Bloking pages in roborts.txt that are under a redirected subdomain
-
Hi Everyone,
I have a lot of Marketo landing pages that I don't want to show in SERP. Adding the noindex meta tag for each page will be too much, I have thousands of pages.
Blocking it in roborts.txt could have been an option, BUT, the subdomain homepage is redirected to my main domain (with a 302) so I may confuse search engines ( should they follow the redirect or should they block)
marketo.mydomain.com is redirected to www.mydomain.com
disallow: / (I think this will be confusing with the redirect)
I don't have folders, all pages are under the subdomain, so I can't block folders in Robots.txt also
Would anyone had this scenario or any suggestions?
I appreciate your thoughts here.
Thank you
Rachel
-
Thank you so much for you answer!
the home page in the subdomain is redirected but none of the actual pages in the subdomain are, and because there are so many of them, it would be easier to block them in robots.txt, even if there is small change that Google will still index them. But because the home page is redirected, I don't want to confuse Google with a Disallow: /
Could I do Disallow: / and then Allow: /homepage.html
-
Under usual circumstances, Google won't index redirecting addresses which it considers to be a shallow form of 'doorway' page (Google doesn't like to rank those). If I am reading your post right, no pages on the redirected sub-domain can be visited as they all now redirect. Google should start dropping those old URLs from its index automatically. It's important to note that you should be using 301s to eventually de-index the old URLs. If you're using 302s then you're telling Google that the old pages are only being redirected temporarily and they will return (which could mess with indexation)
If I am reading your post wrong and some pages are still live on the old subdomain and are not redirecting, and you want Google to redirect most addresses but some are staying (for whatever reason) and you still want to de-index those specific ones, Meta no-index (sorry) really is your best bet! Robots.txt tells Google not to crawl a page but it doesn't tell Google not to index a URL if external metrics (inbound links) are strong enough. Both are 'directives' and Google is forced to obey neither
I think from what you are saying, I'd just leave the redirects and let Google do its work. Make sure they're 301s, though. You're right that Robots.txt might end up confusing things. Robots.txt can also sometimes 'kill' the SEO authority of a page. If you did that for all the redirecting pages, no equity would flow through your 301s (hazardous)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I redirect desktop users visiting mobile page to desktop version?
So I am redirecting mobile users to mobile version of the page and also have alternate attrubute set up for that: What about the opposite case? When user from desktop computer visits mobile version of the page. Should I redirect him back to desktop version?
Technical SEO | | poiseo1 -
Updating inbound links vs. 301 redirecting the page they link to
Hi everyone, I'm preparing myself for a website redesign and finding conflicting information about inbound links and 301 redirects. If I have a URL (we'll say website.com/website) that is linked to by outside sources, should I get those outside sources to update their links when I change the URL to website.com/webpage? Or is it just as effective from a link juice perspective to simply 301 redirect the old page to the new page? Are there any other implications to this choice that I may want to consider? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | Liggins0 -
Big page of clients - links to individual client pages with light content - not sure if canonical or no-follow - HELP
Not sure what best practice here is: http://www.5wpr.com/clients/ Is this is a situation where I'm best off adding canonical tags back to the main clients page, or to the practice area each client falls under? No-following all these links and adding canonical? No-follow/No-index all client pages? need some advice here...
Technical SEO | | simplycary0 -
Domain redirect
Recently we launched a site under a new domain, the site is doing well under the URL. Client calls me today and would like to have another domain he owns point to the new site. The domain he has has no history and no content. He is under the impression that people are looking for him by typing in www.domainxyz.com. I attempted to explain otherwise to him, but I lost. Question, what are the drawbacks of taking this domin and doing a perm redirect via . Httpaccess file?
Technical SEO | | VanadiumInteractive0 -
What should be use 301 or 302 redirection for 404 pages
Please suggest which redirection we should use for 404 pages- 301 or 302. If you can elaborate it with reason then it will be highly appreciated.
Technical SEO | | koamit0 -
Top pages give " page not found"
A lot of my top pages point to images in a gallery on my site. When I click on the url under the name of the jpg file I get an error page not found. For instance this link: http://www.fastingfotografie.nl/architectuur-landschap/single-gallery/10162327 Is this a problem? Thanks. Thomas. JkLej.png
Technical SEO | | thomasfasting0 -
Is it better to delete web pages that I don't want anymore or should I 301 redirect all of the pages I delete to the homepage or another live page?
Is it better for SEO to delete web pages that I don't want anymore or should I 301 redirect all of the pages I delete to the homepage or another live page?
Technical SEO | | CustomOnlineMarketing0 -
Https redirect
Hi there, a client of mine is asking me if Google would penalize to redirect from all the http urls to https (they want to change the security protocol). I assume it is going to work as a classic 301, right? so they might lose some authority in they way, but I am not 100% sure. Can anyone confirm this? does anyone has a similar experience? thanks a lot!
Technical SEO | | elisainteractive0