undefined
Skip to content
Moz logo Menu open Menu close
  • Products
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Pro Home
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Home
    • STAT
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Home
    • Compare SEO Products
    • Moz Data
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis
    • Keyword Explorer
    • Link Explorer
    • Competitive Research
    • MozBar
    • More Free SEO Tools
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO
    • SEO Learning Center
    • Moz Academy
    • MozCon
    • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Digital Marketers
    • Agency Solutions
    • Enterprise Solutions
    • Small Business Solutions
    • The Moz Story
    • New Releases
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Products
    • Moz Pro

      Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

    • Moz Local

      Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

    • STAT

      SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

    • Moz API

      Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

    • Compare SEO Products

      See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

    • Moz Data

      Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

    Let your business shine with Listings AI
    Moz Local

    Let your business shine with Listings AI

    Learn more
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis

      Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

    • Keyword Explorer

      Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

    • Link Explorer

      Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

    • Competitive Research

      Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

    • MozBar

      See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

    • More Free SEO Tools

      Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO

      The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

    • SEO Learning Center

      Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

    • On-Demand Webinars

      Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

    • How-To Guides

      Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

    • Moz Academy

      Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

    • MozCon

      Save on Early Bird tickets and join us in London or New York City

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
    Moz API

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

    Find your plan
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Digital Marketers

      Simplify SEO tasks to save time and grow your traffic.

    • Small Business Solutions

      Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

    • Agency Solutions

      Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

    • Enterprise Solutions

      Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

    • The Moz Story

      Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

    • New Releases

      Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

    Surface actionable competitive intel
    New Feature

    Surface actionable competitive intel

    Learn More
  • Log in
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Dashboard
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Dashboard
    • Moz Academy
  • Avatar
    • Moz Home
    • Notifications
    • Account & Billing
    • Manage Users
    • Community Profile
    • My Q&A
    • My Videos
    • Log Out

The Moz Q&A Forum

  • Forum
  • Questions
  • Users
  • Ask the Community

Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

  1. Home
  2. SEO Tactics
  3. Technical SEO
  4. Google is indexing bad URLS

Moz Q&A is closed.

After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

Google is indexing bad URLS

Technical SEO
2
8
1.4k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as question
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
  • Tom3_15
    Tom3_15 last edited by Nov 26, 2018, 2:08 PM

    Hi All,

    The site I am working on is built on Wordpress. The plugin Revolution Slider was downloaded. While no longer utilized, it still remained on the site for some time. This plugin began creating hundreds of URLs containing nothing but code on the page. I noticed these URLs were being indexed by Google. The URLs follow the structure: www.mysite.com/wp-content/uploads/revslider/templates/this-part-changes/

    I have done the following to prevent these URLs from being created & indexed:

    1. Added a directive in my Htaccess to 404 all of these URLs

    2. Blocked /wp-content/uploads/revslider/ in my robots.txt

    3. Manually de-inedex each URL using the GSC tool

    4. Deleted the plugin

    However, new URLs still appear in Google's index, despite being blocked by robots.txt and resolving to a 404. Can anyone suggest any next steps? I

    Thanks!

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • effectdigital
      effectdigital last edited by Nov 29, 2018, 11:58 AM Nov 29, 2018, 10:36 AM

      All of the plugins I can find allow the tag to be deployed on pages, posts etc. You pick from a pre-defined list of existing content, instead of just whacking in a URL and having it inserted (annoying!)

      If you put an index.php at that location (the location of the 404), you could put whatever you wanted in it. Might work (maybe test with one). Would resolve a 200 so you'd then need to force a 410 over the top. Not very scalable though...

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • Tom3_15
        Tom3_15 @effectdigital last edited by Nov 28, 2018, 4:19 PM Nov 28, 2018, 4:19 PM

        I do agree, I may have to pass this off to someone with more backend experience than myself. In terms of plugins, are you aware of any that will allow you to add noindex tags to an entire folder?

        Thanks!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • effectdigital
          effectdigital @Tom3_15 last edited by Nov 28, 2018, 3:31 PM Nov 28, 2018, 3:31 PM

          Hmm, that's interesting - it should work just as you say! This is the point where you need a developer's help rather than an SEO analysts :') sorry!

          Google will revisit 410s if it believes there is a legitimate reason to do so, but it's much less likely to revisit them than it is with 404s (which actively tell Google that the content will return).

          Plugins are your friends. Too many will overload a site and make it run pretty slowly (especially as PHP has no multi-threading support!) - but this plugin, you would only need it temporarily anyway.

          You might have to start using something like PHPMyAdmin to browse your SQL databases. It's possible that the uninstall didn't work properly and there are still databases at work, generating fresh URLs. You can quash them at the database level if required, however I'd say go to a web developer as manual DB edits can be pretty hazardous to a non-expert

          Tom3_15 1 Reply Last reply Nov 28, 2018, 4:19 PM Reply Quote 1
          • Tom3_15
            Tom3_15 @effectdigital last edited by Nov 28, 2018, 1:52 PM Nov 28, 2018, 1:34 PM

            Thank you for all your help. I added in a directive to 410 the pages in my htaccess as so: Redirect 410 /revslider*/. However, it does not seem to work.

            Currently, I am using Options All -Indexes to 404 the URLs. Although I still remain worried as even though Google would not revisit a 410, could it still initially index it? This seems to be the case with my 404 pages - Google is actively indexing the new 404 pages that the broken plugin is producing.

            As I can not seem to locate the directory in Cpanel, adding a noindex to them has been tough. I will look for a plugin that can dynamically add it based on folder structure because the URLs are still actively being created.

            The ongoing creation of the URL's is the ultimate source of the issue, I expected that deleting the plugin would have resolved it but that does not seem to be the case.

            effectdigital 1 Reply Last reply Nov 28, 2018, 3:31 PM Reply Quote 0
            • effectdigital
              effectdigital @Tom3_15 last edited by Nov 28, 2018, 7:24 AM Nov 28, 2018, 7:24 AM

              Just remember, the only regex character which is supported is "*". Others like "" and "?" are not supported! So it's still very limited. Changing the response from 404 to 410 should really help, but be prepared to give Google a week or two to digest your changes

              Yes, it would be tricky to inject those URLs with Meta no index tags, but it wouldn't be impossible. You could create an index.php file at the directory of each page which contained a Meta no-index directive, or use a plugin to inject the tag onto specific URLs. There will be ways, don't give up too early! That being said, this part probably won't add much more than the 410s will

              It wouldn't be a bad idea to inject the no-index tags, but do it for 410s and not for 404s (doing it for 404s could cause you BIG problems further down the line). Remember, 404  - "temporarily gone but will come back", 410 - "gone - never coming back". Really all 410s should be served with no-index tags. Google can read dynamically generated content, but is less likely to do so and crawls it less often. Still - it would at least make the problem begin shrinking over time. It would be better to get the tags into to non-modified source code (server side rendering)

              By the way, you can send a no-index directive in the HTTP header if you are really stuck!

              https://sitebulb.com/hints/indexability/robots-hints/noindex-in-html-and-http-header/

              The above post is quite helpful, it shows no-index directives in HTML but also in the HTTP header

              In contrast to that example, you'd be serving 410 (gone) not 200 (ok)

              Tom3_15 1 Reply Last reply Nov 28, 2018, 1:34 PM Reply Quote 0
              • Tom3_15
                Tom3_15 @effectdigital last edited by Nov 27, 2018, 6:24 PM Nov 27, 2018, 6:19 PM

                Thank you for your response! I will certainly use the regex in my robots.txt and try to change my Htaccess directive to 410 the pages.

                However, the issue is that a defunct plugin is randomly creating hundreds of these URL's without my knowledge, which I can not seem to access. As this is the case, I can't add a no-index tag to them.

                This is why I manually de-indexed each page using the GSC removal tool and then blocked them in my robots.txt. My hope was that after doing so, Google would no longer be able to find the bad URL's.

                Despite this, Google is still actively crawling & indexing new URL's following this path, even though they are blocked by my robots.txt (validated). I am unsure how these URL's even continue to be created as I deleted the plugin.

                I had the idea to try to write a program with javascript that would take the status code and insert a no-index tag if the header returned a 404, but I don't believe this would even be recognized by Google, as it would be inserted dynamically. Ultimately, I would like to find a way to get the plugin to stop creating these URL's, this way I can simply manually de-index them again.

                Thanks,

                effectdigital 1 Reply Last reply Nov 28, 2018, 7:24 AM Reply Quote 1
                • effectdigital
                  effectdigital last edited by Nov 27, 2018, 3:19 PM Nov 27, 2018, 3:18 PM

                  You have taken some good measures there, but it does take Google time to revisit URLs and re-index them (or remove them from the index!)

                  Did you know, 404 just means a URL was temporarily removed and will be coming back? The status code you are looking to serve is 410 (gone) which is a harder signal

                  Robots.txt (for Google) does in-fact support wild cards. It's not full regex, in-fact the only wildcard supported is "*" (asterisk: matching any character or string of characters). You could supplement with a rule like this:

                  User-agent: *
                  
                  Disallow: /*revslider*
                  
                  That should, theoretically block any URL from indexation if it contains the string "revslider"
                  Be sure to **validate** any new robots.txt rules using Google Search Console to check they are working right!
                  
                  Remember that robots.txt affects crawling and **not indexation!** To give Google a directive not to index a URL, you should use the Meta no-index tag:
                  [https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/93710?hl=en](https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/93710?hl=en)
                  
                  **The steps are:**
                  
                  • Remove your existing robots.txt rule (which would stop Google crawling the URL and thus stop them seeing a Meta no-index tag or any change in status code)
                  • Apply status 410 to those pages instead of 404
                  • Apply Meta no-index tags to the 410'ing URLs
                  • Wait for Google to digest and remove the pages from its index
                  • Put your robots.txt rule back to prevent it ever happening again
                  • Supplement with an additional wildcard rule
                  • Done!
                  -
                  
                  Hope that helps
                  
                  Tom3_15 1 Reply Last reply Nov 27, 2018, 6:19 PM Reply Quote 1
                  • 1 / 1
                  1 out of 8
                  • First post
                    1/8
                    Last post

                  Got a burning SEO question?

                  Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.


                  Start my free trial


                  Browse Questions

                  Explore more categories

                  • Moz Tools

                    Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

                  • SEO Tactics

                    Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

                  • Community

                    Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

                  • Digital Marketing

                    Chat about tactics outside of SEO

                  • Research & Trends

                    Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

                  • Support

                    Connect on product support and feature requests.

                  • See all categories

                  Related Questions

                  • IrvCo_Interactive

                    What could cause Google to not honor canonical URLs?

                    I have a strange situation on a website, when I do a Google query of site:example.com all the top indexed results appear to be queries that users can perform on the website. So any random term the user searches for on the website for some reason is causing the search result page to get indexed - like example.com/search/query/random-keywords However, the search results page has a canonical tag on it that points to example.com/search, but that doesn't seem to be doing anything. Any thoughts or ideas why this could be happening?

                    Technical SEO | Apr 25, 2020, 11:00 PM | IrvCo_Interactive
                    0
                  • SS.Digital

                    Google Indexed a version of my site w/ MX record subdomain

                    We're doing a site audit and found "internal" links to a page in search console that appear to be from a subdomain of our site based on our MX record.  We use Google Mail internally.  The links ultimately redirect to our correct preferred subdomain "www", but I am concerned as to why this is happening and if it can have any negative SEO implications. Example of one of the links: Links aspmx3.googlemail.com.sullivansolarpower.com/about/solar-power-blog/daniel-sullivan/renewable-energy-and-electric-cars-are-not-political-footballs I did a site operator search, site:aspmx3.googlemail.com.sullivansolarpower.com on google and it returns several results.

                    Technical SEO | Aug 1, 2017, 5:10 AM | SS.Digital
                    0
                  • jasny

                    How can I get a photo album indexed by Google?

                    We have a lot of photos on our website. Unfortunately most of them don't seem to be indexed by Google. We run a party website. One of the things we do, is take pictures at events and put them on the site. An event page with a photo album, can have anywhere between 100 and 750 photo's. For each foto's there is a thumbnail on the page. The thumbnails are lazy loaded by showing a placeholder and loading the picture right before it comes onscreen. There is no pagination of infinite scrolling. Thumbnails don't have an alt text. Each thumbnail links to a picture page. This page only shows the base HTML structure (menu, etc), the image and a close button. The image has a src attribute with full size image, a srcset with several sizes for responsive design and an alt text. There is no real textual content on an image page. (Note that when a user clicks on the thumbnail, the large image is loaded using JavaScript and we mimic the page change. I think it doesn't matter, but am unsure.) I'd like that full size images should be indexed by Google and found with Google image search. Thumbnails should not be indexed (or ignored). Unfortunately most pictures aren't found or their thumbnail is shown. Moz is giving telling me that all the picture pages are duplicate content (19,521 issues), as they are all the same with the exception of the image. The page title isn't the same but similar for all images of an album. Example: On the "A day at the park" event page, we have 136 pictures. A site search on "a day at the park" foto, only reveals two photo's of the albums. 3QolbbI.png QTQVxqY.jpg mwEG90S.jpg

                    Technical SEO | Aug 2, 2016, 12:32 PM | jasny
                    0
                  • Iamfaramon

                    How to stop google from indexing specific sections of a page?

                    I'm currently trying to find a way to stop googlebot from indexing specific areas of a page, long ago Yahoo search created this tag class=”robots-nocontent” and I'm trying to see if there is a similar manner for google or if they have adopted the same tag? Any help would be much appreciated.

                    Technical SEO | Sep 26, 2014, 6:46 PM | Iamfaramon
                    0
                  • BBuck

                    Will blocking the Wayback Machine (archive.org) have any impact on Google crawl and indexing/SEO?

                    Will blocking the Wayback Machine (archive.org) by adding the code they give have any impact on Google crawl and indexing/SEO? Anyone know? Thanks! ~Brett

                    Technical SEO | Nov 6, 2013, 6:56 PM | BBuck
                    0
                  • reidsteven75

                    How Does Google's "index" find the location of pages in the "page directory" to return?

                    This is my understanding of how Google's search works, and I am unsure about one thing in specific: Google continuously crawls websites and stores each page it finds (let's call it "page directory") Google's "page directory" is a cache so it isn't the "live" version of the page Google has separate storage called "the index" which contains all the keywords searched.  These keywords in "the index" point to the pages in the "page directory" that contain the same keywords. When someone searches a keyword, that keyword is accessed in the "index" and returns all relevant pages in the "page directory" These returned pages are given ranks based on the algorithm The one part I'm unsure of is how Google's "index" knows the location of relevant pages in the "page directory".  The keyword entries in the "index" point to the "page directory" somehow. I'm thinking each page has a url in the "page directory", and the entries in the "index" contain these urls.   Since Google's "page directory" is a cache, would the urls be the same as the live website (and would the keywords in the "index" point to these urls)? For example if webpage is found at wwww.website.com/page1, would the "page directory" store this page under that url in Google's cache? The reason I want to discuss this is to know the effects of changing a pages url by understanding how the search process works better.

                    Technical SEO | Jun 2, 2013, 12:00 PM | reidsteven75
                    0
                  • CommercePundit

                    Does it really matter to maintain 301 redirect after de-indexing of old URLs?

                    Today, I was reading latest blog post on SEOmoz blog about. Uncrawled 301s - A Quick Fix for When Relaunches Go Too Well This is very interesting study about 301 & How it useful to maintain traffic. I'm working on eCommerce website and I have done similar stuff on my website. I have big confusion to manage 301 redirect. My website generates new URLs due to following actions. Re-write dynamic URLs. Re-launch entire website on different eCommerce platform. [osCommerce to Magento Commerce] Re-name category. Trasfer one product from one category to another category. I'm managing my 301 redirect with old practice. Excel sheet data from Google webmaster tools and set specific new URLs for redirect. Hoooo... Now, I have 8.5K redirect in htaccess... And, I'm thinking it's too much. Can we remove old 301 redirect from htaccess or not? This is big question for me. Because, all pages are not hyperlink on external website. Google have just de-indexed old URLs and indexed new URLs. So, Is it require to maintain 301 redirect after Google process?

                    Technical SEO | Jun 15, 2012, 11:59 AM | CommercePundit
                    0
                  • dim_d

                    Why is a 301 redirected url still getting indexed?

                    We recently fixed a redirect issue in a website, and although it appears that the redirection is working fine, the url in question keeps on getting crawled, indexed and cached by google. The redirect was done a month ago, and google shows cached version of it, even for a couple of days ago. Manual checking shows that its being redirected, and also a couple of online tools i checked report a 301 redirect. Do you have any idea why this could be happening? The website I'm talking about is www.hotelmajestic.gr and its being redirected to www.hotel-majestic.gr

                    Technical SEO | May 10, 2011, 6:42 AM | dim_d
                    0

                  Get started with Moz Pro!

                  Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                  Start my free trial
                  Products
                  • Moz Pro
                  • Moz Local
                  • Moz API
                  • Moz Data
                  • STAT
                  • Product Updates
                  Moz Solutions
                  • SMB Solutions
                  • Agency Solutions
                  • Enterprise Solutions
                  Free SEO Tools
                  • Domain Authority Checker
                  • Link Explorer
                  • Keyword Explorer
                  • Competitive Research
                  • Brand Authority Checker
                  • Local Citation Checker
                  • MozBar Extension
                  • MozCast
                  Resources
                  • Blog
                  • SEO Learning Center
                  • Help Hub
                  • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                  • How-to Guides
                  • Moz Academy
                  • API Docs
                  About Moz
                  • About
                  • Team
                  • Careers
                  • Contact
                  Why Moz
                  • Case Studies
                  • Testimonials
                  Get Involved
                  • Become an Affiliate
                  • MozCon
                  • Webinars
                  • Practical Marketer Series
                  • MozPod
                  Connect with us

                  Contact the Help team

                  Join our newsletter
                  Moz logo
                  © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                  • Accessibility
                  • Terms of Use
                  • Privacy

                  Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.