undefined
Skip to content
Moz logo Menu open Menu close
  • Products
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Pro Home
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Home
    • STAT
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Home
    • Compare SEO Products
    • Moz Data
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis
    • Keyword Explorer
    • Link Explorer
    • Competitive Research
    • MozBar
    • More Free SEO Tools
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO
    • SEO Learning Center
    • Moz Academy
    • MozCon
    • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Digital Marketers
    • Agency Solutions
    • Enterprise Solutions
    • Small Business Solutions
    • The Moz Story
    • New Releases
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Products
    • Moz Pro

      Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

    • Moz Local

      Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

    • STAT

      SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

    • Moz API

      Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

    • Compare SEO Products

      See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

    • Moz Data

      Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Free SEO Tools
    • Domain Analysis

      Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

    • Keyword Explorer

      Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

    • Link Explorer

      Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

    • Competitive Research

      Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

    • MozBar

      See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

    • More Free SEO Tools

      Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
    Moz Pro

    NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

    Learn more
  • Learn SEO
    • Beginner's Guide to SEO

      The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

    • SEO Learning Center

      Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

    • On-Demand Webinars

      Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

    • How-To Guides

      Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

    • Moz Academy

      Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

    • MozCon

      Save on Early Bird tickets and join us in London or New York City

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
    Moz API

    Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

    Find your plan
  • Blog
  • Why Moz
    • Digital Marketers

      Simplify SEO tasks to save time and grow your traffic.

    • Small Business Solutions

      Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

    • Agency Solutions

      Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

    • Enterprise Solutions

      Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

    • The Moz Story

      Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

    • New Releases

      Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

    Surface actionable competitive intel
    New Feature

    Surface actionable competitive intel

    Learn More
  • Log in
    • Moz Pro
    • Moz Local
    • Moz Local Dashboard
    • Moz API
    • Moz API Dashboard
    • Moz Academy
  • Avatar
    • Moz Home
    • Notifications
    • Account & Billing
    • Manage Users
    • Community Profile
    • My Q&A
    • My Videos
    • Log Out

The Moz Q&A Forum

  • Forum
  • Questions
  • Users
  • Ask the Community

Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

  1. Home
  2. SEO Tactics
  3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
  4. Looking to remove dates from URL permalink structure. What do you think of this idea?

Moz Q&A is closed.

After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

Looking to remove dates from URL permalink structure. What do you think of this idea?

Intermediate & Advanced SEO
6
18
6.7k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as question
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
  • HashtagJeff
    HashtagJeff last edited by May 24, 2017, 5:18 PM

    I know most people who remove dates from their URL structure usually do so and then setup a 301 redirect. I believe that's the right way to go about this typically. My biggest fear with doing a global 301 redirect implementation like that across an entire site is that I've seen cases where this has sort of shocked Google and the site took a hit in organic traffic pretty bad.

    Heres what I'm thinking a safer approach would be and I'd like to hear others thoughts. What if...

    1. Changed permalink structure moving forward to remove the date in future posts.
    2. All current URLs stay as is with their dates
    3. Moving forward we would go back and optimize past posts in waves (including proper 301 redirects and better URL structure). This way we avoid potentially shocking Google with a global change across all URLs.

    Do you know of a way this is possible with a large Wordpress website? Do you see any conplications that could come about in this process? I'd like to hear any other thoughts about this please.

    Thanks!

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • julienraby
      julienraby @HashtagJeff last edited by Mar 8, 2019, 2:30 PM Mar 8, 2019, 2:30 PM

      Hey Jeff,

      thank you for your input. So you just globally changed the permalink structure, put global redirects in place and you didn't see permanent loss in trafic? And you did that on multiple sites?

      If so I'll most probably follow your path.

      Thanks again,

      Julien

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • HashtagJeff
        HashtagJeff @julienraby last edited by Mar 8, 2019, 2:24 PM Mar 8, 2019, 2:24 PM

        Hey Julien -

        I wouldn't go this route. Since asking this question I have had dates removed from 30+ domains, many with 5-10 million+ pageviews per month. We haven't seen this as a risk and are now very in favor of removing dates from URLs on most sites we work with. We work with sites that have very evergreen content, and republishing is a very strong SEO strategy.

        The process is very similar to moving your site to HTTPS from HTTP. Since Google has started recommending HTTPS we haven't seen any issue with removing dates as well.

        Hope that helps 🙂

        julienraby 1 Reply Last reply Mar 8, 2019, 2:30 PM Reply Quote 0
        • julienraby
          julienraby @BlueprintMarketing last edited by Mar 7, 2019, 9:48 PM Mar 7, 2019, 9:48 PM

          Hey Thomas,

          Interesting thought! Could you go in a little more details as to how that regex would work? Would that randomize the redirects to only a portion of the posts?

          Thanks!

          Julien

          HashtagJeff 1 Reply Last reply Mar 8, 2019, 2:24 PM Reply Quote 0
          • topic:timeago_earlier,9 months
          • BlueprintMarketing
            BlueprintMarketing last edited by Jun 21, 2018, 8:04 PM Jun 21, 2018, 8:04 PM

            I think only do 10% of pages watch them if you like what you see do the next 20%

            RedirectMatch301^/([0-9]{4})/([0-9]{2})/(.*)$ http://yourwebsite.com/$3
            
            julienraby 1 Reply Last reply Mar 7, 2019, 9:48 PM Reply Quote 0
            • topic:timeago_earlier,5 months
            • HashtagJeff
              HashtagJeff @garrettn last edited by Jan 17, 2018, 5:44 PM Jan 17, 2018, 5:44 PM

              Garrett -

              I never got a clear answer, but I have since gone forward making changes on 20+ Wordpress blogs without any ill-effect. The changes we made were only to sites that had dates in the permalink structure and 301 redirects were put in place (on the server, not through a plugin). Trying to change the permalink structure going forward but not back was too much of a hassle. It appears Google sees this as a positive change for users because it cleans up the permalink structure and allows site owners to keep their content updated and continue sharing.

              Not sure how this will apply in other scenarios such as removing folder structure (categories and tags) from the permalink, but I've had only positive results removing the dates. I work with some very high profile mom and food blogs so I have some pretty solid evidence and data supporting my decisions now.

              I hope that helps. Cheers!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • garrettn
                garrettn Subscriber last edited by Jan 17, 2018, 5:30 PM Jan 17, 2018, 5:29 PM

                Hi Jeff,

                Did you end up making these changes? How is it going? I found your post as I was researching and rethinking how to structure WordPress blog permalinks.

                I have a few e-commerce clients with blog posts that are several years old and still popular in organic search. I'd like to turn some of them into evergreen content that is regularly updated, but I feel like we should do something about the permalinks first.

                There are some great insights here. Thank you to all who contributed.

                Garrett

                HashtagJeff 1 Reply Last reply Jan 17, 2018, 5:44 PM Reply Quote 1
                • topic:timeago_earlier,8 months
                • LoganRay
                  LoganRay @HashtagJeff last edited by May 25, 2017, 10:47 AM May 25, 2017, 10:47 AM

                  No problem, glad to help! Best of luck with whichever route you go with!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • HashtagJeff
                    HashtagJeff @LoganRay last edited by May 25, 2017, 10:43 AM May 25, 2017, 10:43 AM

                    It was worth a shot. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Cheers!

                    LoganRay 1 Reply Last reply May 25, 2017, 10:47 AM Reply Quote 0
                    • LoganRay
                      LoganRay @HashtagJeff last edited by May 25, 2017, 10:35 AM May 25, 2017, 10:35 AM

                      Unfortunately, I don't have any examples for ya. Never come across this particular topic for a client.

                      HashtagJeff 1 Reply Last reply May 25, 2017, 10:43 AM Reply Quote 0
                      • HashtagJeff
                        HashtagJeff @LoganRay last edited by May 25, 2017, 10:18 AM May 25, 2017, 10:18 AM

                        Know of any site that has used the canonical to do anything like this? It seems like the safest option, I just haven't seen this to this scale is all.

                        LoganRay 1 Reply Last reply May 25, 2017, 10:35 AM Reply Quote 0
                        • LoganRay
                          LoganRay @HashtagJeff last edited by May 25, 2017, 10:08 AM May 25, 2017, 10:08 AM

                          Yes, I'm saying you should keep URLs as they are. I'm always an advocate for not changing URL structure unless there's a really good, highly beneficial reason for doing so. I don't know of a way to change only new URL structures while keeping old ones the same, but I'm no WP expert.

                          HashtagJeff 1 Reply Last reply May 25, 2017, 10:18 AM Reply Quote 0
                          • HashtagJeff
                            HashtagJeff @LoganRay last edited by May 25, 2017, 10:02 AM May 25, 2017, 10:02 AM

                            Although I haven't strongly considered that approach, it did cross my mind to utilize the canonical. Do you know of any way to change WordPress permalink structure going forward but not backwards? Or are you suggesting we keep the dates in the URL going forward? I just think that eventually we'll have to think about updating that URL structure.

                            LoganRay 1 Reply Last reply May 25, 2017, 10:08 AM Reply Quote 0
                            • LoganRay
                              LoganRay @HashtagJeff last edited by May 25, 2017, 9:58 AM May 25, 2017, 9:54 AM

                              OK, now that I understand the reasoning...

                              I believe there's a better, less-risky approach. What I would do is write a completely new post based on information from the old post. At the same time you publish the new post, go back to the old version and add these two things: a canonical tag pointing to the new version, and a bit of _very readable _text at the top linking to the new post. Something like "Hey, thanks for your interest in our content. Feel free to read on, but we thought you should know we've updated this post which can be found here: link"

                              This accomplishes a few important things. It eliminates the need for a risky project that could affect your entire site just for the ability to update posts (which I'm guessing doesn't happen too often, what percent of posts get updated?). The canonical tag removes the dupe content risk so you're not cannibalizing your own content. And leaving the old post there gives people the opportunity to discover old content that, while possibly not relevant anymore, still demonstrates you've been a trustworthy source of information for a long time.

                              HashtagJeff 1 Reply Last reply May 25, 2017, 10:02 AM Reply Quote 0
                              • HashtagJeff
                                HashtagJeff @LoganRay last edited by May 25, 2017, 9:11 AM May 25, 2017, 9:11 AM

                                Logan,

                                By not being able to remove the dates we're not able to go back to a 5-year old post, make updates, and then republish the content. This is a "mom blog" and the topics can be recycled, but if we create a new post that we also covered 5 years ago we would be competing with ourself instead of using something that already has some authority and rank to it.

                                That's why we were thinking to somehow make it possible (in WordPress) to keep all current URLs as is, change the permalink structure moving forward so that future posts don't have date, and then be able to update posts as we go and 301 them manually over time. Does that make sense?

                                I agree with your last 2 statements, it is a HUGE risk to 301 this entire site to do away with those dates. Even though redirects supposedly pass all link juice we all know that a big change like that across an entire site could have ill-effect with search engines.

                                I'd like to know if anyone has gone about the URL structure change like I'm outlining here. Am I crazy to think that is a logical way to go about it? I haven't been able to find anywhere that someone has done this though.

                                LoganRay 1 Reply Last reply May 25, 2017, 9:54 AM Reply Quote 0
                                • LoganRay
                                  LoganRay last edited by May 25, 2017, 8:59 AM May 25, 2017, 8:55 AM

                                  Jeff,

                                  Based on the traffic you say this blog gets, I'm assuming its rather large and has hundreds, if not thousands of posts. Which leads me to one simple question:

                                  Why? This seems like a HUGE amount of risk and a pretty decent amount of work to go into something that's really not going to provide any benefit.

                                  *edit: It should also be noted that just because Google has recently stated that redirects now pass all link juice doesn't mean you should go needlessly add a massive amount of redirects. There are other implications that redirects have, like load time for example. If you have 1,000 redirects, every single one of those is going to be checked before any page on your site loads, which takes a lot of time.

                                  HashtagJeff 1 Reply Last reply May 25, 2017, 9:11 AM Reply Quote 1
                                  • HashtagJeff
                                    HashtagJeff @DonnaDuncan last edited by May 24, 2017, 10:34 PM May 24, 2017, 10:34 PM

                                    Thanks for your response. I actually agree with most, if not all of what you are saying.

                                    The problem is that this is a larger blog with 5-7 million page views on average per month. 1 million+ just from organic. I agree with your statement about postponing and never getting done. With a large blog I still think it would be easier (less stressful, not necessarily easier) to manage it in waves in order to pause or correct when there is a larger than normal dip that maybe doesn't come back up. With a business it makes sense, but with these bloggers sites it seems like too big of a risk when it's what brings in almost all the income. Does that make sense?

                                    That tweet you're referring to, I thought that was mainly in regard to HTTP to HTTPS migrations. I need to look more into that I guess.

                                    Thanks!

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DonnaDuncan
                                      DonnaDuncan last edited by May 24, 2017, 9:51 PM May 24, 2017, 9:51 PM

                                      I'm not a fan of your plan.

                                      There can be many reasons why a site might "take a hit". For example, if page-to-page redirects were not implemented or the sitemap was not updated, updated correctly, or resubmitted to search engines. I wouldn't assume that will happen in your case. In my experience, if the transition is done correctly and there's a hit, it's short-lived.

                                      If you're thinking the redirects will cause you to lose SEO equity, that is no longer the case. Gary Illyes, a Google webmaster trends analyst, tweeted on July 26, 2016 "30x redirects don’t lose PageRank anymore."

                                      One of the biggest risks (in my mind) of staging the migration the way you suggest is that the "waves" never happen. I see that a lot - a situation where an organization agrees to postpone work to a future date that never arrives. New and competing priorities take precedence resulting in an endless postponement. If you have the management commitment, funding and resources to do the work now, I say bite the bullet and go for it. Make a plan. Stick to it. Check and double check your work.

                                      HashtagJeff 1 Reply Last reply May 24, 2017, 10:34 PM Reply Quote 2
                                      • 1 / 1
                                      1 out of 18
                                      • First post
                                        1/18
                                        Last post

                                      Got a burning SEO question?

                                      Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.


                                      Start my free trial


                                      Browse Questions

                                      Explore more categories

                                      • Moz Tools

                                        Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

                                      • SEO Tactics

                                        Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

                                      • Community

                                        Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

                                      • Digital Marketing

                                        Chat about tactics outside of SEO

                                      • Research & Trends

                                        Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

                                      • Support

                                        Connect on product support and feature requests.

                                      • See all categories

                                      Related Questions

                                      • Kingalan1

                                        Removing Toxic Back Links Targeting Obscure URL or Image

                                        There are 2 or 3 URLs and one image file that dozens of toxic domains are linking to on our website. Some of these pages have hundreds of links from 4-5 domains. Rather than disavowing these links, would it make sense to simply break these links, change the URL that the link to and not create a redirect? It seems like this would be a sure fire way to get rid of these links. Any downside to this approach? Thanks, 
                                        Alan

                                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Feb 21, 2019, 7:49 AM | Kingalan1
                                        1
                                      • CarolynSC

                                        Does google ignore ? in url?

                                        Hi Guys, Have a site which ends ?v=6cc98ba2045f for all its URLs. Example: https://domain.com/products/cashmere/robes/?v=6cc98ba2045f Just wondering does Google ignore what is after the ?. Also any ideas what that is? Cheers.

                                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jun 23, 2017, 2:30 AM | CarolynSC
                                        0
                                      • TheDude

                                        URL Rewriting Best Practices

                                        Hey Moz! I’m getting ready to implement URL rewrites on my website to improve site structure/URL readability. More specifically I want to: Improve our website structure by removing redundant directories. Replace underscores with dashes and remove file extensions for our URLs. Please see my example below: Old structure: http://www.widgets.com/widgets/commercial-widgets/small_blue_widget.htm New structure: https://www.widgets.com/commercial-widgets/small-blue-widget I've read several URL rewriting guides online, all of which seem to provide similar but overall different methods to do this. I'm looking for what's considered best practices to implement these rewrites. From what I understand, the most common method is to implement rewrites in our .htaccess file using mod_rewrite (which will find the old URLs and rewrite them according to the rewrites I implement). One question I can't seem to find a definitive answer to is when I implement the rewrite to remove file extensions/replace underscores with dashes in our URLs, do the webpage file names need to be edited to the new format? From what I understand the webpage file names must remain the same for the rewrites in the .htaccess to work. However, our internal links (including canonical links) must be changed to the new URL format. Can anyone shed light on this? Also, I'm aware that implementing URL rewriting improperly could negatively affect our SERP rankings. If I redirect our old website directory structure to our new structure using this rewrite, are my bases covered in regards to having the proper 301 redirects in place to not affect our rankings negatively? Please offer any advice/reliable guides to handle this properly. Thanks in advance!

                                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Nov 12, 2015, 1:16 PM | TheDude
                                        0
                                      • MiguelSalcido

                                        Linking to URLs With Hash (#) in Them

                                        How does link juice flow when linking to URLs with the hash tag in them? If I link to this page, which generates a pop-over on my homepage that gives info about my special offer, where will the link juice go to? homepage.com/#specialoffer Will the link juice go to the homepage? Will it go nowhere? Will it go to the hash URL above? I'd like to publish an annual/evergreen sort of offer that will generate lots of links. And instead of driving those links to homepage.com/offer, I was hoping to get that link juice to flow to the homepage, or maybe even a product page, instead. And just updating the pop over information each year as the offer changes. I've seen competitors do it this way but wanted to see what the community here things in terms of linking to URLs with the hash tag in them. Can also be a use case for using hash tags in URLs for tracking purposes maybe?

                                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Apr 22, 2015, 5:06 PM | MiguelSalcido
                                        0
                                      • underscorelive

                                        What is the best URL structure for categories?

                                        A client's site currently uses the URL structure: www.website.com/�tegory%/%postname% Which I think is optimised fairly well, as the categories are keywords being targeted.  However, as they are using a category hierarchy, often times the URL looks like this: www.website.com/parent-category/child-category/some-post-titles-are-quite-long-as-they-are-long-tail-terms Best practise often dictates (such as point 3 in this Moz article) that shorter URLs are better for several reasons. So I'm left with a few options: Remove the category from the URL Flatten the category hierarchy Shorten post titles two a word or two - which would hurt my long tail search term traffic. Leave it as it is What do we think is the best route to take? Thanks in advance!

                                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Jun 6, 2013, 11:53 AM | underscorelive
                                        0
                                      • WebMarketingandDesign

                                        Multiple URLs for the same page

                                        I am working with a client and recently discovered that they have several URLs that go to the same page. http://www.maps.com/FunFacts.aspx
                                        http://www.maps.com/funfacts.aspx
                                        http://www.maps.com/FunFacts.aspx?nav=FF
                                        http://www.maps.com/FunFacts.aspx?nav=FS
                                        http://www.maps.com/funfacts.aspx?nav=FF
                                        http://www.maps.com/funfacts.aspx?nav=ffhttp://www.maps.com/FunFacts.aspx?nav=MShttp://www.maps.com/funfacts.aspx?nav=
                                        http://www.maps.com/FunFacts.aspx?nav=FF#
                                        http://www.maps.com/FunFacts
                                        http://www.maps.com/funfacts.aspx?.nav=FF I am afraid this is happening all over the site. So, my question is: Is this hurting the SEO and how? If so what is the best way to go about fixing this problem? Thanks for your help!

                                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Nov 17, 2011, 11:15 PM | WebMarketingandDesign
                                        0
                                      • AU-SEO

                                        Brackets in a URL String

                                        Was talking with a friend about this the other day. Do Brackets and or Braces in a URL string impact SEO? (I know short human readable etc... but for the sake of conversation has anyone relaised any impacts of these particular Characters in a URL?

                                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | Oct 2, 2011, 8:46 PM | AU-SEO
                                        0
                                      • joechicago

                                        Url with hypen or.co?

                                        Given a choice, for your #1 keyword, would you pick a .com with one or two hypens? (chicago-real-estate.com) or a .co with the full name as the url (chicagorealestate.co)? Is there an accepted best practice regarding hypenated urls and/or decent results regarding the effectiveness of the.co? Thank you in advance!

                                        Intermediate & Advanced SEO | May 13, 2011, 7:32 PM | joechicago
                                        0

                                      Get started with Moz Pro!

                                      Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

                                      Start my free trial
                                      Products
                                      • Moz Pro
                                      • Moz Local
                                      • Moz API
                                      • Moz Data
                                      • STAT
                                      • Product Updates
                                      Moz Solutions
                                      • SMB Solutions
                                      • Agency Solutions
                                      • Enterprise Solutions
                                      Free SEO Tools
                                      • Domain Authority Checker
                                      • Link Explorer
                                      • Keyword Explorer
                                      • Competitive Research
                                      • Brand Authority Checker
                                      • Local Citation Checker
                                      • MozBar Extension
                                      • MozCast
                                      Resources
                                      • Blog
                                      • SEO Learning Center
                                      • Help Hub
                                      • Beginner's Guide to SEO
                                      • How-to Guides
                                      • Moz Academy
                                      • API Docs
                                      About Moz
                                      • About
                                      • Team
                                      • Careers
                                      • Contact
                                      Why Moz
                                      • Case Studies
                                      • Testimonials
                                      Get Involved
                                      • Become an Affiliate
                                      • MozCon
                                      • Webinars
                                      • Practical Marketer Series
                                      • MozPod
                                      Connect with us

                                      Contact the Help team

                                      Join our newsletter
                                      Moz logo
                                      © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
                                      • Accessibility
                                      • Terms of Use
                                      • Privacy

                                      Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.