Google Update?
-
We have a website that for the past several weeks has been very consistent at between 13,500 and 14,200 daily visits and this site received 15,600 last Thursday.
THIS week, Monday is at 22,200, Tuesday is at 26,200, and at mid-day today (at about our traffic halfway point in the day) we're already at 14,000 today.
This was a site that was bringing about 14,000 visits as of May 16th last year and dropped to 11,000 the following week. The traffic to this site this week is so far beyond statistical analysis that there must have been something that happened.
-
Is it possible that this direct traffic is coming from email? I've seen big direct traffic spikes when a link has "gone viral" over email. The other thing I would check for is multiple Google analytics tags on the home page (double counting your traffic), but you would probably see a crazy low bounce rate if that were the case.
-
Possible tracking issues are not checking out. 3rd party advertisers are showing higher impressions and clicks.
Traffic by specific service providers... Comcast, Roadrunner, Cox, etc.. are all consistently higher at the pace of traffic growth. Traffic from all of these sources have a graph that looks identical; Showing the same increase at the same time.
Further, the non-U.S. traffic is down by percentage so the spike is coming from domestic traffic originating in the United States.
Average time on site for the last 30 days is: 1:20... minute twenty seconds. Month of January was 1:24. The past two days is 1:02. With traffic being up 70% if they were all brief hits - then the past two days' visitor duration should be cut in half.
The home page traffic which is where the spike in visitors are landing on the site has a visitor duration of about 22 seconds lower than usual, which is 55 seconds.
The visitor duration difference looks more like the traffic isn't targeted, although not 100% uninterested either.
We have done a lot of work on this site since losing some traffic to Panda last summer. I just wouldn't expect such a dramatic increase without an update in Google but regardless the increase is in "direct" visits and not from search.
-
Has time spent on page changed at all? If the bounce rate is higher I would figure it would have dropped. Also is it just visits that are up? Did pageviews stay roughly the same?
When something like this happens I try to look for any indicator that analytics is having tracking issues.
For example if a user came to the site, then went to a page that is somehow killing my cookie information or ending my session somehow then that would cause the visits to spike while pageviews stayed the same. This would also drive my bounce rate up.
This happens often if you have a third party tool like a booking engine or chat tool that uses a different URL, and you aren't using the linker functionality where you need to.
Another suggestion would be to do a comparison to recent history of location and service provider dimensions to see if any specific location or service provider is spiking compared to recent slower times.
If all of that looks legit it may just be that other marketing efforts are paying off, and people are coming back to your site...
-
Yeah, revenue is up. We have several ad programs running and affiliate systems that are outside of our tracking software - so it seems that 3rd parties are seeing it too.
Now, revenue isn't up in a straight line with the traffic increase because we are not as aggressive on our home page with ads and affiliates. Bounce rate is higher on that page than before but time spent on page isn't? Bounce rate went from 48% to 79% which scares me. Seems the traffic coming in is less targeted now than our typical sources.
-
Interesting stuff - is revenue up as well then? Could there be an issue with analytics code counting people twice, or not counting people in the past?
-
Carson thanks for your response.
Here's how strange it is. There's an overall boost in traffic on most of the pages but they are trickling out from the home page. The home page traffic is up tremendously. Our direct visits: Not driven by Google, Yahoo or any other significant referrer - the spike seems to be from direct visits. No spike in keywords, nothing. Last Tuesday/Wednesday's home page PV= 1,435. This Tuesday/Wednesday's home page PV = 22,594.
I was wondering if there was an algorithm change with Google maybe temporarily from a URL where the SSL system they are using is giving referring the visitor as a no-follow. Google I ask, because I don't know of another traffic source that could produce these numbers. I wish that I knew so I could duplicate it!!
Affiliate impressions and revenue are up in reflection of the traffic change, the average time spent on the home page is almost identical to historic #s (55 seconds).
Not to toot my horn but we are good at this stuff and we can't figure it out. There's no referrer for this new traffic - it is all registering as direct - and still seems to be increasing.
No significant blog, forum or social media mentions either. The thought was that maybe the site was mentioned on TV or something but even that would have spiked inside a 2-3 hour window and then go back down. Not keep gaining.
The site is samplewords.com and typically gets about 365k visits per month and 825k PV. I would love to hear someone's theory on this.
Maybe it's something simple I'm missing while I look for something more technical?
-
We are not aware of any significant changes since last Thursday, but I'm glad to hear that your results are doing well! It might be interesting to go into analytics and see where the users are coming from. Are they coming through Google-organic, or did you perhaps pick up some coverage that is sending you referring traffic?
If it is organic traffic, you can then look at organic keywords, compare it to the past, and see which keywords have increased the most. It's always good to know what's going right and how you can duplicate it It's also worth looking at your content report to see which organic landing pages are doing well.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Search Console Not Indexing Pages
Hi there! I have a problem that I was hoping someone could help me with. On google search console, my website does not seem to be indexed well. In fact, even after rectifying problems that Moz's on-demand crawl has pointed out, it still does not become "valid". There are some of the excluded pages that Google has pointed out. I have rectified some of the issues but it doesn't seem to be helping. However, when I submitted the sitemap, it says that the URLs were discoverable, hence I am not sure why they can be discovered but are not deemed "valid". I would sincerely appreciate any suggestions or insights as to how can I go about to solve this issue. Thanks! Screenshot+%28341%29.png Screenshot+%28342%29.png Screenshot+%28343%29.png
Algorithm Updates | | Chowsey0 -
Increase in impressions reported by Google Analytics
Because Universal Analytics (and Google Webmaster) only stores SEO data for 3 months, I've been downloading SEO data (from the Acquisition tab of Analytics) to get a record of how impressions, clicks, CTR etc are changing in the long term (our business is seasonal, so these long-term patterns are important). Today, I downloaded data for September, and found a very large increase in the number of impressions compared to previous months. I looked back at the data for August, which I've already downloaded, and found that Analytics is now reporting much higher numbers of impressions than I have in my downloaded data. The total number of impressions has roughly doubled, and the increase for individual URLs varies, with some increasing by a factor of 10. The number of clicks has also increased, by about 15% in total. Because of the 3 month cut-off, I could only look back as far as the 11th of July, but the impressions for the end of July are also much higher than in my downloaded data. I've noticed that Analytics has changed some other details in its reporting of SEO data. For example, the impressions and clicks data is no longer rounded. Could this increase in impressions be a result of those changes? Has anyone else experienced something similar? We can go ahead and use the new data but it will throw our analysis off for past months (which have the lower numbers). If others have experienced something similar it would be good to know, so that we can adjust our historical numbers accordingly.
Algorithm Updates | | MargotLoco20 -
Will Google discount new gTLDs?
I have the opportunity now to acquire a very desirable generic domain name with either the .org or .pro TLD. Obviously, the .pro version I can get for a far better price. The .org will probably end up being about 10x the price of the .pro. I feel like the .org would give me instant clout while the .pro might raise eyebrows. Also, I'm concerned that Google might also discount these new gTLDs. What do you guys think? Is the perceived authority of the old-time TLDs something worth investing in? Or will this fizzle away over time as the new gTLDs flood the market? THanks! Ira
Algorithm Updates | | iraweissman0 -
How to you get a company details to appear on the right side of google searches? For example is you type dr martens in google , the search page shows links and then a snippet of the company on the right. Thank you.
For example is you type dr martens in google , the search page shows links and then a snippet of the company on the right. Thank you. https://www.google.com/search?q=dr+martens&oq=dr+martens&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.2176j0j7&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8
Algorithm Updates | | vijayvasu0 -
Is Google now ignoring title tags?
Hey guys, I noticed alot of titles of webpages in Google now vary from search to search. They also differ from the Title tag that has been set by the webmaster. Anyone else notice this? (My results are depersonalized)
Algorithm Updates | | benjaminspak0 -
Google.uk rankings plummet, .com improves. What to do?
Hey Guys, Seems so much has changed with international SEO I'm not sure what to do with our site. We have a huge site with many country level landing pages that perform very well on google.com searches (IE; keyword + Jamaica) etc. We are not using a .co.uk version of our site and now our rankings have plummeted in the UK. Should we just make a .co.uk with similar (or the exact same content) or is there some newer strategy to follow?
Algorithm Updates | | iAnalyst.com0 -
Toolbar PageRank Updated
Just reporting that there has been a public toolbar PageRank update. What did Santa give you this round?
Algorithm Updates | | Dan-Petrovic1 -
What are the differences between Google SEO and Bing SEO?
I came across this question on why the poster's rankings in Bing/Yahoo were so much lower than his rankings in Google. One of the links responded with was a presentation Rand gave about the difference in ranking elements of Google and Bing. My purpose for looking into this is to boost rankings in Bing to be more in line with my Google rankings. My takeaways from Rand's presentation were that Bing likes shorter URLs than Google and it's better to have more links from more root domains with more precise anchor text. Unfortunately this presentation was given at last year's SMX Advanced and is almost a year old. Since then Microsoft has been accused of basically scraping the Google SERPs and Google unleashed at least two maybe three rabid Pandas. Needless to say the environment has changed. So my question is for those people who are happy with how they rank in Bing: What SEO factors are you seeing make a bigger impact in Bing vs. how they impact your Google rankings?
Algorithm Updates | | rball11