Getting links on old blog posts
-
There's 100 of blogs with posts that link to my competitors, but don't link to my site.They are mostly lists. Eg: "The best Sites to get blue widgets"
I was thinking about getting in touch with these blogs, and asking them to take a look at my site, to see if perhaps they would add it to the list. In fact, I started doing it and I got some links already.
Now I am starting to worry that Google could consider these links as unnatural, because, you know, the algos are not exactly perfect. Anyway, the links are important for the exposure anyway.
I've two questions:
1. Is there any chance I'll be penalized?
2. May I get a SEO benefit from this links?
-
I agree with you, Alan. That's how most people do it.
I've found through a few small retail sites and a couple of information sites, that publishing useful or interesting content can be enough that other people will share it for you. There are still niches out there where one or two people, working as a team, can produce, in two or three years, more content and better content than all of the competitors in the niche combined. Once you have that, then some of the people who find your site and see the depth of content, will share it for you. And, there are some topics where people will search deeply for the right information.
If you have a hardware store or a toy store or a jewelry store, you don't have to attack the entire industry. Instead, focus on a very small niche of products that are typically not represented well in local stores, and that do not have an online champion.
The niche must be chosen carefully.
I don't have any interest in social media, or making personal connections, or in soliciting others. But, I do have an interest in learning the deep technical details of things and enjoy writing about them. Through that, I provide the community service similar to what you provide. Then a steady stream of visitor questions coming in and being answered, first by email and then published to the content library that provides a service to a consumer community - these are coming from people who may have first purchased at amazon or or some other vendor who places 100% of their effort in making the sale but places zero effort in helping the customer after the sale.
These people are out searching deeply. They feel like they have been abandoned. This is today's internet - Walmart, Amazon, Jet, and others are all focused on the aggressive price competition. Service after the sale and deep information for the consumer has been abandoned at the very time when you think it should be abundant. Nobody wants to write it. How many times have you purchased something and could not understand directions that were written on another continent and then translated into English by someone who knows the language poorly.
That leads to a problem in that you become the default service department for amazon! They don't do it. But if you step into that role you quickly obtain a knowledge of what information people need and when you answer an email, you also place another brick in your relevant content library. So, although I am not making any direct outreach at all to advocate a brand, engaging a community, or soliciting on my own behalf in any way, the questions keep coming in, the content mass continues to grow, and it attracts more and more traffic year over year.
Most business owners are not going to do this because they don't like to write content and they don't have a situation that allows them to invest a lot of time now and not be paid back until years down the road. No SEO will do this because the upfront labor is very high and the return isn't fast enough to satisfy a client. These opportunities are perfect for the person who enjoys working from the cloister.
-
EGOL,
As always, you infuse wisdom into this discussion. I have always been an advocate of "content first, content last". Yet in 2015, search engines are only one piece of the puzzle, and until and unless other efforts for brand visibility / authority / trust are made, the overwhelming majority of sites on the web will leave way too much money on the table.
I happen to believe links need to be generated through our own efforts yet it's not the "traditional" link building. Instead, it's more about advocacy of brand, community service, and participation in the community in which our prospective/existing clients/customers live.
If we are not active in those ways, we build a house on sand.
Just my take on it.
-
just "produce great content" and sit on our asses.
That's what I do.
'Cept, I don't do much ass sittin'. I am right back onto the next piece of content.
If you don't spend any time link buildin' you can make twice as much content and then even if it attracts half as many natural links you have broken even on the links because you have double the amount of content.
The problem with link buildin' is that you can only put 20 hours per week into it. With content makin' at the end of the first year I have 100 articles out there pullin' links and at the end of the fifth year I have 500 articles out there pullin' links, but you are still only able to work 20 hours per week. Rand would say that content makin' is a flywheel activity because it scales while link buildin' isn't.
The biggest risk that you take content makin' is that you are not honest with yourself, or unable to distinguish, "great content" that will become popular from "pedestrian content" that nobody will link to and most people bounce off of.
-
The reason for the skepticism is the scale of spam out there, and the volume of ways spam efforts attempt to trick search algorithms. Google, even now, all these years into it, still does a very poor job of trapping some of that noise, and so the index remains polluted.
Of course, just building great content is never enough and won't ever be enough. So we just need to check the boxes regarding the potential for Google to think "this isn't legitimate".
-
They are real, quality, relevant, etc, etc. Is there any good reason for such skepticism? It seems like every link building idea is met with a negative attitude, as if we should just "produce great content" and sit on our asses.
-
Are they legitimate placement? Meaning - are the posts you seek links from real, quality, and relevant posts, and not on sites that are created for spam purposes?
Are you asking for a link and NOT specific anchor text, and NOT the wording they would use?
If the above scenario is what's happening, it's valid to reach out this way. As long as you leave it up to them to decide whether to include your content or not, and decide what they write, and what anchor text to use, and there is no reciprocal exchange, and no paid aspect, you "should" be fine.
Of course, it's impossible to know what some poorly trained manual reviewer might think about them, however that's the only scenario where I'd be concerned in this situation.
And if all of the above criteria are met, then those links would be helpful to readers of those sites, and thus have a chance of bringing actual human users to your site. Which makes them valuable for many reasons, one of which is SEO.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Link Building where link building is dead. Latest tactics in a land of content.
Hello, What is your latest link building techniques considering manual link building is basically dead, and you should really build good content to drive results. Link building has really become less important. It seems to be much more 10X content now. What would you recommend for basic link building considering this besides the 50 first Links video by Rand, which is excellent. Thanks, Bob
Link Building | | BobGW0 -
Subdomain links vs root domain links? Are the less valuable?
I am determining the value of links we get. Is a link on a subdomain less valuable vs one on the root domain? How less valuable would you consider a subdomain link? For example blog.site.com vs site.com/blog What other metrics would you take into consideration for the value of a subdomain link?
Link Building | | calf0 -
Handling External links to articles in a blog
I have a blog that has it's own articles but then also want to feature third-party sites that have my op-ed content on them. Wondering what is the best practice for handling external links. The reason we want to do this: Make sure our followers and people who subscribe to our blog see all our content (especially when a third-party "high authority" publisher is featuring articles from our authors We also want to be able to get a ranking for the article title when someone searches for it on Search Engines. i.e I write an article for hubspot called "my article about something". When googling "my article about something" I want to see both the Hubspot listing (where my article originated on) as well as a link to my website where I show an abstract (original abstract) and then the link links to the hubspot article. For example: www.myblog.com/listing (renders a listing of articles with links to each individual article) If showing an "abstract" for the blog article and then linking out to the third-party source (where content is featured) www.myblog.com/category/post-title (renders actual article page) When showing an individual post-title page what are the minimum requirements (META TAGS, length or amount of characters ,etc) Thanks in advance!
Link Building | | dspete0 -
Pursuing Links on Sites You Have a Link From
Is it a bad idea to spend resources to get a second link from a site that already links to you? It seems like the marginal value of each additional link is much smaller than the first link.
Link Building | | ProjectLabs0 -
Why does my site only have 4 internal followed links/internal links?
When using Open Site Explorer my site is winning in many categories but lacking in others as compared to competitors. I intend to improve on this but am a little confused by the extremely low number of "internal followed links" and "internal links" at just 4. My competitors have much more than that. Does this mean links to the root domain? Total internal links? I have many internal links so I'm having a hard time figuring this one out. What four internal links are getting noticed? I just went through and changed all the links that went to index.html to link to the root domain at www.njlimocarservice.com as I just found a Q&A that indicates this was better. So as of Wed at 5:45 PM all my links to the homepage went to index.html and not the root which is no longer the case. Not sure if this matters. At the same time I also just put a 301 from index.html to redirect to www.njlimocarservice.com. Any help appreciated! h9QuF.png
Link Building | | kabledesigns0 -
For a new site, does it matter which sites I get back links from first? I.e., are the first back links more important than later ones?
I've heard that when a site is new, the sources from which it gets its first back links are very important -- that the early links are more important for ranking than later links. Is this true. If so, what would be some good places to get these very first links? Thanks.
Link Building | | sigma3x0 -
Why are none of my incoming links showing up in SEOmoz or Google? How do I get good legit incoming links?
There are hundreds of sites that are linking to my website, but nobody is showing it. Google wont display any when using link:eugenecomputergeeks.com, and in webmaster tools it only shows 46 incoming links. SEOmoz shows only 3 links. This just isn't so. Why is this? I DESPERATELY need valid incoming links from well ranked websites , and having lots of trouble getting them. Nobody in town with a well ranked site seems to want to do a link exchange, and I've already made the mistake of buying my way into directories, which didn't do anything good for my rankings. Thanks!
Link Building | | eugenecomputergeeks0 -
Build links through blogging?
Although my site is a wordpress site it presently has about as many static pages as blog posts. The site has a lot of directory links and is doing pretty good with a PR3 after about a year. When I first put the site up I had a well known blogging expert help me with the permalinks and a couple of other things and he said that with a blog there is no need to build links, it can all be done through natural link acquisition off of the blog posts. I was skeptical at the time because it seemed that a lawyer's site was something not a lot of people would be interested enough in to link to it. Now I am thinking about trying his stragegy, as 1 of my blog posts that I put up on a very topical subject immediately got about 15 backlinks. My questions are: Is it reasonable to try to build links just by posting frequent topical blog posts? If yes, should I have links in the blog posts to my home page, to internal pages, or both? \ Paul
Link Building | | diogenes0