How do you value a site that generates no income before it's sold?
-
Hi,
I'm currently creating a number of sites which target the wedding market. Each site is localized and specific to a niche within the wedding market.
The intention is to create the site, rank it in the top position of Google and then sell it to a local business within that niche and area.
The problem that i am having is that I don't know how to place a value on each site. I have factors taken from Google (using Market Samurai) so I know the broad and phrase match traffic details as well as the Google PPC average prices.
My initial thought was to use the Google PPC price and multiply that by the number of organic visitors the site would receive if it was ranked #1 on Google. I appreciate that the PPC figures may be higher than what an advertiser would actually pay per click so I conservatively halved the Google PPC figure given in Market Samurai.
Is this a good way of valuing the site or do I need to look at the value per customer to the business that I am trying to sell the site to and work from a conversion factor based on the number of visitors that the site would receive.
If the site received 500 visitors per month and 5% of those became customers multiplied by the average profit per customer - that would give a monthly value of the website.
I am very unsure as to what the best approach is here and look forward to hearing any advice and ideas from fellow members.
Thanks,
Michael
-
The traffic to the site will generate leads for the company who owns the site. If they already have a website that converts then they will know what content to put on this site to create that conversion rate.
The buyer is buying the site knowing the potential that the site will have when it comes to generating business for them.
I've looked at is as the first page results of Google are a line of shops. The shop at #1 is seen as the shop which gets the most visitors to it. Now imagine that shop is currently being refitted - people can still see the shop and what it sells but are unable to actually enter the shop to buy anything.
Now, the person who owns the shop further down the street (i.e is ranked #10 or #12 or #15 etc) - he really wants to own that shop which is being refitted and he knows how much that shop is worth to his business if he owned it after the refit is completed.
Although the site I have created is a basic canvas, all it needs is branding by the new owner and it will then perform as well as their current site when it comes to conversion rates.
Does that make sense with explaining the view point I am taking on this project ?
-
"how to value organic traffic"
That's a different question than "how much can I get for a website?".
But getting to your real question of "how to value organic traffic".... that depends upon what you can do with the traffic (display adsense, sell merchandise, generate leads).
Although you can put a generalized number on that the bottom line for the buyer of your website depends upon how effective your website is at converting customers for a specific service provider. The generic website that you have for sale has zero value for the service provider.
You are selling a sign post without a sign, not a money-making machine.
I think that you have a lot more money making potential selling SEO services than selling pre-ranked websites.
-
And again, the finer points of how to sell the site are something that i have covered from all angles. The part of making the sale and closing the sale isn't an issue.
I appreciate the feedback from everyone here but doubt I'm going to find someone who can actually answer the question of "how to value organic traffic". The matter of the niche or if the potential client already has a site or an SEO company is by the by and not part of the issue. I can deal with all of those parts.
Market Samurai makes a calculation for organic traffic value by taking the average PPC cost and multiplying it by the amount of traffic the site will receive if it was ranked number one on Google.
My question really should have just simply been asked as "How accurate is that figure" ? , <- that's all I needed answering.
-
You get what you can convince someone its worth.
I agree.
I believe that most people who own wedding shops will be much more inclined to invest in having SEO done on their existing website or on a domain that matches the name of their business than they are to buy a website from a Joe Schmoe who is trying to sell them YourPodunkWedding.com.
If they already have a website they probably have a relationship with a local person or company who built the site for them. They will call that person who they know and trust and say... some Joe Schmoe is trying to sell me YourPodunkWedding.com... and he will say.. "They are probably going to sell you the site and then pull the links as soon as they have your money."
-
" All I wanted to know is how a site would be valued when it comes to selling it."
There is no way to tell. You get what you can convince someone its worth. You can like that or not but it won't change it.
-
I feel like your question answers itself, a site that generates no income before it is sold doesn't really have any value to be completely honest. If the site is ranking, and generating leads, then it has an intrinsic value of potential income. I feel it is a gamble and as Ben said "[it] is worth what they buyer will pay for it."
I suppose, if you have qualified leads being generated, you could place a market value on each lead with a realistic conversion rate factored in to get a base sale value. Once you have a base, you could project what it is worth to a company that can build a reputation and stronger business with it.
Using the above example of 500 visitors, 5% to leads, and a 1.5% conversion rate (lets be realistic now) works out to 1 client. So for this venture to be profitiable, you would probably need to generate at least 1000 * 5000 visitors a month, and hope for 5-10 clients. Now if a business buys this and makes it successful, the conversion rate should increase due to reputation. You could build a projected sale price of the 1-2 year projection.
That all being said, you really will need to have a decent amount of traffic coming to the site in order for it to be salable, or follow the old adage 'a sucker is born every minute' and swindle someone into buying based on promised traffic and revenue that is in fact not there (not recommend: very unprofessional and possibly reputation damaging.)
-- edit --
- clearly my math was wrong, it should be 5000 visitors for 5-10 clients, not 1000.
-
Why would they want to buy a website from you? They probably already have a site, have spent a lot of money on it and want to continue using it. Your site would not feature their store or their products or their staff or their salesmanship. The site would need to be built over again. A waste of your time or their money.
I think that you will get a better return selling SEO services to the biz owner who is currently in position #7 who would like to be in position #1.
If the site received 500 visitors per month and 5% of those became customers multiplied by the average profit per customer - that would give a monthly value of the website.
I think that your 5% is really high. In a small town there might only be a few places to buy these products and the shoppers already know about them. Where there is a larger market the buying decision is going to be based more on the products for sale and less on the rankings of a website.
Also, I think that your valuation is high.... why should they pay you the entire profit on the monthly sales? They are in business to make money for themselves - not to give all of their profits to you.
-
Oh I did my research on this and looked at the service providers who already have website ranked in the top 30 as well as all those who are currently using Google AdWords. The service providers already understand the value of an online presence, I'm just trying to work out what that value is.
-
there is no calculation that will tell you this. Anything that professes to be an indystry standard or generic answer will be out as your buyers will not be conforming to any standard
Wedding businesses that dont know about the internet are sure as hell not going to know how to value a website, its worth whatever you can get for it as a salesman
Btw, Id suggest finding a market first and then building sites for it
-
Thanks Ben, thanks for your answer. I have thought about different payment options from a "one off - hand it all over" option to a "monthly payment" where they 'rent' the site. Or even break the cost down in to a deposit payment followed by monthly payments until the full amount is paid. Once it's paid I would then sign over the domain ownership.
The main sticking point is calculating a price for the site in the first place.
-
Everything is worth what the buyer will pay for it. Since organic search traffic ebbs and flows, a simple traffic times conversion equals monthly price may to be reflective of what someone will pay for it. You might want to think about offering a lump sum payment where the customer takes control of the domain and a monthly fee where you retain control, but re brand the site for the client.
Good luck
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Paid links from directory listing and business listing sites are good or bad according to Penguin 2.1 update?
Hi Friends, Recently on October 4<sup>th</sup>, 2013, a new spam filtering algorithm got live named Penguin 21. / Penguin 5. The update goes after sites that may have purchased paid links. I would like to know is it safe, if we submit website details with links in paid directories, eg: https://ecom.yahoo.com/dir/submit/intro/ (yahoo directory) and quality business listing sites provided the categories are related to our website. Our competitor sites having the backlinks from those kind of directories and they are performing (ranking) well in major search engines. May I know how Google treat these kinds of links according to this recent algorithm update?
Industry News | | zco_seo0 -
Best ranking Magento sites?
What would be your top 10 Magento sites in terms of SEO and ranking? I'm looking for examples of Magneto sites that have been set up correctly and are ranking well. Especially recently launched sites that have managed to get themselves ranking well in competitive markets! Cheers
Industry News | | OnlineAssetPartners0 -
Do rankings return to previous rank after a site has been un-indexed?
My client has had a site since 1996 (the first one was a www subdomain, his current site has no www). He came to my company for SEO about a year ago, after having a WordPress site that was accidentally set to not be crawled/indexed by search engines. We set the site to be indexed and added a blog. Since then, he has had slow increase in keyword rankings (on page 3 or most globally searched terms) but is still nowhere near page 1 for most of his keywords. He thinks my company has done nothing, while I see the keyword improvements as a sign of success - slow, gradual - but going in the right direction. I don't know if he was ranking well before he had a site that was not set to be indexed - but if he was on page one, would he eventually return there? Or do we have to build everything over again?
Industry News | | Alex_Ratynski0 -
So, Google is the best site on the internet.. Right? Or is that just what most people tend to think off-face?
LOL woah, put the guns away. I'm not about to rant, I just have a question and wanted to present it well. Then again, I might have actually found some easy fixes to some of Google's tools that they could make. So here's the thing. I noticed how annoyed I always getting when I have to sign in every time I go to the adwords keyword tool, or analytics. Why do you have to sign in a million times? I think it is a problem that can be fixed because if you go to check your webmaster tools, you go straight into your account, where you can then select which site you want to explore. It knows that I am already signed in to Google Accounts when I go to webmaster tools, but it doesn't recognize that fact when I go to my Analytics account, or to use the Adwords Keyword Tool. Now, every site has things that they need to work on, but not necessarily that need to be 'fixed'. Google being so commonly accepted as the best site on the net, I thought it was funny/interesting at the least to point out the problem. Even funnier is the fact that I could submit it as a problem to see if they could fix it or not, but they do such a good job of making it hard for people to contact them, that A) I don't feel like wasting my time trying B) I don't even really know if it is possible to do that. Also, why is there no official Google Analytics App / Mobile site?? Google has been pushing how important mobile is to us webmasters, but then it doesn't seem to be very high on their priority list for the tools that we use. I mean you can't view graphs on phones / tablets (mine at least), in webmaster tools, OR google analytics. Also, its a pain in the but to click the sign in button on Google Analytics when using my phone / tablet, it disapears really fast for me (needs more research from others to see if everyone has the same problem) Thanks for the interest / answers everybody. Look forward to hearing from you guys. Also, tips and help would be nice if anybody knows a solution to my sign in issue
Industry News | | TylerAbernethy0 -
Help settle an argument pls - are local results 'organic'?
Hi y'all. Hoping you can help give some definition here to organic results as I've inadvertantly started an argument in a forum when I was suggesting to some soul in need of advice that he needed to concentrate on the two types of SEO, those being Organic AND Local search results. So the argument started that Local search IS Organic, and results are classed as either Organic or Paid. Though to me, the term 'organic results' represents the search results derived from googles main website indexing algorithm, Not Paid, and not any of the Verticals (Local/News/Images/Video etc.) So would love to hear what others views are... if I'm totally wrong I'll go back and graciously accept my education 🙂
Industry News | | davebrown19750 -
What is the best site-map software?
I am in the beginning stages of building a website and would like to know the site-mapping software for organizing my company's ideas. Any recommendations are greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Industry News | | canadianplum0 -
Is their value in building your own website network?
--- I am moving this into open discussion to see if I can get a few more responses, I am very curious if anyone has experience in this area --- Hello, As a resource for my link building strategies I have often wondered if building my own 'web network' of sites would prove to be valuable in link building. For example, if I were targeting the travel industry (or insert a niche here) and created 30 websites on various related topics in the industry, would using outbound links from those sites to other relevant websites help increase domain authority? Obviously, I would need to avoid creating unusable sites with boilerplate content just for the sole purpose of linking. I am envisioning working websites/blogs that would be valuable on their own. Some thoughts and questions that have crossed my mind: If these sites are all hosted on the same server, would the link exchange end up in penalization in the SERPs? Being that the sites are designed to be quality sites on their own, can they share links between themselves if the links are relevant? This is already being done across the web, but what makes one network valuable and 'quality' vs another Being a web dev / host as well as SEO guy I would like to utilize those resources to create a network that is of quality and of value, but am not sure about things appearing 'unnatural'... It seems that the majority of link building falls into the 'unnatural' category as we as SEOs are constantly trying to place our links throughout the web vs. site owners linking naturally back to a website
Industry News | | Millibit0 -
SEO sites were blasted by Panda
Just noticed that lots of SEO sites were blasted by Panda... http://trends.google.com/websites?q=webmasterworld.com&geo=all&date=2011&sort=0 http://trends.google.com/websites?q=seomoz.org&geo=all&date=2011&sort=0 http://trends.google.com/websites?q=digitalpoint.com&geo=all&date=2011&sort=0 http://trends.google.com/websites?q=forums.seochat.com&geo=all&date=2011&sort=0
Industry News | | EGOL3