Is this going to shoot people and my clients in the foot?
-
I have mentioned before about rewriting search URLs to look like landing pages, in e-commerce sites. Is this going to be a bad practice to use on a wide scale?
I took the time to make a module for the platform I develop on which is going to make it easier to do. Normally a search would look something like shop.com/search_controller?search_term=searchword and the search pages are disallowed in the robots.txt file.
But the module I made lets you configure them to be like site.com/searchword or what ever you want it to be. It also lets you configure the meta title and the meta description of the page too. Here is a screenshot of the options.
http://screencast.com/t/PwhBfSia5k
The module also appends the urls to the site map of the site too. Will this get people a penalty by google? Or will it get their pages indexed? I have done similar on a small scale of like 5 words per site, I am wondering how it will be seen on a large scale.
-
Looks good.
-
Correct, here is an example, this is a search how it is normally generated, http://admedonline.com/index.php?controller=search&controller=search&orderby=position&orderway=desc&search_query=tape
It uses no meta tags really and has an ugly url that is not great for indexing. Plus I disallow the search in the robots.
Here is one of the searches that I rewrote, I have cheesy meta tags just to test it, but it has a better url.
-
Lesley,
That sounds fine. I was thinking of these general site search pages I keep coming across, where someone stuck Google site search or something onto their site and then Google returns one of those pages. Often times there's nothing even relevant in the search. The big thing for me is that I want to find what I was looking for when I click through a search result. I don' want to find another search results page. That said, if the results page is a list of products that I'm searching for, then I've found what I'm looking for.
Based on your last description, it sounds fine to me and I don't think it would be considered poor quality. It's basically just a category page and I always recommend to ecommerce clients that they optimize their category pages.
Sounds good.
Kurt
-
See my strategy is not to provide poor results, but more targeted results. How I normally use it is like this, say you have a site selling laptops. You would put them into categories like amd, intel, then screen size, maybe processor speed and ram. But what happens when someone searches "red laptop" or "beats by dre laptop" having a search page come up with all of the appropriate laptops is not a bad thing. I don't recommend people over categorizing, so I see this is a way around it.
-
It's hard to know how Google will respond, but I can tell you that I find search results pages in the search results all the time. Personally, I can't stand it.
The two factors that I think will play into whether Google does something about this is:
- Will they think these pages are poor results?
- Will search results pages in Google results become a widespread enough issue that they take the time to deal with it?
I guess one more question to ask would be whether, if they do address it, whether they would penalize sites or just remove the pages from the search results.
My guess is that they probably would find most of these pages to be poor quality results. I don't know if they'll get around to doing anything about it, but if they did, I think they would just remove the pages from the results, not penalize people.
That's my $0.02.
Personally, I hope this doesn't become widespread because I really don't like site search pages in the Google results.
Kurt Steinbrueck
OurChurch.Com
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Going mobile: Responsive or different mobile version?
Going mobile: Responsive or different mobile version?
Web Design | | FCRMediaLietuva
Which one should we choose? Should we do responsive design or should we have a different mobile version and go m.domain.com ? http://searchenginewatch.com/sew/how-to/2253965/3-reasons-why-responsive-web-design-is-the-best-option-for-your-mobile-seo-strategy I just read this article. It seems that the responsive design is OK, but the first comment kills that opinion and says that it is pretty hard to make it OK. 🙂 So I need more opinions? What is best for people and for SEO?0 -
Spotted Hidden Omiod Links in Footer - What do you think is Going on Here?
Hi guys, Hoping one of you have come across this before. While taking a look at the source code for a website I've recently started working on, I spotted some 'display:none' code in the footer of the page. Here's a snapshot of the code: close XMETAhead title : 404 Page Not Found | ( 39 chrs ) [http://www.omiod.com/chrome-extensions/meta-seo-inspector/info.php?meta=description&cont=404 Page Not Found.](<a href=)" title="more about description" target="_blank" class="ad_seo_link">description : 404 Page Not Found( 170 chrs )[http://www.omiod.com/chrome-extensions/meta-seo-inspector/info.php?meta=keywords&cont=404, 404 error page,](<a href=) " title="more about keywords" target="_blank" class="ad_seo_link">keywords : 404, 404 error page ( 7 items )SCRIPT![](<a href=)http://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=www.google-analytics.com">www.google-analytics.com http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js <div< a="">class="ad_seo_title">HTML5 report</div<>Doctype is not HTML5, there are no HTML5 tags, but at least no obsolete HTML tags were found. 1/5
Web Design | | ecommercebc0 -
Going Mobile - Advice Requested
Hi, I run a website called tvfoodmaps.com. We currently have a desktop website and a mobile app (native apps). However the largest community of our users tend to use our desktop site on their mobile phones. Our bounce rate is about 12% higher for mobile devices than desktop users and our pages per visit drops by almost 50% from desktop to mobile. My hypothesis is that mobile users when presented with a "designed for desktop" site are more likely to leave since the navigation isn't as natural. I'm considering investing in either a responsive design for the site or a dedicated mobile site and wanted the communities input on what metrics I should be looking at to determine "is it worth it"? Or should I just stick with service the desktop version to the mobile users?
Web Design | | tvfoodmaps0 -
How to answer this request from a client?
Hello Mozzers, I just launched a website for one of my clients and one of the update requests they had was to add the first link in the navigation again when the navigation drops down. Here is an example of the navigation now: http://screencast.com/t/K6ooX0I9pe For example, they would want "About" showing up again, they want this for every navigation item. I know this wouldn't be right. How would you respond to them?
Web Design | | alexhoug0 -
Check list for Manual penalty – Before going for reconsideration
Hi there, Any one please help us, in cross checking our recovery work before submitting to reconsideration request. Quality Check list for a Website SEO audit check list Why am requesting means, our previous request was came with a negative result. Thanking you in advance
Web Design | | Shashidhar.SEO1 -
Should my link href be www or go direct to page?
Hi, just wondering which is the best format for linking to pages. In my navigation at the moment i have links like; Car Repair Services Is this the recommended format or should it be; Car Repair Services Many thanks for any answers. Alex
Web Design | | SeoSheikh0 -
For A Corporation With 3 Distinct Business Divisions, Is It Better To Go With 1 Domain & 3 Sub-Domains, 1 Domain & 3 Folders, or 3 Domains for SEO Purposes?
Hi, I am working on a project right now for an existing client, we have one domain up and running well, they want to create an 'umbrella' site to cover three current business divisions and roll everything up under that main site, including the existing site on a totally different domain (would migrate over and 301 redirect from current domain). From what I've researched, I am inclined towards one main domain with three sub-domains due to the amount of content for each business division being significantly different enough that it seems to deserve separation from each other. However, in terms of SEO and maintaining consistent domain authority, would anyone recommend it be better to structure this as just folders/categories falling under the main domain instead of separate sub-domains for each division, and focus keyword targeting on pages tailored to that end within the main domain structure rather than spreading out link-juice to different sub-domains? Thanks!
Web Design | | Dan_InboundHorizons0 -
Need to rebuild client's flash website
I am working with their web designer and need to figure out a way to rebuild their site which is currently all in flash. I was wondering if there was a way to do this without spending a ton of time in completely re-doing the site from scratch.
Web Design | | awalker840