Wordpress & On-Page Optimization
-
Seomoz,
Our current SEO provider built a squeeze page using Wordpress.
http://www.buddyrents.com/rent-to-own-furniture/spring-hill-34608/
The page has minimal links and the one drop-down menu links to other pages that look exactly the same with the exception of the page name and Google map.
Since the pages were built a 2 years ago there have been zero copy changes or code changes until a few weeks ago, yet the provider maintains that there is a maintenance charge to make sure the pages function correctly and are easily read by Google.
This sounds like a made up charge. Wordpress pages like these should be pretty stable and search friendly. Am I missing something?
Is this common to charge for SEO, On-page SEO and Maintenance for pages that have not changed and only rank if you actually enter the long-tail keywords that match the page title? They also don't create a lot of traffic, but the provider says they are essential to our online footprint. The pages have a PA of 1 and
the below on-page links (the exact same links for all 120 pages)
| Internal Followed Links | 23 |
| Internal Nofollow Links | 0 |
| External Followed Links | 3 |
| External Nofollow Links | 0 |Thank you in advance for your insight!
-
Daniel,
Sorry, C3 Media is the agency/ marketing department for Buddyrents.com. This is the site I am discussing.
Thanks.
-
Agreed. Sales is the ultimate measure. We are not able to complete sales agreements online, consequently lead generation is our key metric.
I have brought up the concerns with the provider. They responded that the branded traffic is part of their SEO results because some users seeing their links don't click, but then search the name. I don't buy it. Then when I asked them for a report of the monthly SEO/SEM. They responded with a link building report. I insisted that the report did not warrant the monthly spend and they replied...
"We are constantly changing our strategy depending on the competition and it would be like giving our secrets away. We use the spend as we feel necessary to generate leads. If you are happy with the leads then that should be the focus, not reports."
I think it is in our best interest to work with a partner who is willing to share information, so I want to move on. However, I want to make sure we have a plan and valid reasons before taking that next step.
Thank you and have a great day!
-
What about sales? isn't that the true measure of effectiveness? And the only one that counts in the end?
It's very easy to get caught up in semi-relevant (or downright phony) metrics. What difference does it make if you rank well on insignificant keywords? Or even if your traffic is up, but it's lousy traffic that doesn't generate sales.
A common "trick" used by SEOs of less than outstanding virtue is to optimize for not very competitive keywords. This is quite easily done and presents the illusion of progress. It can also generate really nifty reports with impressive charts and graphs. But to what end?
The fact that most of your traffic is coming from branded keywords is another alarm bell. It means that most of the people accessing your website are already familiar with your brand. But I'm betting that the whole of your web strategy is to reach new prospects.
If your competitors are getting almost all the non-branded traffic and you have other issues with your current firm, it may be time to move on. As mentioned before, you might want to give them one last chance. Talk about your billing issues and concerns with non-branded keywords.
I suspect what you really need is a deep data dive into the whole competitive web landscape. The findings should drive the strategy going forward.
Is your site by any chance www.c3medianetwork.com? if so, I must tell you there are serious issues on everything form on-page stuff to the diversity of your link profile.
-
You make some good points. So, let me ask you what is the best measure of SEO effectiveness?
If I look at overal traffic for our site, we are up 52% form last year, but compared to our two main competitors our traffic is minimal...competitors have close to 8x more traffic per month. Then in analytics the majority of our top performing keywords are branded. The provider sends ranking reports for 1st page SERP keywords, but the traffic we capture from those keywords isn't that great.
My understanding is that the traffic from non-branded keywords is a better gauge of SEO performance. We have never used PPC.
Thanks again for taking the time.
-
If the trust is gone, it may be time to move on.
Make sure you have a plan in place for a transition.
After all, however dissatisfied you are now, something is better than nothing.
But why not give it one last shot? Tell the company you are thinking of moving on, and see how they react. if you are otherwise satisfied with the company's performance, and it's just a matter of billing practices, the relationship might yet be salvaged. It could be as simple as moving to a monthly blanket charge, rather than itemized charges for different services.
Again, I don't know what your contract says, so I'm just taking some guesses here.
-
Hi Daniel,
My gut has made me raise my eyebrows a lot lately. I am finding that much of my day is spent trying to figure out if the charges are valid. Unfortunately, it is difficult for me to question SEO practices, when I am not an expert. We have seen "good" results with the main website, but I feel we are paying for "accessories" that aren't really necessary.
The trust is gone and I feel it is time to move on, but don't want to shoot ourselves in the foot.
Thoughts?
-
My objective is to find out what charges are bogus vs. real. We have had several instances as of late that has really made me question their practices. Including, when I have asked for a report of the the monthly SEO/SEM. They responded with a link building report. I insisted that the report did not warrant the monthly spend and they replied "We are constantly changing our strategy depending on the competition and it would be like giving our secrets away. We use to spend to as we feel necessary to get results." I know for a fact that is not a good answer.
If the choice is to find a new provider without losing the work that has already been done. What is the best process? Per the partnership agreement, we have full ownership of all online assets created for the company.
Thank you.
-
I am an SEO provider and this is probably another case of taking the money and doing nothing much for it. What are the objectives here?
-
It's really difficult to comment intelligently in the absence of more information about the overall relationship with you SEO Provider or what is spelled out in the contract.
But my gut tells me you are right to raise your eyebrows....
(to mix metaphors and body parts)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Very different results for 2 different pages
My site is samhillbands.com If I search “Book a band in Charlottesville” - This page is returned #1 out of 427,000 https://www.samhillbands.com/bands-by-location/Charlottesville-VA However if I search "Book a band in Atlanta" - I do have a result on page 1 out of 16,700,000 https://www.samhillbands.com/bands/retreat-band But the corresponding /bands-by-location/ page is nowhere to be found: https://www.samhillbands.com/bands-by-location/Atlanta-GA Thoughts on what I can do?
Link Building | | brianvest0 -
One page hit with 10K no follow spam links, should we disavow?
Hi everyone, I'd like your opinions on the best way to handle this situation: One particular site page just got hit with 10,000 no follow spammy backlinks over 10 days time. I've read that it's pointless to use the disavow tool on no follow links (since it basically does the same thing) but we want Google to be aware that this WAS NOT US and we don't want to be penalized for these spammy links. Couple of questions: 1. Do we send backlink removal requests to each domain webmaster? 2. Should we skip removal requests and move right to disavow? 3. Should we take other action? As a site we have NEVER used any black hat SEO tactics over a 15 year history and have many HQ do follow and no follow links to the site and this particular page. Thanks for any suggestions in advance!!
Link Building | | geteducated0 -
Blog snippets on home page
Mozzes, We're running a real estate portal in which we have a pretty good news/blog section running on wordpress. It's placed into our LAMP site on a dash from our root URL: www.ourportal.com/news/ To attract traffic via our landing pages we publish article snippets from the blog, linked to the complete articles. What would be the optimal SEO here to lead the spiders to the orignal content? Follow, Noindex? Best Johan
Link Building | | PropertyPortal1 -
Targeting high Page Authority sites vs high Pagerank sites for backlinks?
For many years I've been working on seo/backlinks for my website. When doing analysis in opensiteexplorer I notice that the highest listed backlinks for my site are sites with high page authority and domain authority, rather than pagerank. For example one of the highest backlinks for my website has page authority/domain authority of 72/96 but the site itself is only a PR2, while my other backlinks have PR4, 5, or 6 with lower page authority. For a while I've been trying to partner with websites for backlinks from high pagerank sites, as I've always believed this is the #1 metric in relaying link juice. But OSE's metrics seem to not follow that train of thought -- it believes page authority/domain authority is a more important measure. Is it? Should I change my strategy to try to partner with websites that have high page authority rather than focusing so much on pagerank?
Link Building | | DiamondJewelryEmpire0 -
Ranking for pages within your website
Hello, I'm ranking well for my keywords on my main domain site www.f1plus.co.uk But how can I improve ranking and increase the amount of links to pages within my website such as <cite>www.f1plus.co.uk/microsoft-word-aberdeen/</cite> Any Suggestions? Thanks Jack
Link Building | | senreview0 -
What % Page Metrics & Social, What % Links?
It seems that a lot of the focus of SEOs, especially whitehat SEOs like SEOMoz and Distilled has shifted a lot more towards improving page metrics (bounce, return rate, etc) and social metrics. I'm curious - And of course, I'm just asking for guesses - But what percent of ranking do you think is page metrics, social metrics and other non-link based metrics and what percent do you think are link based metrics?
Link Building | | DerekP0 -
Public Pre-Release Landing Page Optimisation
We currently have a pre-release landing page online with little content that is hiding our Beta release, is it worth beginning link building against that landing page?
Link Building | | agilityinteractive0 -
Strong pages and subpages: Building exact anchor again and again, or mix up?
Hi Seo Moz Team, I'm looking for some tips to optimize my site. The site is from mid 2009 and I'm targeting a bunch of keywords around a specific topic. One mainkeyword is a two phrase, let's say "keyword one". Since the beginning I built a lot of keyword anchor links with exact "keyword one" to my homepage. The key was climbing week to week until I reached number two on google. This place I could hold for round about 4 month. Until then it was going down to number 18 to number 14. The keyword "keyword one" was used most of all and it is the far most used key in the bunch of the other keywords. My first question is: I don't know what to do. I started building some brand links in order to mix the anchortext up. Should I built some new links to "keyword one" until I'm in the tops again although I have so much of them already? Could it be, that I have a keyword penalty one year now? In the meantime I worked with other keywords, deeplinks with total different keys and brand links. Smaller keys are ranking good and are very stable on positions 1-3. But especially this key is a little bid tricky. Other sites in the serps have roundabout 5-10 links regarding "keyword one" and they are ranking better than my site with 30-40 exakt anchor. My other idea was, that some links with anchor "keyword one" could be devalued. In this case it should be ok to build some new with exact anchor? The second keyword, lets say "key word two" is a three word combination. I have 60 good and editorial links on this special page and mixed up since I was optimizing for this key. Url mentions, exact anchor, variations and so on. With this key I'm on number 3. Number two is a very week site with no exact anchor backlink but a three word "keyword Domain". Regarding to this, my second question: There is no other site on my project, that is stronger than this three key combination page, but I can't reach to number 1-2 in google. The incoming links are very good regarding to all the other sites in the serps. Should I have patience? Building more and more links? I'm afraid that it is unnatural this way. For your information: There is one site in the serps from 2004. Everything this site does is to build lnks with "keyword one" and two other keywords. No variations, no brand. I think 85% of the time. This guy is ranking on positions 2-3 with this combinations since 3 years now, but smaller keys are week and foundable in comparison. Thanks in advance!
Link Building | | Whipeout770