How do I know what pages of my site is not inedexed by google ?
-
Hi
I my Google webmaster tools under Crawl->sitemaps it shows 1117 pages submitted but 619 has been indexed.
Is there any way I can fined which pages are not indexed and why?
it has been like this for a while.
I also have a manual action (partial) message. "Unnatural links to your site--impacts links" and under affects says "Some incoming links"
is that the reason Google does not index some of my pages?
Thank you
Sina
-
Thank you very much for the detail answer,
Is there any way I can find when I got the Manual Actions (Partial)
there is no date
-
Hi Sina,
For your first question, make sure you have Google Webmaster Tools setup (which I gather you do) as you have received a 'low quality/spam links' message by them. I should add that dealing with an 'unnatural link profile by Google is a whole other project!) and super important to boot so get on top of that also! Open Site Explorer is a perfect place to start, to crawl the links and to profile your entire linking domain profile. From here you can begin to examine domain link profile by filtering through options to identify ones which may be causing you that warning from Google. This will need to be rectified in order to ensure solid indexing of your site pages. You will need to clean these up in order for the rest to work and be effective
Now, to look at the indexing issue you asked on. If you look to the right in Webmaster Tools once you login, on the dashboard, you will see a section called SITEMAPS (3rd on the right once you click into the domain) from the main panel. Click on the TITLE of this section from the dashboard, and you will land on the SITEMAPS report file. There is a wealth of information here from Google about the indexing health of your site.
There are 3 steps here, Google needs to have done in order to identify which to help you figure out the information you are looking for:
- Crawling
- Indexing
- Ranking (what you see in the SERP results pages using search terms or Google Operators for site review.
In order to see any results at all, you need to ensure you have a SITEMAPS.XML file built, loaded and submitted to Google. It also needs to be configured properly and have no errors for proper processing. This is the only way you will get clear snapshot of what has been indexed based on your XML file by Google. This will tell you have many pages you have indexed in their index, but not identify. If you don't have any at all, it will state it.
it's also time to look at your robots.txt and .htaccess file to ensure those are configured and installed properly. This would be another troubleshooting step, but seeing as you have a unnatural link profile, you may want to take these steps first. Ensure you don't have any of the <noindex>meta fields listed here as well site-wide.</noindex>
So, from here, once you login to Webmaster Tools (dashboard for the site you are referring to you) under SITEMAPS, you will see a section saying XXX number of pages submitted and XXX # of pages indexed along with any errors and warnings you are getting from them now in that box (link warnings will be here too!). This will give you some important informtion which you can log in an Excel file later Here is where you will most likely see that linking domain link alert from Google as well.
Now you have Google's 'indexed pages' view. Now you have to dig a little.
----- GOOGLE OPERATORS ---- Now, once you have some data from Google WebMaster Tools as mentioned above, You can now go to Google.com (or the Google index you want to see like .ca. or others) and use Google search operators to speficially see which URL's and pages have been indexed by the engine. There are a few different ones you can use below. I found a great resource below and copied in the link.
Domain search with - site: Operator
(site:google.com)
This should returns results only from the specified Domain.
So you will need to be careful if your site is with a SubDomain (or multiple SubDomains) ("www" is a SubDomain).Domain search with - inurl: Operator
(inurl:google.com)
This should return results that contain the specified Domain.
This may not be only from the site in question though! It is possible for other sites to contain your domainname in their URLs (whois.domaintools.com may have such URLs etc.)Domain search with - site: and inurl: Operators
(site:google.com inurl:google.com)
This way you limit the results to your Domain Only ... and it seems to generate more "reliable" results than the site: operator alone.Domain and Path/Query search with - site: and inurl: Operators
(site:google.com inurl:/somepath/somedirectory/)
(site:google.com inurl:?this=that&rabbits=lunch)
This way you limit the results to your Domain Only ... and focus on a specific directory/folder or set of paramters etc.Domain and FileType search with - site: and filetype: Operators
(site:google.com filetype:html)
This limits the results to those from your Domain, and to a specific type of file.
Please note - the filetype: operator may not show All of that type - it may only work for URLs that end in that type. thus if you serve content as html, but without the .html in the filename - they will not show in the results!)Domain and Path/Query search with - site:, inurl: and inurl: Operators
(site:google.com inurl:google.com inurl:/somepath/somedirectory/)
(site:google.com inurl:google.com inurl:?this=that&rabbits=lunch)
This permits you to start limiting the results to specific parts of your site if you need too.Make sure that your site pages also don't include in the section the <meta-noindex>or <meta-nofollow>tags. This would tell Google not to index or follow the pages from your site </meta-nofollow></meta-noindex>
Ensure that you have, in your .htaccess file the proper redirects for the site if you find you have duplicate content. Ensure you are 301 redirecting the non-www to www versions of your site and pages (or vice-versa), whichever you prefer to have indexed by Google to ensure clean indexing of the site. This will make sure you don't have problems indexing wide for search.
TO NOTE
---- SERVER LOG FILES ---- (Note: please make sure that you request log files) from your hosting company too. If you don't have access to server log files for hosting traffic, switch! Log and keep an eye on these as well for information for your needs. This process is not a fast or easy one and does require some work to detect. Don't get lazy. This is a crucial step to keep an eye on.
What I recommend next is starting to keep log files if you aren't already and tracking those on a weekkly pr monthly basis (which ever is easier). The reason being is once you get indexed to Google, you always want to keep an idea of what is indexed and what isn't (dropped) or de-indexed pages. This can also help identify early problems (or penalties) from Google if you see trending things happening day over day or week over week.
Hope this helps point you in the right direct. Remember don't be lazy here Exhaust all options to indentify your problems! Cheers,
Rob
-
Based on the manual action message from Google, I would guess that one of the possible reasons is that the unindexed pages have bad links pointing towards them. So Google is thinking that those pages are not "quality."
I would also check that all pages are included in your XML sitemap at a minimum and HTML sitemap (if you have the latter one). I'd also check the section of all pages to make sure that no pages are set to "noindex." Lastly, you may have duplicate content. If two pages have the exact-same text with only minor keyword-based variations, for example, then Google will often index only one of the two pages.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Will google be able to crawl all of the pages given that the pages displayed or the info on a page varies according to the city of a user?
So the website I am working for asks for a location before displaying the product pages. There are two cities with multiple warehouses. Based on the users' location, the product pages available in the warehouse serving only in that area are shown. If the user skips location, default warehouse-related product pages are shown. The APIs are all location-based.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Airlift0 -
Pages canonicaled to another appearing before the canonical on google searches
Hello, When I do this google search, this page(amandine roses category) appears before the one it is canonical-ed to(this multi-product version of amandine roses). This happens often with this multi-product template, where they don't rank as well as their category version(that are canonical to the multi-product version). Can someone maybe point us in the right direction on what the issue may be? What can be improved?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | globalrose.com0 -
Does anyone know of a Google update in the past few days?
Have seen a fairly substantial drop in Google search console, I'm still looking into it comparing things, but does anyone know if there's been a Google updates within the past few days? Or has anyone else noticed anything? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoman100 -
Weird Page switch for a keyword in Google Rankings
Over this past weekend Google switched the page which usually showed in search results for keyword benchmarking. It went from from http://www.apqc.org/benchmarking to http://www.apqc.org/benchmarking-portal/osb. Also on Google the Rankings for the keyword 'benchmarking' sank from 15 to 47 for http://www.apqc.org/benchmarking Just looking for some theories or ideas or anyone that has had this happen to them.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | inhouseninja0 -
Incorrect cached page indexing in Google while correct page indexes intermittently
Hi, we are a South African insurance company. We have a page http://www.miway.co.za/midrivestyle which has a 301 redirect to http://www.miway.co.za/car-insurance. Problem is that the former page is ranking in the index rather than the latter. The latter page does index occasionally in the same position, but rarely. This is primarily for search phrases like "car insurance" and "car insurance quotes". The ranking was knocked down the index with Penquin 2.0. It was not ranking at all but we have managed to recover to 12/13. This abnormally has only been occurring since the recovery. The correct page does index for other search terms like "insurance for car". Your help would be appreciated, thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | miway0 -
Site revamp for neglected site - modifying site structure, URLs and content - is there an optimal approach?
A site I'm involved with, www.organicguide.com, was at one stage (long ago) performing reasonably well in the search engines. It was ranking highly for several keywords. The site has been neglected for some considerable period of time. A new group of people are interested in revamping the site, updating content, removing some of the existing content, and generally refreshing the site entirely. In order to go forward with the site, significant changes need to be made. This will likely involve moving the entire site across to wordpress. The directory software (edirectory.com) currently being used has not been designed with SEO in mind and as a result numerous similar pages of directory listings (all with similar titles and descriptions) are in google's results, albeit with very weak PA. After reading many of the articles/blog posts here I realize that a significant revamp and some serious SEO work is needed. So, I've joined this community to learn from those more experienced. Apart from doing 301 redirects for pages that we need to retain, is there any optimal way of removing/repairing the current URL structure as the site gets updated? Also, is it better to make changes all at once or is an iterative approach preferred? Many thanks in advance for any responses/advice offered. Cheers MacRobbo
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | macrobbo0 -
Adding Orphaned Pages to the Google Index
Hey folks, How do you think Google will treat adding 300K orphaned pages to a 4.5 million page site. The URLs would resolve but there would be no on site navigation to those pages, Google would only know about them through sitemap.xmls. These pages are super low competition. The plot thickens, what we are really after is to get 150k real pages back on the site, these pages do have crawlable paths on the site but in order to do that (for technical reasons) we need to push these other 300k orphaned pages live (it's an all or nothing deal) a) Do you think Google will have a problem with this or just decide to not index some or most these pages since they are orphaned. b) If these pages will just fall out of the index or not get included, and have no chance of ever accumulating PR anyway since they are not linked to, would it make sense to just noindex them? c) Should we not submit sitemap.xml files at all, and take our 150k and just ignore these 300k and hope Google ignores them as well since they are orhpaned? d) If Google is OK with this maybe we should submit the sitemap.xmls and keep an eye on the pages, maybe they will rank and bring us a bit of traffic, but we don't want to do that if it could be an issue with Google. Thanks for your opinions and if you have any hard evidence either way especially thanks for that info. 😉
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | irvingw0 -
Meeting Google's needs 100% with dynamic pages
We have bought into a really powerful search, very exciting We can define really detailed product based 'landing pages' by creating a search that pulles on required attributeseghttp://www.OURDOMAIN.com//search/index.php?sortprice=asc&followSearch=9673&q=red+coats+short-length Pop that in a link Short Red Coats on a previous page and wonderful, that gives a page of short red coats in price ascending order, one happy consumer, straight to a page that meets their needs Question 1 however unhappy Google right? Question 2 can we meet Google's needs 100% with a redirect permanent in an .htaccess file E.G redirect permanent /short-red-coats/ http://www.OURDOMAIN.com//search/index.php?sortprice=asc&followSearch=9673&q=red+coats+short-length
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | GeezerG
Many thanks
CB0