80% of traffic lost over night, Google Penalty?
-
Hi all.
I have a website called Hemjakt (http://www.hemjakt.se/) which is a search engine for real estate currently only available on the Swedish market. The application crawl real estate websites and collect all estates on a single searchable application. The site has been released for a few months and have seen a steady growth since release, increasing by 20% weekly up to ~900 visitors per day.3 days ago, over night, I lost 80% of my traffic. Instead of 900 visitors per day I'm at ~100 visitors per day and when I search for long, specific queries such as "Åsgatan 15, Villa 12 rum i Alsike, Knivsta" ( <adress><house type=""><rooms><area> <city>), I'm now only found on the fifth page.
I suspect that I have become a subject of a Google Penalty. How to get out of this mess?</city></rooms></house></adress>
Just like all search engines or applications, I do crawl other websites and scrape their content. My content is ~90% unique from the source material and I do add user value by giving them the possibility to compare houses, get ton of more data to compare pricing and history, giving them extra functionalities that source site do not offer and so on. My analytics data show good user engagement.
Here is one example of a Source page and a page at my site:
Source: http://www.hemnet.se/bostad/villa-12rum-alsike-knivsta-kommun-asgatan-15-6200964
My Site: http://www.hemjakt.se/bostad/55860-asgatan-15/So:
-
How do I actually confirm that this is the reason I lost my traffic? When I search for my branded query, I still get result. Also I'm still indexed by Google.
-
If I am penalized. I'm not attempting to do anything Black Hat and I really believe that the app gives a lot of value to the users. What tweaks or suggestions do you have to changes of the application, to be able to continue running the service in a way that Google is fine with?
-
-
because you have no backlinks you have six total and your site apparently has an incredible amount of duplicate content after running it through screening frog and site liner you have a ton of broken links as well.
From only scanning 250 pages total I was able to come up with quite a few huge issues
with out the www.
400 Bad Request:
Top Issues
1,301 pages were not scanned.
772 broken links were found.
Your site is missing an XML Sitemap.
WWW vs. non-WWW: Server error.Your Pages
250 pages scanned of 1,551 found.
Normal Pages: 67
Skipped, Redirect: 10
Errors: 173
Not Scanned: 1,301Duplicate Content
Duplicate Content: 15%
Common Content: 59%
Unique Content: 25%** the complete PDF report is right here http://cl.ly/WF4O will**
http://www.siteliner.com/www.hemjakt.se/omrade/centralt/?siteliner=broken
OSE backlinks http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/links?page=1&site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hemjakt.se%2F
After using the elite addition of Ahrefs ( the different editions offer different abilities) Summary of links found for www.hemjakt.se
You have roughly 2 domain backlinks total from utilizing both tools I would run it through MajesticSEO but I do not see the point.
you need to fix the problems with your site I have a guess as to how you are ranking, but I do not believe it was natural.
If you had built that many pages on a website and really gotten only about 5 or 6 backlinks out of that only 2 our from domains/ IP's to link to your site total I would find that impossible to believe.
You have clearly scraped them or somebody else has been doing a lot of scraping and you may not know about it.
Here is a lot of information I hope this helps,
Thomas
-
I would say that your site goes against the Google guidelines in regards to thin content: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/2604719?hl=en
Part of the description of thin content includes "automatically generated content" and "copied content".
Have you checked your Webmaster Tools console to see if you have been given a thin content penalty? Check Search Traffic --> Manual Actions. If there isn't one though, then Panda is probably still the culprit.
-
If your site is only a couple of months old, it's possible that you initially had a honeymoon boost and now you're seeing the traffic you would normally get. But, I think that there is a more serious issue.
According to Google there are over 72,000 pages of your site indexed. How many of these pages contain useful and UNIQUE content that users can't find anywhere else on the web? If you're crawling other people's sites and publishing their content as yours then you're just asking to be demoted by the Panda algorithm. The only thing that doesn't exactly fit with this is the date. As far as we know the last Panda update was May 20. Still, this is my best guess.
"My content is ~90% unique from the source material and I do add user value..."
I would not agree here. In the examples that you gave me, I see that the majority of the actual content (i.e. the text) is 100% copied from the original source. There are several issues with this:
1. Google will see that the vast majority of your site contains content that did not originate with you. This is a sign of low quality and Google will not want to display your site over the originator of that content.
2. Copyright issues. Do you have permission to scrape these sites?
I haven't had a thorough look but from what I've seen, I don't think that this business model will work.
-
Oh yes - I'm sorry about that. So the duplicate content issue still applies, and now I've tested your website - it is quite slow but not as bad as the example I gave. I'd still recommend improving the speed.
Do you link to the website you're scraping the content from? Do you have permission to publish it?
I'm assuming at this stage you don't have any messages from Google in WMT about penalties. Can you pinpoint any onsite changes you made before the traffic drop?
Considering the duplicate content on your site I'm surprised you ranked so well and saw the traffic increases you did - so with your absence of links perhaps the website is at it's natural position at the moment. I have no experience of real estate websites or the Swedish market and competition within it though.
You could consider adding some unique content to the homepage and other location pages - something useful for users. If I was moving to a new city I'd want to know about the different neighbourhoods and which area suited me - which areas are quiet, near to parks? Which have good (public) transport links, might be noisy, have amenities nearby? These could be expanded into really useful standalone location guides, with pictures, maps and more info added.
-
Not sure what you are talking about. There are no links in the footer, there's no footer. On category pages there is a infinity scroll and on normal pages there are no footer at all.
On a normal house page there is only about ~55 <a>tags. </a>
-
Hi Alex thanks for your response.
That is not my website you are linking to, that is the source website that I crawl the content from in the example above.
The domains are very similar so easy to mix up.
Hemjakt.se is my site.
Hemnet.se is the source that I crawled.So in this case if you want to do a Pingdom Speed Test on that page, you should do it on the following URL: http://www.hemjakt.se/bostad/55860-asgatan-15/
But to answer the rest of your question:
- No there have been no significant speed changes to the website according to Google Analytics Speed Page. The last bump when speed times was increased temporarily was 2 weeks ago and only for 1 day.
- The site is hosted on Amazon with a CDN for all images. The site is not perfect but there have been a lot of time spend on making sure that the load times are decent and that the site get a OK score in Google Insights Speed Test.
Here is the Overview page from my Google Analytics to display my Bounce Rate and so on.
Regarding the Bounce Rate. It was ~66% when I had 0 goals set for the site. When I set up goals such as completing forms, viewing the gallery of each house etc the bounce rate dropped to ~38%. That is the reason for the bounce rate drop. -
Footer links are not usually an issue unless you're using them for keyword spamming e.g. you have a load for different locations: "buy house london", "buy house manchester", "buy house liverpool" etc. You won't get a penalty for having over 100 links on a page so that's unlikely to be the issue either.
I've had a quick look at your website and there are two major issues I picked up on:
- Duplicate content - you say you crawl websites and your content is "90% unique from the source material". The content would be better if 90% of it was unique to your website only. I searched Google for a block of text from one of the links you provided and 5 websites appeared. Google doesn't like duplicate content - maybe your website does provide value to users but how can Google's algorithm know this if all it sees is duplicate content? Perhaps your site had poor user metrics (e.g. people pressing back to return to the search results page after a short period of time on your website) so Google demoted it. Can you see any evidence of this in Google Analytics?
- I tested http://www.hemnet.se/bostad/villa-12rum-alsike-knivsta-kommun-asgatan-15-6200964 on Pingdom Speed Test and "Your website is slower than 92% of all tested websites" - has a recent change caused that slowdown? Is the site registered with Google Webmaster Tools? If so, can you see a change in page speed, crawl rate etc.? Google Analytics can also report on page speed. That's very slow and if it's a recurring problem the first thing I'd fix.
While I was browsing this happened to me twice "Just nu har vi tekniska problem".
-
Remove some footer links. More footer links cab be affected any kind of website.No more then 100 links per page.
-
What? Not sure what you're talking about.
Here is an example of a page on my site:
http://www.hemjakt.se/bostad/59873-soldatgatan-13-b/ -
As per my knowledge can you delete footer links then i am sure you will rank again.
You putting more and more links in footer.
Thanks,
Akhilesh
-
What is your suggestion to solve it?
I truely think my application can add a lot of value to the users by giving them a chance to find a lot of data at the same spot, instead of having to navigate to a bunch of other sites. Since I also get access to "Big data" I can add a lot of value to the users by displaying price history from multiple sources.
I'm not trying to do anything shady or black hat. I'm just trying to create a search engine for real estate. Obviously that will generate a lot of content and many pages in a short amount of time.
What am I doing that is against the Google Guidelines? I doubt that "Adding pages too fast" is a reason to give a penalty, but more suspicious activity that would indiciate that a closer look by Google would be needed to see if any spam is going on.
-
Means in your website no instances (Inbound links). I think you create more pages in very short of time that's the reason behind this.
-
I have done no linkbuilding for this site. I have only focused on building a strong crawler and with ~60'000 pages/houses indexed I have been able to rank well on long queries with low competition, and thereby getting good traffic without any linkbuilding.
Moz reports 0 links and from my Google Analytics report I have only been getting some referral traffic from Reddit, a post that has now been deleted. All other traffic is organic search traffic. So I highly doubt that there are any "bad links" that is causing this punishment.
Regarding the crawler. I crawl other websites for real estate objects. I cache the HTML and I then filter out specific information such as price, number of rooms, address and so on.
I then publish this data with my own structure. This makes the data 87-90% unique if compared to the Source site. You can see example in the first post of this topic.
The 10-13% that is not unique, is the description of the real estate object which is usually a 1-2 paragraph text saying something like "This is an amazing house with 12 rooms with a great view that would be a perfect fit for the large family". This text is copied straight off. Which might be what gives me the punishment? Even if its only 10% of the page content. What do you think?
-
HI Marcus Lind,
Can you share me what activity have you done for SEO for this website and how much anchor and which anchor text created by you.
After that we can say clearly what is the exact issue.
-
Please note that I have not done any link building at all to the site, it's only 2 months old. There are no unnatural links, no keyword stuffing and no other black hat seo tactics used. No links have been purchased at all, so Penguin should not be relevant to this site.
I've attached an image of my Google Analytics Overview for the past months, and you can see how it has been naturally steadily growing day by day and then just taking a huge drop the last few days.
-
That's fantastic that you been keeping track of your Bing queries and it sounds like you've been hit by a penalty and going for. I am guessing
i can pull link data for you however my girlfriends want to kill me if I don't stop answering questions right now so look for my answer in about six hours of use
Ahrefs majestic SEO & Moz
-
Try running your queries in Bing and see how it compares. If you see the terms you ranked for earlier ranking well in Bing, then you know you've been hit by a penalty in Google.
That's what made it clear for a site I'm involved with and have been trying to recover for many months now.
-
I'm very sorry to hear that this is happened to you. Here is some information I hopefully helpful
This URL may say on the video that you have to be a member to see the video however you do not have to remember to read the transcript. Therefore read the transcript use the tool that tries to gauge now this is not 100% but it might give you a lot more insight into what's actually occurred. You have to have Moz opensiteexplorer.com and another tool like MajesticSEO.com or Ahrefs.com
I like Ahrefs however either one will do.Your first step is to Google “fruition Google penalty tool”,
https://fruition.net/google-penalty-checker-tool/
because that will bring up a cool tool that will show you whether or not you’ve been hit by Google Penguin, because there are several updateshttp://www.quicksprout.com/university/how-to-identify-and-recover-from-a-google-penguin-penalty/
So your aware this link shows a video that you may not be able to see you and I sure remember however because it is fully transcribed you have a exact how-to manual right below it.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What does Google's Spammy Structured Markup Penalty consist of?
Hey everybody,
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | klaver
I'm confused about the Spammy Structured Markup Penalty: "This site may not perform as well in Google results because it appears to be in violation of Google's Webmaster Guidelines." Does this mean the rich elements are simply removed from the snippets? Or will there be an actual drop in rankings? Can someone here tell from experience? Thanks for your help!1 -
Dealing with Dodgy Looking Traffic
Hi there I am really hoping someone can help. The site I run has started receiving traffic from the US (we are a UK run firm who don't ship overseas). Ordinarily, this wouldn't be a massive problem but the traffic is coming directly to lots of pages and instantly bouncing. I am worried this is going to negatively impact my rankings as drop off rate and conversions are getting hammered by this 'fake traffic'. The attached image shows the traffic for the homepage but its happening on every page with hundreds of hits bouncing and hurting my stats. Is there any way of dealing with this or reporting it to an authority or even Google itself? Any help would be greatly appreciated. George 7vprsJo
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | BrinvaleBird0 -
Malicious links on our site indexed by Google but only visible to bots
We've been suffering from some very nasty black hat seo. In Google's index, our pages show external links to various pharmaceutical websites, but our actual live pages don't show them. It seems as though only certain user-agents see the malicious links. Setting up Screaming Frog SEO crawler using the Googlebot user agent also sees the malicious links. Any idea what could have caused this or how this can be stopped? We scanned all files on our webserver and couldn't find any of malicious links. We've changed our FTP and CMS passwords, is there anything else we can do? Thanks in advance!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | SEO-Bas0 -
How does Google determine if a link is paid or not?
We are currently doing some outreach to bloggers to review our products and provide us with backlinks (preferably followed). The bloggers get to keep the products (usually about $30 worth). According to Google's link schemes, this is a no-no. But my question is, how would Google ever know if the blogger was paid or given freebies for their content? This is the "best" article I could find related to the subject: http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2332787/Matt-Cutts-Shares-4-Ways-Google-Evaluates-Paid-Links The article tells us what qualifies as a paid link, but it doesn't tell us how Google identifies if links were paid or not. It also says that "loans" or okay, but "gifts" are not. How would Google know the difference? For all Google knows (maybe everything?), the blogger returned the products to us after reviewing them. Does anyone have any ideas on this? Maybe Google watches over terms like, "this is a sponsored post" or "materials provided by 'x'". Even so, I hope that wouldn't be enough to warrant a penalty.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | jampaper0 -
Should you include keywords in your domain name to rank well on Google Places?
Is it okay to include keywords in your domain name (as well as business name) to rank well on Google Places? In my opinion, this is very spammy and the sites using this technique will be slapped by Google sooner or later.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | thegoatman1 -
Google +1s Quality Factors?
It is apparent that Google +1s are becoming an increasingly large factor in results pages and I had a few questions about some of the dynamics. Do +1s take into account factors such as c-blocks, location diversity based on IP, and similar elements? To what degree? Do +1s from well-diversified and historically more active/authoritative G+ accounts carry more weight than someone who simply has a G+ account because they use Gmail and were prompted? What is the spectrum here? How much weight would a +1 from Rand Fishkin hold in contrast to an account created one year ago with little activity? I know Google has a great deal of user data from Gmail, YouTube, Calendar, Docs, search history and many more so would imagine this plays a role. Do +1s from newly created accounts that only target one business or niche cause damage? I am assuming that +1s should accumulate naturally just as backlinks so if what would be considered an unnatural amount of +1s in what time period? Any insights here are greatly appreciated!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | SEOGroup1230 -
Massive drop in Google traffic after upping pagecount 8-fold.
I run a book recommendation site -- Flashlight Worthy. It's a collection of original, topical book lists: "The Best Books for Healthy (Vegetarian) Babies" or "Keystone Mysteries: The Best Mystery Books Set in Pennsylvania" or "5 Books That Helped Me Discover and Love My Italian Heritage". It's been online for 4+ years. Historically, it's been made up of: a single home page ~50 "category" pages, and ~425 "book list" pages. (That 50 number and 425 number both started out much smaller and grew over time but has been around 425 for the last year or so as I've focused my time elsewhere.) On Friday, June 15 we made a pretty big change to the site -- we added a page for every Author who has a book that appears on a list. This took the number of pages in our sitemap from ~500 to 4,149 overnight. If an Author has more than one book on the site, the page shows every book they have on the site, such as this page: http://www.flashlightworthybooks.com/books-by/Roald-Dahl/2805 ..but the vast majority of these author pages have just one book listed, such as this page: http://www.flashlightworthybooks.com/books-by/Barbara-Kilarski/2116 Obviously we did this as an SEO play -- we figured that our content was getting ~1,000 search entries a day for such a wide variety of queries that we may as well create pages that would make natural landing pages for a broader array of queries. And it was working... 5 days after we launched the pages, they had ~100 new searches coming in from Google. (Ok, it peaked at 100 and dropped down to a steady 60 or so day within a few days, but still. And then it trailed off for the last week, dropping lower and lower every day as if they realized it was repurposed content from elsewhere on our site...) Here's the problem: For the last several years the site received ~30,000 search entries a month... a little more than 1,000 a day on weekdays, a little lighter on weekends. This ebbed and flowed a bit as Google made tweaked things (Panda for example), as we garnered fresh inbound links, as the GoodReads behemoth stole some traffic... but by and large, traffic was VERY stable. And then, on Saturday, exactly 3 weeks after we added all these pages, the bottom fell out of our search traffic. Instead of ~1,000 entries a day, we've had ~300 on Saturday and Sunday and it looks like we'll have a similar amount today. And I know this isn't just some Analytics reporting problem as Chartbeat is showing the same drop. As search is ~80% of my traffic I'm VERY eager to solve this problem... So: 1. Do you think the drop is related to my upping my pagecount 8-fold overnight? 2. Do you think I'd climb right back into Google's good graces if I removed all the pages at once? Or just all the pages that only list one author (which would be the vasy majority). 3. Have you ever heard of a situation like this? Where Google "punishes" a site for creating new pages out of existing content? Really, it's useful content -- and these pages are better "answers" for a lot of queries. When someone searches for "Norah Ephron books" it's better they land on a page of ours that pulls together the 4 books we have than taking them to a page that happens to have just one book on it among 5 or 6 others by other authors. What else? Thanks so much, help is very appreciated. Peter
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | petestein1
Flashlight Worthy Book Recommendations
Recommending books so good, they'll keep you up past your bedtime. 😉0 -
Local Listing Spam - Why is Google Missing this?
I have a competitor that ranks in Google Search for a Top Dollar Keyword in the organic rankings with the normal result, however just below that it shows another result that contains the Local City Name followed by their business name. In the URL they have domain.com > Local and below the description data it shows a map for a totally different location as this competitor only has one location... Once clicking on the link I found that it has everything in the title, description and h1 and body content in footer that talks about the local area but not their product. and when you click the breadcrumbs you can go back to a directory of all the other cities and states they are targeting with doorway pages with the same layout however the anchor text is cityname+keyword How are they getting away with this?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Ben-HPB0