and SEO services in Kingston. Build that site. Forget about Google and keywords. Build a variety of pages related to SEO, but not necessarily about SEO. You can break it up with information useful to readers like how to optimize a landing page, what UX converts buyers, etc. And for Pete's sake, don't put SEO and Kingston in EVERY title or on every page. Get as much information as you can and make each page informative and useful. Don't focus on SEO at all - just build the site for people. When you're done with this and you have a functional and informational site that people like to use, you can then go back and edit it for SEO. It looks like you're obsessed with rankings and keywords. This is going to get in the way of your overall goal - ranking for your keywords.
That's the best advice I have for you. Good luck!
-
Very insightful feedback. Thank you for the recommendations.
My thoughts were simply this (square brackets denote keyword target):
Kingston SEO and SEO Kingston don't appear to be the same simply because the Google SERP display very different results. That was the impetus for creating multiple pages with specific keyword targets.
-home [kingston seo]
-services
--kingston seo services [kingston seo services]
--service2 [etc]
-seo kingston packages [seo kingston]
The overlapping characteristics of the keywords however has made this more challenging in the end. I believe you're correct with the restructure. But with so many key terms overlapping each other with keywords, wouldn't I end up in the same place again - having multiple pages effectively jockeying and competing against each other?
-
I can lead you to water, Thomas, but I can't make you drink. You should not be targeting the exact same keywords on your internal page as your home page. With each sub page your keyword set should be more and more precise. 3 links deep should be pages that are very precise and they should be sniping long-tailed keywords from Google SERPs. You don't have to worry about how link juice travels all around the internet to make your site rank well. Don't get yourself confused with all the jargon and details of SEO. Make your site for people first - then Google. If you build a home page about Kingston SEO and then I go to a subpage and its about SEO in Kingston... ?? i'm confused. Plus, Kingston SEO and SEO Kingston are really the same aren't they? I think you should reevaluate your site structure and exactly what you're trying to accomplish.
Obviously, your goal is to rank for Kingston SEO and SEO Kingston. That should be the focus of your home page. A good idea for a sub page is "Why we're the best SEO Company in Kingston". Then build a landing page around that topic and try to get that page to rank for "best seo company kingston", etc.
-
Thanks for taking the time to respond.
The challenge I'm facing is that my key terms are for these two pages are simply reverses of one another. "Kingston SEO" vs "SEO Kingston". My sub page is optimized for SEO Kingston whereas my front page is optimized for Kingston SEO.
In addition to this, I'm still confused about the concept of inner pages feeding keyword juice back to the front page.
Thoughts?
-
You're discovering one of the Google algo changes the hard way, Thomas. The explanation is more than I'm willing to bang out on a keyboard. In short, Google has shifted the value to sub pages for some keywords. It also has to do with the keywords and if Google thinks they're broad match or specific. Broad match USUALLY works best for the home page. But what you consider to be broad match keywords might not be what Google considers to be broad match keywords. Google is telling you that it likes your internal page better. Focus on your internal page to rank. You'll be surprised at the results.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Homepage target keyword less volume than subcategory keyword
As an example - let's say that I have an online store that sells home accessories. Within my store, I have categories like "kitchen accessories", "bedroom accessories", and "bathroom accessories" among others. Naturally I would want my homepage to be the broadest keyword that best describes my store's offering (i.e. "Home Accessories"). Then, on my sub-category page, I would target "Kitchen Accessories". In this example - let's assume "Kitchen Accessories" has more search volume than "Home Accessories". Would it be better to focus on that keyword on my homepage instead? Example Current Homepage Title: "Beautiful Home Accessories - Crate + Feather" Alternate Homepage Title: "Bath, Bedroom, and Kitchen Accessories - Crate + Feather" Which one would you do assuming everything is equal aside from search volume?
On-Page Optimization | | clarasboutiqueusa0 -
Keywords dropping
My website http://www.refrigeratedtransportuk.com/ is dropping like a stone for the keyword 'refrigerated transport'. Even though the page gets a grade A, can anyone help?
On-Page Optimization | | CreativeCow0 -
Keywords to optimize
In the menu there's an item with a submenu with 4 items (pages) and another item with a submenu with almost the same pages with a litle bit different content. The problem is that one keyword can be applied and must be applied to the similar pages (the topic is very similar). I guess the number of keywords that we optimize is also important too. Optimizing minimun 8 keywords seems to me very hard. I' was told to optimize for a very low number of keywords but then we have the problem of redundancy. What should I do? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | juanmiguelcr0 -
Is thumbnail text crawlable/lists of product names considered as normal copy in terms of keywords?
On a page that lists products (thumbnail text repeating the same word when you sell variations of the same thing) and also has copy at the bottom, are the product names crawlable? Is it better to avoid repeating the keyword in the copy? Can you get penalised for it?
On-Page Optimization | | LawrenceNeal0 -
Positioning the keyword in two pages
Hi there! I've decided to use four criteria (keywords) for my website. The "problem" is that I have to use the same keyword (criteria) in two different pages. Is there a problem If I do this? On the other side, there are two sections of the web that (I assume) must have title and description tag as well as a keyword/criteria (Contact and Registration)....any advice?¿should they have a ttile and a description?¿Should they have a keyword associated? Thanks in advance for the answer.
On-Page Optimization | | juanmiguelcr0 -
Ecommerce On-Site SEO: Keywords in Category Descriptions
Hello, I'm doing on-site SEO for a client's ecommerce site. Are 160 words enough for a category description? I'm using the keywords once at the top of the description, and once at the bottom of the description, with the ones at the bottom reworded so that they are the keywords with a different word order. I used to put the keywords in 3 times but it just feels like stuffing. Is twice, worded differently the second time, enough for a category description? Thanks.
On-Page Optimization | | BobGW0 -
Important keywords in product names
Hi! among other we sell motorcycle clothing, which you can buy as a set (both jacket and pants) or single piece. Currently we name the products with the labeling in the beginning, e.g: Motorcycle pants R2000, Motorcycle jacket R2000, Motorcycle kit R2000 Motorcycle pants R4000, Motorcycle jacket R4000, Motorcycle kit R4000 This is causing keyword stuffing and cannibalization in the category pages as all the product names include important keywords. On the other hand it would be beneficial to keep the labeling in the name for search queries for the exact product. What be your recommendations? I tend to take the labeling away.
On-Page Optimization | | RomiSverige0 -
Keyword distribution in the whole site
I've been taught during a SEO course that the whole site has to contain the chosen keywords with a fixed proportion of optimized pages, that should be like this: 50% of pages optimized on the most relevant keyword (just one keyword) 25% of pages optimized on secondary kewords (depending on the size of the site, could be a few pages for each secondary keywords) 25% of pages on long tail keywords. the teachers was a very respected SEO professional, but I've never seen this strategy anywhere in other articles or SEO guides. what do you think about it?
On-Page Optimization | | DavideM
It's true that it brings visibility for the top keyword?
does it lead to cannibalization?
what others strategy do you use?0