Value of URL Changes
-
Hi Guys,
I have a question. Each product listed on my webstie has product number like /product.php?id=3624. After I spent many hours with MOZ, I figured out that this approach is wrong and I should use the product name as URL to achieve better SEO performance.
Now I am planing to change the URL generating algoritm but should I do it for existing products. Some of them have already been linked to external websites. I am thinking to create mirror URLs but this may cause rather damage on my website. Do you know what is the right answer?
Best,
Tony
-
I agree with Alex I was trying to think of a way to make the URLs little bit shorter and would recommend doing so as well.
The chicken is not an insult it is an analogy of somebody making changes to a site without checking the site structure and testing it prior.
When you make the changes use a tool like deep crawl or Screaming Frog SEO Spider
https://www.deepcrawl.com/knowledge/best-practice/test-development-changes/
Look out for redirect chains shown below and or redirecting which you can check using this handy tool in addition to the other fantastic tools above.
https://varvy.com/tools/redirects/
You need to redirect from https// & http:// to one URL
See the bigger photo here http://i.imgur.com/zQYE65R.png
please keep in mind the chicken is just to be humorous and lighten everyone's day it's not an insult.
Respectfully,
Thomas
-
There's always a small amount of authority lost through a 301 redirect or canonical, but as long as you set the 301 redirects up correctly I wouldn't worry about it. It should benefit your site in the long-term.
I've overseen a few site migrations where unfriendly URLs (e.g. /product.php?id=1234) were replaced with friendly URLs (e.g. /category/product) and more often than not, immediately after the migration organic traffic and rankings remained consistent or improved. I think there was one where traffic and rankings dropped in the short-term but then recovered to a better level within a month.
If you go ahead with the URL change and 301 redirects, keep a crawl/record of your current website, then when you've completed the redirects, crawl the old URLs to see if they're redirecting as you expect. If they're not, fix them as quickly as you can.
I agree with Tom in terms of the URL structure and breadcrumb trail, though I am a fan of short URLs, so I'd shorten some of the category names when used in your URLs e.g.
/transport/air
instead of
/motors-and-transport/air-transportAlso be aware that
/transport/air
is different to
/transport/air/- so make sure only one version exists - with or without the trailing slash.
-
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your reply.
I thought that if I used 301 for redirection would work. What are methods that will not affect my traction?
Best,
Tony
-
Tony on the URL I referenced below there is a clear breadcrumb trail to the product. If you created URLs that used a subfolder for the category and then an additional subfolder for the product new for instance / The used a subfolder for the category and then an additional subfolder for the product new for instance
- www.threeding.com/antiques-historical/gravestone/
- www.threeding.com/antiques-historical/early-middle-ages/gravestone/
HOME ANTIQUES & HISTORICAL EARLY MIDDLE AGES GRAVESTONE
As Alex said anytime you change your URL structure or your site structure you are going to deal with a lot of complications. Including loss of traction in the search engine's. There are methods of doing it where you go about making small changes as you work.
Let me know if this is something you're considering doing it so I'll give you more information on it and I if you want.
All the best, Tom
-
Hi Tony,
I took a random URL
http://www.threeding.com/product.php?id=567 out of your site and found the structure was identical to what you had shown us.
If you give me some time and happy to give you a lot more information on what can be done to help you.
I see Not found “Rel="canonical"Not found
http://www.threeding.com/product.php?id=567
Meta Robots
Not found
Rel="canonical"
Not found
Page Load Time 2.394 seconds Google Cache URL
http://google.com/search?q=cache:http://www.threeding.com/product.php?id=567
IP Address 54.72.236.205 Country United States
Private message me or allow me 24 hours and I will have quite a bit more data
Tom
-
Hi Alex, Thomas,
Thanks a lot. Much appreciate your responds.
Thomas,
We use proprietary CMS. You can take a look at my website. www.threeding.com. I have noticed there are a lot of things to improve. The platform has plenty of content, much more than the competition but Google ranking is lower than many of the competitors. Now I am reading about SEO and it seems that we are on the right way.
Regards,
Tony
-
Tony,
Are using magento as a CMS platform if not what CMS?
you do not want to kill your crawl budget by having Google index session ID URLs.
http://searchenginewatch.com/sew/news/2064349/crawl-index-rank-repeat-a-tactical-seo-framework
- https://blog.kissmetrics.com/googlebot-optimization/
- http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/crawl-optimization
- http://www.seoadjust.com/seo/url-parameters-in-google-webmaster-tools/
Indicate How to Handle Dynamic Parameters
Tell Google and other search engines when to ignore any parameters added to your URL, such as a session ID or pagination. By doing this you are telling Google that http://yourdomain.com/keyword?sessionid=54 has the same content as http://yourdomain.com/keyword.Try using the URL Parameters tool in Google Webmaster Tools. https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/crawl-url-parameters
Depending on your content management system, the URLs it generates may be “pretty” like this one:
or “ugly” like this one:
-
https://www.quicksprout.com/2015/04/06/does-url-structure-even-matter-a-data-driven-answer/
-
http://www.wordtracker.com/academy/learn-seo/technical-guides/seo-clean-urls
-
http://mysiteauditor.com/blog/top-10-most-important-seo-tips-for-url-optimization/
-
http://www.searchenginejournal.com/five-steps-to-seo-friendly-site-url-structure/
-
https://moz.com/blog/visual-guide-to-keyword-targeting-onpage-optimization
-
https://moz.com/blog/url-rewrites-and-301-redirects-how-does-it-all-work
-
https://moz.com/blog/4-graphics-to-help-illustrate-onpage-optimization
Large photo
https://moz.com/rand/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/elements-optimized-lrg.gif
- https://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/
- http://stallion-theme.co.uk/seo-static-html-vs-dynamic-urls/
- https://www.searchenginegenie.com/Dynamic-URLs-versus-Static-URLs.html
- http://platform.productsup.com/help/35
- https://moz.com/blog/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls-the-best-practice-for-seo-is-still-clear
-
Hey Tony and Alex,
Thumbs up Alex did an excellent job of explaining what I was trying to get across. I apologize I did not have much time when I replied.
Tony I agree with everything Alex has said I would award him best answer.
Sincerely,
Tom
-
It isn't wrong to use question marks in URLs.
However - as Thomas says, short and descriptive URLs describe what is on the page, whereas the query parameters you use currently don't. "Keyword present in the page's URL" was also believed to be an important ranking factor by the participants in Moz's Ranking Factors survey earlier this year: https://moz.com/search-ranking-factors/survey
By mirroring URLs, will each product then exist at 2 URLs? E.g.:
example.com/product.php?id=3624
and
example.com/category/productIf so, you don't want to do that as it creates duplicate content. Using canonical tags to fix the duplication doesn't solve the problem completely.
If you change URLs, you should 301 redirect the old to the new, so
example.com/product.php?id=3624
would 301 redirect to
example.com/category/productJust in case you aren't aware - a "301" is a permanent redirect, so when using a permanent redirect, even if other websites have linked to example.com/product.php?id=3624 - the browser will automatically redirect to the new URL, passing most of the authority built up from the links you mentioned.
Whether I'd advise you to change the URLs of existing products depends on whether you can implement the redirects. In the short-term you'll lose a slight bit of link authority through the redirect, but in the longer-term, the frendlier URLs should benefit your website.
Also, there's always a risk when making large scale changes to URL structure - you need to make sure customers can still navigate the site without issues, and search engine crawlers understand the changes you've made - 301 redirects are best-practice to ensure this.
Ideally, when URLs are changed, all internal links should be updated.
-
Thanks. In this case I will duplicate the products and use the absolute canonical.
Just want to make sure I understand correctly: All my products URL's are with question marks. I just don't understand, is this wrong?
Regards,
Tony
-
/product.php?id=3624 In in the example you have given it shows a question mark which means you are hopefully not using that URL as your canonical.
/product/shoes/air-jordans/ vs /product.php?id=3624
Would tell a customer
more about what they are actually clicking on.
Remember that you have given an example of “?” “<element id="id”>”
Please use the absolute canonical and do not change-year-old links
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Will Multiple 301's to the Same URL Cause Issues?
Hey Everyone, We have a client (I don't have permission to disclose) that has just attempted to create better URL's for their site, per our direction. In the process, their website platform kind of took over their renaming attempts and instead of creating the clean, short, descriptive URLs we all wanted, they got convoluted, longer URLs. This all happened within the past 3 or 4 days. So, they went out and got an add-on that's going to help them create better URL's. In the meantime, they now have the original page/URL plus two new ones for a total of three. No 301's have been setup yet. When they create the new and (hopefully) improved URL tomorrow, will it hurt their rankings to have three pages redirected to the new one? Is a 301 redirect the right method for this issue or should they do something different? Thanks in advance, Kirk
On-Page Optimization | | kbates0 -
URL structure
Hello all, I am about to sort out my websites link structure, and was wondering which approach to our services page would be best. should we have: services/digital-marketing & services/website-design etc or: digital-marketing/website-design & digital-marketing/seo Basically I see digital marketing as the top level category that is the umbrella term for all of our digital services. But would it make more sense to have service to be the main category and digital marketing within that (along with all the other services from web design to seo)? all thoughts welcome!
On-Page Optimization | | wseabrook0 -
Two URL's for the same page
Hi, on our site we have two separate URL's for a page that has the same content. So, for example - 'www.domain.co.uk/stuff' and 'www.domain.co.uk/things/stuff' both have the same content on the page. We currently rank high in search for 'www.domain.co.uk/things/stuff' for our targeted keyword, but there are numerous links on the site to www.domain.co.uk/stuff and also potentially inbound links to this page. Ideally we want just the www.domain.co.uk/things/stuff URL to be present on the site, what would be the best course of action to take? Would a simple Canonical tag from the '/stuff' URL which points to the '/things/stuff' page be wise? If we were to scrap the '/stuff' URL totally and redirect it to the 'things/stuff' URL and change all our on site links, would this be beneficial and not harm our current ranking for '/things/stuff'? We only want 1 URL for this page for numerous reasons (i.e, easier to track in Analytics), but I'm a bit cautious that changing the page that doesn't rank may have an affect on the page that does rank! Thanks.
On-Page Optimization | | Jaybeamer2 -
Should ".html" in the URL or not?
Does URL like /wedding-dresses.html/f/price/2,100 with "html" in the middle do harm to SEO? Should I drop the ".html"?
On-Page Optimization | | StevenRoland0 -
Canonical URL Tag
Hi, I have two pages that are identical on my site: http://www.absolutepower.nl/creatine-monohydraat and http://www.absolutepower.nl/CREATINE/creatine-monohydraat Should I use the canonical URL tag in this case? Thanks, Jasper
On-Page Optimization | | Japking0 -
Importance of URL Structure
We are trying to restructure our onpage SEO and want to make sure we have our URLs correct. The problem is we did the URLs incorrectly in the first place and the ones we currently have are several years olds. We have some URLs such as: http://www.firebrandtraining.co.uk/courses/management/prince2.asp and
On-Page Optimization | | RobertChapman
http://www.firebrandtraining.co.uk/courses/cisco/ccna_2007.asp which are not ideal but user experience aside does it make sense for us to change the URLs and use 301 redirects to the new ones or is the damage done to our natural rankings simply not worth making the change? I have read different articles saying different things, some say that URL structure has little weight (if any weight at all) on rankings while other people seem to say it is quite important. In addition we have heard that changing the URLs with a 301 redirect will cause a large drop in ranking which will take months to recover from and contrarily that 301s are now considered "ok" by Google and we shouldn't see too much change at all in our rankings. Any advice would be much appreciated.0 -
Is having the word catalog in an ecommerce site url detrimental to seo.
IS: www.example.com/catalog/category%/product% better than www.example.com/category%/product% category and product are dynamic values that change with the diff. categ. and products displayed while catalog is constant.
On-Page Optimization | | no6thgear0 -
URL with two forward slashes //
We have a potential client with a URL structure in this fashion: http://www.site-url.com//cpage/page.html pretty strange, right? my question is: How bad are the 2 forward slashes // for SEO? How bad is it to have that extra layer of /cpage in the URL? this doesn't appear to serve any other purpose than making the URL longer than necessary.
On-Page Optimization | | Motava0