Removing pages from index
-
Hello,
I run an e-commerce website. I just realized that Google has "pagination" pages in the index which should not be there. In fact, I have no idea how they got there. For example, www.mydomain.com/category-name.asp?page=3434532
There are hundreds of these pages in the index. There are no links to these pages on the website, so I am assuming someone is trying to ruin my rankings by linking to the pages that do not exist.The page content displays category information with no products. I realize that its a flaw in design, and I am working on fixing it (301 none existent pages). Meanwhile, I am not sure if I should request removal of these pages. If so, what is the best way to request bulk removal.
Also, should I 301, 404 or 410 these pages?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Alex
-
yes the no content page thing is a big problem. If you have a "view all" option, and it's more than a dozen, fifteen or maybe 20 products, that should be paginated, with full indexing. Maile Oyhe even talked about that specific scenario of "view all" being good.
In my experience, all of the no-content pages should, ideally, be 301 redirected in a way that they point to the most relevant highest level category page on your site.
Since there's so many, there's no easy way to get them removed from the index other than doing the 301 then being patient as Google recrawls then re-confirms.
-
Ah - that's definitely better, if you don't go too wide. 2009 - 2010's concept of not having too many links went too far with too many people. Sites became too flat.
Categories and pagination are best served with having enough categories to cover the highest level groups, with sub-categories as appropriate, but not to the the point where there's only a few products in any single sub-category. So if you've got more than a dozen or fifteen products in a category or sub-category, pagination is perfectly valid.
Having more than six, eight or maybe ten categories at most, is also not good.
-
Alan, I think I misspoke. I meant to say that a categorically structured set of your products would be better to index than a paginated version. For example :
http://www.sunglasses.com/mens/black/productx
as opposed to http://www.sunglasses.com/products?page=233
Is it still considered wise to index both paginated results along with categorized results in this case?
-
Hi Alan,
Thanks for the info. I was going to set my page 2+ to "noindex,follow", however your reply makes sense. I will leave them indexable. I do see some competitors "rel=canonical" pagination to "view all" pages. I think I will keep my pages as is.
However, as my reply to Ryan stated, my issue is still the INDEX.
Google has thousands of "no content" pages indexed. They contain links to other "no content" pages making my site look thin. This may be the reason we lost so much ranking/traffic with Panda update.
How do I get these pages removed from the index? And do I return 301, 404 or 410 when Google comes back to reindex them?
Thanks for your help!
Alex
-
Hi Ryan,
I crawled the site, and did not find links to these pages, however it made me realize another HUGE issue. Since the paging is dynamically created, it has links to the "back" & "forward" no matter what page you are on. So, if page # 5000 is displayed, it will have links to page # 4999 and 5001. Although in my website I do not have links to pages that do not exist, all it takes is someone link to my site with "page=10000" and Google to index that page. From this point on, G will index all the PAGEs that do not exist.
Thanks again for getting me a step closer to resolving my problem.
However, the problem is still the INDEX. Google has (now realizing that its in the thousands) pages indexed with no content. These pages just contain links to other PAGING pages that have no content and my main menu/categories.
How do I get these pages removed from the index?
Thanks again!
Alex
-
For the record, that link that SSCDavis referenced includes Matt Cutts discussing faceted navigation, not pagination. Faceted navigation is different than pagination by leaps and bounds. So he (SSCDavis), with all due respect, is absolutely incorrect in his claim of what Matt said.
Maile Ohye, Senior support engineer at Google, definitely recommends allowing pagination to be indexed, if implemented properly. She even discussed this at length this week up at SMX Advanced in Seattle. Vanessa Fox, head of Nine by Blue, and former Googler (the creator of Google Webmaster Tools) agrees.
And so do I.
When performed properly, pagination (with quality optimization of paginated pages) can lead to dramatic increases in individual products indexed, higher quality visits from people further along in the buying process, and more people finding the site through an exponentially greater number of keyword phrases.
Consider this - in pagination (X number of products on the initial page, with X additional DIFFERENT products on page 2, and x additional still more and different products on page 3,etc. - by not wanting those pages indexed, you're communicating to Google - hey - we don't care about these other products enough to include them." Which means they get a false and negative understanding of how many products you have in your catalog. And THAT drives the overall strength of your catalog down.
Now, if, on the other hand, you already show ALL of your products on a top level page that is linked from the main navigation, then sure, pagination should be killed. But only if that's the case.
-
Alex,
I would highly recommend crawling your website and examining the crawl report. If Google is indexing these pages, then they got to them on your site at some point. I would proceed with the idea in mind this is a web design issue, not someone trying to ruin your rankings, as you suggested.
The crawl report will show the referrer page which can help troubleshoot the issue. When you have pages generated by a CMS or other software, there can easily be issues like the one you are experiencing. In my experience this is the most likely cause of your issue.
You mentioned there are 100s of these pages in the index. If you can determine a pattern they match, it is possible you can 301 all of them with a single rule, sending the user to your main category page or where ever you feel is best.
You can also set up a parameter specific instructions in Google WMT. I would avoid doing this until after you have reviewed your crawl report. From your Google WMT dashboard > Site Configuration > Settings > Parameter handling tab > find or add your parameter and adjust the setting as you deem fit.
-
**Edit: Please see alans answer
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
If a page ranks in the wrong country and is redirected, does that problem pass to the new page?
Hi guys, I'm having a weird problem: A new multilingual site was launched about 2 months ago. It has correct hreflang tags and Geo targetting in GSC for every language version. We redirected some relevant pages (with good PA) from another website of our client's. It turned out that the pages were not ranking in the correct country markets (for example, the en-gb page ranking in the USA). The pages from our site seem to have the same problem. Do you think they inherited it due to the redirects? Is it possible that Google will sort things out over some time, given the fact that the new pages have correct hreflangs? Is there stuff we could do to help ranking in the correct country markets?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ParisChildress1 -
Changing Canonical Tags on Indexed Pages that are Ranking Well
Hi Guys, I recently rolled out a domain wide canonical tag change. Previously the website had canonical tags without the www, however the website was setup to redirect to www on page load. I noticed that the site competitors were all using www and as far as I understand www versus non www, it's based on preference. In order to keep things consistent, I changed the canonical tag to include the www. Will the site drop in rankings? Especially if the pages are starting to rank quite well. Any feedback is appreciated. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | QuickToImpress0 -
Our client's web property recently switched over to secure pages (https) however there non secure pages (http) are still being indexed in Google. Should we request in GWMT to have the non secure pages deindexed?
Our client recently switched over to https via new SSL. They have also implemented rel canonicals for most of their internal webpages (that point to the https). However many of their non secure webpages are still being indexed by Google. We have access to their GWMT for both the secure and non secure pages.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RosemaryB
Should we just let Google figure out what to do with the non secure pages? We would like to setup 301 redirects from the old non secure pages to the new secure pages, but were not sure if this is going to happen. We thought about requesting in GWMT for Google to remove the non secure pages. However we felt this was pretty drastic. Any recommendations would be much appreciated.0 -
301'd an important, ranking page to the wrong new page, any recourse?
Our 1,300 page site conversion from static html to Wordpress platform went flawlessly with the exception of 1 significant issue....an old, important, highly ranking page was 301 redirected to the wrong corresponding new page. The page it was redirected to is about a similar product, but not the same. This was an oversight that slipped through. It was brought to my attention when I noticed this new page was still holding the old page's rankings but the bounce rate skyrocketed (clearly because the content on the wrong new page was not relevant). Once identified, we cleaned up the redirect. My fear is that all the juice built up on the old .html page that ranked well has now permanently been passed to an irrelevant, insignificant page. -Is there any way to clean up this mistake? -Is there anything I can do to assist Google in associating the correct 'new' page with correct 'old' page after the wrong redirect was initially set-up? -Am I going to have to start from scratch with the new page in terms of trust, backlinks, etc. since google already noted the redirect? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seagreen0 -
Should we show(to google) different city pages on our website which look like home page as one page or different? If yes then how?
On our website, we show events from different cities. We have made different URL's for each city like www.townscript.com/mumbai, www.townscript.com/delhi. But the page of all the cities looks similar, only the events change on those different city pages. Even our home URL www.townscript.com, shows the visitor the city which he visited last time on our website(initially we show everyone Mumbai, visitor needs to choose his city then) For every page visit, we save the last visited page of a particular IP address and next time when he visits our website www.townscript.com, we show him that city only which he visited last time. Now, we feel as the content of home page, and city pages is similar. Should we show these pages as one page i.e. Townscript.com to Google? Can we do that by rel="canonical" ? Please help me! As I think all of these pages are competing with each other.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | sanchitmalik0 -
Old pages still in index
Hi Guys, I've been working on a E-commerce site for a while now. Let me sum it up : February new site is launched Due to lack of resources we started 301's of old url's in March Added rel=canonical end of May because of huge index numbers (developers forgot!!) Added noindex and robots.txt on at least 1000 urls. Index numbers went down from 105.000 tot 55.000 for now, see screenshot (actual number in sitemap is 13.000) Now when i do site:domain.com there are still old url's in the index while there is a 301 on the url since March! I know this can take a while but I wonder how I can speed this up or am doing something wrong. Hope anyone can help because I simply don't know how the old url's can still be in the index. 4cArHPH.png
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ssiebn70 -
Should you stop indexing of short lived pages?
In my site there will be a lot of pages that have a short life span of about a week as they are items on sale, should I nofollow the links meaning the site has a fwe hundred pages or allow indexing and have thousands but then have lots of links to pages that do not exist. I would of course if allowing indexing make sure the page links does not error and sends them to a similarly relevant page but which is best for me with the SEarch Engines? I would like to have the option of loads of links with pages of loads of content but not if it is detrimental Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | barney30120 -
Pages un-indexed in my site
My current website www.energyacuity.com has had most pages indexed for more than a year. However, I tried cache a few of the pages, and it looks the only one that is now indexed by Goggle is the homepage. Any thoughts on why this is happening?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | abernatj0